Gartner Buzzword Tracker Says "Cloud Computing" Still on Hype Wave 84
If you're sick of the term "cloud" to refer to pretty much anything on "the internet" and consider that phrase a symptom of useless MBA, PHB, PowerPoint talking points oozing where they don't belong, sorry — you'll probably have to endure it for a while yet. Nerval's Lobster writes that Gartner's 2012 Hype Cycle of Emerging Technologies says that "Cloud computing" (along with a few other terms, such as "Near Field Communication" and "media tablets") is not just alive but growing.
"Gartner uses the report to monitor the rise, maturity and decline of certain terms and concepts, the better for corporate strategists and planners to predict how things will trend over the next few months or years. As part of the report, Gartner's analysts have built a Hype Cycle which positions technologies on a graph tracing their rise, overexposure, inevitable fall, and eventual rehabilitation as quiet, productive, well-integrated, thoroughly un-buzz-worthy technologies. Right now, Gartner views hybrid cloud computing, Big Data, crowdsourcing, and the 'Internet of Things' as on the rise, while private cloud computing, social analytics and the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) phenomenon are coasting at the Peak of Inflated Expectations."
Buzzword compliance (Score:5, Funny)
Slashdot needs to update their text for buzzword compliance. Instead of "submitting" comments to Slashdot, it should indicate that I'm "syncing comments to the cloud."
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Slashdot needs to update their text for buzzword compliance. Instead of "submitting" comments to Slashdot, it should indicate that I'm "syncing comments to the cloud."
+1 depressing
Re:Buzzword compliance (Score:4, Funny)
for web 2.0 cloud compliance all mods are to be replaced with "like"
Re:Buzzword compliance (Score:5, Funny)
Talk dirty to me (Score:2, Funny)
This would promote synergy in the global open source ecosystem causing upward mobility of natural language and ultimately a paradigm shift.
As an MBA, I'd like to say that you made me cum!
Off to change my shorts.
Re: (Score:3)
As an MBA, I'd like to say that you made me cum!
So, "as an MBA", who's mouth were you cumming in?
Re: (Score:1)
yours
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
May I recommend a new ophthalmologist?
Nerval's Lobster writes that Gartner's 2012 Hype Cycle of Emerging Technologies says that "Cloud computing" (along with a few other terms, such as "Near Field Communication" and "media tablets") is not just alive but growing.
Re: (Score:2)
His name wasn't included initially. Also, he's not a slashdot user, the link for his name goes to his geek.com email address.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
his name goes to his geek.com email address.
Actually.. it's geek.net, ie the company that owns slashdot
http://geek.net/ [geek.net]
Re: (Score:2)
They believe, these new editor folks, in buzzwords. They even know that Gartner is bought and paid for. Yet they'll run this drivel, as Gartner has the fat corporate market by the short-hairs. The juiciest of juice, all dripping, following every sparrow fart Gartner utters. It's somewhat revolting. Ok, really revolting.
In actuality, nothing happens because Gartner believes it will, only by coincidence will a prediction come true. Otherwise, we'd be using OS/2, and using our screen-pop phones from Lucent, he
Re: (Score:2)
"Has Slashdot sunk so low that their submission queue has run dry?"
Slashdot will never run dry. Here's the submission queue:
http://www.fark.com/ [fark.com]
Meta (Score:1)
Gartner Buzzword Tracker Says "Buzzword" Still On Hype Wave
Re: (Score:2)
Gartner Buzzword Tracker Says "Buzzword" Still On Hype Wave
Is a term used in an advertisement descriptive of a specific technology, item or service you can learn more about? If not, it's probably a buzzword.
Is a term used to describe things for which there is no set beginning and no creator or founder? If so, it's probably a buzzword.
It's not perfect, but it seems to me buzzword has a relatively specific (and useful) definition. I suppose we could all say "horseshit" instead of "buzzword," but that might not go over as well at the next all hands meeting...
totally on the cloud (Score:2)
riding chill waves of condensed water
It's a good word... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
I kind of think "The cloud" at least in corporate terms, is entering a second life now. When it first came about, it was a lot of hype and nonsense. And I saw a lot of Execs getting excited about it and moving services to it. Over the years I've seen them realize the pitfalls of the services. Poor support, major security issues, unpredictable downtime relating to hardware issues we have no way of knowing about. But now I've seen it coming into it's own with the execs realizing that it IS good for some things. Your support site? Sure! Even if your whole company goes to shit it's still up. Your billing database? NOOOO...
Our present experience with it - users are hampered by their work. Clouds overloaded and unresponsive. Effectively it's not a hugely useful tool, yet. I suppose it will get better, as soon as someone is making some money at it and competition takes it's work seriously, rather than just being "Me, too!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The alternative term, which I find less fuzzy sounding is 'hosted services'. For me, 'cloud computing' just seems like a term to obfuscate stuff and make marketing people happy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not a consequence of any single technology, except virtualization perhaps. It's more the idea of what becomes possible at the point where you can provision, manage, use, and deprovision a practical computing environment entirely in software.
It's not that the underlying hardware doesn't exist and can't make itself felt through outages o
Re: (Score:2)
in the clown... (Score:3, Funny)
s/cloud/clown
makes reading stories about "clown gaming", "clown storage", and anything else they put in the clown much more interesting.
Re: (Score:3)
Is this a nice, friendly clown? Or a Steven King clown, like IT [wikipedia.org]?
Hmm, an IT angle here. I wonder how far one could write a white paper on the use of Cloud Computing as being a "penny wise" move for the company before someone catches on?
Re: (Score:3)
We all float down here, in the clown.
Anyone remember (Score:5, Insightful)
Way back when if we would just make our apps CORBA compliant they would all magically integrate with no human effort whatsoever? And then XML promised the same?
Now, apparently if we go with cloud computing, the desktops and LANs will magically maintain themselves for no discernible reason, apparently.
Re: (Score:1)
Now, apparently if we go with cloud computing, the desktops and LANs will magically maintain themselves for no discernible reason, apparently.
I don't think any cloud provider has ever promised anything like that. Can you give an example of one?
Re: (Score:1)
So what's your point? Bad magazines make untrue statements? Why should that stop the rest of us from discussing and using the cloud to our advantage?
Re: (Score:2)
True, but it does seem to be part of the hype.
Whenever that sort of thing happens, many ad slicks start growing virtual ellipsis so the pointy haired can fill in the blanks from the hype. But they never actually make such claims in a legally binding sort of way. Often, it isn't the vendor, but the high priced consultant who will set up the vendor's product for you that does this.
Re: (Score:2)
You will always need access devices, true. However, there are a lot of orgs out there running servers who a) don't need a whole server and b) really don't want to run servers. You think your local mechanic shop wants to do anything more complicated than than plug in a laptop and router?
Re: (Score:2)
The point isn't that cloud computing has NO value, just that it's value is more limited than it's hype.
For example, do you REALLY think that the mechanic who just wants to plug in a laptop and a router is going to be able to select and then maintain a service in the cloud? Maintain the local backups in case the cloud provider says 'OOPS!' (while wildly gesticulating at the disclaimers in the contract)? What happens to the business if that DSL connection goes kaput for a few days? Is there at least a limp-a
Hype Wave? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought Wave was dead.
This is Wave 2.0
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Ooooh! Now I understand! It's a paradigm shift!
I can see how you'd think that, but It's actually a discourse related to the cognitive dissonance inherent to the post-modern influx of cultural normativity.
What about digital? (Score:2)
While the cloud irks me, digital just makes me want to choke someone
"you can get this computer generated in both DVD AND DIGITAL!!!"
"now available for digital download!!!"
and on and on and on
And now the "on-premises cloud" (Score:2)
More often called a private cloud (Score:3)
It's not as stupid as it sounds. The goal is to separate the administration of the physical hardware and the applications. The IT admins in the data center just maintain the servers and don't know or care what applications are running on them. The application admins in the office just maintain the application and don't know or care what servers it's running on.
Re: (Score:2)
And everybody tries to pretend it doesn't cost more in the long run.
The Onion (Score:5, Funny)
The Onion seems to share the "hype" assessment:
HP Offers 'That Cloud Thing Everyone Is Talking About' [youtube.com]
Words Mean Something (Score:3, Insightful)
Words mean something; they are shorthand labels that encapsulate concepts, so we don't have to spell everything out all the time.
For example:
Cloud Computing = Running your software and storing your data on a computer that you do not own and cannot control
So instead of boring my listener to death with "My business runs its software and stores its data on a computer we do not own and cannot control", I can simply say, "My business uses cloud computing."
Isn't that so much nicer?
Re: (Score:2)
Here's my problem. I was doing that 20 years ago. I know others were doing it longer ago than that. If that's truly all cloud computing is, then cloud computing is precisely nothing new at all.
IMO, cloud is a real thing, but it entails more than just putting your apps and data on someone else's server.
Re: (Score:1)
Words mean something; they are shorthand labels that encapsulate concepts, so we don't have to spell everything out all the time.
For example:
Cloud Computing = Running your software and storing your data on a computer that you do not own and cannot control
So instead of boring my listener to death with "My business runs its software and stores its data on a computer we do not own and cannot control", I can simply say, "My business uses cloud computing."
Isn't that so much nicer?
I'm sure the first phrase is a lot nicer to you, since it neatly encapsulates your prejudices against the technology. But not everyone is like you, and some people value different things from what you value. How about:
"My business runs its software on a fleet of computers that can grow and shrink automatically, based on CPU load limits that I define"
or
"My business stores its data in a database that is redundant across three data centers, and we didn't have to build or rent buildings all around the world"
For
Re: (Score:1)
If you have a "personal cloud", you actually do, at least least in part, control the computers. From the definition I got from Microsoft Norway, it pretty much just means your server room uses virtual machines in a dynamic way with lots of automation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't that so much nicer?
The major problem is choosing a word that accurately describes the encapsulated concept. The term, "cloud computing" implies something soft and harmless. The more correct term is, "crapshoot computing", because you're gambling with your future.
what about the word "mainframe" (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
It can also mean "a computer under the developer's bed".
To hell with the cloud (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You can choose to install sendmail on a server somewhere yourself, and connect to it using Thunderbird, or you can use Gmail.
You can choose to install MySQL on a server somewhere yourself, and connect to it using phpMyAdmin, or you can use Amazon's RDS.
If you had ever tried, you'd know that sendmail is an absolute bitch to configure properly. Most people don't bother, even those who are technically inclined. MySQL is less painful, but administrating a big database is still a lot of work.
Why you think email
Re: (Score:2)
Irrelevant. You're dependent upon Internet service providers.
I however, can install locally a host of productivity and entertainment software that does not depend upon a service hosted "in the cloud". I do not need a cloud hosted IDE, word processor, a cloud hosted FPS, a cloud hosted storage server, music/video content, compute node, etc. etc.. each with a monthly rent, each vulnerable to external threats. Threats from business shutdown, threats from foreign or domestic attack, threats from rate increas
Re: (Score:1)
Why is this irrelevant? SaaS encompases applications that require Internet access (e.g. email and databases), and applications that haven't traditionally required it (e.g. word processors and storage).
Re: (Score:1)
not really, most of the time you can download a backup or copy (whats the difference?) before your service goes down. unless they are total sociopaths...
Re: (Score:2)
Weather (Score:2)
I don't want clouds! I want sun!
Is the trademark "Sun" free already?
NFC is a buzzword? (Score:2)
Wearable Personal Private Cloud (Score:1)
Is anyone else enjoying the irony here (Score:1)
buzzword (Score:2)
weather (Score:1)