German Bundeswehr Recruiting Hackers 156
bad_alloc writes "Heise.de tells us about the German Bundeswehr's idea of recruiting hackers in order to 'penetrate, manipulate and damage hostile networks.' (Note: The following passage has been translated from German into English: 'The Regiment is stationed in Rheinbach, near Bonn, and consists of several dozen graduates from Bundeswehr universities. They're training at the moment, but the 'hackers in uniforms' are supposed to be operational by next year. This regiment officially belongs to the "Kommando Strategische Aufklärung" (strategic reconnaissance) and is commanded by Brigadier General Friedrich Wilhelm Kriesel. The Bundeswehr has not said anything to this regiment yet.' You can find the full article in German."
Just asking. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I wouldn't buy a parser from you (Score:5, Funny)
So I'm not the only one who read that as Budweiser!
Incidentally Hacker [wikipedia.org] is a brewery.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So I'm not the only one who read that as Budweiser!
Just what I was thinking. Free beer and Euro-babes. Sign me up!
Re: (Score:2)
Using unnecessarily pretentious language (such as calling the German army "The Bundeswehr" instead of just saying "German army") is always a bad idea. On Slashdot it's positively dangerous!
Is this really news? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Is this really news? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Is this really news? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a matter of opinion as to whether USAF uniforms are "spiffy". Some of us think they look like bus drivers...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Would you want to be the commander of that unit?
airman 1: Is my helmet on straight?
airman 2: When do we get those female robots the recruiters promised us?
airman 3: Where are the Doritos and Red Bull? These MREs really suck...
Re: (Score:1)
LOL! Beautiful! I bow(*) to you, sir!
The bow of Das Boat of course! ;)
Re: (Score:1)
Since they are hackers, they probably get T-shirts with some text on it, like "All your base are belong to us!"
Re: (Score:2)
I read your email?
http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/unisex/frustrations/31fb/ [thinkgeek.com]
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
"There are plenty of nuclear powers already, so I don't understand why it is news Iran may be trying to build nuclear weapons." :P
In English (Score:3, Informative)
very informative! (Score:5, Funny)
"And even if the cyber attack on Estonia in retrospect, not as a "war" browsed meanwhile shall any State which is a substantial electronic IT infrastructure operates, potential threats posed by cyber attacks seriously."
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The rest of the article is rather uniformative though..
(emphasize by me)
Well, it's about military, so uniforms shouldn't be a surprise ...
IT Work (Score:5, Interesting)
The first sentence of TFA says that "not only will it do the security of IT systems but also carry out..."
Why does everyone focus immediately on the "black hat" side of the story, and neglect that the group is supposed to do BOTH sides, which in some ways, is a good aspect of ANY security team... just hopefully, your security team follows ethics.
And I imagine that the Bundeswehr is going to follow ethics as well, "no hacking friendly networks......... overtly".
Re: (Score:1)
Same reason why exorcists are taboo topic regarding the church
Actually... (Score:2)
Actually, the constitutional safeguards still work in Germany, so it will likely be more like "no hacking anyone else's networks ever, unless we've already properly declared war and the bureaucracy is done approving the paperwork." (At which point the war is probably over anyway.)
Wait what? (Score:2)
Re:Wait what? (Score:5, Insightful)
Exactly when has the "Bundestrojaner" been actually used without authorization? No, seriously, I'm curious now.
And how's it any worse than, say, the USA? You can find plenty of cases where the FBI planted a trojan or a keylogger on a _suspect's_ computer, which is all that the "Bundestrojaner" is supposed to do. The difference is that in Germany there has been a whole debate about it and it's been shot down on constitutional and privacy grounds repeatedly, while in the USA nobody even bothered wondering much about it.
Let me repeat: the "Bundestrojaner" is supposed to only be used with a court mandate, only for a limited time, and only on the computers of people suspected of terror activities and the like. Plus a court is supposed to establish (as per the german supreme court decision) that the use does not pose any danger to a person's other rights, among which their freedom. It'll be interesting to see if they can use it at all then, but at any rate you can't use it, say, to intimidate your opponents.
But seriously, how's that any worse than what the rest of the world already does? It seems to me like the USA just shipped such suspects to Gitmo for some waterboarding. I'll take a court-approved keylogger instead if I'm ever suspected of anything, thank you very much.
And then you have cases like the NSA spying on its citizens without any court approval or legal mandate.
Basically if you think that a law which sets clear limits is actually worse than no law, well, you're naive.
Re: (Score:2)
The Bundeswehr Tornado Bomber is usually only used with a mandate as well and yet these things flew recon missions during the G8 summit. So what? Let's just agree that this kind of publicly funded technology isn't always used according to it's dedicated purpose.
It's not any worse than in other countries
Re: (Score:2)
So basically you're proposing that the civil servants in Germany are so much better than those in the USA, that they can actually keep something like that a secret if it actually happened?
At any rate, you're asking me to believe... what? That something happened although you have absolutely no evidence, nor even wild claims of it?
Re: (Score:2)
German Beamtenschaft is actually a technocratic class of its own. They are not just employees of the government.
The funny thing in the US is that people really do hate administration and still they have fat administration, their federalism is a mess, etc.
"So basically you're proposing that the civil servants in Germany are so much better than those in the USA, that they can actually keep something like that a secret if it actually happened?"
Yes, but they possibly wouldn't do it in the first place.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.searchsecurity.de/themenbereiche/bedrohungen/viren-wuermer-trojaner/articles/107236 [searchsecurity.de]
http://octo.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/sammelsurium-der-grausamkeiten-aus-allen-lander-polizeigesetzen/ [wordpress.com]
http://octo.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/bundesregierung-legt-einsatz-von-trojanern-beim-voip-abhoren-nahe/ [wordpress.com]
These are just a few that I found quickly Scroogling for it. Please excuse my lack of diversity in sources but I don't have that much time and you can f
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't hear Andrej Holm complain except that his wife made a agitprop case of it.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't hear Andrej Holm complain except that his wife made a agitprop case of it.
Excuse me, the last thing you do if two words you've used in a scientific paper brought you constant surveillance and months of imprisonment is to give the people who still think you are a terrorist any reason to want so "silence" you even more. I would guess he keeps back with that because every word he says in his own defence would be interpreted as a terrorists denial.
Re: (Score:2)
I would not buy into that propaganda.
He is no simple scientist.
Re: (Score:2)
I would not buy into that propaganda.
He is no simple scientist.
And even if he is a left-wing activist so what? The accusations made against him and the other alleged members of the "mg - Militante Gruppe" were arson charges on vehicles. That justifies total surveillance and remand even though there is no apparent connection between the alleged arson and him? At least that is what is communicated about the case. You don't hear much from the government side of things, they're probably too embarrassed to even admit to the proceedings. I, for one, have never heard an offic
Re: (Score:2)
The law does state clear limits on the usage of the Bundestrojaner, but those don't mean squat if the courts just rubber stamp requests from law enforcement.
Which is exactly what is happening with phone wiretaps in Germany right now. A court request for a phone wiretap is basically a simple form with a line that says "check here to authorize" and that's it.
Unsurprisingly, Germany is the country with the most wiretaps per capita in the EU by a very large margin.
In fairness, I should add that the requirement
Re: (Score:2)
The "Federal Trojan" is a political troll.
What the whole debate revealed was that the inner security agencies were apparently unable so far to hack computers to get information.
Re: (Score:2)
``just hopefully, your security team follows ethics''
Which, of course, isn't unique to security teams.
Re: (Score:2)
Why does everyone focus immediately on the "black hat" side of the story, and neglect that the group is supposed to do BOTH sides, which in some ways, is a good aspect of ANY security team... just hopefully, your security team follows ethics.
Because in general, the military is not exactly known for it's humanitarian altruistic approach. Most military define security by going into the enemies home and screwing them there.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Why does everyone focus immediately on the "black hat" side of the story, and neglect that the group is supposed to do BOTH sides, which in some ways, is a good aspect of ANY security team... just hopefully, your security team follows ethics.
Because in general, the military is not exactly known for it's humanitarian altruistic approach. Most military define security by going into the enemies home and screwing them there.
Which is why the majority of soldiers in the "Democratic" Republic of Congo has AIDS.
I hope our German friends have better security than that.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sweet... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
The Bundeswehr is german military.
Did all you beer and football confused people not pay attention in school, or was the second world war only lightly touched upon?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Except during WWII the German armed forces were known as the Wehrmacht, not Bundeswehr.
Re: (Score:2)
You're not going to find many references to the Bundeswehr in histories of World War II. You're more likelly to hear about the Wehrmacht.
Re: (Score:2)
German Bundeswehr Recruiting Hackers (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
No, this is Germany. They're more likely to drink Budweiser Budvar [wikipedia.org] :)
Oh god (Score:1)
Finally... my chance to escape the MAFIAA! (Score:2)
Where do I sign up? Can we keep it quiet?
Good times for security professionals (Score:2)
Not that it will be really difficult keeping these pople out, but many networks have not been attacked because of lack of an attacker. One more group that fills the role and increases the need for working defenses. Incidentially, bad times for Microsoft as well and generally for systems without competent administrators. But then, a competent administrator was allways and likely will allways be a requirement for professional computing. C
Important issue missing in TFA (Score:2)
If I sign, will they give me that cool german helmet?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Do you want the Stahlhelm [wikipedia.org] or the Pickelhaube [wikipedia.org]?
Beer company wants hackers? (Score:2)
German Bundeswehr's idea of recruiting hackers in order to 'penetrate, manipulate and damage
You get the 'penetrate, manipulate and damage' with Budweiser or any beer, but why hackers only? Carnage for all I say!
English version of article. (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.heise-online.co.uk/news/Report-claims-German-armed-forces-setting-up-cyberwar-unit--/112595
Translation (by native speaker) (Score:1)
The "Bundeswehr" (german military arm) is currently in the process of building a "cyberwar unit", which does not only protect it's own infrastructure from attacks, but also conducts reconnaissance and manipulation operations on foreign computers, respectively in foreign networks. According to information from "der Spiegel" (a german weekly newspaper), the unit consists of a couple of dozen computer science degree holders barracked in Rheinbach close to Bonn. Currently the "hackers in uniform" are still trai
this doesn't bode well for freelancers (Score:2)
the best hackers are still freelancers. Is hacking going to become an act of war in the future?
If that's the case, the freelancers are going to send us all back to the dark ages.
They won't stand for cyber-terrorism by the world's armies.
Where do I sign? (Score:2)
Ok, I can crack a WEP network in under 30 minutes, does that make me qualified?
If you get your own "Das Keyboard" in the Bundeswehr -- I'm all for it.
And what about police, WTU, Interpol? (Score:2)
We do need a protection of our websites and services, but not by a small secret army unit.
What we need is training the civil police in every country, in every city, in every village all over the world to take care of vandals, extortionists, etc. by an organized international effort. With the participation of the programmers' community.
Instead they invent
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:5, Funny)
what with this being an english site and all.
This being slashdot and all, nobody would actually read the article anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
"This being slashdot and all, nobody would actually read the article anyway."
It's easier, in this case, to just wait for Godwin to show up.
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:5, Insightful)
... it would be nice if you could post a link to a full article in English, what with this being an english site and all. No, babelfish doesn't count.
Yes, we should ignore all foreign articles until they've been officially translated, even tho' translation tools are adequate to give you the gist of an article
I mean - it's not like there's any Germans who read Slashdot & will translate in the comments or anything is it?
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:5, Funny)
Jaja, aber Kartoffelbrei, ich bin mit der Fernsehturm verheiraten. I can fix it for you! Super hero acht klar!
Dieses hax0rs wollen siene gelÃck zu hax0r nicht-unsere aber others netwÃrk getesten. Jemand wollen SS uniformen zugaben before entlich der communist volk probieren sind!
Or well, maybe I leave it to the native germans after all.
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:5, Informative)
I'll give it a shot. The page this article is from (heise.de) is probably the closest to a german ./ there is. The original article that is referred to in this text was published in the Spiegel (Translation: mirror), a well-known german magazine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Spiegel [wikipedia.org]
The Bundeswehr is said to set up a "Cyberwar unit", which won't only protect the (army's or Germany's, not explicitly stated) own IT-infrastructure but is also supposed to carry out reconnaissance or manipulation "in opposing networks". ./ article) and is led by the Brigade General (whatever rank that is)Friedrich Wilhelm Kriesel. There haven't been any comments from the Bundeswehr regarding this report. According to the Basic Constitutional Law the German army is not allowed to carry out any functions/missions in the inland (meant is that they may not carry out police or secret service work, etc.... within germany) but there have been plans to abolish that restriction for quite some time.
According to information of the Spiegel, the troup is made out of a few dozen computer science alumni of the Bundeswehr's universities.
According to the Hamburg-based news magazine the "hackers in uniform" are still in training at the moment but should be fully ready next year.
The top secret (har har) unit is supposedly under the command of the "Kommando Strategische AufklÃrung" (like they said in the
While experts are still debating wether a term like Cyberwar is correct since there are neither killings nor injuries in such a war, there seems to be an agreement that the defense against such threats should be one of the duties of a nation's army. And even if the Cyberattack on Estland wasn't termed a "War" afterwards it's true that every state that runs a substantial IT-infrastructure is taking potential threats of cyberattacks seriously.
Americans mangling up random german words never fail to amuse me ;)
Re: (Score:2)
mod grandpappy up puhleeeeeezzzzee!
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
If it's a major, huge, timely event, sure, fine. If it's some minor story about, okay, bundeswehr (who are they? why do I care?) recruiting hackers (because no other company/military/whatever the hell they are does that, clearly), then either translate it before submitting or wait for some English news source to pick it up.
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:5, Informative)
bundeswehr (who are they? why do I care?)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundeswehr [wikipedia.org] In short, the German army/navy/air force/etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Great, now why wasn't any of this information in the story? :)
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, yes, we all should google things we don't know. But it's not really common knowledge--I just asked 5 intelligent, educated people, and none of them had any idea. But hey, now you can feel even more superior!
And was there really any reason not to say "German military"?
Re: (Score:2)
Bundeswehr is an established word which describes German armed forces. It is used in many languages not only german. And this word is in Oxford dictionary too.
It is similar to Sputnik, for example. Not that uncommon for any language to use foreigh words, you now...
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes, we should ignore all foreign articles until they've been officially translated, ...
And it's not as if this is specifically an English-language site anyway, is it? I mean, look at the URL -- ".org". Not ".us", ".uk", ".au" or anything nation- or language- specific. The URL clearly indicates that it's supposed to be a pan-national site.
(Yes, I know what the FAQ says. The URL sends a stronger and more direct message than the FAQ, however.)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And .us would also not mean English-language as the the US has no official language.
And Hawaiian is an official language in the state of Hawaii.
Re: (Score:1)
(Yes, I know what the FAQ says. The URL sends a stronger and more direct message than the FAQ, however.)
It's not as if 'US-centric' necessarily means English only. Other languages are spoken there.
Manually translated (Score:4, Informative)
All links are leading to German pages. No guarantees on the accuracy of the translation, especially the military terms.
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:4, Funny)
Yes, we should ignore all foreign articles until they've been officially translated, even tho' translation tools are adequate to give you the gist of an article
Quite. After all this being the Internet, it's not like it interconnects any networks all over the planet, or if /. had been around for any amount of time and had drawn English speaking people from all kinds of places.
So let's stick to articles from the US or (very occasionally) Air Strip 1. After all all other people must hate freedom as shown by their willingness of living outside of the US (and speaking funny languages with weird characters that aren't even proper ASCII).
I mean - it's not like there's any Germans who read Slashdot & will translate in the comments or anything is it?
Now that's just crazy talk.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Perhaps you could post a link to an English version of the article instead of just complaining that somebody else didn't?
No?
Perhaps you should just keep your whining to yourself then.
P.S. If you don't like Babelfish, vielleicht sollst du Deutsch lernen.
Re: (Score:2)
No?
Yes [heise-online.co.uk].
Re:That's great and all, but... (Score:4, Funny)
Vieleicht solltest Du auch erst einmal deutsch lernen ...
Are we going to get faulty spelling flames in German now?
Re: (Score:1)
... it would be nice if you could post a link to a full article in English, what with this being an english site and all. No, babelfish doesn't count.
Can't read the German one? Bad luck, Bro.
Re: (Score:2)
Trilingual.
What do you call someone who speaks two languages?
Bilingual.
What do you call someone who speaks one language?
American.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Why? Who here's gonna notice?
Re: (Score:2)
It's the German army. I don't think it's that difficult to figure it out from context for English readers, but I speak German so I'm probably not the best person to make that judgment.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Timmy, great article, by the way. 99% of your readers have no idea what it's about.
Only 1% of Slashdot readers know how to use Google translate?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's the German Army.
Now I'll yield the floor for Godwin.
Re: (Score:2)
It's the German Army.
Now I'll yield the floor for Godwin.
Grandparent was as ignorant as a Nazi.. ;)
Jokes aside though, one of the things the Germans learned from WWII was not to have an army only consisting of professional soldiers, who live in their own bubble and are shielded from contact with the 'normal' people (e.g. simply by just living in army bases). That way it is much easier to control them and give them orders normal people would not follow so blindly.
The current Bundeswehr consists of people being drafted from the normal population.
Re: (Score:2)
The current Bundeswehr consists of people being drafted from the normal population.
(Emphasis mine)
I would certainly contest that. The Draftees, for the most part, are a nice enough crowd, but God help us should we ever have to engage in a full-scale military operation against a traditional armed force. The median IQ on the "executional" level is not exactly stunning, to say the least.
The Bundeswehr has quite a history of misplacing vehicles and weapons on their own exercise areas, and I had the questionable pleasure of experiencing first-hand how prone to getting lost even with maps and
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
So, this is the WindowSS division ? Do their caps Death Head's have their skulls replaced with computers displaying the Blue Screen of Death ?
Oh, I can smell the burning karma... at least I hope it's just karma.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundeswehr [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
being proud of you own ignorance sure makes you look like a hero!
Re: (Score:1)
Ahh, the German Bundeswehr. Of course! I was wondering what those guys were up to.
Who or what is the German Bundeswehr and why should I care?
Jeez, guys, nobody ever saw a WWII movie?
Timmy, great article, by the way. 99% of your readers have no idea what it's about.
It's not the fault of the poster, that you are all illiterate, and do exchange czech beer manufacturers (Budweiser) with one your few remaining allies, who's ass is still on line in your f**ked up war in Afganisthan. (Bundeswehr)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Jeez, guys, nobody ever saw a WWII movie?
You haven't, apparently. Otherwise you'd know that it was the Wehrmacht back then, the Bundeswehr came to existence only a decade after the war.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Because everyone knows what is US navy or USAF ... You should care because US has just managed to pull whole world into financial crisis, so we would appreciate if you look a bit further then inside of your borders.
Re: (Score:2)
Reichswehr
Wehrmacht
Bundeswehr / Nationale Volksarmee
Bundeswehr
Armed Forces. Means literally "Federal Defense"
Re: (Score:1)
You are in a war. There's that enemy airplane approaching you. You know that your armation will not survive the attack, so your only chance to survive is to shoot that plane. However, your weapons are defunct due to some computer problem. There's currently no "special circumstances" staff there. However there's s