Giant Paper Airplane Takes (Brief) Flight Over Arizona 54
The L.A. Times reports that 12-year-old Arturo Valdenegro's winning entry in a paper-airplane contest got
upscaled to slightly larger dimensions, courtesy of Pima Air & Space Museum's Giant Paper Airplane Project, and flown, via helicopter assistance, in the Arizona desert. Slightly larger, in this case, means the plane based on Valdenegro's designs "was 45 feet long with a 24-foot wingspan and weighed in at a whopping 800 pounds," constructed of a tough, corrugated material called falcon board. Unfortunately, the tow didn't take the plane as high as planned (only 2,703 feet, instead of four or five thousand) so the resulting flight was brief and destructive — which doesn't make the accompanying launch video any less fun to watch, though I wish it showed more of the flight, including its end. (I tend to always make the same kind of acrobatic glider; do you have any good paper-airplane hints?)
What's missing (Score:5, Funny)
is an equally upscaled trebuchet.
Re: (Score:2)
Nonsense. With modern composite materials you could do it.
Yes, a treb made of whatever materials you make an F-18E out of. Shut up, that's why.
Re: (Score:2)
is an equally upscaled trebuchet.
What would you do with such a thing, fling container-ship across the English channel?
I'd I donate to the kickstarter fund.
A decent hint. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:A decent hint. (Score:4, Funny)
omg, i'm such a n00b and fb whore, I tried to thumb up your comment.
Around here it tends to be more of a "single finger" up and it's often applied via an AC comment...
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
As an American Citizen, when it's the right time for us, not when anonymous coward citizens from other nations whine about it. It's not your problem. Deal with it.
Re: (Score:2)
Because you're so good at keeping out of the business of other countries...
Re:As an European citizen... (Score:5, Funny)
Should people who still weigh themselves in stone really argue this on Slashdot?
Re:As an European citizen... (Score:4, Interesting)
I lost interest after the summary. :( Seriously, America, when are you going to use meters and kilograms, again?
Of course, there's always the possibility that the parent AC is really just an American troll trying to stir up trouble, as we spell it "metres" in Britain.
:-)
They *could* be from elsewhere in Europe and using the American spelling when writing in English, but I wouldn't put the likelihood of trolldom past the OP...
Re: (Score:1)
When their educational system fails badly enough that it is finally too much for their youth to remember the random conversion factors. When their students can finally only divide and multiply by ten they will no longer have a choice.
Best paper airplane book ever... (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.amazon.com/Great-International-Paper-Airplane-Book/dp/0671211293 [amazon.com]
The Great International Paper Airplane Book, from 1971.
Re:Best paper airplane book ever... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Mmmm. Hot wings.
Re:Feet, foot, inch? (Score:4, Informative)
You have to make a jump from the tiny centimeter, to the relatively huge meter, with nothing in between to easily reference.
What about the decimeter [wikipedia.org]?
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, no one uses dm, or any unit that isn't a multiple/factor of 1000 other than cm and occasionally cl. Deci, deca, and hecto are defined, but almost never used, so most people who know the metric system won't recognize or understand them.
Re: (Score:1)
What about hectares? These are very commonly used when dealing with land.
Re: (Score:3)
However, we pretty much never use "deca" and "hectoliter" is very rare, though most people know what they are.
Re: (Score:2)
Ergo: speak for yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
The hectare is a bad example because the "are", and consequently the hectare [wikipedia.org], was not accepted as an SI unit. It exists as a legacy measure unit "...whose use was limited to the measurement of land."
Similarly, hectopascal [wikipedia.org] is a modern adaptation of the legacy pressure measurement "millibar". It allows them to continuing using the customary unit of millibar by redefining 1mbar = 1 hPa. In effect, they're still using millibars, they just use a different name now.
As for your other examples, the fact that you ha
Why this trip was modded insightful ? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
There is no worst blind than the one which do not want to see. US using imperial units is the perfect example of that.
You're arguing against someone because they're stuck in the past when you're stuck on an overgeneralization. The metric system is used in the US in a number of places, notably by medical professionals, scientists, and sometimes engineers. There are actually some decent arguments for Fahrenheit over Celsius (2 sig figs gives good human-scale accuracy vs. 3 with Celsius; the 0-100 range is pretty much the human range; neither are absolute anyway). On the whole, Imperial is used far more often, but certainly n
Re:Feet, foot, inch? (Score:4, Informative)
So do Americans find the jump from the tiny cent to the relatively huge dollar inconvenient, then? :)
Seriously, there *is* an intermediate unit (dm), but people usually don't use it because it's not necessary. I'm 1 m 96 cm tall, if I grew 10 cm I would be 2 m 6 cm tall. Dead simple, there's no need for any intermediate unit for everyday use.
It's funny how people not using metric, but imagining what it would be like, always make up strange drawbacks that no one in countries that actually use the system has found.
What could possibly follow? (Score:2)
Best paper plane, IMO (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
That's almost the same plane I made as a kid. Every step was the same except for fold #3, where a flat face is given in the Eagle, mine were pointed. Otherwise it's the same design I grew up with.
Re: (Score:2)
The one in the photo has a straw for a fuselage, but you can make it from paper by folding a long strip of paper into a three-sided prism and taping or gluing it shut. The two ring-shaped wings should be slightly different diameters, and the plane should be launched small ring forward. It is amazingly stable and I could throw it farther than any competing plane in my
My paper airplane site (Score:5, Interesting)
http://hairball.mine.nu/~rwa2/aircraft/ [hairball.mine.nu] (/shameless plug)
Most planes like the one in the article sort of fly like darts, so of course it had a pretty lousy glide slope. They might have done a bit better with a glider design, that might have rode thermals for a while, but it probably would have been harder on the structural design.
My friends and I tried to make paper airplanes out of large poster boards back in high school, but they didn't do too well (one of my "reader's rides" on my site has video of an attempt to make a posterboard version one of my aircraft). Unfortunately, paper airplanes don't scale up very well. The best results I've seen look more like actual conventional glider aircraft that just happened to be built up using ribs and spars made of paper and covered with a light sheet of paper skinning material.
Re: (Score:2)
My favourite is actually nothing like anything you have on your site, but more similar to this one [10paperairplanes.com], only you make it diagonally across the paper so that it (a) has a longer extension at the rear bottom but almost none at the top, which seems to make it more stable somehow and (b) has a larger diameter. I've flown one made from an A3 sheet over a distance of about 60-70m (large lecture theatre) and it is beautifully slow and graceful.
my favorites: (Score:2)
Meh (Score:2)
World Record Plane (Score:3)
It is a variation of the stunt plane I decided was my favourite when I was doing my plane testing in my youth!
http://howto.wired.com/wiki/Fold_Your_Own_Sky_King_Paper_Airplane [wired.com]
Good design :) (Score:2)
I used a very similar design for paper planes myself, except at least on the A4 sheet of paper type, I always folded the pointy tip of the nose back about a centimeter. It improved the balance of the aircraft, made it much more stable, and it would fly much further (and it also made the nose more resilient on landing). This design has a bit of an aft centre-of-gravity if you don't fold the nose back a bit.
The other thing I used to do is to make a little vertical tail in the middle. I don't think that made a
wrong choice of design (Score:2)
I was taught the "basic glider" (according to rwa2 and his website) by a Japanese man who called it a
I like the ring paper airplane (Score:2)
My favorite paper airplane is the ring. [instructables.com]