Wikimedia and KDE Cooperation Announced 174
eean writes "As reported by KDE Dot News, today Jimmy Wales, chairman of the Wikimedia Foundation, announced the beginning of a cooperation between Wikimedia and the KDE project at LinuxTag in Karlsruhe, Germany. As the first applications, like the media player amaroK,
start to integrate Wikipedia content the idea is to create a webservice
API to access the information from Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia or Wiktionary."
I swear to God... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I swear to God... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I swear to God... (Score:1)
Re:I swear to God... (Score:2)
I'm jewish you insensitive clod
Re:I swear to God... (Score:3, Informative)
Shoulda done it with GNOME (Score:3, Funny)
The marketing practically writes itself.
Re:I swear to God... (Score:3, Funny)
Good Idea (Score:1)
Re:Good Idea (Score:3, Funny)
Who needs a moderator?
Playing Tag? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Playing Tag? (Score:2)
Excuse me, I believe that I may have seen something that appeared like a statement of fact there.
The people
Thank God (Score:5, Interesting)
While I understand it isn't (directly) the goal of open-source to compete with Company, Inc., the next generation of computing tools is going to be heavily service-oriented. That is to say: open-source has thus far concentrated on making software "products" -- applications, utilities, libraries, and so on. In a service-oriented community, though, open content is just as important as the tools that use it.
Furthermore, I like to see when open-source products doing a little more -- wait for it -- synergy. (Shoot me.) Thus far, open projects have, apart from sharing code and libraries, stayed mostly to themselves. But partnerships like this are absolutely beneficial to creating a cohesive, seamless user experience. Via services, you create an entire open "platform" that isn't just the tools, but the content that backs it up. It also creates an entirely new market for companies to support open-source software.
Re:Thank God (Score:1, Redundant)
Seems I was trhinking along similar lines. [slashdot.org]
(Shoot me.)
Dammit, I guess I'm next then.
Re:Thank God (Score:1)
Bingo!
noooooo! (Score:2)
Why Amarock and not Konqueror or word processing? (Score:1, Insightful)
Wouldn't it be a better use of resources to incorporate this into a browser or word processor? You could look highlight any word(s) on the web page and, like Firefox searches Google, search Wiki.
Wouldn't that be nice?
Re:Why Amarock and not Konqueror or word processin (Score:1)
Re:Why Amarock and not Konqueror or word processin (Score:4, Informative)
AbiWord has already done for some time.
> I already know who sang the song - they're my legal copies
Yes, but this isn't about looking up the song somehow to see who sang it (try MusicBrainz for that). It's about looking up the band to read about their history or other news. (Wikipedia does have articles on a surprising number of bands.) And nothing says that amaroK (not Amarock) would insist on popping up a Konqueror window with the results from every new song -- lots of features can be disabled as a preference, or not even compiled in in the first place. (In the same way that you'd only want your word processor to do this with words you highlight instead of *every* word you type.)
And of course there's already a list of other KDE stuff that could integrate this to benefit from information that's already been collected, instead of duplicating information on stars and chemical elements and countries (for instance).
So it's *already* been incorporated into a browser *and* word processor (there's a search plugin for Firefox); why not add it to amaroK and Kalzium and KStars and.... ?
OpenOffice Wikipedia Plug-in (Score:2)
Re:Why Amarock and not Konqueror or word processin (Score:4, Informative)
It doesn't do the Wikipedia lookup unless you ask it to - normal operation is the same as ever. It works very nicely
Re:Why Amarock and not Konqueror or word processin (Score:2)
AbiWord does this already... (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.abisource.com/twiki/bin/view/Abiword/P
Trillian does this. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Trillian does this. (Score:3, Insightful)
How often do you really need to look up a word in an IM conversation? All this feature does is place useless load on the wikipedia servers because people are bored and are mousing over the links to look at definitions for mundane words.
Re:Trillian does this. (Score:1)
Re:Trillian does this. (Score:2)
(so far, it does not fix spelling and grammar errors yet, my sentence might have been wrong but you might get the point.)
The services itself (all hail SO
Re:Trillian does this. (Score:2)
Re:Trillian does this. (Score:2)
Re:Trillian does this. (Score:2)
Great! (Score:3, Funny)
"Earl Grey tea is a black tea blend, which gets a distinctive flavour and aroma from bergamot oil..."
Re:Great! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Great! (Score:4, Funny)
"Earl [wikipedia.org] Grey [wikipedia.org] tea [wikipedia.org] is [wikipedia.org] a [wikipedia.org] black [wikipedia.org] tea [wikipedia.org]
Hope this helps you fit in more.
Re:Great! (Score:2)
This could be really useful... (Score:4, Interesting)
Now, both of these programs use a MySQL database backend to help organize and catagorize mp3s, and use id3 tag information. I think it'd be an absolute joy to have them share the same data, instead of using two redundant databases. Perhaps as this project matures, we could see this become a standardized format for multiple projects to use, so the information can be shared and edited more easily.
Re:This could be really useful... (Score:1)
Re:This could be really useful... (Score:1)
On the other hand, to the OP: if 20GB used to be a small collection it most definately still is; people's mp3 collections don't shrink....
Re:This could be really useful... (Score:2)
Re:This could be really useful... (Score:2)
Will this affect our Leaders at Google? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Will this affect our Leaders at Google? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Will this affect our Leaders at Google? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Will this affect our Leaders at Google? (Score:2)
Re:Will this affect our Leaders at Google? (Score:2)
Re:Will this affect our Leaders at Google? (Score:2)
A very good thing (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:A very good thing (Score:2)
Re:A very good thing (Score:2)
(To be fair, Charles Samuels was very helpful when I was actually writing something, but the replies to feature requests for other programs are often less so)
Useful for technical apps (Score:1)
Awesome! (Score:2)
kidding... though I'm an xfce fan myself
right idea, wrong example (Score:3, Insightful)
Now, something like an e-book reader tied to a service like Wiktionary [wiktionary.org] would be far more useful. I think a lot more people would take advantage of something like this (particularly those with handleld wireless devices).
Re:right idea, wrong example (Score:2)
You, sir, are in the minority.
Re:right idea, wrong example (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsoft to do the same with Encarta? (Score:3, Informative)
Indeed, I would be very hesistant to trust their results. While Wikipedia's veracity has often been questioned, at least it is a public effort with the input of hundreds of thousands of people. Encarta, on the other hand, is a corporate effort without the public involvement. The risk of corporate nogoodery is far greater.
Re:Microsoft to do the same with Encarta? (Score:2)
(IHBT)
Re:Microsoft to do the same with Encarta? (Score:1)
Re:Microsoft to do the same with Encarta? (Score:2)
WebServices -- NOT limited to KDE. (Score:3, Insightful)
amaroK's previous web integration (Score:1)
Now what I'd like to see is blog/journal integration with contacts. KDE's use of the standard address book for mail and IM is a
Bandwidth (Score:2, Insightful)
And on the other, they are doing things like this that will increase the load on their servers...
(Then again, I never understood why people mow their lawns and then water them.
Re:Bandwidth (Score:2)
I never understood why anybody would plant grass on their lawns. Douglas firs are nicer looking and lower maintenance. Then again, the Douglas fir lawn is an Oregonian thing, you're not expected to understand this.
Re:Bandwidth (Score:2)
Only if you're dumb enough to mow down all the trees around the stand near your home. Trees need other trees to break the wind for them.
Re:Bandwidth (Score:2)
Kdict and Kthesaurus (Score:2)
Handy indeed. :) (Score:2)
2) Type in 'wp <term to look up>'
3) Prof-- err, Kencyclopedia!
You're welcome.
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
KDE documentation in a Wikipedia format (Score:2)
KDE and Wikipedia (Score:2)
Wonderfull way to encourage me to code open source.
Re:KDE and Wikipedia (Score:2)
Greetings,
Torsten Rahn
Wikipedia Rocks (Score:3, Interesting)
I hope GNOME and the folks in Redmond follow this lead and create a Wikipedia desktop app to interact with this webservice.
Nevermind tight integration with applications.... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Nevermind tight integration with applications.. (Score:2)
Re:Nevermind tight integration with applications.. (Score:2)
Uniting it with HELP (Score:4, Interesting)
We could type 'man ls' and get the latest page with comments and all.
Sure beats submitting manpage patches to developers.
Even better, like in wikipedia, you'd click on a word in a manual page, and you'd get the man page of that manual and all related pages...
Now combine that with the google search engine.
Re:Uniting it with HELP (Score:2)
That's all well and good... (Score:2)
Re:strange alliances (Score:4, Interesting)
well, wiki is a big bag of web-accessible content that could fit nicely into desktop applications... personally i would like to be listening to a cd on my computer, say "here come the warm jets" by brian eno, and be able to pull up a short bio on mr. eno, his complete discography, the lyrics to the current song, a list of reviews of the album and artist and the cover art for the album... all without having to fire up my web browser and performing a bunch of search-n-clicks.
Re:strange alliances (Score:2)
Re:strange alliances (Score:3, Informative)
Then quickly discovers it already does this using Allmusic [allmusic.com]
Re:strange alliances (Score:2)
Re:strange alliances (Score:1)
Re:strange alliances (Score:2)
Wiki knows all.. Quiet down before it finds out what a jerk you can be.
Laugh, its a joke and its Friday. (It is here anyway)
Re:strange alliances (Score:3, Interesting)
I actually started building a wiki [healeys.net] for a CS class with this goal in mind. Rather than a traditional HTML wiki, it was built around RDF data. So not only was it able to dump the data in a machine-readable format, it also had a built-in RDQL query engine [healeys.net] that worked over http.
To conform to the data model, I had to impose restrictions on the input, but the final product is a lot more reliable than screen-scraping HTML, which is something I hope the kde/wikipedia people avoid in this project.
Re:strange alliances (Score:2)
This got me thinking about how how the semantic web could all fit together to achieve this and similar tasks. There could be a number of components:
Client applications, graphing is just one possibility. Spreadsheets filled with data from the web, o
Re:strange alliances (Score:1)
Amarok already do much of this. When I listen to an album, you will see the albumart, you can read the lyrics, other albums by that artist on your system. About the only thing that is missing is
Re:strange alliances (Score:2)
Re:strange alliances (Score:2)
It wouldn't bother me except the KDE people seem to suffer from Microsoft's disease, aka a near-total lack of good taste; it's no
Re:strange alliances (Score:2)
Who says you won't be able to use this under programs in GNOME? Windows?
Where does it say that they will change wikipedia to fit in with KDE design? Nowhere? All right.
Your wikipedia experience will stay the same and there will be advanced features available for those who want it. Capice?
Re:strange alliances (Score:2)
They don't say they are going to add f'ed up metadata to wikipedia? Can't happen then. They didn't say it.
They didn't say my wikipedia experience will change? Can't change then. They didn't say it would change, so it won't.
Never mind what I do, only what I say. Don't be concerned over the results, only the intentions. That's kind of a f'ed up mentality. Now give me my -1 for responding to flamebait.
Re:After being linked on slashdot (Score:1)
Close.
A look at the article's history [wikimedia.org] shows that within about 15 minutes of this
Re:Amarok? (Score:1)
Re:Amarok? (Score:2)
In general, nothing.
But browsers are big and fat. (Yes, even FF.) They have to handle Javascript, SSL, plugins & any and all sorts of horendous MS-generated shit-HTML.
A purpose-built Wikipedia viewer will/should be fast, small and not subject to any security breaches.
It's the same basic reason why I use GAIM instead of firing up Mozilla and going to http://chat.yahoo.com./ [chat.yahoo.com]
If only it worked. (Score:2)
'Cause it's pretty damn hard to read right now.
--grendel drago
Re:Amarok? (Score:2, Insightful)
rtfa (Score:2)
Re:Speaking of amarok (Score:2)
Re:Speaking of amarok (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Speaking of amarok (Score:2, Funny)
Good decision, BTW.
Re:graphical install? (Score:2)
Re:amarok-1.3.1-beta1 compilation fails (Score:2)
Re:amarok-1.3.1-beta1 compilation fails (Score:2, Insightful)
For the sake of everything that is good and holy, let aRts die already. Nuke it. Nuke it without mercy. Let no bit stand atop another. Walk now amongst the ruins of the evil hack as the new Scourge of God. Drive now the thrice-cursed band-aid solutions to cheap hardware problems from our sight, nay, from the sights of every man, woman and child in this world.
And compile --without-arts or whatever it's called in amaroK.
Or just do what everyone else does and wait for 1.3 final, but even there, disabling a