World Standards Day 2005 187
ewg writes "Today, 2005-10-14, is World Standards Day as celebrated by the IEC, ISO, and ITU. The press release emphasizes the benefits of safety standards, but the interoperability is the true prize for information systems. How many sets of country codes and date formats do we need?" From the release: "International Standards accommodate people's desire to live in a safer, more secure world by providing a valuable safety net. 'Standards for a safer world' is the theme of the message signed by the leaders of the three principal international standardization organizations to mark World Standards Day 2005. Standards developed at the international level through IEC, ISO and ITU are available for use at the national and regional levels to meet the needs of society at large, the market and government regulators," the three leaders point out. They see standards as vital in disseminating best practices and new technologies, while avoiding new barriers to trade that national security and safety regulations may create."
Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:5, Insightful)
One of my biggest beefs in non-standard behavior (since this article talks about the safety benefits of standards) is highway construction and layout. I could go on about bizarre practices for signage, etc., but I'll just take a couple:
Another example was in Bellevue, WA, and I'm not making this up. There was a line of cones angling out from the curb, closing off a lane around construction of a new high-rise. Nestled behind those cones in the "dead zone" of the closed off lane was one of those generator run highway signs that said, "Right Lane Closed Ahead"! Wow! I wished for my digital camera.
On the other hand, there is the state of Illinois where I also lived for a long time. Their warning practices are amazing. I one time was way north of Peoria driving south on the interstate, and I saw signs warning of "Construction Ahead, 40 miles"! It may seem ludicrous, but I at least had it in my consciousness I would expect delays and construction, obviously with plenty of time. I wouldn't say THAT would have to be the standard, but in WA there seem to be none.
I could go on, but I wonder how many accidents and deaths could be prevented on our highway systems if there were more sane and consistently applied standards. (And don't even get me started about Europe where they've got ALL of their cars on the wrong side of the road going the wrong way! (kidding))
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:3, Funny)
In Sweden they actually both drove on the left and sat on the left, but they switched to driving on the right.
There used to be a joke about this. Changing the side of road to drive on was quite radical so they wanted to do it gradually. Trucks should switch first and cars half a year later...
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
As for why some countries now pass on the left, I don't have a clue.
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
Most people are right-handed, meaning that they'd wear a sword on their left side, so that if they needed it, they could reach across and pull it out of its scabbard (there's no way you can pull a sword out on the same side).
Therefore, people used to ride on the left, so that if for whatever reason you needed to attack the person coming towards you, you could reach across to your left, yank out your sword, and then swipe at the assailant on your right.
Therefore, the custom was to
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
OTOH if you had an Ox cart (or drove a carriage or whatever) you normally held the reins in your right (because most people are right handed) and the whip in your left. So if you met someone else driving in the other direction it was much easier to move to the right to let him
I would propose an even more weird system .. (Score:2)
Now back to the question on which side of the car to sit, for the British custom of steering on the right side, it is often said this is so that drivers of carriages could attack each other better with the sword.
I suppose steering on the left then must be better for knightly jousting with the lance
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
Usually that means that at some point in the next 40 miles you could find some or all of it under construction.
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:3, Informative)
Maybe using pictures on the warning signs [www.vv.se] is too simple? My favourite is this warning for a quay [www.vv.se]. The most notably that I have seen is the "Right lane must turn right" and similar small signs often almost too late. I would really like the use of graphical lane information signs like the following: lane information be [www.vv.se]
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
Maybe some of the pictures are difficult to decipher, or are ambiguous, and plain English words aren't (or are less so)?
For example, from the page to pointed to, what does this sign [www.vv.se] mean?
Or this one [www.vv.se]?
Or this one [www.vv.se]?
And I assume that these [www.vv.se] two signs [www.vv.se] have something to do with simple str
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
As for the questions you asked:
This [www.vv.se] means "you have priority at the next crossing"
This [www.vv.se] is the generic "Attention!" sign.
These [www.vv.se] are distance markers indicating a railroad crossing at 150m, 100m and 50m respectively, if I recall th
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
Look into getting the 'personal' variant of this [wikipedia.org]. A certain percentage of drivers slaughter a number of construction workers every year. Be sure you can survive the consequences reasonably whole.
Wow! I wished for my digital camera.
Your expectations of construction crews are out of phase with the reality of ex-cons and 'illegal immigrant' day workers that may not have intended to return to the site in the morning. Factor this into your driving.
Anot
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:3, Funny)
About 15 years ago, I was driving from Brisbane to Sydney one rainy night. All the way from the NSW border, I kept coming across warning signs saying "Roadworks Ahead - 5km", "Roadworks Ahead - 2km", "Roadworks Ahead - 1km", "Roadworks Ahead" - only to find the "roadworks" was a small pothole that had been filled in the day before.
Lulled into a false sense of security by this, and driving in the rain at 110kph, I saw a little sign by the side of the road on a blind corner sa
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
> On the other hand, there is the state of Illinois where I also lived for a long time.
> Their warning practices are amazing. I one time was way north of Peoria driving south on
> the interstate, and I saw signs warning of "Construction Ahead, 40 miles"!
Speaking of standards, the rest of the world has been metric for quite some time.
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2)
Construction Zone
Next 14 Miles
Prepare to Be Annoyed
Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: (Score:2, Funny)
I'm not, I'm posting on slashdot... driving and typing is way too dangerous!
Riiiiiighht (Score:5, Funny)
...the 15th.
Maybe we need some new standards?
Re:Riiiiiighht (Score:2)
Remember, the IEC, ISO, and ITU were all in on this. No doubt someone proposed this date back in January or February and it took them until today to agree on it.
Re:Riiiiiighht (Score:3, Insightful)
Just because you don't use it -- that doesn't mean there isn't a standard.
Re:Riiiiiighht (Score:2)
There are some people who live outside of your TZ you know.
Re:Riiiiiighht (Score:2, Funny)
Remember... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Remember... (Score:2)
Re:Remember... (Score:2)
How many country codes are needed? (Score:3, Interesting)
The date formats annoy me quite often e.g. 13/4/2005 compared to 4/13/2005. Please use 2005-4-13 as it is less confusing.
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
What's wrong with using "April 13, 2005", "13 Apr 2005", etc.? Very few uses (e.g., sorting) require numerical YYYYMMDD formats. If you're talking about, oh, the terrorist attacks on the US a couple years back, it's stupid to call them the 2001-09-11 attacks. They're the September 11 attacks. If you call them the 11 September 2001 attacks it would probably make sense (although people in the US would be more used to Month Day). But 2001-09-11 imparts a data-ness t
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:3, Insightful)
Good idea, but let's get it right while we're at it. It should be 2005-04-13, or it will be lexicographically ordered later than, for example, 2005-21-13.
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
What's the name of the 21st month? ;)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
(
Yes, and I am well aware that Great Britain and The United Kingdom have different meanings (at least to those in the Northern part of the island of Ireland). I am also not aware of England, Wales, and Scotland having widely used individual country codes.
My address registered on eBay ends with GB (as I originally registered on the US site). The postage calculator on the UK site does not recognise this as being (essentially) the same as UK and
please use 2005-04-13 (Score:2)
thank you.
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:3, Informative)
I'd prefer the date format according to ISO 8601 instead of your own format. :-)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
decimal time, anyone? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Why not? YYYY-MM-DD is the international ISO standard (yes, I am aware of what the I and S stand for). YYYY-MM-DD goes from least specific to most specific, so if you sort a set of dates you get them in the right order. Nobody ever uses YYYY-DD-MM. It's the most intuitive choice.
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2, Informative)
So who uses YYYY-DD-MM? I think you misread the date format. Either that, or I misread your post
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
According to anybody the least bit familiar with numbers? That's generally how they work - the higher magnitude numbers go to the left. Anybody who can count higher than nine is surely familiar with the concept.
Well it doesn't conflict with other practices, unlike DD/MM/YY, MM/DD/YY, etc.
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
It sounds like you spend too much time interacting with machines and not enough time interacting with people.
What's wrong with the Eurocentric DD Month Year? It fits with how our brains work in relation to time. When someone is telling me a date I don't need to know that it's this year first, t
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
United States, 17745
McEntire Hall
Room 545
Jim Smith
Better yet since each country already has a unique phone extention maybe even.
+1 17745
McEntire Hall
Room 545
Jim Smith
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Also, it looks like Canada doesn't have a unique phone code, sharing +1 with the US. I wonder if there are any other countries that share phone codes.
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
"What's wrong with the Eurocentric DD Month Year? It fits with how our brains work in relation to time. When someone is telling me a date I don't need to know that it's this year first, then this month, then some day."
When someone is telling you the date, they're not going to say YYYY dash MM dash DD. They'll simply tell you it's the DDth. They're just giving you a reference, not a timestamp.
"2005 20 10" gives me big concepts to digest first which might not even be necessary, while leaving the most i
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Re:How many country codes are needed? (Score:2)
Lock Haven University
United States
Room 545
Pennsylvania
Jim Smith
McEntire Hall
17745, Lock Haven
Bureaucracy (Score:2, Interesting)
HD Video release of proceedings... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:HD Video release of proceedings... (Score:2)
...in 1280x720 and 1920x1080 screen sizes, and 25Hz, 30Hz and 60Hz frame rates!
It's the standard way of doing things, you know.
Re:HD Video release of proceedings... (Score:2)
Baby Steps (Score:5, Funny)
Speaking as someone who has worked on a few large scale, interdepartment information systems, I think a good first step would be to get it down to one per application.
ITU (Score:4, Interesting)
It's worth pointing out that the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is an agency of the United Nations. All the bluster about the EU "taking over" the Internet is actually a move to have the Internet administered in much the same way as the international telephone service.
Bear that in mind before celebrating World Standards Day today and accusing the EU of being petulant children tomorrow.
Re:ITU (Score:2)
Oh, good. I though there was something to worry abo&*$(3zz.. NO CARRIER
Let's not be too hasty here. (Score:5, Funny)
Let's all hear it for the C99 standard! (Score:4, Funny)
Let's all hear it for the C89 standard!
That's better.
Re:Let's all hear it for the C99 standard! (Score:2)
This is all well and good... (Score:2, Funny)
Important question (Score:2)
Re:Important question (Score:3, Insightful)
From that point, it's a hop-skip-ju
Re:Important question (Score:2)
Yeah, but then those darn Zuluians get to have New Years first, you just can't win.
I think once we have colonies of people on the Moon and Mars, we'll switch to Zulu time or something derivative of that to avoid confusion when talking with people who aren't on earth.
Re:Important question (Score:2)
Ah, those good old ISO standards (Score:5, Funny)
I had a customer that was very intent on becoming certified to the ISO-14000 standard, the "environmental" standard. Part of this includes writing 3 page procedures on how people should throw their aluminum cans in the recycle bin. Of course, one must track the 7 revisions to the document to comply with the standards.
Anyway, they had a big push for this. They implemented training for everyone, wrote policies and procedures for just about every action (such as recycling cans), and so on and so forth. To motivate the troops and show off their pride, they had dozens and dozens of signs made up that they placed all around the plant, talking about ISO 140001.
Yes, you read it correctly.
A few weeks after they put the signs up, I pointed out the error. I wondered if ISO-140001 was an order of magnitude better than ISO-14001.
On my next visit, they had painted over one of the zeros so that they were now promoting ISO-1400 1. I guess that's revision one of the 1400 standard.
In my country ... (Score:2)
For IEC, ISO, and ITU (Score:3, Funny)
That was a tad late (Score:3, Funny)
Metric system sucks (Score:2, Funny)
Well actually... (Score:2)
Well actually, I read about this in the Universal History of Numbers [amazon.com]. Counting in 12 and 60 is quite easy for people if you use your thumb to count each of the 3 segments of the other 4 fingers. If you use the 5 fingers of your other hand to keep track of each group of 12 - tada, you have 60. They theorize this is why the Babylonians
Re:Metric system sucks (Score:2, Funny)
Invoice (Score:2)
My favorite standard.... (Score:2)
Regional Differences (Score:2)
--Please note-- (Score:4, Funny)
Woohoo! (Score:2)
Don't get me wrong, I am fully aware of the importance of standards, but by their nature they are extremely boring things.
Electrical standards (Score:2)
Now I have actually figured out that in the country where there are a multitude of responsibility write-offs (read USA) the electrical plugs are still "unsafe at any handling" (compare with Unsafe at any speed [amazon.com]) I have since figured out that the Underwriters Laboratories [ul.com] isn't doing a good enough job when they are checking the safety of our household utilities.
From the Plan 9 fortunes file... (Score:2)
Surprising (Score:2)
Wait. (Score:4, Funny)
ISO date (Score:2)
ISO 8601 specifies calendar dates like this: YYYY-MM-DD.
The great thing about ISO date is that folders with names like this get correctly sorted alphabetically. Useful for archiving digital camera photos, etc.
Re:ISO date (Score:2)
Will the event be sponsored by... (Score:2)
It's amazing, isn't it? (Score:2)
For the sake of irony... (Score:2)
Re:For the sake of irony... (Score:2)
...I'm going to celebrate World Standards Day today (15 October) instead.
--
http://microsoft.toddverbeek.comI'm not surprised.
iso.org - page is not Valid (no Doctype found)! (Score:2)
World Standards Day (Score:2)
Which timezone was that in? (Score:2)
Why the emphasis on safety? Why not simplicity? (Score:2)
Barriers to Market Entry (Score:2)
My former employer designated me a their rep to the ANSI T1 standards body back in the mid-90's when SONET was the hot thing. I entered with y
and world standards day on the 16th for china, (Score:2)
it's 5-o'clock somewhere, and they have a different standard there for happy hour than we do.
this message is patented in the US and the Azores, copyrighted in Italy, open-source in Belgium and Norway, and pirated everywhere else.
Re:Oops (Score:2)
What I'm hoping for... (Score:2)
...is the day when ISO 8879 [iso.org] can be downloaded for free. Granted, OpenSP [sourceforge.net] kicks ass at much of it, but I'd still like to read the standard without paying ~$224, and if Goldfarb [sgmlsource.com] is the one in the way of that, he's gonna get smacked soon.
(Or did I miss a PDF somewhere this side of eMule? I've seen none there of 8879 yet...)
This isn't off-topic (Score:2)
Re:Defiance (Score:2)