Another Battery Fire in AT&T's Network 48
An anonymous reader writes "AT&T has disclosed another fire started by one of the 17,000 Avestor batteries in its broadband network. The first fire caused a violent explosion in suburban Houston. This second incident occurred just 20 miles away."
Good thing Houston gets rain... (Score:2)
Wow (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyone else read ".... YET" in that sentence. I'm hoping they are doing further testing in whatever conditions these batteries were in that made them explode. TFA did not mention anything but then again it is light reading.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I did, take the quote from the bigwig:
"the battery design was sound, as were the safety features," and concluded that "the risk of hazardous failures with this battery is as low, if not lower, than the risk with alternative batteries, which are used by other telecommunications and cable companies in similar applications."
IF the battery design was sound, why did 2 of them start fires?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now maybe this is for legal reasons, but at the very least they should explain why this happened and how to prevent it from happening again. Or if the batteries are indeed safe,
Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
It is likely they were installed by the same group of people (person?), and if they (he) didn't know what he was doing, it may very well happen again. It is also likely the batteries were all part of the same batch.
Re: (Score:2)
It also should be noted that (depending on your source) Houston, TX is the second hottest city in the United States, when looking at daily mean.
"Second Hottest" (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I understand that Avestor made some twenty thousand of the things before going bankrupt.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Were they exposed to heat? Yes. It's been a very hot summer this year, or at least this month, in the Southern Plains when it hasn't been raining. Nineties or 100s(Fahrenheit).
Corrosive chemicals? Probably not. But these batteries are li-poly! They can explode without help from other chemicals.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So that's what happens if you run Windows Embed (Score:2, Insightful)
That post was a waste of all our time, and a moderators mod points, and your Karma.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:So that's what happens if you run Windows Embed (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You have to distinguish between two types of lead-acid batteries and then the whole thing is not that optimal anymore.
With wet-cell lead-acid batteries [wikipedia.org] you'll get evaporation and resulting loss of capacity. Beside that you have a precipitation of lead(II) sulfate that can ultimately kill your battery.
With maintenance-free (sealed) batteries like Valve Regulated Lead Acid batteries you do not get these problems but you could get thermal runaway [hanford.gov] and they do explode. Gel-batteries [wikipedia.org] are less inclined to expl
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Having said the above, even
Re: (Score:2)
Funny thing is, I've got here plenty of manufacturer data sheets claiming pretty much the same thing for SLA / VRLA batteries.
In practice, for ambient temps between 15C & 40C, service life seemed to be ~ 3 years max. And not much, if any, better in a regulated 25C ~30C environment.
OTOH, I remember these being used to replace batteries of flooded lead-acid cells, su
AT&T: One Hot Telephone Network! (Score:1)
Did Anyone (Score:3)
What I can't figure out is why they aren't using SLA's in those cabinets in the first place. They are, by far, the most common battery in use in almost every application. The advantage is that SLA's are safe, predictable and cheap. The disadvantages are volume and weight, but in a stationary cabinet that shouldn't make a difference.
Doesn't surprise me.... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Er, read the article (again). They're Lithium Polymer (LiPo) batteries. Remember those exploding Lithium-Ion laptop batteries a couple of months ago? These are even more dangerous. This [youtube.com] should give you an idea... and that's a small one.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Put a lot of energy in a small place... (Score:2)
http://www.askthepilot.com/upsfire.html [askthepilot.com]
Story that explains the picture:
http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2006/09/22/ask thepilot202/print.html [salon.com]
Granted, Smith is a pilot, not an engineer, but he gives a somewhat good explanation of thermal runaway.
Are we sure people aren't the accelerant? (Score:2)
Why does AT&T use such huge cabinets? (Score:2)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kd1s/553921527/in/se
Avestor Itself Blows up (Score:1)
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/11/avestor_sh uts_d.html [greencarcongress.com]
Avestor, the Canadian developer of Lithium-Metal-Polymer (LMP) battery technology, is shutting down. The company filed with the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy in Montréal with a view to making a Proposal to its creditors on 31 October.
In August, the company had produced and shipped its 20,000th battery. At that time, Avestor said it had signed multimillion dollar, multiyear contracts with ma
avestor... isn't that the outfit that went bust? (Score:2)
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/11/avestor_sh uts_d.html [greencarcongress.com]
our telecom outfit had ship issue after ship issue and RMA issue after RMA issue, before we finally got a tech advisory that the vendor was shyt outta luck, and use sealed lead-acid for field replacements.
which will probably improve reliability immensely.
if you have any, seriously consider replacing them with non-incendiary technology.
BUY FLYWHEELS YOU FUCKING INGRATES (Score:2)