Mobility Email reaches Beta 4 58
Shane M Coughlan writes "Mobility Email Beta 4 has now been released. It is the fourth beta release of the portable distribution. It is stable enough for people to use as an every day email client. This version changes a configuration option in Mozilla Thunderbird to prevent crashes with the new in-line spell checker. Mobility Email is a full version of Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5b2 with added OpenPGP and Webmail extensions. It is portable, and can run from a USB drive without being installed on a computer. "
Re:Windows only (Score:1)
Coming soon: (Score:2)
Coming soon: Portability Email, Beta 1
Configurable Crashes... (Score:4, Funny)
See, that's where Windows goes wrong. People like their crashes configurable.
Unintentionally true (Score:4, Funny)
Only to be expected I suppose!
Gmail has this feature (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Gmail has this feature (Score:3, Insightful)
The Future Looks Good (Score:5, Insightful)
That's an excellent idea. USB keys are so easy to lose, I don't like the idea of carrying around a whole bundle of potentially compromising emails on them. I think I'll be waiting for this functionality before I start using it, but so far I like the direction the team is taking.
Re:The Future Looks Good (Score:1)
Dare I ask what it is you're up to that makes you emails "compromising"?
Re:The Future Looks Good (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The Future Looks Good (Score:1)
How is this any better... (Score:2)
I guess I don't get it. I can't se the advantage of having an email app on a thumb drive, other than for reference purposes, in which case you don't actualy need the app.
Re:How is this any better... (Score:5, Informative)
A PDA is not an option because it won't work when there is no connectivity for external devices (like in most non-geek homes) and it's much bigger than a USB stick.
Re:How is this any better... (Score:2)
But that still leaves the problem of the WebCafe. It means you implicitly trust the machine you use. The problem is the same whether you use your own application or one that's on the machine.
And using ssh to your own machine isn't much better. First, try mentionning ssh to pretty much any webcafe owner and enjoy the blank stare, and you *still* have to trust the machine you type on.
My solution is simple, if I know I'll hav
Re:How is this any better... (Score:2)
Thinking further, I wouldn't put my PGP keyring with the private keys onto an USB stick to use at public terminals because I couldn't be sure that the contents of the stick isn't dumped somewehere as soon as I plug it in.
Regard
Re:How is this any better... (Score:1)
The world will not blow up if you do not answer your emails within 24 hours.
I was on vacation for the past week, did not leave OOA or forwarding rules on, and told relatively few people.
The sky is still standing.
Although I did get about 9 phone calls per day to my cell phone to which i promptly ignored. It was funny, each message got just a little more desperate.
Re:How is this any better... (Score:2)
Still impressive though, not only did you not confuse it with a stringed instrument [wikipedia.org], you even knew it was accented
Windows Only (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Windows Only (Score:1)
Re:Windows Only (Score:1)
Re:Windows Only (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Windows Only (Score:2)
There's a bit of a implied criticism in some of the "this is Windows only" responses (not yours) which I'd like to address. The project at this point appears to be one guy who's making a hobby of scratching his itch , with a couple of buddies to help him with testing, and he's trying to drum up some developers get some momentum.
Under the circumstances, I say good for him for trying, and there's no particular reason for him to do a *nix port. He may as well make it as good as h
Windows and Linux versions (Score:5, Informative)
The linux version, unfortunately, is very buggy and pretty much unusable. Hopefully they'll bring the Linux version up to scratch soon.
Until then, I'd stick to a Windows client for email reading.
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:2)
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:1)
Sounds like a 'vim' user, shunning usable interfaces for hardcore elitism.
Not to mention what happens if you don't have a computer with a sshd running on it. This idea of a GUI mail client made completely portable is definitely a good thing for the average user.
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:1)
Now go and find me one public (aka internet cafe) teminal thatallows you to stick in a usb-device and execute arbitary programs!
For the owner of the cafe this would be the dumbest thing he could do. Because only some days later he would own a beowulf-cluster of zombie-servers...
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:2)
Hey, watch that flamebait. If vi[m] were unusable, then nobody would use it. Heck, I use vi all the time. Oh wait, silly me, I forgot. An interface can't be "usable" unless it has a shinee, gooee, clickee Mickey Mouse interface with all of the icons and translucency and so on....
It's just amazing how GUI people call us people who love command-line interfaces "elitists", and call anything that doesn't have an icon "unusable."
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:2, Insightful)
But then again, its all a matter of opinion. I've tried vi, vim, emacs, etc, and my opinion is that I prefer to spend a higher percentage of my time working within the interface, not with the interface. But if it truly works for
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:3, Informative)
ME, 2000, XP, 2003
98 SE needs a driver, but those are easy to burn onto a CD if you really need to use a 98 SE computer. The original 98 and 95 have crappy USB drivers, so they aren't usually supported anyways for this kind of stuff.
I know MacOS X can use USB drives fine, probably MacOS 9 too (although I cannot verify this).
I have no idea about Linux, but I imagine most Linux c
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:1)
The good thing is that PuTTY will run on Win9[58] too, last time I've checked.
Why would I need a Linux machine "on the road"? I can run a ssh client on basically every half-decent OS and get to a fair FreeBSD server!
Re:Or just the old fashioned way ... (Score:2)
I have no idea about Linux, but I imagine most Linux computers that are up-to-date can use USB drives with no driver issues. Besides, how many Linux computers on the road do you expect to find?
With Gentoo USB drives can can mount automatically using udev and hotplug. It works very well, Even with M$ DOS formatted flashkeys.
Linux (Score:5, Interesting)
That would be great. Now you are Machine _and_ operating system independent!
Re:Linux (Score:1)
hrmm.. the usb drive option (Score:1)
Re:hrmm.. the usb drive option (Score:1)
ok, so... (Score:1)
Standards (Score:2)
There are many clients that are "stable enough" - why use this particular client?
Are such news newsworthy?
OMG wtf (Score:1)
This is new to everyone (Score:2, Interesting)
Looks suspicious to me... (Score:3, Interesting)
I could not see any polite nods to the original Portable Thunderbird project by John Haller: http://johnhaller.com/jh/mozilla/portable_thunderb ird/ [johnhaller.com]
Or to John Urbanek who originally put together Portable Thunderbird with Enigmail/GPG ages ago: http://dev.weavervsworld.com/projects/ptbirdeniggp g/ [weavervsworld.com]
Is this a complete rip-off or what?
Re:Looks suspicious to me... (Score:2, Informative)
It is composed mainly of JH latest PTB release (based on Deer Park) and the launcher that JH, myself, and many others have been tweaking for the past year to get it to what it is today. Mobility Email relies on those two pieces and adds a few additional extensions (RTFA to find out which ones), "pretty" do
Re:Looks suspicious to me... (Score:2, Informative)
The PortableThunderbird launcher
Editors and Submitters: WTF Rule (Score:2)
quotes from the website (Score:3, Insightful)
"The best thing about Mobility Email is that it's totally mobile. "
"Simply plug your USB key into any Windows computer in the world and boom."
These guys have a remarkable talent for overstatement, redundancy, and frightening users.
Re:quotes from the website (Score:1)
Shane Coughlan
John Moore III
Scott Fringer