University of Penn. Recommends Against Vista SP1 286
At least one university liberal enough to accept the deeply flawed and mostly rejected Vista OS is recommending faculty and students stay away from SP1. "University of Pennsylvania tech staffers are advising faculty and students not to upgrade their computers to the new service pack for Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system. The school's Information Systems & Computing department said it will support Vista SP1 on new systems where it's pre-installed, but added that it 'strongly recommends that all other users adopt a "wait and see" attitude,' according to a newly published department bulletin." And CIO magazine doesn't quite go so far as to call on Microsoft to throw away Vista, but it does ask its readers to weigh in on that topic.
Wait and See (Score:5, Insightful)
Isn't that the standard advice for any major upgrade on any operating system ever?...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's also a holiday... a slow news day.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Pfft. Kick an operating system when it's down...
Actually that's called rebooting, isn't it?
Re:Wait and See (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wait and See (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Wait and See (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wait and See (Score:4, Insightful)
IT support staff usually suggest what will make their lives easiest. Vista works just fine on the right hardware. As with most O/S you are in for some misery if you attempt to upgrade a legacy machine.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Don't do it! (Score:5, Interesting)
Vista seems to be Windows ME part 2. A really crapy OS to replace a somewhat stable one. I don't see how a service pack could make things any worse.
Re:Don't do it! (Score:5, Insightful)
That's not why we blame Microsoft.
We blame Microsoft for making it irritating, DRM infested and slow when they fixed the security issues.
Re: (Score:2)
University of Pennsylvania [wikipedia.org], not Penn State [wikipedia.org].
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Liberal? (Score:5, Insightful)
The university would offer advice and support for the students own computers - any reasonable university is going to be "liberal enough" to let people use their own machines!
Re: (Score:2)
I swear I wish we could keep those conservative vs liberal arguments for the goverment's spending.
Oh wait you think because it's public money, it becomes a governmental issue? Then why isn't the CIO of a university elected?
Sheesh it's gvmt or it's not, but it can't be halfway.
Re: (Score:2)
Liberal had a meaning prior to politics - specifically - lacking moral restraint [merriam-webster.com].
It's sort of funny that liberal is seen as a pejorative. Or at least a "high reaction" type of word. . .
Huh? (Score:5, Interesting)
As has been said above; this was going to happen. I know of companies running OS X, companies running Linux servers, who all adopt the wait-and-see approach. I'm not that impressed with Vista either, but I don't think I've ever seen an update to an operating system in which all users had total confidence in the manufacturer and OS enough to all update, no questions asked.
Yes, I agree there are certain aspects of Vista which deserve to be slated, but this is more process related than product related.
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, but companies need much much more stability then college students. Most OS X upgrades are just fine and only usually break apps that modify the OS a lot, the same could be said though with adding random repositories to Ubuntu/Debian and the OS will break sometimes on installing the next version. But generally, I wouldn't recommend a Ubuntu user not upgrade to 8.04 when it comes out, nor would I recommend a Mac user not going to Leopard. However it seems that Vista SP1 is bad enough to warrent students not to upgrade, now that is saying something.
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But OSX upgrade problems are all the OS's fault!
Sorry, that won't wash.
Vista has major issues, and should never have been released in the state it was. SP1 fixes most but not all of them... but it's still way below the usability of XP.
Re: (Score:2)
No, they are all Apple's fault. When you make the hardware and you make the software, people expect compatibility. Apple even advertises this as an advantage.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
And while CIO doesn't come out and say "Microsoft, dump Vista!" they 'explore the idea' in such a way that it's pretty much what they are saying without using expletives and they certainly seem to be recommending it.
What I find amusing is that force ONCE my predictions on something have come true. Before Vista was released, I believed it would be as popular as WindowsME. Well, I wasn't entirely correct--I think WindowsME had a stronger following. But as far as OS successes go, Vista ranks right in ME's neighborhood.
In the past, the next version of Windows might have been hailed as a 'triumphant come back' or some such thing... WindowsME did not cause the public to doubt Microsoft in the slightest. They just counted WindowsME to mean "Windows MistakE." But Microsoft has saved its real mistake for Vista. Vista has been FORCED onto a public through OEM channels resulting in a public that actually refused to buy hardware based on the fact that there was no WindowsXP option quite frequently. Microsoft back-peddled by allowing "downgrade rights" but I'm not sure how many people actually got that memo because the practice of avoiding machines "sold with Vista" is still going on.
Microsoft may choose not to listen to its users, but they're damned stupid for not listening to their OEMs. Apple's popularity is only growing because of it and while there may be some out there, I have yet to actually hear about people switching back from Mac once they've committed to the move.
*Facepalm* (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Why stop here? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Yawn... (Score:4, Insightful)
The news here has to be those companies that jumps to SP1 without checking up on any risks with that. You'll have a harder time finding stories about those.
Re: (Score:2)
Most companies are not using Vista. Most are still using XP or Windows 2K. The companies that are using Vista generally are smaller companies that aren't tech-based.
I throw Vista away all the time (Score:5, Interesting)
This experience comes at a cost, namely supporting machines for my family and friends. Never mind what the media and professionals say about Vista, but when my friends and family BEG me to remove Vista and replace it with XP, you know something is bad wrong with this operating system.
These days, if someone is buying a new machine, and all they do is email, browsing, pictures and the like, I will always recommend a Mac. I don't have to support the damn thing - it just works. If they're intent on a PC or need one for certain software, I send them to the Dell Outlet where you can still get a fantastic Core 2 Duo Optiplex with a 3-year warranty and XP for a few hundred bucks.
If by chance I'm forced into Vista, I too am moving to Mac. Times change. Microsoft fucked up. I never thought I'd be advocating Macs, ever.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why? That means buying a new computer whether you need it or not. Why not just move over to Linux? That way you can use your existing computer. Not only that, Linux isn't as resource intensive as Windows (especially Windows iCandy) so you'll find your current box working faster than ever. Not saying you must chose Linux, or that you'd be stupid not to, just asking why you don't consider it a viable option.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I get the allure of Linux, I understand its stability and security, I buy devices that use it whenever possible... I just don't have the
Re:I throw Vista away all the time (Score:4, Informative)
That you are. And, unless I miss my guess, showing how long it's been since you took a good look at Linux. It now comes with drivers for most common peripherals, and almost every mainstream distro (except Gentoo, of course, but that's a special case) provides precompiled kernels. If you need to work with MS Office files, OpenOffice reads, edits and saves in that format if you need it to, and I've never had the slightest compatibility issues. Linux is much easier to work with now than it was ten years ago, and for somebody with your computer experience, it's more than ready for Prime Time. Again, I'm not saying you must or even should switch, just making sure you understand that it's a viable option now.
Re: (Score:2)
WINE is neither.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft won't let XP be offered forever on new computers (but maybe until the next major OS release, we see how it goes). But it will undoubtedly be supported for at least the greater part of another decade (regardless of MS's current projections).
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I throw Vista away all the time (Score:4, Informative)
My brother uses Vista. He likes to think of himself as relentlessly practical on computer decisions. I built a 64 bit PC for him, and made it triple boot: 64 bit Windows XP, 32 bit Windows XP (just in case), and 64 bit Xubuntu Linux. And he threw it away for a computer with Vista. Why? He wanted to keep using an old Canon laser printer he had. Canon wasn't going to make a 64 bit Windows XP driver for it, they weren't going to help the Linux people make a driver, but they did make drivers for Vista. He said the machine with Vista preinstalled "just worked", and mentioned some other software (VPN stuff I think) that gave him troubles. Also was afraid to use OpenOffice to create doc and xls files. Afraid that they might not work in MS office, and creating them in OpenOffice then switching to MS to check was too much bother. I suggested his email recipients also switch to OpenOffice, but that of course was a non-starter.
He doesn't care why. When something doesn't work, he doesn't care whether it's MS's fault. He wants to use computers, not screw with them. I keep wondering how long this can last before something bites him in a tender spot and Vista (fairly or unfairly) gets blamed or excused.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I refuse to install Vista, as I enjoy a certain degree of control over my operating system.
What do you think Vista is going to stop you doing ?
If by chance I'm forced into Vista, I too am moving to Mac. Times change. Microsoft fucked up. I never thought I'd be advocating Macs, ever.
So you won't go to Vista because "you enjoy a certain degree of control", but you *would* buy a Mac ?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
So you won't go to Vista because "you enjoy a certain degree of control", but you *would* buy a Mac ?
The thing is, this is showing the affect of Vista on this person. They dislike it so much they just want something non-Microsoft.
What do you think Vista is going to stop you doing ?
Maybe they feel that using Vista is getting them further entrenched into Microsoft's vision and not necessarily their own idea proper of what they want to do with their computer. They j
Re: (Score:2)
Journal (Score:3, Interesting)
http://slashdot.org/~twitter/journal/177855 [slashdot.org]
Shame it's not updated for SP1, contains links to lists of links of things that are out of date (e.g. iPod problems), has silly claims, contains inaccurate/biased 'studies' like this [slashdot.org] highly scientific study of five games (highly debunked in the comments).
For what it's worth, I'd highly recommend that Vista users install SP1.
Vista SP1 Helped Me (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Your SDK argument doesn't wash - microsoft moved the goalposts and somehow this is the developers fault? I personally know of several APIs that simply behave differently on Vista.. and a program which adheres 100% to the documentation will likely fail if it uses them.
SP1 craps out peoples computers and it's their own fault.. I've heard that from MS fanboys with every update and it's *rea
Penn State is not the University of Pennsylvania (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Penn State is not the University of Pennsylvani (Score:3, Insightful)
The Slashdot Trifecta (Score:5, Funny)
2 It's a post from Twitter.
3 It got the green light from kdawson.
Does anyone actually use Vista? (Score:2)
Vista rocks. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
All the crying and moaning is just MS bashing. Vista works just fine on both my machines.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Does anyone actually use Vista? (Score:5, Interesting)
I used it from pre-launch until a few months ago.
1. Recursive file copy is broken - it'll copy a few files then crap out without an error.
2. Network file copy is broken - it has a max transfer rate of 2k/sec on a gigabit network (XP on the same hardware can saturate it).
3. Network settings worked for a couple of months then broke, giving 'permission denied' for every screen so you couldn't even tell if the cable was plugged in.
4. It would just reboot, randomly, with no warning. On known good hardware with 100% WHQL drivers.
5. The base OS uses 700mb minimum. On a 1.5GB machine that leaves too little for a decent development environment, so the whole thing slowed to a crawl with both the prefetch *and* swapping to disk driving the hard disk to distraction.
6. The DNS handling is utterly broken - if you try to connect to a local machine more often than not it'd pick something random on the internet and try to connect to that. You have to use FQDN all the time otherwise it's a major security problem (vista is currently banned at our company for precisely this reason).
7. On a laptop it fails to impress. Because it's hitting the hard drive 24/7 the battery life is less than 1/3 of what XP can manage on the same hardware.
8. Sometimes it would just forget its users... literally forgot they existed. You had to boot into safe mode and recover.
Those are the ones I can think of off the top of my head.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Evidence please!!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Horrible recommendation (Score:3, Interesting)
I wonder if by this you mean that they are ignorant enough to recommend against a service pack that, on the four systems I've installed on, works great and improves any troubles I've had with Vista. I still wonder just how few of the people who call Vista "deeply flawed" have actually tried it (my guess is four).
Re: (Score:2)
What they should be recommending is that users check the list of known incompatibilities and then, if they don't see any conflicts in that list, that they go ahead and update.
Remember that they're talking about machines outside of their own control.. mainly student machines and possibly some faculty/staff personal machines.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I installed the Ultimate version of Vista, but one of the biggest things that I can't understand is it's 10GB installation footprint. It really bothers me that the base installation is bloated. I really wish that I could turn off and uninstall a lot of features that I know that I won't use on my workstation. For example, let's get rid of Media Center. I don't have a tuner card installed, so I won't watch TV. I don't watch DVDs on my computer, that's what my entertainment center is for. I don't need x. Don't need y. Why won't you let me remove them?! I want to be able to have just in case I want to use them, but please! I want to have a little bit greater control than you're giving me!
Re: (Score:2)
Wait a sec. (Score:5, Interesting)
Uh, not Penn State (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Well, that is, unless you don't drink coffee. I can go to the lab, type in my U/P, hit log in, go grab a coffee and the paper, and be back just in time for the desktop to pop up.
We have seen this, before, right? (Score:2, Funny)
Why didn't they just call it "Windows ME, the next generation"?
Vista critism from MS advocates (Score:2)
Codeproject is a stong MS technology site funded by MS themseleves. One of the founding members has voiced his critisim of the OS and said that he would rather use a Mac than Vista.
huh? (Score:2)
Vista is it the new Microsoft Bob ? (Score:5, Informative)
I'm advising my clients to ignore Vista (Score:3, Insightful)
This is great! (Score:2)
Wait for the next patch of the patch? (Score:2)
I'm getting a kick out of these replies (Score:3, Informative)
Saying "don't install this the day it comes out" is officially not news, okay? We've got plenty of custom research and buisiness systems all over the university, and getting everything to work is a bitch. I'm sure ISC will recommend installing it later after they are done testing all their systems.
Slow news day I guess?
Slashdot mods, do us all a favour (Score:4, Insightful)
Twitter is a troll, Eris too. They both shamelessly bash Microsoft, and especially Vista at all costs, with lies or heavily distorted facts like a raving madman foaming at the mouth, blindly screaming murder.
They represent the absolute worst of FOSS people - complete fanatics motivated by pure hatred of Microsoft, and with zero professional intent.
They are the biggest advert on this site to stay well away from FOSS as much as possible, and in my opinion do more damage to the FOSS reputation than anything else.
Re:woot (Score:4, Interesting)
For that matter, why is the CIO magazine article even included in the summary? Did Twitter just scour the internet for anti-Vista articles and throw them all into one stupid Slashdot submission?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In most companies we deal with even upgrading to 2003 or XP is considered a risk, and only done on noncritical machines run in parallel with the critical ones.
In Nov 06 you're talking about the RC I presume - the one that wouldn't run anything useful without falling over... in production? I wish I had the balls to try that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:woot (Score:5, Informative)
Except for say UAC, all the DRM and the fact that the thing runs slower on more powerful hardware then XP?
It employs many design concepts from *Nix that weren't present in 9X so in a way it is very similar to Unix. Now granted there are only a finite way of solving problems present in Windows 9X so making it more Unix like is one of the ways to make it more secure.
2000 probably won't run on the same hardware that 95 ran on, so yes they don't need what they can't run.
It is, it is basically Windows 2K with a shiny theme on it much like how Vista is like XP with a bunch of crap thrown on it and a shiny GUI.
A bit off topic, but I can't help replying to such blatant lies.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
VMS, surely?
Re: (Score:2)
NT 3.1 was actually quite good. Stable as a rock. NT 3.5 wasn't bad either. NT4 it started to go downhill. 2000 started out a trainwreck and ended up quite good after enough service packs and fixes... as did XP (only took them 2 (arguably) or 3 service packs to do it too).
Vista is still at the trainwreck stage, but at least SP1 takes it out of beta.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been using Vista since October, and, where stuff is moved around, and a little different, it is NOT Satan personified. Turn of UAC, use Google Desktop instead of Windows Sidebar, Firefox instead of IE, and it's been very stable.
No. You shouldn't upgrade your old hardware. But, if it's new hardware, it will run j
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It's funny you should mention that.
TCP/IP over firewire support? Gone. [microsoft.com]
APIs for useful Explorer customisation? Gone. [sourceforge.net] (That extension, which I found infinitely useful, not only doesn't work but has no hope of ever working thanks to an API change).
I'm sure I would have found more stuff I liked that they took out, but at this point I formatted my laptop and installed XP SP2. I actually didn't mind the UAC and other stuff people complain about (and it a
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Alright -- this is the last straw!
If this site is going to accept journal entries from twitter as articles for the main page, why don't we just stop bothering with this moderation BS and pretending to be an unbiased site? It's not as if we haven't discussed this topic 100 times already..
Re:woot (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The unbiased site would have:
1 a seperate section for the family of operating systems to be found on 92% of the world's desktops and with a very significant presence in the server room and other markets.
Operating System Market Share for February, 2008 [hitslink.com]
2 it would dispose of the stained glass window and Borg icons which set the tone for every posting
3 it would accept that Vista is showing sustained and health
Re:I'm running vista business and I'm happy (Score:4, Insightful)
For a dev machine running that combination even on XP I wouldn't go with less than 2GB... given Vista's memory footprint you'd probably want 4GB for that.
btw. Have they fixed JIT in 2008 (is that out of beta yet?). Certainly on VS2003 and VS2005 UAC simply hoses any attempt at debugging, because it blocks it.
Also btw. this is *nothing* like the early days of XP. In those days only the devs hated it because of its stupid interface and they way they moved everything around. Now you've got ordinary non-technical people literally calling their techie friends and begging them to install XP on their new machines because nothing works.
Re: (Score:2)
Cheers!