School System Considers Jamming Students' Phones 785
An anonymous reader writes "The St. Ansgar, Iowa school system is considering buying cell-phone jamming equipment for up to $5000 if it is deemed legal. The use of the equipment would be suspended in the case of an emergency, but one has to wonder if they would be quick enough to shut it down should an emergency arise. 'A Federal Communications Commission notice issued in 2005 says the sale and use of transmitters that jam cellular or personal communications services is unlawful.'"
back in my day (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah? That's nothing! Wait til Encino Man figures out how to type and then sign up on slashdot. Then he'll be telling you about how everyone used to accidentally light entire forests on fire to signal time for dinner, and tell long winded grunting stories about waiting around the cave fire for one of them to mutate and evolve.
Re:back in my day (Score:4, Interesting)
In my day, we didn't have emergencies in school. I graduated before Columbine. Back then if someone made you mad, you just beat the shit out of them instead of shooting up the whole school. I saw stuff like a jock stealing a nerd's backpack in the lunchroom, and then the nerd smacking the jock in the head with a metal chair repeatedly until he was down and taking back the backpack. The lunch monitor didn't even flinch. No one gave such fights a second thought; not teachers, not parents, and not students.
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Funny)
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Insightful)
I graduated before Columbine.....the nerd smacking the jock in the head with a metal chair repeatedly until he was down....The lunch monitor didn't even flinch.
Lessons learnt: you can get away with just about anything (e.g. beating someone around the head with a metal implement!!) if you think it is justified, if you are going to nick something make sure you leave the victim in no fit state to come after you and you can save money by sacking the "lunch monitors". All excellent preparation for entry into a civilized society.
Makes you wonder how Columbine could possibly have happened doesn't it?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Funny)
In my day we didn't have screenshots.
You just had to take people's word for things...or risk getting beaten over the head with a chair.
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Interesting)
Still, this is a simple solution. Kids don't need cell-phones in class. If there's an emergency, the principal can inform the student involved. So, block cell-phones.
However, active transmitters are illegal - And there are valid reasons for that. So use passive blockers. The cost is probably a little higher, but the result is the same. And you're not tangling with the FCC. Our local movie theater does it (although they built it in during construction, lowering the installation price).
Heck, call installing chicken-wire a "make-work" program and you may get a chunk of the stimulus $$.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe I don't know, the fact that they block things other than just cell phone signals might be an issue?
Sheesh. People don't seem to understand that.
Give it another 20 years and the social stigma of cellphones should go away and we should see less of shit like people complaining that a cellphone can be used anywhere, etc.
It's currently about the same level as the people who say they want the government to keep their hands off of medicare (a conundrum in and of itself)
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:back in my day (Score:4, Insightful)
So are vocal chords, but we don't "block" those. We teach the kids how to use them properly in a learning environment, and punish them accordingly if they don't.
("Talk out of turn again, and you'll be here for detention")
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Funny)
Aw Christ... a chorus of crazy characters might use a corps of vocal cords to sing a chronicle of chromatic chords, but it's still spelled vocal "cords", not "chords".
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I see both spellings.
I do, too, but that is only because grandparent spelled it correctly and great-grandparent spelled it incorrectly.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Insightful)
So how did we manage to raise our children safely, much less survive, for the last 100k+ years without them?!
Oh wait, when I was in school (before cellphones), my parents could come pick me up from school just fine. Telling me before the fact really didn't matter, and still doesn't. (I love people who really need to call you and tell you that they are on their way, then call you and tell you that they're there, and then come and knock on your damn door). The rest of your examples are pretty weak proof for the need to have always on access to your children (poor kids!). How often will I need to call my kids in the case of a terrorist attack? Wait... Your chances of being involved in a terrorist attack is less than your chances of being struck by lightening.
The convenience isn't worth the price, especially if we're going to use terrorism as an excuse (yet again).
As for:
"You left your homework home again, I'll meet you after 3rd period to drop it off - last time (right) I'm doing this"
So, your going to disrupt a whole class of 20-30 children for this?
One of my professors in college would drop you a grade-point every time you disrupted the class with a phone call. It was actually a very popular program.
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Informative)
It's the texting that's the big issue. My wife teaches middle-school math, and she is constantly interrupting her classes to tell her students to put their not-allowed-on-campus phones away.
30 years ago, it was passing notes in class. Now it's texting. 30 years from now it'll brain-melding in class or something...
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Insightful)
You're right, and you're wrong.
You're right, in that there is NO cure for boring Teachers (Bueller? Anyone?).
However, your wrong if you have ADDITIONAL distractions available. I don't care how "interesting" things are especially if some girl is texting naked pictures of herself to her boyfriend.
On a scale of "interesting", the most entertaining and engaging teacher cannot compete with all sorts of other "interesting" options.
There is NO need for a cell phone in a K-12 classroom. Especially when you consider that every classroom HAS a phone in it! NONE!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Give it another 20 years and the social stigma of cellphones should go away and we should see less of shit like people complaining that a cellphone can be used anywhere, etc.
I don't see it is a meaningless "social stigma". Using a cell-phone in a learning environment can be seen more as "causing a distraction". Most schools frown on you wearing headphones in class, or talking to your neighbors during inappropriate times, cellphones are no different. They are devices that make annoying noises at inappropr
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That's a terrible idea. What if the call coming in is "Your father just had a heart attack and we're rushing him to the hospital"? Not to mention the problem of being unable to call 911 in an emergency, the problem of first responders suddenly being unable to go to movies or restaurants, etc. There are very good reasons why jammers are illegal. They aren't the right solution. The right solution is to
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Blocking cell phones is the issue. The government and in fact most governments around the world, defined those frequency spaces as being an asset that could be sold, and that asset passed through all spaces ie. a government mandated seizure of the active use of those frequencies within all spaces public and private.
That sold clear access to that frequencies and the right to transmit into other peoples domains regardless of their preferences.
So jamming that frequency within your premises means you are s
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Why doesn't anyone realize that they'd be banning teachers from using cell phones as well? I know not all teachers use cell phones, but a lot do, and I doubt they'd be amused that they're suddenly unable to use a cell phone during the portion of the day when the cell phone is most useful (i.e. when they're not at home).
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Workers can't use personal phones to do personal things instead of working.
Somehow I'm not sad.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
A teacher shouldn't be required to walk off the property just to make a quick personal call, especially since a teacher's "break" is usually just a few minutes and they have other things to do as well.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No... my wife's a stay-at-home mom, and I'm a programmer. I can take (or make) as many personal calls as I want to. But I don't, because that's what IM is for ;)
Anyway, no active jammer is going to jam just inside the walls, it's going to have a range that extends outside the walls of the school, and probably significantly so.
If they're being forced to walk halfway across the soccer field to make a call, you may as well call it "off the property".
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Most classrooms do NOT have phones. You have no idea what you are talking about. Teachers use phones in the office to call parents not to make personal phone calls that be overheard by everyone..
Teachers have every right to use a cell phone on their break.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
What the fuck is the point of arguing over this?
People live in different areas with different schools, the classrooms of which may or may not contain telephones.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
In most local school districts teachers are no more permitted to use cell phones in class than students. Sure, it would be a minor inconvenience when they have a break, but their classrooms and offices likely already have phones in them.
The problem with this is that most teachers I know (I used to date one) practically live in their classrooms... they are always there, between breaks, during "off hours", during lunch, and before and after class. There's no reason they shouldn't be able to use their phones
Re:back in my day (Score:4, Insightful)
Great!
Your movie theater will burn to the ground when it catches fire because the FD will not enter a building where there are known radio problems.
RF is a vital link, and thinking that cellphones are the only thing that uses the link is stupid at best.
Just get the teachers to TAKE AWAY THE DAMNED PHONE if there's an issue.
Re:back in my day (Score:4, Insightful)
the FD will not enter a building where there are known radio problems>
Where did you get this "fact"?
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Informative)
a lot of emergency management agencies are moving up to 800 mhz systems
from the great wiki:
# 806-824 MHz: Public safety and commercial 2-way (formerly TV channels 70-72)
# 824-851 MHz: Cellular A & B franchises, terminal (mobile phone) (formerly TV channels 73-77)
# 851-869 MHz: Public safety and commercial 2-way (formerly TV channels 77-80)
# 869-896 MHz: Cellular A & B franchises, base station (formerly TV channels 80-83)
it'd be very hard to filter out 824-851 and 869-896, at least passively, while still allowing the public safety frequencies to remain in use.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Second, even if we are talking about out-of-school family emergencies, the principal has no right to know the situation.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It's unrealistic to say to a class, "Students, use your cell phones' web browsers to research the February Revolution" when not all students are going to have cell phones with web data plans. I know mine sure doesn't. It's more equal to either go to the library or get a mobile computer lab.
Also, not all kids who have technology are brilliant students who are only going to use it for research or other related activities. I knew this one kid who brought his laptop into school and would be playing World of War
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Disclaimer: I used my graphing calculator for porn... BOOBS....
Re:back in my day (Score:4, Insightful)
I went to an all boys Catholic High School [holycrosshs.org]. Graduated in 1999. We were not allowed to use cell phones or beepers. Most infractions involved beepers at the time. The single payphone and 2 vending machines on the school were off limits from first period to dismissal.Naturally some people just didn't get caught, and those of us in honors calsses or sports were usually given a little bit of leeway if we didn't abuse it. I was one of the people that could have gotten away with a beeper shaped buldge in my pocket, but I would not have attempted it if I could afford such a luxury.
In the end, I'm glad for these restrictions on my freedom. I'm a liberterian, and tended to always lean that way, but until graduating high school one should be denied a certain level of freedom and personhood.
Now, dresscodes on the other hand made me not give a crap about how I look. I was more concerned with following the rules than how I looked. Therefore I tend to be one of the worst dressed in a "business casual" envirorment.
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Insightful)
Thank you for foisting your ill-behaved little offspring on the rest of the world. If you had taught your children how to operate in a polite society, then society wouldn't be looking at a way to enforce good behaviour.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Interesting)
We also used suspensions and expulsions to deal with those that broke rules such as not bringing certain items onto school property.
But these days the kids have turned the table on us. Now dropping out is so common that schools can not regulate the children as the schools are under pressure to keep kids from dropping out.
In order to turn things around we need to get rid of the G.E.D. and let kids know that if they drop out they will live in poverty and follow that up by demonstrating that we are more than willing to toss kids out of school.
That may sound cruel but it could stop the current loss of lives and futures that now are consequences of a broken educational system.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:back in my day (Score:4, Interesting)
In all fairness, you probably represent far less than 1% off all outcomes of students that drop out. Yeah, I know a guy too that dropped out as a freshman in high school, bought a fake ID (in his name with an older age), got a G.E.D, and then attended community college. Very bright and successful guy. He just could not put up with the bullshit in high school and wanted to go straight to the more advanced stuff. That and college girls put out.
You are the SECOND person in my whole life that sounds like a success story of a dropout with a G.E.D. I have been forced to interact with far more people with a G.E.D, that are quite frankly, making tremendous achievements just tying their shoes in the morning.
So, although I will agree with you that dropping out does not guarantee failure, it has a much higher likelihood of failure than you seem to be indicating.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Mine is self sufficiency. I don't care if you are part of the middle class, have a moderate amount of credit card debt, and the latest and greatest shiny toys either. To me, a farmer that is feeding him and his family while making enough to purchase the supplies that he needs, is a success story too.
Living on welfare, or basically being subsidized by the rest of us tax payers, is NEVER a success story. It's me (and others) basically dragg
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
[Needs Citation]
Here you go. [howstuffworks.com]
Calling someone a liar makes you the asshole. Just so you know.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Interesting)
You have no idea the growing levitation power of the new, modern, helicopter parent. They would scream if you even thought of proposing that maybe, just maybe, the kids should leave the burning building BEFORE calling them. (So they can immediately schedule a meeting with the principal and teacher about the lack of fireproofing in the school, and how it affects their childs chances of getting into a good college) For once, think of the parents, not the children. If they can't reach/see their children every minute of every day, then obviously, child molesters are trying to kidnap them...
the last few years, I have started feeling very, very sorry for teachers..
Re:back in my day (Score:5, Interesting)
You are partially joking in your response, but you are more correct than, perhaps, you even realize.
I've been a public school teacher at a high school for 4 years now, and to be honest, cell phones are an utter nightmare. The cheating of students using texting to get answers is rampant, well beyond anything that, as teachers, we were never warned about. Students have become masters of texting "under the table", and it has gotten bad enough that I now feel the need to make 12 different versions of a test for the 6 classes I teach a day - versions A and B for each period. I know that if I don't, by the end of 1st period, all of my students in periods 2-7 will have the questions (and answers) by the time I get to them. The "rookie" teachers who haven't learned that realize it awfully quick when the grade distributions go steeply upwards by the end of the day. Even then, with the prevalence of iPhones and Blackberry phones, cheating is becoming even more widespread since students can easily websurf to the answers for test questions. I have to hawk around my room constantly looking for phones under desks. It's amazing.
As a county, we've tried everything to penalize the use of cell phones, to no avail. We've tried detentions (students never serve them), we've tried suspensions ("Oh, a day that I don't have to go to school, great!"), no deterrents worked.
Then we tried getting "tougher". We tried to take the cell phone away from the student until the end of the school day. That lasted about 2 weeks, until we were told we couldn't do that any longer because a parent decided to get a jazzy lawyer and sue the district. They, apparently, were convinced that we were endangering their student by taking away their ability to call for help in an emergency. Rather than fight it out in court (and risk losing, as these things tend to go), the county settled and changed the policy. Now, supposedly, the plan is to confiscate the battery, but let the student keep the phone. Of course, students now carry spare batteries, so it doesn't matter.
We were the school a few years back that had the lockdown that made CNN news, when a deputy sheriff and his police dog were both shot and killed less than 2000 feet from our school. It was a massive manhunt that made national news. We were locked down for about 9 hours, with about (literally) 200 police with assault rifles and body armor, with armored vehicles, and eventually they bussed us out of the school under very heavy armed guard. During that time, the cell phones became a fiasco. Every student with a phone was calling their parents, and every parent was coming to the school to try and get their darling children out, despite the reality that a gunman with 2 automatics who had already killed a cop was anywhere around. The police were stretched thin trying to keep the roadblocks up to keep the idiot parents away. Insanity.
It gets worse then that, of course. I've had cases where I pass back a test at 8am to a 2nd period class, and I get an email from our secretary at 8:30am saying that the students parent called and wants to talk to me about the grade their daughter got on the test. Last year the newest craze was students getting "disposable" cell phones and using them to call in bomb threats to the school. Of course, any time a threat comes in you have to go through the evacuation drill, just in case, and according to our resource officer it can be difficult for them to trace the "disposable" cell phones. Plus, as before, any time some drill does come in, it's only a matter for 15 minutes before a bunch of parents show up ready to check their kids out of school.
I couldn't be happier as a teacher than if they blocked every last cell phone on campus. I don't have a phone in my classroom (very few of us in our high school have one in the room), but we each have intercoms we can use to reach the main office, and we had no communication problems during the dangerous lockdown. I don't need to use a cell phone during the school day, at least not once in the 4 years I've been there.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
we didn't have cell phones. beepers were just starting to appear when i graduated high-school. we never had any problems alerting in the event of an emergency. we had fire alarms, PA system, and ye olde fashioned telephones in every classroom.
Me too, but to be fair, by the time we got to high school, over 70% of my classmates had been killed by fires, cholera, and indian raids. Cell phones would have really helped alert us as to the dangers so we could circle the wagons.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh good argumentation! (Score:4, Funny)
The logical conclusion is that school shootings cause cell phones.
Use of transmitters.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If it's legal? (Score:4, Informative)
I'll help them:
It isn't.
What if.... (Score:5, Interesting)
What if instead of jamming phones, the school put up their own cell antena. They could work with the other local providers to tweek the handoff rules such that phones in side the school are significantly more likely to stay on the school's tower.
Once you have all of those phones on the school's tower it would be simple to shut down texting and internet access while still allowing access to 911 and emergency numbers listed in the student's records.
Sure, it'll cost more than $5000 to get up and maintain, but it is much more likely to pass muster.
Personally though, I'm all for the confiscate and return rule. It's cheaper AND it reinforces lessons in personal responsibility.
-Rick
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Good luck with that.
Re: (Score:2)
Many (perhaps most) things that are made illegal are made so for ethical reasons, so yes...
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm one of those "what the fuck does a kid need a cell phone for?" people, but I'm also one of those "as long as they're not whipping it out in class and turn the ringer off, who the fuck cares?" people.
You don't need a signal jammer to keep kids from using their phones during class. You just need a teacher to tell them not to do it and follow through on consequences for using phones in class. Seems simple enough to me. I can, however, see the appeal of a cell jammer from the administration's point of view.
Re:If it's legal? (Score:5, Informative)
No idea why I'm humoring an AC who thinks that such claims are outrageous, all of these are real, and recent examples:
Is that the kind of evidence you're looking for? Are you a teacher in self-righteous denial?
I might be too old... (Score:5, Insightful)
I obviously didn't RTA, but what a waste of money... (if not the possible consequences)
Re:I might be too old... (Score:5, Insightful)
But what happened to good ol' telling them not to use their mobiles, and if they -do- use it, apply punishment?
A crapload of lawsuits against the schools happened.
When I was a senior in high school, a student started physically assaulting one of the teachers. The teacher didn't fight back because he had been instructed, as the entire faculty had been, to not do so as the school would face a lawsuit if a teacher injured a student.
I noticed that as I went from Kindergarten to a Senior in High School the teachers seemed to become less aggressive. They no longer bellowed "sit down and do your work" but asked you politely to "stay on task, everyone".
I was glad I got out before things became any more passive-aggressive.
Re:I might be too old... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:I might be too old... (Score:4, Interesting)
There was a recent incident in here in the UK where a teacher had come back to school after recovering from a stroke and wasn't quite back to normal. The kids noticed this and in the class they started singing "I'm looking at the psycho in the mirror" (to the tune of the similarly named MJ song). He demanded they stop, the lead kid swore at him in return.
What happened then? The teacher bashed the student over the head with a metal weight, dragged the student into a supply room where he almost beat the student to death before he was dragged off by a load of students.
The surprising thing was the reaction. There was very little pity for the student in question and huge amounts of support for the teacher (who's now on attempted murder charges).
Re:I might be too old... (Score:4, Informative)
A crapload of lawsuits against the schools happened.
Citation? A friend of mine is a teacher, he says a phone ringing in class is very common these days, some of the kids even do it deliberately to look cool. He is allowed to (and does) confiscate the phones. He usually returns it at the end of the lesson, or if it's a repeat offender or some kid being smart at the end of the day. No phone for a day = not cool. The kids quickly learn to turn them off.
Of course, it is possible that in some countries confiscating phones is actually not allowed...
Re:I might be too old... (Score:5, Informative)
My father-in-law is a Jr. High School teacher, so I can tell you some of the restraints that are on the teachers.
They are not allowed to discipline students. (I am not talking physical discipline here. Teachers are not to scold a student for bad behaviour. At most they can send them to the principle's office, which means the kids gets out of class that day.)
If a teacher gives a student a bad grade, they are often yelled at by a parent, claiming that if the teacher has it in for the child, sometimes even calling the teacher racist. (That happened to my father-in-law.)
Teachers are not allowed to confiscate knives, cell-phones, distracting toys or video games without being accused of stealing, but make sure each student pays attention.
Teachers are given conflicting instructions on teaching. (leave no child behind, but teach to the highest level. Don't teach just so they pass tests, but you need to cram 1.5 years of test stuff plus the stuff beyond the tests into 9 months.)
Oh, and by the way, we are cutting salary again because we don't have the budget, but we need to attract the best and brightest teachers.
While we are at it, we know that you have been teaching students for 10 years and have some of the highest test scores in the state, but this charter school that has only 3 students per class has a new method of teaching so we want you to start using it in your class of 35.
If the teacher can't keep the class in line, sometimes it is because they are not allowed to, not because they can't be bothered.
With the way teachers are treated these days, I would never recommend a teaching profession to anyone.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Amen to everything you said!
I teach in an "inner city" high school with a minority rate of somewhere around 65% or so. By definition of the vocabulary word, I myself would be qualified as a minority when I walk on campus.
If I try to punish all of my students for infractions like cell phone usage, cheating, disruptive behavior, etc, it is a statistical certainty that a majority of students thus affected will be a "minority". Still, I have been called a racist by parents at least three times over the last 4 y
Unlawful, probably (Score:5, Interesting)
Whether the FCC allows such things overall, though, is quite another issue.
In before... (Score:5, Funny)
In before completely unrealistic, hypothetical scenario involving an off-work doctor who is out on his unicycle, when someone gets their second cellphone stuck in their throat, and would have been saved if it hadn't been for the phone-jamming equipment in operation at a nearby school.
Re: (Score:2)
In before completely unrealistic, hypothetical scenario involving an off-work doctor who is out on his unicycle, when someone gets their second cellphone stuck in their throat, and would have been saved if it hadn't been for the phone-jamming equipment in operation at a nearby school.
That's pretty far-fetched. A doctor having his phone on when he's off-work? How realistic is that?
Jam? (Score:5, Funny)
What kind? Blackberry?
emergency/911 calls? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Authority Figures (Score:2)
It's unfortunate that teachers have ceased to be considered authority figures.
Why should they muck around with jamming when they can just confiscate the phones when they are being used in violation of school policy and then returned at the end of the day, as has been done for countless other disruptive devices (before the wussification of America and the rise of the helicopter parent)?
Re: (Score:2)
before the wussification of America
We used to call it pussification. Looks like they got to you, too.
Re:Authority Figures (Score:4, Interesting)
Students know that the teacher can not do anything to them, and that in some cases the parents don't care if they misbehave in school, or misbehave at all. So they do not respect authority figures.
It is one think to not respect authority when your rights are being violated, it is another thing to not respect authority when other people around you are trying to learn.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You are doing it wrong! (Score:2)
Whatever happened with the classic scenario of the teacher saying: "If you don't put away that fucking cell phone during class, I'll confiscate it and you can get it after school again!" ??
These people obviously fail to see that social problems can't be solved with technology. They can be solved with education. (Ask a school, oh wait..).
And yes, it's illegal too..
Active jamming is illegal in the US (Score:3, Informative)
First off - yes, this is very illegal which is why you don't see the use of active jamming equipment in the US. If they want to instead build a Faraday cage around the entire campus, this would be the "legal" - though prohibitively expensive - way of getting around the issue.
If in fact they attempt this, and staff or a student have a bona-fide medical emergency and are unable to summon emergency services, this district will then be tasked for paying for a home nurse to wipe the drool off of said victim's face for the rest of their lives.
You would think those who work in education would, you know, educate themselves on the relevant laws and ramifications of actions... nahhh, this is the US public school system we're talking about here.
It's not that complicated... (Score:3, Interesting)
If the phone is seen or heard anytime during school hours, it's taken away, and the parent can come claim it. Parents will get sick of having to do that pretty quick, and the students will learn what happens if they use them during school. In our school district, each school can make the specific rules regarding cell phones, and this is generally how they handle the issue. The best part is, the policy is free to implement and only affects a small minority of phones (the offenders) in an emergency situation.
How about... (Score:2)
Faraday shield (Score:2)
Of course that can cost millions of dollars for a school building. But I heard of a theater that put one in while it was constructing the building (it's a lot cheaper then).
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Tin foil is even cheaper. And it looks really cool and quasi-futuristic.
Can't Do It In Prisons (Score:2)
a slippery slope, best stop this nice and quick (Score:3, Insightful)
Jamming cell phones is a slippery slope and I think we (as a society) would be just as well off to put a stop to this right here.
There is of course the fact that jamming a cell phone for almost any reason is quite illegal. But let's set that aside.
As has often been mentioned- the idea that the jammer would be shut off in an emergency is absurd. If there's a 'big' emergency nobody will remember to turn it off (assuming anybody knows how to), and for 'little' emergencies (as someone else said, girl getting raped in the locker room) this would create a serious problem. Plus which a jammer, being an RF emitter, doesn't immediately stop jamming when you walk thru the school doors. It will either be overpowered, and reduce or degrade service around the school, or underpowered leading to kids just sitting next to the window so their phones will work.
These problems arise anytime you talk about cell phone jamming, and there is no solution. Cell networks are encrypted, so you can't block only non-emergency calls. And no carrier is going to be the first one to step up and help block their customers, it's just not in anybody's best interest.
This is a societal problem, not a technical one, and it requires a societal fix. If people are yakking on their phone in the movie theater, the solution isn't a jammer, the solution is to get people to not be rude assholes.
As for the school, if they can't get kids to pay attention in class maybe the problem is that their lesson plan is boring and the teacher couldn't care less if the kids are interested or not. Or perhaps their problem is that the faculty doesn't demand student respect, so students ignore the rules.
As a previous poster said- just take away the phone or battery of any kid that is using it in class and give it back to him at the end of the day. If he does it again make his parent come in and get it.
Put simply, this school has a discipline problem and needs better teachers or better administration. It does not have a technical problem, so a technical solution won't help them.
Bad solution (Score:2)
I guess I sound somewhat "get off my lawn"-is
the solution is simple (sort of): (Score:2)
not jamming, but traffic shaping
something dramatically different than technologically that simply fills an rf frequency with white noise or pink noise. it could simply monitor all calls for geolocation by triangulation or gps and time code, overlaid with blueprints. geographically and temporally refined: let it be used outside, but not inside, 2 meters away, along a straight line. allow a phone to be used during lunch time in the cafeteria, but then not during study hall an hour later, all the while the lib
SO Stupid (Score:2)
1: It's illegal
2: What's to stop kiddies from skyping, iming, etc. over wifi?
Not so bad (Score:4, Funny)
So what's the problem? (Score:3, Insightful)
All they need are the usual restrictions for movie theaters. Tell students that carrying a cell phone is fine, but ringing has to be off while in class, and texting in class is a no-no. That's enough to keep cell phones from interfering with the school's educational mission. Beyond that, as a Government body, the school has no business interfering.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Because we all know that kids never violate school rules...
Re:WTF? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:WTF? (Score:5, Insightful)
Students should be -encouraged- to collaborate because the real world is built on collaboration and research.
Yes, because I'm sure the problem is that students are just *dying* to collaborate over their cell phones, and those nasty teachers are too backwards to understand it. :rollseyes:
Sorry buddy, this is the kind of thing that's being communicated between students during times when they should be working:
"OMG did u c wat ashleys waring 2day???"
"OMG I no wat a hore!"
"LOL!!!"
Re: (Score:2)
Only if they are retarded enough to think that their voice cannot be heard without it going through a phone first.
With the exception of a phone that has some sort of panic button, I don't think a phone would be much more use than a calculator in that or similar scenarios. Screaming/yelling, kicking/biting, etc would be much more effective, than 15 seconds to dial, wait for someone to answer, then wait for whoever answers to decide if it's a joke or not, and then if they act upon it, how long it takes them t
what school would that be? (Score:2)
Oh I can't dial 911 as my phones jammed, let me just ask the nearest teacher to go to the principal to find the technician to switch it off.
Because of course most schools wouldn't have regular phones anywhere in the building. I'm sure that teacher that you found to go ask the principal wouldn't have been able to find a phone to dial from, either.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Calling 911 will not prevent the rape anways.
I'd just ban cell phone use if I were a principal/school admin. Get caught using it during school hours for non-emergencies.. phone gets confiscated til the end of the week and you get a detention. Hel
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Because this would make it so the school district would actually have to put a technical person on their payroll.
From what I gather 1) school districts tend to not want techs of any sort on the payroll and 2) most school districts don't have the money for techs anyway.
I am not on the inside of any school district so I might be wrong, but it seems that most schools have a strong bias against techs for whatever reason. Again though this is just my impression.
Re: (Score:2)
Really, they should be -encouraging- the use of cell phones because that is how the real world is. It is pointless to have more "get a sheet of questions
Re:Wow--The Original Texting (Score:2)
Like passing notes -- the original method of texting?
Re: (Score:2)
And the problem being that the old-fashioned "...track down the person..." mechanism, as inefficient as it was, due to being obsolete is now near impossible. The assumptions of the past have changed and are no longer compatible with the assumptions of the present.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Regardless of whether or not it should be illegal to confiscate items, the fact is that schools have basically the same rights as your parents. So yes, they have every right to search you if that's considered necessary and they can confiscate anything they want.
I personally think that they should only be able to confiscate the battery when it comes to cellphones, because taking a phone is a violation of privacy IMO. (Especially if you're nosing around in the texts or pictures stored on it... but you could,
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
My problem with your number 2: teaching is not entertainment, and there will always be devices that are more interesting and attention-grabbing in the short term for most of the students than whatever is being taught. Sometimes, there is a certain amount of drudge in learning, and if teachers were such stellar entertainers that they could make sentence-diagramming, long division, and basic biology more interesting than the girl you have a crush on and keep texting, they'd be making hundreds of thousands of