

Yahoo To Update Mail Service 302
tonyq writes "Yahoo! is beginning beta testing of a completely reworked UI for Yahoo! Mail that incorporates DHTML technologies. The web-based application resembles a desktop e-mail client. Features include message preview; drag-and-drop filing; the capability of quickly searching e-mail headers, body text and attachments; and the ability to view multiple e-mails at the same time in separate windows and scroll through all message headers in a folder rather than one page at a time. Other niceties are auto-complete, right-click menus and standard keyboard shortcuts. A user who got an early look has graciously posted screenshots. Yahoo is also taking signups on their what's new for Mail page."
It looks impressive (Score:5, Interesting)
This was back in early August, he said employees had been using it for a while, but it was hush-hush. He seemed pretty sheepish about it, and made me promise not to post on Slashdot, apparently yahoo wanted it under wraps for as long as possible.
He did give me the dog and pony show, and I must say that it really is a pretty slick application. Though I did not get to really test it, just watched him walk through it.
I own a small hosting company,and wanted to see what web-based mail clients were out there that I could use for my customers. Squirelmail and TWIG looked pretty ugly in comparison. Incidently I found an open source mail client that has a lot of similar functions: Round Cube I haveinstalled that and it is almost as impressive. [roundcube.net]
Anyway, it is amzing how far web applications have come in such a short period.
-MS2k
Re:It looks impressive (Score:5, Funny)
Hey! Don't call my baby ugly!
-Peter
Former SquirrelMail "Head Nut"
PS: It's spelled with StudlyCaps.
Re:It looks impressive (Score:2)
Seriously, though thank you for SquirellMail. It along with TWIG, and Iloha mail have been open source staples for my clients for a long time.
In many cases these mail clients were the first direct exposure (hands on) that those users had to open source software. I have many users insist upon using SquirrellMail as their sole email application.
Thanks again,
Brandon
Re:It looks impressive (Score:3, Informative)
I said "my baby", but I'm really more of an estranged uncle. The project was Luke Ehresman's brain child.
And there are a score, or more, developers who deserve far, far more credit than I.
Anyway, I'm glad you like it. It still gives me a little thrill whenever I see it in use or see a reference to it.
Thank you for exposing people to Free Software, and thank you for fulfilling the important and often overlooked role of providing commercial end-user s
Re:It looks impressive (Score:2)
Re:It looks impressive (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:It looks impressive (Score:2)
Sorry about the sarcasm. I suppose you could live in China and have a legitimate concern.
Re:It looks impressive (Score:5, Funny)
You're claiming some kind of twisted "first post" aren't you.
Re:It looks impressive (Score:2, Funny)
Round Cube? (Score:2, Funny)
Where do they come up with these names?
I think I'll call my next project "Big Small"!
Re:It looks impressive (Score:2)
There are lots of good ones out there now. If the customer doesn't already have an email infrastructure, you might also want to have a look at Citadel [citadel.org], which has all of its data stores and protocols built in (even its own HTTP engine so you don't have to integrate it into your Apache server). It has an attractive web UI with a
Re:It looks impressive (Score:2)
I'm working on encorporating it into suso.org already. I submitted some code back to the author to deal with long folder names and stuff.
roundcube (Score:2)
Unfortunately the 'planned feature' list is a little bit of the essentials, namely:
* Forwarding messages with attachments
* Richtext/HTML composing
* Spell checking
(the other things are all 'optional' bonus features by my watch), but if you were to deploy it in a
Re:It looks impressive (Score:5, Informative)
Re:It looks impressive (Score:2)
Re:Round Cube requires MySQL (Score:2)
Just a guess, but maybe it pulls from an IMAP account and puts all the data into a database. None of this is my forte, but I wouldn't be terribly surprised if it would be easier to do clever things with data in MySQL than pulling it live out of a IMAP server. Things like index the text in e-mails, maybe store an address book, caching for quicker access. Or maybe they have something very clever planned for the fut
Re: (Score:2)
Re:No Achievement Erases Disgrace (Score:2)
I hope you are boycotting Google, Microsoft and Cisco as well. I want you to come out and say explicitly what standard you are holding Yahoo to, and what companies currently meet that standard, and what evidence you have that those companies meet that standard.
You want Yahoo in China to vio
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Argh. (Score:2, Informative)
The new interface is optional (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Argh. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Argh. (Score:2, Funny)
I agree. If only they'd made it with that new 'AJAX' technology instead of DHTML...
Invite (Score:5, Funny)
Still no encryption? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Still no encryption? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Still no encryption? (Score:3, Interesting)
It matters that the sys-admins at the company where I work can't read it.
Re:Still no encryption? (Score:2)
(Unless you take the computer home every night and they never have physical access to it.)
Re:Still no encryption? (Score:2)
Re:Still no encryption? (Score:2)
-David
SSL not needed for logins (Score:3, Informative)
The easiest way to do it securely with Javascript would be to send a challenge to the client over regular HTTP, request the user's password, combine the challenge and password and run it through a hashing algo like MD5 or SHA to produce the respone.
The server then takes the challenge and the stored password, hashes them and if the hash matches that sent by the cli
Re:SSL not needed for logins (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Still no encryption? (Score:2)
yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm guessing this is Yahoo's answer to gmail. If so where is my 2Gig mail box.
To be honest I think simplicity is paramount there is a reason I don't use outlook. I've found the gmail interface to be almost perfect for my personal back and forth e-mail.
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:3, Interesting)
yea didn't netscape use this argument againts microsoft.
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:2)
Different argument.
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:2, Informative)
The numbers represent the number of unique visitors to the email portion of the site each month. RTFA.
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:2)
It's about an order of magnitude slower too. I can be in and done with Gmail (which is receiving most of my mail now) in the length of time it takes yahoo to respond to my first click. Not to mention the ads they run take up half the screen.
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:2)
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:2, Flamebait)
It has been 2 GB before GMail even existed.
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:2)
Switched back in June. Right now, I still like GMail just for the "conversation" feature which keeps my mailbox from being cluttered with "re:re:re:adinfinity" crap. I'm probably gonna stick with it unless Yahoo really comes out with something killer.
Yahoo 2Gig account = $19.99/yr =! free (Score:2, Informative)
Get more control and more capacity. Mail Plus includes virus protection from Norton AntiVirus, personalized spam filtering with SpamGuard Plus, no graphical ads, POP access, 20MB message size, virtually unlimited storage 2GB and more. Learn more.
Give your email that personal touch with mail made just for
you get you@your-name.com or any other address that is available! Personal Address includes your own domain and five different email addresses that
Re:yahoo's answer to gmail. (Score:2)
With all the features Gmail like POP3 has for free, is a mailbox over 1 GB all you're looking for?
Beta-test is US only (Score:5, Informative)
Unfortunately for a great number of people (including me) who don't live in America, the page states 'The beta version is only available to Yahoo! Mail users in the U.S.'.
Re:Beta-test is US only (Score:2)
Re:Beta-test is US only (Score:2)
No plaintext protocols for login, please (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do any webmail services still use unencrypted http? I'd be quite glad to see nothing but https on any services that I log in to.
Re:No plaintext protocols for login, please (Score:5, Insightful)
Have you forgotten that typical emails will pass between a number of hosts unencrypted as it is being delivered? Where's the advantage in encrypting the last leg of the journey if none of the others are encrypted?
Re:No plaintext protocols for login, please (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:No plaintext protocols for login, please (Score:2)
If you want confidentiality, authentication, and non-repudiation, use GPG and a host based email client. If you want a throw away account for signing up to web forums and personals sites, use webmail services.
(But I think they should be using TLS for the login stage of webmail services)
Re:No plaintext protocols for login, please (Score:5, Interesting)
...and it takes 30 seconds to load the javascript (Score:5, Funny)
Get in line, folks.
Zimbra's offering is very similar to Yahoo's (Score:2, Informative)
I guess it sucks to be them (Zimbra) now. They thought they created a very innovative email app.
Some screenshots:
http://www.zimbra.com/screenshots/ [zimbra.com]
Re:Zimbra's offering is very similar to Yahoo's (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Zimbra's offering is very similar to Yahoo's (Score:3, Informative)
"Billed as an online collaboration server with an AJAX-powered Web client, Zimbra will run on a Linux server and behave as a dedicated email, calendar, and directory server (in fact, it has Postfix, an open source email server, built in), accessible with desktop email, calendar, and address book applications like Microsoft Outlook, Mozilla Thunderbird/Sunbird, Apple Mail/iCal, and others.
"But Zimbra also provides an enhanced Web in
Looks Great, but... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Looks Great, but... (Score:2)
If it makes you feel better, I'm sure there will be "Do You Yahoo?" advertising footer on every piece of outgoing piece of mail
I just hope (Score:2, Interesting)
Mirrordot (Score:2, Insightful)
Coral link (Score:4, Informative)
Try the snappy Coral link:
http://patcavit.com.nyud.net:8090/2005/09/14/y-ma
Re:Coral link (Score:5, Informative)
contacts.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
drag.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
nodrag.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
editcontact.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
message.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
resized.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
indent.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
centered.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
rightalign.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
addcontacts.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
colors.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
smilies.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
autocomplete.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
hyperlink.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
hyperlinkoptions.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
writing.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
confirm.png [nyud.net] (long lines make slashcode happy)
"Bigger" Doesn't Mean "Better" (Score:3, Interesting)
Take Gmail. It's clear, concise, and uses Basic HTML to navigate. Frankly, DHTML is just the web-equivalent of "Feature Bloat". Fine, it looks good, and it'll dazzle the users, but it may also overwhelm them, too.
I saw DHTML in practice when Barryworld still existed. The DHTML interface was so slow, and so horrible (Even on a 4MB Line, with Dell Optiplexes), I went back to POP3. I'm hoping Yahoo won't make the same mistakes, and at least offer a more "Streamlined" approach for the users that don't care about bells and whistles.
Re:"Bigger" Doesn't Mean "Better" (Score:3, Informative)
The special version provided for older browsers does. But normal GMail certainly doesn't. It's really frustrating to try and open links in new windows only to find that they aren't links at all but some kind of pseudo-link created with spans and onclicks that doesn't work properly.
Google really don't have a clue when it comes to Javascript. Yeah, they come up with good features, but their implementation sucks. For example, it took [jibbering.com]
Wow. Tabs for multiple message windows! (Score:4, Informative)
PS. Screenshots are
Re:Wow. Tabs for multiple message windows! (Score:2)
There are probably others but IMP is great.
Does it have Google-like labels? (Score:5, Interesting)
I am so reliant on Labels - it just makes so much sense that any email can really be in more than one folder. (In fact, since being forced to use Outlook 2003 at work, I've forgone folders and used it’s Category feature which work remarkable similar to Gmail Labels to organize my work email - I can use Outlook's search to organize/search by Category).
If Yahoo Mail were to offer anything like Labels, I’d switch back.
Compatibility? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Compatibility? (Score:5, Informative)
GPG (Score:2)
Re:GPG (Score:2)
http://www.roundcube.net/?p=about [roundcube.net]
Support for GPG/PGP encryption
Re:GPG (Score:2)
Re:GPG (Score:5, Informative)
Screenshot mirror (Score:2)
based on technology from oddpost.com (Score:5, Informative)
DHTML: Why isn't it in that broad use? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:DHTML: Why isn't it in that broad use? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:DHTML: Why isn't it in that broad use? (Score:2)
About Damn Time - Oddpost (Score:2)
I haven't seen anything out of Yahoo! that indicated they were using that toolkit _anywhere_ much less in their mail
Can you change the From: address? (Score:2)
Re:Can you change the From: address? (Score:2)
Since it's Yahoo!, we can be sure of one feature: (Score:2, Informative)
F*ck Yahoo.
Autoconvert "Office" docs (Score:5, Interesting)
Yahoo Mail already seems to do a bit of converting some MS Office docs into HTML for viewing in your browser. What I'm talking about is the next step: autoconvert between openoffice and ms office.
I send someone an
I know there would be a lot of bugs and things that wouldn't work right to start with, but leave it in beta for awhile (perhaps gmail should offer this then?). However, I think the long term good could outweigh the short term drawbacks. Yes, there's a privacy concern, but if you're really that concerned about the docs you shouldn't be using public mail systems in the first place, right?
Get back to me (Score:4, Interesting)
Where is the notepad feature?! (Score:2)
They better not be phasing it out. I'm a paying subscriber and would drop the service for certain.
What would be even better would be if you could have shared notepads. We've wanted that feature for a LONG time.
How are they rolling this out? (Score:2, Insightful)
Will they also fix their login?? (Score:4, Insightful)
1. It defaults to clear http, not https. Nice way to encourage users to expose their passwords... This should obviously default to https, and require users to jump through hoops to send their password in the clear. (GMail uses https for authentication).
2. Authentication only lasts a day, then your session expires and you have to re-authenticate. For me, the expiration usually happened when I was typing a long reply to an e-mail, and clicked "send" only to be greeted with the error message saying I needed to authenticate again (in the clear), and my message was lost.
This combination is particularly briliant... encourage insecure authentication, then require users to do it often.
This is just one of many ways that GMail beats Yahoo! Mail.. I'll check out the improvements, but I doubt I'll ever go back to Yahoo.
New features not mentioned (Score:2)
Just another level of privacy lost due to information era.
Time to move on to another webmail platform.
POP3 (Score:3, Insightful)
i only want one feature (Score:5, Insightful)
I use my Yahoo! Mail that I've had since about 1998 on a daily basis, and I really only want one new feature: I want to be able to move to the next message in the list in well under a second.
Preferably, now that I am sitting at a computer with a 1.25 MHz PowerPC processor and 1 GB of RAM, I'd like to be able to do this as fast as I used to be able to do on a SPARCstation 2 (which had a 40 MHz processor) equipped with a whopping 64 MB of RAM. Ten years ago, on that computer that was 1.5 orders of magnitude slower than the one I'm using now, I could go to the next message in about 0.1 seconds.
Yes, I realize there are web servers and things (like the open Internet) involved here, but it should still be do-able. If need be, they could easily prefetch and cache messages in the browser's memory, so that when I hit the "next" button, it goes there right away. And I don't mind if unusually large messages don't load that quickly.
It would also be nice to be able to jump from mailbox index to message body and back in a fraction of a second and vice versa, while I'm asking for things.
This all sounds nice, but (Score:3, Insightful)
Yahoo ( the paid version ) has good anti-spam features, but I could get so much more out of them if their plain old filters were more flexible/ powerful.
With the exception of slashdot, most web based forums suffer from either too much control or too little control. The site owners do not want to play umpire, hear complaints, etc and I can't blame them. The time has come for 100% ( note the 100% ) user controlled content.
By this I mean giving the user the ability to make it as if a regular objectionable poster never existed in the forum. Making his/her original posts vanish, along with all replys to his/her post and any mention of him/her.
The org that comes out with this first ( proprietary or open source ) will be able to very visibly set their software apart from all other similar software. The forum owner who implements such software will have a hook for drawing in members, his/her board will not just be another board among many boards for that same subject.
People really want this.
Google seems to be hesitant about these kind of filters. The mozilla mail client will take the entire thread/tree of posts out, they know it is a bug, but nobody seems motivated to fix it.
Yahoo can give their email filters much more flexibility and power, but they do not.
I'm guessing filters are a lot of work, that is why these various groups have been slow to do it.
It seems like what people want the most, more control in getting rid of the crap they don't want.
FTFA (Score:3, Funny)
No wonder it's been so tricky! I've been using live rodents to drag-and-drop for a decade now.... If only I'd used a "computer" mouse....
Re:Any good IMAP services? (Score:2)
AOL's free webmail [aol.com] is available through IMAP as well.
Re:Any good IMAP services? (Score:2)
Re:Any good IMAP services? (Score:2)
R.
Re:yahoo blahhoo (Score:2)
Re:yahoo blahhoo (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Slashdottet (Score:2)
If it bothers you so much, you should know about mirrordot [mirrordot.org]
Re:Thanks for the mirrors (Score:2)
You can set it to 25, 50, or 100 conversations per page. If you get tired of them, archive 'em. You'd get more emails because Yahoo uses traditional one line per mail/response.