Twitter Testing Facebook-Like Profile Wall

Mightee writes "Twitter is experimenting with a Facebook-Like message wall to its users' profile pages, that will allow twitter users to send '@ replies or mentions' directly from their profile. The change is apparently coming in order to enhance conversation between tweeters. According to Official Twitter Spokeswoman: 'Twitter is testing the feature with a small percentage of users. It was designed to "make it easier for users to engage with each other" on the microblogging service.'"

So ...

[WrongSizeGlass]

Twits are going to tweet something and see if it sticks to the wall?

Twitter Testing Facebook-Like Profile Wall

[omar.sahal]

a Facebook-Like message wall

Doesn't mean a thing to me, I use twitter!

"Understandability to Interact"

[retroworks]

According to the article: "The understandability to interact has always been an issue on Twitter for new users — this hopefully will solve the problem."

Well, there you go. Couldn't have said it any better.

Convergent evolution

[Arancaytar]

Apparently, Twitter and Google have decided that in order to beat Facebook they must become Facebook.

I hope that they stop short of imitating its attitude to user privacy.

Easier User-to-User Communication?

[Anonymous Coward]

This could have saved Anthony Wiener a lot of trouble.

Don't link to a re-blog...

[Anubis IV]

...when the original source [mashable.com] is available and doesn't contain grammatical wonders such as the following (emphasis mine):

...infact making “mentioning of users in tweets” more easier for new users.

One more

[wrencherd]

From TFA:

The understandability to interact has always been an issue on Twitter for new users

Ummm . . . yes, "the understandability to interact" . . . that is an issue . . . ???

The Big Three Social Networks

[The O Rly Factor]

The big three social networks are quickly getting themselves into a war over control of personal information. One can only hope that once the dust clears from the social network wars we are quickly barrelling towards that there will have been no survivors. I really hope we will look back upon this period of internet history afterwards and say to ourselves "Well, turns out you can't trust advertising companies with personal data...what the hell were we thinking?"

Who actually uses Twtter.com though??

[brunes69]

Twitter is not like facebook. The incredible majority of Tweets are not sent and recieved via Twitter.com, they are done via standalone apps.

I am a pretty heavy twitter user, but unless they are somehow going to implement this "wall" in API form and allow my SilverBird extension to access it, I will never even know it exists.

Re:

[dakameleon]

(1) Twitter.com is the biggest single client for interaction with Twitter: http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/15/report-use-of-third-party-twitter-clients-dwindles-to-42-percent/ [techcrunch.com]

(2) It's not a "wall" in the sense that TFS/TFA makes it out to be, it's just a quick way to do an @reply to the user whose profile you're looking at. Many Twitter clients already have a "reply to this user" button to achieve the same thing.

Move along...

[dakameleon]

It's just a box which fills in the user's @name into your next tweet when you're looking at their profile. It's nothing like the "wall" that Facebook has at the moment.

Why use Twitter in English?

[Baloo Uriza]

Why use Twitter in any language that uses an alphabet (as opposed to a syllabary like Cherokee or ideograms like Japanese and Chinese)? It's barely possible to have a cogent thought in 140 characters, much less have anything resembling intelligent metadata in addition to that.

Re:

[Baloo Uriza]

But it wasn't particularly intelligent or meaningful. So, that doesn't really counter my point at all.