Google Confirms $600M South Carolina Data Center 144
miller60 writes "Google continues its furious data center building program in the Carolinas. Today the company announced a $600 million data center in Berkeley County, South Carolina. Google has already begun construction on a $600 million data center project in Lenoir, North Carolina, and is in the permitting process on another huge project in Richland County, South Carolina. Google's appetite for large tracts of land and cheap power are driving the site location process. Similar huge projects in central Washington are already transforming the tiny town of Quincy, where real estate prices have spiked, with open land fetching as much as 10 times its previous value."
Maps (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
That or use custom KML(Z)s with it already plotted.
Re:Maps (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, Google Earth isn't updated daily, the images of my house show the car in the driveway of the people who lived here before the people who lived here lived here.
Re:Maps (Score:5, Funny)
It's like they say, Slashdot has changed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Maps (Score:5, Insightful)
If you're looking for smart, capable people in South Carolina (or California, or Idaho, or wherever), you'll find smart, capable people - as long as compensation is strong.
Most of Google's hires may be from out of state, but they will quickly become South Carolinians through property purchase, taxation, and spending their money within the local service economy.
Teaching them to love Lowcountry shrimp boil will take a few weeks; teaching them to say "y'all" as a pronoun will take a few months; teaching them to refer to all soft drinks as "Coke" takes one to two years. But now I'm offtopic.....
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You will likely take a paycut since the area is cheaper. After that, you will lose value if you try to move out of SC. I
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't think you or the OP AC realise that Google [Earth|Maps] data is updated on a _very_ irregular basis with an emphasis on large metropolitan areas. (Which Charleston isn't.) Data can be as much as six years out of date.
Re: (Score:2)
Off topic, yes, but it had to be said.
.... at a geometric rate.... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I fear the Googlezon.
Re: (Score:2)
No matter how cheap... (Score:2)
I would love for them to open one in the Little Rock area. I wonder if I could convince them somehow...
Re: (Score:2)
Plus, Mississippi _loves_ to attract new business by giving them gargantuan incentives. For example, when Mississippi brought Nissan to Mississippi (the only plant that manufactures the Armada and the Titan), they _gave_ Nissan the land, gave them the water, power, and road infrastructure, and deferred their property taxes for five years. My mom is an economic developer for Mi
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure they already did get good incentives for their new site.
Re: (Score:2)
I would love to see a Google data center here (jobs!), but central Arkansas isn't
Waste (Score:1, Insightful)
Peak oil has already happened and we are beginning down the decline curve. "Cheap power" is becoming more scarce with no entity will escape the harsh reality.
Google has to face the facts. Pushing pixels around a screen is the really irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.
Re: (Score:2)
Which is why locating in states with nuclear power might have appeal.
Found via Googling, of course!
http://www.nei.org/documents/states_sc.pdf [nei.org]
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/at_a_gla nce/states/statessc.html [doe.gov]
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Reuse (Score:3, Funny)
If it lasts (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Let's hope (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
How about building a data center at Swamp Castle (Score:5, Funny)
Re:How about building a data center at Swamp Castl (Score:5, Funny)
So much cruft (Score:2, Interesting)
Goog-y'all! (Score:1, Interesting)
And as a side benefit, I am hoping it will raise the overall 'tech level' of the area, not j
Skynet. (Score:1)
We're not all hillbillies here... (Score:3, Interesting)
I for one am excited to see how this works out. I will definitely send them my resume. South Carolina is a fantastic place to work and live, and with more high-tech jobs like this coming to the state and the area, it can only get better.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good companies can cherry-pick employees from many such sources in SC.
Re: (Score:2)
While I'm sure the people are nice and not as retarded as the media makes them out to be, one thing I couldn't stand about South Carolina is the weather. Yes, the winters are mild. But that's just a euphemism for "oppressively humid summers and bugs that won't die."
I can't stand August here in PA. It's too hot to enjoy anything outside between 10AM and sunset. Going further south would mean that period of time would get longer and longer. Not to mention that the only winter weather in SC seems to be horrib
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I live in the south. I have friends who are rednecks. They really do exist. As do trailer parks.
The danger of any quick-growth area is that infrastructre can't keep up. What's just as bad is that every builder around will fight any assessemnt tootha dn nail, which means bonds and higher property taxes to cover the new growth. And, yes, it will mean trailers for classrooms until the building catches up.
Remember my post and go to your town council meet
Not just the cost of the power (Score:4, Informative)
How much does "power" cost? (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously, I have done no research, and I know there is an economy of scale issue, but if you really need lots of power, in one location, surely it must become cost effective at some point to build your own generator.
With no transmission loss, right-of-way issues, delivery infrastructure, etc. there has to be some break-even-point. Wouldn't the entire output of a 200MW plant be cheaper if it was just for a single on-site consumer?
Discuss amongst yourselves, thank you.
Re: (Score:2)
What about the delivery infrastructure of coal shipments? I think the last thing Google wants to do is get into the power plant business.
they are in the solar business (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.fplenergy.com/portfolio/contents/segs_
Re:How much does "power" cost? (Score:5, Informative)
Umm... at what point does it ever make sense to build a datacenter that doesn't have the ability to run off its own power? South Carolina can experience some grid-pummeling weather, sometimes. If Google plans on having that facility up 24x7, there will be a small fleet of diesel generators and a small ocean of fuel sitting right there to keep it afloat in a pinch. Especially when what they're really up to isn't growing for more search, but growing to host web-based business apps and other stuff that they'll be telling people they can really depend on.
Now, just because you CAN run off your own power doesn't mean you want to do it for long, since it's very maintenance intensive.
Re: (Score:2)
Umm... that wasn't the question!
The _ability_ to generate emergency backup power vs _cost effectively_ powering 24x7 continuous operation are completely different requirements. A one thousand times higher cost per MWh might be acceptable for backup power, but for continuous daily power, the grandparent poses a pretty interesting question as to when it becomes cost effective to produce yo
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. I'd be surprised if they didn't actually end up selling power to the grid, for that matter. With small text ads, of course.
Its called a co-lo (Score:3, Informative)
Most the co-los I am familiar with are in the 10-20MW range. I've never seen one larger so I am guessing that is the point where "it makes sense".
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
The really clever ones (IMO) are set up next door to a stripmine, where the coal elevator/tredmill runs directly over route 7, straight into the plant's furnace (or so it would seem, trundling down the road at 50mph). My guess is th
Re: (Score:2)
How many people does this require in the area? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Obviously a few people are needed to maintain a data center, but in a good organization with standardized hardware, OS, and software platforms, and disciplined backup/restore procedures, remarkably few.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I may apply. (Score:2)
You can't let just anyone vacuum and clean around all those servers you know!
Dude, let it go (Score:3, Funny)
They're building a new facility on the opposite coast, just cover up the fact that they never realized they were talking to the government of the wrong Berkeley the whole time?
Guys: just give up. It's not worth spending hundreds of millions of dollars to avoid saying, "oops, we goofed".
that was... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Perfect timing! (Score:2)
Resistance is futile (Score:1)
Re:Resistance is futile (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Storage density is increasing quarterly. (Score:2)
ones that are DOUBLE the previous size at a cheaper cost, ie pull out an old raid 120gig * 8 setup and replace with 400 gig * 8 setup.
Surely constantly upgrading storage devices will double their storage capacity per building.
And their hosting servers too would double in power, with cell servers or 8core replacements.
Unless there is a dual use roll for
Re: (Score:2)
Google: SC and OR; Microsoft: Quincy, WA (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?co
Quincy is near enough to the Columbia to have cheap hydro power, but I just looked at the map and it's not right on the Columbia like The Dalles. I wonder if Google will use water from the Columbia to help cool their data center; and I wonder what the plan is for the Quincy data center. (Ordinary air conditioning? That part of Washington is cold in the winter but hot in the summer.)
steveha
Re: (Score:2)
Not damn likely. You aren't allowed to once through water and dump it out anymore, it's called thermal pollution. Many of the nuclear facilities that were designed to once through water have had to be retrofitted with long underground rivers to act as heat sinks instead of using bodies of water.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Quincy ain't just about Google and Microsoft. (Score:2)
Nucular in SC (Score:5, Interesting)
In SC, we have the highest percentage of electricity supplied from nuclear (nucular?) power, so I have heard.
This may help protect us from a rise in oil prices, I hope.
And we are building more reactors at existing sites. Not only are we a dumping ground for nuclear waste, we also have tons of power available, and our beaches are nice too...
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah! My sister visits every year and she always has a healthy glow!
Re:Nice locations (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And if you look it up [wikipedia.org], "Oklahoma, Kansas, Arkansas, Iowa, and Missouri are entirely within Tornado Alley"...
I don't know what's more irritating, the clowns arguing about something that they missed the premise of in the first place or the people who are arguing with someone who has been to the DISA [disa.mil] data center in OKC.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
No kidding. If it was really about open land and cheap power there would be up here [google.ca]. Surrounded by empty land and hydro electric power. With the added bonus of being much cooler especially in winter.
Re: (Score:2)
Bzzzt!
Re:Nice locations (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I expect that it's a compelling reason, but only AFTER they've substantially narrowed down the selection. Just about every state in the union would roll out the proverbial red carpet for a big construction project and a few hundred good jobs. With so much competition to lure in companies, I doubt that tax breaks are the primary differentiator. i.e. they scratch places with high electricity costs and poor qua
businesses should not pay taxes (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
OK, I'll bite, not enough people know anyway. South Carolina has some horrible school districts, but I write this from the location in SC with the highest per capita concentration of engineers in the country, and home to installations or headquarters to more Fortune 500 companies than areas 5 times it's size. SC is bringing in technology and knowledge based industry to dig itself out of the h
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Brining in is right.. (Score:2)
Poster is dead on.
It may shock some people to learn this, but the ill-conceived attempt at secession that began in South Carolina a century and a half ago failed miserably. As a result, South Carolina is still part of the United States. Thus there is no impediment for companies and individuals seeking employment to set up shop there.
As a result, a historically (and currently) poor public education sy
Re: (Score:2)