Making Free Phone Calls With Google's GrandCentral 144
andrewmin writes with an enthusiastic pitch for Google's closed-beta call-aggregation service called GrandCentral, for which we non-beta-testers can at least reserve a number. Specifically, he's using GrandCentral in combination with Gizmo5 to make free VoiP calls. Excerpted: "Most of the time, I'm at my computer. Or near it. And if I had an internet device like a Nokia N810 or an iPod Touch, I'd have it with me 24/7. And since most of the time I'm at a place where there's a WiFi network, it makes sense for me to use VoIP rather than a regular phone line. ... I'm talking about making and receiving calls that are completely free (that is, $0.00/minute) forever (that is, no 30-day demo) for as much as you want (that is, no 30-day trial or five hour/week limit)."
knowing google... (Score:1)
a soft 3rd part voice interrupts your conversation "this is Ads by Google: for free unlimited hosting please see http://..../ [....]"
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
"This is Ads by Google: Is your parents' basement becoming a bit to cramped for you and your Star Wars memorabilia collection? Do you long for companionship in your life? Do you wan't to experience this sex thing people keep talking about? Visit Russian Milf Dating dot com now!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Have any spare DC 6150 [lortondata.com] tapes lying around?
Not available outside the US ... (Score:3, Interesting)
So much for 95% of the world ...
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Step 2: Offer free telephone call service not available outside <FOREIGN COUNTRY>
Step 3: ???
Step 4: PROFIT!!
Re: (Score:2)
Funny is the Gizmo mentioned in story... I remember I was supporting Gizmo big time (since OSS/standard based) and advertising them to everyone until... Some genius suit there decided to offer Free real phone calls BUT made a huge list of countries you can't call saying something like "Big fraud happening i
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Step 1 - warn it's not funny
Step 2 - ???
Step 3 - PROFIT!!!1!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>This is not completely accurate. I am in Canada and I had gotten a Grand Central number. Maybe it is for US and Canada only
GrandCentral Requirements [google.com]:
"At this time GrandCentral is only available in the U.S."
also you need a blasted invite (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You can't get an area code that's local to Canada. I looked it up. Kanuckistan isn't exactly 3rd world. Also, you're in violation of their TOS. Why not just grab a copy of iCall (to talk to phones) or Eyeball Chat?
Re:Not available outside the US ... (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't go to Japanese sites expecting freebies from Japanese companies for my American ass.
If it is in Google's interest to offer this product/service to <insert your country>, they will.
It's like the Japanese video game market. A ton of crap gets dumped in the Japanese market, because most of the companies are a) in Japan, b) it's cheaper and easier to test a new game in a local market - before potentially pissing away money on a failure.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I thought it was because they couldn't be 'bothered' doing the translation, & didn't really value anyone else's opinion anyway.
Perhaps that sums up the (USof) American problem too.
I want to know how this relates to android. Live WiFi to GSM handoff anyone? cough from da good ol US of A?
Re: (Score:2)
Google's interest doesn't worth shit. When I hear "VOIP over PC", Skype comes to my foreigner mind. A client which supports my language, offers me to select real numbers all over the planet, even my Nokia E65 phone connects to their network over 3G/WLAN/GPRS via third party client. When you do anything regarding voice over IP, you will be compared to Skype.
So, Google offers free number but blocks ever
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I only count 45 states and the District and Columbia on their reserve page..
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Could you imagine, Hey this is my new number that will be able to contact me anywhere I am at, you just have to call california at 10-15 cents a minute or more. but you can reach me at that number.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
By 2020 it won't matter. Everyone will have a wireless palmtop that connects to the local mesh|lillypad network for internet/phone/video calls/etc.
You can already do that with a lappy - it's just a question of shrinking it down more, and getting more people to "donate" their unused bandwidth to the mesh.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If I remember right, it was originally assigned when your call went to more then one operator board or crossed lines onto another network. For some reason, they kept it around when they became monopolies and went to c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty much every service provider has either unlimited nights/weekends or virtually unlimited. (For example, AT&T's lowest voice plan gives you "only" 5000 night/weekend minutes instead of unlimited.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That $20-$60 per month is money you're already paying, so your choice is between POTS+broadband or VoIP+broadband. For VoIP, I'm currently paying $35 per year plus $0.019 per minute for outb
Re: (Score:2)
Also, your already paying about $250 a year for your VoIP without adding your inet service. Think about it. You stated 1000 minutes a month at 1.9 cents ($0.019). That come out t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Some of the rest of the world already has free VoIP, though. For instance, ~50% of French households have broaband, and the typical monthly fee of 30 bucks includes free VoIP (and numeric TV).
Not only that, but the calls are free when calling no less than about 50 countries, US included. With some providers, you can can connect to your number through SIP from basically anywhere and place calls for free. Wish I had that here in Canada, where I get charged long distance whenever I call out of city limits.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As far as non-US the Grandcentral business model will _NOT_ work outside US. It works due to the vagaries of the US mobile market. In the US called per
Innovation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Damn it! (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Damn it! (Score:5, Funny)
PEnnsylvania 6-5000. And get off my lawn.
+1 funny (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
or reseserve (589)793-2385
VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyway, Grand Central may be a replacement for a land-line phone, but I think Andrew is being a bit optimistic about the adequacy of using it as a "mobile" phone.
Exactly (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? (Score:4, Informative)
1. Give GrandCentral all your phone numbers (Home, Cell, Work, etc.)
2. Tell GrandCentral when you will be around each phone
3. Tell all your contacts you have a new phone number, and give them your GrandCentral one
4a. Someone calls at a time which you told GrandCentral you would be at work, so your work phone rings.
4b. Someone calls when you're on your lunch break, out of the office, and your cell phone rings.
4c. Someone calls when you're at home, and both your cell phone and land-line ring.
4... Repeat for whatever configuration you have set up.
From TFA:
All your calls through a single number. Add your other numbers to your GrandCentral account and then make your own rules for how and when your phones ring.
All your voicemails in one place, saved for as long as you want. If you don't answer a GrandCentral call, your callers will be sent to your GrandCentral voicemail. You can then check messages by calling your GrandCentral number, by logging into your account, or by checking the GrandCentral notification email.
Handy features that work the same way across all your phones:
*ListenIn as callers leave you a message
* Record calls on the fly so you never have to fumble for a pen again
* Switch phones mid-call without your caller knowing
* Block annoying callers at will
* Record custom greetings for different caller or groups of callers
Later in TFA:
Also this:
Sorry for so many quotes, but if people won't look at the website they're commenting on, perhaps they'll read this...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You missed one of the slickest features of GrandCentral, one which is not highly advertised...
Let's say you have your Work, Mobile and Home numbers registered with GrandCentral.
You receive a call to your GrandCentral number, which rings in your office at 4:50pm, and you need to catch the train down the road at 5:30, and it's a 20-minute walk.
You accept the call in your office, have your conversation, then TRANSPARENTLY switch the call to your cellphone, continue talking there, without ever dropping th
Re:VoIP+WiFi=mobile phone? (Score:5, Informative)
Not only VoIP, but any real-time application is useless on nearly all current implementations of 802.x due to two major reseason:
* Response time is too high irrespective of bandwidth. Lag is not acceptable in situations where you can't buffer. Your YouTube playback will not suffer because even a tiny buffer can eliminate the problem, but you can't buffer RT applications.
* Most importantly, the concept of QoS, while theoretically feasible on 802.x, is completely absent from the current implementation. I have heard but I'm yet to see a real Wifi device with QoS. Without QoS, VoIP sucks.
And then, there is also the issue of enhanced emergency services compliance, or what's in US called E911. In Australia where I live, most VoIP providers either completely block calling '000' (our emergency service number) or require you to submit a physical address for your static IP and REMAIN in that location.
To sum it all up, if you're holding your breath for VoIP on Wifi, dream on. I've tested various VoIP clients (from the top of the market Siemens and Snom IP phones with Wifi to softphones like Counter path, etc) using various VoIP servers (Asterisk, Cisco, Nortel, etc.) using various UDP protocols (SIP, AIX2, H.323, Skinny etc.) and it DOESN'T WORK(TM).
Until we have full end-to-end QoS support on wireless networks, or something like WiMAX which promises to drastically lower response time and lag, VoIP on wireless will remain a toy for geeks to play with and nothing more.
Re: (Score:2)
hard phone (Score:2)
FreeWorldDialup, Asterisk and IPKall (Score:3, Informative)
It works great with any VOIP SW or HW or Asterisk for a fancy home answering machine.
If you need the POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) world to call you, http://www.ipkall.com/ [ipkall.com] will give you a free Washington phone nuumber.
Re:FreeWorldDialup, Asterisk and IPKall (Score:5, Funny)
That just doesn't have the same feeling of excitement as getting up at 2am in the pouring rain, going to a telephone booth with a 555 timer chip and piezo, making freaking calls with your computer next to you plugged into the 12V socket of your car, then posting abusive messages anonymously on your favourite BBS. And all for free, man!
Nokia n810 grandcentral and gizmo5 (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Reserve a number? (Score:1)
Only Free?!? PAY US for info harvested from calls! (Score:2)
so can it (very likely) continue to earn even more, eg, automatically listening-in on our future phone conversations - using well-developed voice-to-text technologies - to gather valuable information from them.
Perhaps we should be -paid- for each use of Google's "free" VoIP service, ie, if/when it is unfolded before us... more as harves
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Right now there is no advertising on the website or inserted into your calls.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Please qualify the statement... (Score:2)
Specifically, he's using GrandCentral in combination with Gizmo5 to make free VoiP calls
He's making free phone calls to the USA. I am pretty sure he cannot call Benin or Nepal free of charge. That is the nature of the industry. Once this Google product is out, free calls will not be to every device that can receive them all over the world. Free calls will be to USA and Canada.
By the way, can anyone tell me what determines the cost of an international call? My provider (Sprint Canada) charges an average of 49 cents/min for a call to Asia though you can use some of the many pre-paid phone car
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
One thing to be aware of is the prepaid cards are generally given the lowest quality of service routes. The phone company already has your money, so it doesn't really care whether the call goes through or not. If you are placing the call on a billable basis then the phone company doesn't get any money if the call doesn't go through.
Re: (Score:1)
By the way, can anyone tell me what determines the cost of an international call? My provider (Sprint Canada) charges an average of 49 cents/min for a call to Asia though you can use some of the many pre-paid phone cards and make a call at about 7 cents/min to the same destination.
It's pretty messed up. My wife calls back home to Spain all the time on her ATT cell phone (from the US). If she calls a land line it's like 2 cents a minute. If she calls a cell phone it's nearly 50 cents a minute. WTF??? I get pissed when she calls someone's cell for obvious reasons!
Re: (Score:2)
The voice says "you have 110 mintes" and 8 minutes later, it says "you do not have enough credit for this call".
I am not sure why the telephone regulator has not done something about this, but I suspect corruption might have a bearing on it.
In other cases, notice that an unactivated phone card is worth about $0.005, while an activated one is worth $5. If you wanted a convenient waay to launder money, perhaps you should consider carrying
calls not free to landlines (Score:1)
"Users NEW to the All Calls Free plan get 20 minutes of free calling simply by getting ONE friend to sign up for a new Gizmo account. There are no commitments and no hidden fees."
http://gizmo5.com/pc/network/mobile-or-landline-calls/ [gizmo5.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
skype (Score:1)
just my $3
EPIC is coming... (Score:2)
Anyone read "The Religion War?" (Score:2, Interesting)
Another one?!? (Score:2)
IPKall (Score:2)
To -make- calls, if you have no other option, the GrandCentral web system (http://m.grandcentral.com/) is a bit clunky, but OK for residents of FreedomLand.
(I signed u
So ummm... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
why bother? (Score:2)
My wife and I share a family plan and we get plenty of minutes, and they roll over which is a big help because we don't have to have a plan that allows for that one month when we have higher than normal usage.
I guess some people are on the phone constantly and have to buy a prohibitively expensive plan? But are we talking 5000 minutes or what? Business folk who are on the phone
what I love about grand central. (Score:2)
voice mail in your email, selectable ring-ins.
I love grand central.
Works well with "My Circle" plans as well... (Score:2)
GrandCentral will still tell you who's calling, of ocurse...
One place for ALL msgs (Score:1)
The time savings is great. Add that I get messages sooner that way too.
Finally, unlike the article's comment, it was just a few hours from when I reserved a number (in a more useful calling area for me) to when I was included in the beta (how sweet is that?)
It will be interesting to see what their revenue model is after beta...
Re: (Score:2)
No, thanks! I prefer to pay xebba.com for privacy (Score:1)
Flash? (Score:2)
Or do I need to have Flash on my phone?
Re: (Score:1)
free calls... who cares? (Score:2)
I think GrandCentral needs to do a lot more to appeal to people. Right now, its model is that you give out its number to everybody and it then connects to your devices. I think that model is too rigid. They should offer different services (voice mail, forwarding, parallel forwarding, voice response, VoIP, etc.) and let the users decide how to connect those services to each other and to phone numbers.
A
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, GC has lots of features, but they are bundled in a way that makes them useless to me and most other people.
I know because I have a GC account and I'm not using it.
My Options Are Disappearing (Score:2)
It's getting more and more difficult to be "out of touch", and I'm pretty sure I don't like it. Once upon a time, you could avoid somebody for a while without being flat-out rude to them.
Now we can't even use expense as a reason not to be at everybody's beck and call. I guess I'll just have to amend my message to say something like, "Dave only collects voice mail once a day, and it looks like you already missed today's check-in. Sorry."
More to my taste would be something like, "Fuck off, I'm busy",
Gizmo? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bollocks, I say. Skype works and has the same sorts of limitations as calling overseas (call quality sucks for that regularly!).
Re: (Score:2)
I also try to use a soft phone over my school's wireless occasionally -and I can
Re: (Score:2)