Smart Car Coming To the US In Jan. 2008 575
Blahbooboo3 writes "After many delays and missed promises, the Smart Car is finally coming to the US in January 2008. Smart Car uses a specially designed crash cage to protect the driver and gets upwards of 40 miles per gallon. Crash tests are very positive. The car is deceptively large inside, as showcased by this great ad from the Smart USA site. The second-generation Fortwo will be offered first, starting around $14,000. Unfortunately the slick roadster isn't coming any time soon."
Rather get one of the scion models or even a yaris (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
That's okay; the Smart Fortwo only seats two people anyway (hence the name), so it can't carry soccor moms' "babies!"
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:5, Interesting)
Just look at Fortwo, taller than it is wide, and figure out what happens when someone runs a red light.
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:5, Informative)
Well, considering that, you'd think it'd be safer than other small cars in side impacts, because the door reinforcements are higher off the ground. Also, because it's so short, the side impact actually hits the A and B pillars, the front and back wheels (at the same time!), etc -- the stuff that's rather more solid than the doors.
In a side-impact crash, I would expect the Smart to be more likely to roll and get less smashed-in, meaning that the occupants would be at greater risk for whiplash but less risk for entrapment or getting crushed.
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:5, Insightful)
That, or we need to be as strict with the licensing for every car as we currently are with the license for a semi or train. If you are going to drive a vehicle that is that dangerous to everyone else on the road, shouldn't you have to meet much stricter requirements?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Fully agree. Given the various harms monster vehicles cause, the only way to rationally preserve people's freedom to drive them is to take steps to make their owners bear the costs imposed on all other motorists by their self-indulgent vehicle choice.
First, increase the gas tax until the drivers of heavier vehicles are paying their fair share of the road repair bill. (There are very rational arguments for subsidizing road wear caused by heavy vehicles, such as semis, used commercially. There are no ration
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Detroit and Exxon/Mobil would have a field day lobbying and claiming lost jobs to the politicians that run the government. Ford makes maybe 1-2,000 for each Ford Focus. Meanwhile they make $9,000 for each Ford Explorer sold. Maybe this is why they have been refusing to put fuel cell focuses on the market? Its clear what their financial interests are.
SUV owners would revolt and vote. Most rich white voters who are male and own such vehicles vote more than any other group which is why the republic
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
While I agree that the Oil Titans and the Auto Executives are working together to screw working people (I recently aquired a 13 year old Honda that averages 45m
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The burden of gas taxes disproportionately falls on the poor, not the rich people who are driving the large, luxury SUVs. Gas taxes are flat, $ per gallon taxes, which means, all things held constant, that a poorer person is paying more than a richer person. But, all things are not held constant, you say? Too true. The rich can afford new cars that get better gas mileage, whereas a poorer person must drive the car they have, which is likely to be an older, less effici
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It probably doesn't help that we live in the retirement state (Florida).
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Already done! [backcountryjournal.com]
Oh, wait, you meant making semis and trains smaller, didn't you? Nevermind.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I have a wife and one child. I also have two cats. My sedan is fine to drive around the city but when we want to drive to our other home two adults, one child and two cats (in carriers) will not fit so we're going to need to get an SUV just to manage that. (We don't have one atm, but we plan on one.)
If you have one or two kids and a pet or two an SUV is just practical, it's nothing to do with a 'power trip' or whatever.
I will admit a station wagon would also work but I couldn't possibly
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:5, Insightful)
Or a minivan. Or a crossover.
You realize that what you've just admitted is that you're ...
1) putting most other drivers around you at risk, because of your high bumpers, poor braking and handling, and excess weight; ...
2) paying who knows how much extra in gas, and putting the resulting extra CO2 into the atmosphere;
3) actually *sacrificing* space compared to rational people-moving vehicles (because of your high floor and long hood)
... because you're insecure about how you look.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Anyway to answer your questions
1) Actually, according to consumer reports. The SUV I plan to buy is as safer as the sedan I drive
2) Hybrid
3) I tested my requirements and 2 adults, 2 children with safety seats and 2 pets in carriers all work. This is purely a question of the design of the vehicle. I a
-1; Stupid (Score:4, Insightful)
Try two adults and four kids. That was my family when we were growing up. We never had an SUV. The typical seating arrangement when we all went somewhere was Mom and Dad up front with one kid between them and three kids in the back. Was it cramped? Sure, but rare were the times when we all had to be piled into the car at the same time.
Nowadays, I would suggest against that arrangement for safety reasons (this was when most cars didn't even have seat belts). Still, there is nothing wrong with two adults up front and three kids (or one kid and two cats, in carriers) in the back of any modern sedan.
I can't believe that someone out there actually thinks that two adults, one child, and two cants (in carriers) will not fit in a sedan. I mean, really. Damn. Not only can they safely fit, but quite comfortably.
By your standard, almost every family in the country should have an SUV.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Bert
Re: (Score:2)
bodywork easily for different designs
Dunno about US but here in EU if you change the design of your car you have to get new documents. Btw, those bodywork parts are not cheap in any case, and I haven't seen anyone actually changing the color of their car by buying new bodyparts. Probably the most expensive color change ever.
Secondly it's a Mercedes
Reliability-wise I would own a Toyota over a Mercedes any day of the year.
t can park in small spaces in cities which other cars can't.
Valid point though. Even though, Yaris isn't that much bigger than a Smart.
So what are the benefits of Yaris over Smart?
Much better gear changing.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Please. If this was built by Toyota, it would be worthy of consideration. Considering the diaster of mercedes reliabiliy along with the outrageous cost of spare parts, the e
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:4, Informative)
That doesn't happen here in the uk, since the vehicle is seen as cool, distinctive and effective.
On the other hand the usa motor market that seems to think driving tanks with the same fuel economy as cars from 80 years ago is ok - they get laughed at, by everyone else in the world. Attitudes are changing this way, thankfully, and maybe one day the usa will 'get it'.
Scions and the Yaris DON'T get the same milage (Score:5, Informative)
The Smart gets more than 40mpg; the most efficient Toyotas (in the US) get up to 36 (manual Yaris according to fueleconomy.gov).
If you want a Toyota comparable to the Smart, you're looking at an Aygo [wikipedia.org], which is even smaller than a Yaris and not sold in the US.
By the way, about those Scions: although the first-gen xA and xB had the same 104hp, 1.5L engine as the Echo and Yaris, the new xB and xD will have larger ones and will probably get less mileage.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I meant non-hybrid only, although I didn't say it, as I was only talking about cars of a similar size to the Smart (and Toyota doesn't make any hybrids that small).
Of course, you aren't kidding about Hondas: why would anybody be impressed by the Smart car when they could have gotten a 70mpg Insight any time in the past 8 years?!
Re: (Score:2)
40 mpg isn't that great (Score:3, Insightful)
How come I can't get a car with better mileage than that by now?
Nobody cared too much until recently. (Score:3, Interesting)
It's really only since the price of gas has hit $3/gal(US) that anyone here in the 'States has started to care about fuel efficiency. At least in the mainstream market -- the VW Diesels have always been popular with some folks I know (and I used to own one, great car) who were really into fuel economy, but the price-premium you pay for the diesel engine doesn't pa
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I forgot to qualify my statement with "non-hybrid." Also, I should have checked fueleconomy.gov more thoroughly: strangely enough, the Corolla actually gets up to 37mpg, edging out the Yaris even though it's a bigger car.
But it doesn't really matter, because the Prius (or any other current Toyota hybrid) is obviously not in the same size class as the Smart Fortwo.
Re:Scions and the Yaris DON'T get the same milage (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, there were (relatively) a lot of cars from the late 80s and early 90s that got better mileage than most cars do today: Geo Metro XFI (51 mpg), Honda CRX HF (50 mpg), your Citroën, etc. But what you seem to not realize is that those cars were also a heck of a lot lighter than modern ones, because they weren't weighed down with airbags, ABS, etc. It's much harder for a modern car to achieve that same efficiency and still meet safety regulations (let alone customer expectations, which are also a lot higher).
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:2, Informative)
It is mostly used by young people that creativity related careers like architects and designers. It is also quite common as a company car for innovative dynamic companies.
Besides, you can park perpendicularly in a street that only allows parallel parking.
Re: (Score:2)
You say that as if it's somehow difficult to parallel park any of the other cheaper small cars in the US (e.g. Hyundai Accent, Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit, etc.).
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That might be the stupidest statement I've ever read at Slashdot, and I browse at -1.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Does Mercedes offer an address to send all your parking tickets to?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:2)
A Yaris is not a beautiful car, and a Smart is.
Buying a car is not about saving mney in gas, if that was the issue, the only sane way to buy cars would be following a TCO study of each model, because the price of the car is an issue in fuel economy.
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:3, Interesting)
The Smart car has Mercedes engineering behind it, and crashworthiness is superior to anything put out from Toyota.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The Smart car has Mercedes engineering behind it, and crashworthiness is superior to anything put out from Toyota.
is some serious bullshit.
The previous model of Smart got barely three stars(http://www.crash-test.org/marques/resultat.p hp?mod=mccsma_1999-2000 [crash-test.org])in Euro NCAP test. I do think that the new one isn't much more safer than that. Consider that Toyota Yaris got 5/5 stars in the same test (http://www.adac.de/Tests/Crash_Tests/Automodelle/ toyota_yaris_ab2005.asp?ComponentID=130151&SourceP ageID=8650 [www.adac.de]). There goes your fanboi credibility.
And the Sma
Re:Rather get one of the scion models or even a ya (Score:2, Informative)
$14,000 too high? (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
re: Why buy a NEW car at all? (Score:5, Insightful)
Meanwhile, loans on new vehicles tend to have much better interest rates than loans on used vehicles, so you're not giving as much of your money away to some bank as you pay off your car....
My new car also included such "bonuses" as free roadside assistance during the warranty period. Used car owners generally don't receive benefits like this, and have to pay for a "motor club" membership like AAA to get the same thing.
The warranty itself can be a factor, too. You may or may not get one with your used car purchase, depending on its mileage and all. But it could easily "make or break" the overall "value" of your purchase if something major like a transmission fails 2 or 3 years into the vehicle ownership.
Ultimately, for me, the assurance that my new car doesn't have some worn out part just waiting to fail and greatly inconvenience me when I need my car the most is the *best* reason for buying new. I only own one vehicle, and I count on it daily. If I'm supposed to go to a customer site and can't make it because my car breaks down, that costs me income from both ends at once on a used car that's not in warranty. (Loss of income on a job I can't do, AND loss of income paying for a car repair.) Generally, the dealership will even give me a free rental car while repairing mine under warranty - which they'd never do on used car repairs.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Bacause people think they are cool and hip... (Score:2)
Because people think they look cool and hip and fun. People buy cars as an expression of their personal taste as much as anything else, projecting an image, etc, not just on rational aspects like price/fuel efficiency. If that was the case we'd be following Henry Ford's line about having any car we want as long as it's black, we'd all be driving identical vehicles. Jus
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For that matter, who in the world would consider a Smart car sexy?!
Now, if you were talking about the roadster or the Crossblade, you might have a point, we'd only be getting the ugly ones in the US anyway!
Fortwo (Score:2)
Already quite popular north of the border (Score:5, Interesting)
Smarts and Japanoids (Score:2)
Smart have been on sale in Canada since 2004. There are zillions on the road here in Vancouver. Once again the U.S. is behind the times, while us Canadians are on top of things. :-)
The current fad (everything is a fad in Vancouver) is for older Japanese imports. It started with Nissan Skylines [theskylineshop.com], but you also see lots of Mitsubishi Delicas [terra2imports.ca] and Nissan S-Cargo [japanoid.com] vans. I've even saw a Toyota Hi-Lux pickup, the same kind Top Gear [bbc.co.uk] failed to destroy...
If they're more than 15 years old you can privately import th
For anyone who can't stream the ad... (Score:2)
Smart indeed (Score:4, Funny)
inaccessible by normal means - like closer to the mall entrance than a
regular parking spot.
Re: (Score:2)
Comedy handling (Score:2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfguxvWPRZE [youtube.com]
or not.
montana has a a dealership for a few years (Score:2)
http://www.ecoautoinc.com/smart.php [ecoautoinc.com]
Re: (Score:2)
you can't park like that even if you want to (Score:2)
This isn't to say that an influx of microcars might not lead to a change in the laws, but it ain't that way yet.
"smart", not "Smart Car". (Score:4, Informative)
The decline of slashdot posters (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Not everyone has the same value system, or makes a large salary as you apparently do. Just because you're an aerospace engineer doesn't mean what you value is any more important than anyone else values. You seem to put an enormous value on safety. That's fine, that's a good thing to value IMO. Of course, not everyone makes the nice salary that I imagine an aerospace engineer makes, so we can't all afford expensive Volvos or Mercedes.
Get a grip buddy and maybe
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The video of the crash test is from an old Smart. (Score:2)
The 2008 version hasn't been tested yet, but hopefully it will get 4 stars in the same test.
Back to the future! (Score:5, Informative)
The Lupo can transport 4 persons and reach a top speed in excess of 165km/h (102mph in twelve-finger units). Read more here [vwvortex.com].
Volkswagen has now ceased building this gem - and well, I guess it would never sell in SUV-loving States of America anyway.
I just rented one this week (Score:5, Interesting)
I was skeptical at first, but figured I'd rent it for the experience. Having driven it for two days I'm a total convert. When you get into it, you notice that it not only has plenty of room inside for two people and their stuff, but that you actually sit higher up than in most regular cars. The car seems quite stable, even at speed up to 100kmh and probably faster, but I didn't really have a chance to take it any faster an this.
The suspension is maybe a bit too hard and sporty in it's feel, you can feel rough roads a bit too well. The interior quality was excellent and I like the dash design. The seats were very comfy and it was very easy to find a good seating position. Like I said, there's plenty of room for even big and tall people.
The engine is small and turbo charged and has plenty of oomh, though only at higher rpm's and you have to wait for the turbo to spool. It has six gears and an automatic transmission. You can use the shifter to go up and down the gears on your own or switch it into automatic. My only gripe is the automatic taking way too long to downshift when you want to surge, but supposedly that's been fixed in the newer version (ours was the 1st gen).
Really truly the best part was the pitiful amount of fuel it used. I filled the tank up as soon as I got it, and the gauge indicated a full tank (a very unscientific 5 bar gauge) when I returned it to the rental place. I actually felt a bit cheated by it, since I didn't use most of the gas I put in the tank
Like I said, I have reservations about high speed handling in an emergency. I've seen the crash test videos, and I believe the car to be safe enough in crash, it's avoiding one I'm still not sure about. The car does have every electronic measure available, ABS, stability control and other stuff, but I didn't want to test it on public roads.
On the other hand, most SUV's will flip easily if you do a high speed left-right, so it's a matter of being careful I guess.
My other gripe is the transmission, though I can live with it and as I said, it's been fixed in the newer model.
All in all, I'm seriously looking into buying one as a second car. A Smart would fulfill about 95% of my motoring needs, but I would still need my current large gas guzzler for transporting more than me and my spouse and driving to see our relatives through elk infested wintry roads at night.
Roadster won't come at all (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm sure it's cute (Score:5, Funny)
And you can be sure that the rednecks down here in NC will pass some kind of law making it prohibitively expensive or uninsurable. Because as we all know, small is faggoty Eurocommunism. Down here in AMERICA, guldurnit, 75% all new Veee-hick-ul registrations are trucks and SUVs. Learn the damn rules.
Why only 40mpg? (Score:4, Insightful)
...and gets upwards of 40 miles per gallon (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm sorry to have to burst your bubble, but 40mpg is nothing. Most cars in the UK can do this. My 1987 Vauxhall Astra (1.3L engine, petrol) regularly gave me 43mpg (and lasted 13 years before it was written off by thieves. My girlfriends Skoda Octavia 1.9L diesel can get about 60mpg on a good run and averages 54mpg including urban commuting. If you don't know what a Skoda Octavia is it is an Audi A4 with a different skin styling - made by VW/Audi group - they own Skoda and Seat.
It is a true indictment of how wasteful car designs and usage are in the US that you think 40mpg is newsworthy. BTW, your $3.50/gallon petrol is cheap. We pay £0.97 per litre - thats $1.94 per litre to you, or about $9 per gallon. So when you complain about your "high" US petrol, sorry, gas, prices, you are complaining about something that is not high at all.
Re:...and gets upwards of 40 miles per gallon (Score:5, Informative)
Re:...and gets upwards of 40 miles per gallon (Score:4, Interesting)
When you see how big this place REALLY is, you'll shit yourself. $3.50/gallon (US gallon) might be cheap in the UK, but it is NOT cheap in the US. Do you know how many goods (vital goods, even) are transported cross-country by diesel truck at 12 MPG? Do you know how many people are forced to drive an hour (50-60 miles) to work each day because the only other options are to a) get a much lower paying job closer to home or b) move to a crowded, polluted, dirty, restrictive, crime-laden, expensive city? When (not if, but when) fuel gets up to $9 gallon, our economy will likely collapse.
Yeah, I think it's stupid how a lot of Americans choose to live with their mortgages and SUVs and high debt, but that's besides the point- it is how it is, and it's not going to change overnight just because some European thinks it ought to. It's going to take a significant emotional event to effect the kick in the ass this country (in my opinion) so desperately needs.
Deja Vu (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Forget smart cars... (Score:5, Informative)
(John Stewart voice) Gooo on...
Yeah, stupid people are funny.
Of course she did! The system is out of control, I tells ya.
Did you ever consider that your father might be telling you an urban myth?
Re:Forget smart cars... (Score:4, Funny)
After all, nobody could envision the car wandering off the road under this scenario without a proper test, could they?
Re:Forget smart cars... (Score:4, Informative)
Read Snopes lately? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Forget smart cars... (Score:5, Funny)
I can only assume that the extremely small size of the Smart leads to an attempt to overcompensate. Most Smarts are driven as fast as the can go, whenever possible (which isn't very fast, but far faster than safe for the size of car). They will cut you up at junctions, they will race you, they park in a manner that is often extremely selfish.
It seems that in Europe, only total dicks buy the Smart.
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm... In Canada it's Volkswagen drivers that invariably, and yes I mean always, ride your bumper, cut you off, and come flying at pedestrians as if there is a God given right that nothing on Earth shall impede their right to Fahrvergnügen.
VW people scare me more than taxi drivers.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
We need to get them to convert to Smarts.
Re: (Score:2)
In the US the total Dicks drive big SUVs and 4wd pickup trucks that are never driven off pavement.
Being a Brit, that sentence brings a whole new meaning to off-road:
Pavement - Pavement in English is sidewalk in American. The first chapter in the Texas driving handbook says that you must drive on the pavement at all times! Yikes!
http://www.effingpot.com/motoring.shtml [effingpot.com]
Re: (Score:2)
No, an SUV would drive right over something like a Corvette. A Smart fortwo is way too tall (even awkwardly so) for that to happen. I've seen pickup trucks that are shorter!
Re:Now all we need to do (Score:4, Interesting)
Mercedes has safe cars. I know, I have seen a Mercedes roll on the German autobahn (the guy was doing about 170-190). His Mercedes end up upside down. The guy walked out without being hurt. Ok he was shaken, and he looked like, "I survived that?"
Re: (Score:2)
Have you looked at the videos illustrating how safe they are?
I saw a video of it smashing into another car, but not one smashing into an SUV (which is what we're talking about here)
Or how about the one in the UK where they ran the thing against a wall head on.
Didn't see that one, but when you're smashing into a wall you only have to consider the mass of the vehicle you're riding in, not say the mass of an SUV that's 2-3 times heavier.
These things are incredibly safe!
Well, I'll believe that when I se
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, but yes, I do feel confortable with the size of my penis.
with it's tiny size you're get about zero respect from other drivers on the highway.
Who needs respect, when you can "merge" into the space between any two cars on the road, even ahead of a tailgater?
And the milage is ONLY 40 mpg? What the hell?
I'll give you that point... 40MPG really doesn't amount to anything special. For a car so tiny, I'd expect quite a
Re: (Score:2)
Who needs respect, when you can "merge" into the space between any two cars on the road, even ahead of a tailgater?
Sounds like a dangerous, idiotic thing to do that only pisses people off because you've engangerd their lives. Sorry, but respect IS important on the road, as it's a shared resource and thus cultural.
As far as looking freakish, people WILL judge you on the way your vehicle looks. I don't want to be the freak who drives the freak mobile.
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, if you actually drive like that, which car your driving becomes totally moot because no driver will respect you anyhow. You better hope your car has a good safety rating and that you have good insurance. And don't run into anyone disgruntled with a gun.
Re:I thought this car was a joke... (Score:4, Insightful)
I take it you've never driven in Boston...
And for the record, no, I do not regularly drive like that. But having the option to forcefully merge...
In any case, "respect" comes from a long relationship. On the road, that means nothing. A bunch of strangers that I'll never see again, and around whom I drive defensively because I can't trust any of them to have slept well last night; to have at least one hand on the wheel rather than one on the coffee and one on the cellphone; to have a BAC of zero; To have a blood benzo level of zero (Xanax/Klonopin/Ativan/etc have warnings on them for a reason, bluehairs!); to generally count as what we might call "sane" and not suddenly express their self loathing with suicide-by-head-on-collision. I "respect" them only in the same way I "respect" a pissed-off badger - I do my best to avoid them.
Re: (Score:2)
Your info is out of date. (Score:5, Informative)
Diesel is a great fuel for the economically minded as it is more energy efficient than gasoline, and can also supplemented with biodiesel to the extent it is available (which in turn is much much more efficient than ethanol).
Re:Not for the Energy Conscious (Score:5, Interesting)
BMW and Merc both have developed a european-spec diesel which if theoretically driven in the LA or DC areas where smog is a problem, the air going into the engine is dirtier than the air coming out of the exhaust. You're actually CLEANING the environment, just a little bit. The Mercedes engine passed the 2007 US diesel emissions standards as is, so is currently on sale here already. BMW will begin offering the diesel in their SUV models in 2008. All other manufactuers (including Volkswagen, the only other company that currently produces a small diesel for sedans) are currently refining their engines to meet the new US standards for low sulfer fuels.
In all seriousness, mile-for-mile, a modern diesel engine using low sulfur diself fuel is cleaner than a gasoline engine of the same displacement. Get over it.