Student Uses Oculus Rift and Kinect To Create Body Swap Illusion 88
kkleiner writes Using an Oculus Rift virtual reality headset, Microsoft Kinect, a camera, and a handful of electrical stimulators, a London student's virtual reality system is showing users what it's like to swap bodies. Looking down, they see someone else's arms and legs; looking out, it's someone else's point of view; and when they move their limbs, the body they see does the same (those electrical stimulators mildly shock muscles to force a friend to mirror the user's movements). It's an imperfect system, but a fascinating example of the power of virtual reality. What else might we use VR systems for? Perhaps they'll prove useful in training or therapeutic situations? Or what about with robots, which would be easier to inhabit and control than another human? The virtual body swap may never fully catch on, but generally, virtual reality will likely prove useful for more than just gaming and entertainment.
Will it let me swap bodies with Miranda Kerr? (Score:5, Funny)
I would never leave the house.
Re: (Score:2)
If you want a sex change and plastic surgery, those are already available.
Re: (Score:1)
isn't everyone on the internet?
Re: (Score:1)
and has been for millions of years: a swift kick to the [bleep]
Re: (Score:1)
Why robots? (Score:1, Flamebait)
Homeless people would be cheaper than robots.
Re: (Score:2)
to expensive. Homeless people need food and a place to sleep. Robots just need electricity at $.10 a KWH.
Why do you think business argue against paying people a livable wage?
Re: (Score:2)
If you have control of the homeless person, why do you need to pay them?
The capital investment for a robot is much higher than a homeless person too.
If the robot is destroyed because you sent it to the front line of a war or cut the wrong wire defusing a bomb, it's an expensive mistake.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
you obviously have never heard the whining of some homeless guy only partially blown up. they can go on and on for days. the "please, can you help me find my arm", "would you mind making a tourniquet for my leg with this diaper'. and then bleeding all over the place.
you pretty much have to find a new route to work for at least a week.
saw a movie sorta about this (Score:2)
Re:saw a movie sorta about this (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Not that I can blame you, but I guess you've all blocked this [wikipedia.org] from your memories.
Re: (Score:2)
Not that I can blame you, but I guess you've all blocked this [wikipedia.org] from your memories.
No, but I wish I could.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Reminds me more of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... [wikipedia.org]
Scientific Curse Dolls! (Score:1)
It's been done before... sort of (Score:5, Informative)
Re:It's been done before... sort of (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, but it's not real science unless someone is wearing a shock collar...
Re: (Score:2)
Hmmm ... it's only science if some of the subjects can shock some of the other subjects without actually knowing who (including themselves) will get shocked.
Otherwise, I think it's just kinky adults, and the goth kids. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Strange Days (Score:3, Insightful)
Wow this is super old news (Score:3, Interesting)
They were using the Oculus rift to look down at genitals of swapped bodies when it first came out fools.
http://gizmodo.com/oculus-rift-lets-you-see-what-it-would-be-like-to-swap-1505973834
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Conversely, maybe we can now take snide, fucking smart-alecks and swap them into the body of a lardass so they can experience the humiliation and despair of being obese, so people like you can have a little more empathy for the human condition.
Meanwhile, every tranny on earth just got serious wood thinking about the potential of this technology.
Re: (Score:1)
Then you might want to show some fucking empathy. No one is going to think you used such harsh language because you used to feel that way about yourself, they're going to think you're just a dumb, judgmental prick.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Also you act like fat people just keep to themselves. They don't. They aren't. They take up 2 seats + seats on airplanes for instance. They also have a fat acceptance movement going on.
if.they have a few pounds on
I'm not talking about a
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
"We have a right to tell other people that they are living unhealthy lives. Because I now pay for it."
No you don't. Just simply, no, you don't.
Do others have the right to tell you that you must always drive the speed limit, for -them-, because they might pay a tiny sliver of the additional risk involved?
In any case, this is all moot. Studies have shown that the public costs for the "healthy" end up being significantly higher than the severely overweight or smokers. Statistically, the latter drop dead of
Re: (Score:2)
You acting like an asshole like this might also have the result that somebody will be inclined to break your face and/or other parts of your body.
Since healthcare pays for that as well, we have a right to request that you don't act like a dick so you won't get your ass beaten for which healthcare pays.
Re: (Score:1)
I wonder if either of you see the irony-- because the government arguably overstepped its bounds by forcing everyone to buy health insurance, now it gets to claim it can overstep its bounds even further by telling you what you can do with your body.
Government is the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems.
Re: (Score:1)
Do others have the right to tell you that you must always drive the speed limit, for -them-, because they might pay a tiny sliver of the additional risk involved
Actually, yes. This is precisely the reasoning behind helmet laws for motorcycle riders in some states.
Re:Fatsos (Score:5, Insightful)
Calorie in Calorie out.
That's not how it works. Celery has calories (in the sense that burning it will generate heat), but has negative digestive calories (in the sense that pulling the nutrients from it and pushing the waste out will burn more calories than gained by the process).
Some people have low absorption. They eat anything they want, and don't get fat. Others are much more efficient. The efficient can eat according to any diet you pick that is sustainable for an inefficient person, and still gain weight.
You don't make fat from nothing, but some people can get fat on 1/2 the calories of someone else. Blaming the person with the efficient metabolism for eating "only" 75% of the other person (despite having a nearly identical hunger response), makes you a gigantic asshole.
Re:Fatsos (Score:5, Insightful)
I would still argue one point then: weight stability has nothing to do with internal absorption.
If a person is gaining weight that means their caloric intake is in excess of what they are using. If a stable weight is desired they must either reduce intake or increase calorie usage into a balance. Even if they have a high hunger response and can't reduce caloric intake they could do more activities that burn calories rather continue a more sedentary lifestyle.
The thing that really sucks is that moving around more ( burning calories ) is much much more difficult to start once obesity has set in due to how obesity affects the body. Stresses on joints and support bones are much greater, Oxygen absorption is generally lower, and depending on how obese the person is pressure on the diaphragm may make hard breathing even more difficult.
Between the difficulty in getting started exercising and the difficulty in breaking bad eating habits makes it very hard for many obese people to lose the weight. This does not excuse them from giving up before trying though.
Re: (Score:2)
There are other factors too. Some foods get metabolised into energy in different ways, affecting metabolic rate. High fructose is a particular issue, as it's very common in the American diet and rapidly becoming so in Europe too - it causes blood sugar to peak quickly, so the body starts putting on fat stocks right away, then falls and leaves the person quickly hungry for more sugary goodness.
On the basic model though, you're right. The key to weight management is to eat less energy and exercise more. Easie
Re:Fatsos (Score:5, Insightful)
"Fat? No, I'm efficient!"
Though I agree in sentiment, there's still the case that if you don't eat more than X weight of food, you can't put on more than X amount of weight.
The ones who are happy being fat, fine. The ones who are trying to lose weight and can't because of their "hunger"... that's the problem. Because it's hardly ever a celery that they pig out on, but chocolate and other high-fat foods.
It's still down, in the end, to a question of willpower. If you want to slim, you'll allow yourself to feel a little more hungry and - at the same time - find ways to cure the hunger that don't involve fat.
Your gut is just as adaptable as any other part of you - it can learn, given time. And though I don't want to trivialise the effort of losing weight, especially if you have medical conditions or even just suffer from the inherent medical conditions of being overweight (such as it being more difficult on your joints to exercise), there's still a willpower game at play here.
I'm sure there are people who struggle 24 hours a day against hunger and lose. And I'm sure there are a hundred times as many who win for as long as they want to and then give up. And I'm sure there are a hundred times as many again who say they are trying, and don't even bother.
There are weight-loss TV programs where they "stalk" the contestants. They know they could be watched. They know they have cameras in their house. They know they have to cut down. But still they have midnight snacks and go shopping for high-calorie food (if it's not in the house, at least you have to expend more effort than normal to go get it if you have a craving!).
Not everyone is a lard-ass. But equally not every overweight person struggles against an unbeatable desire to eat only high-calorie food.
Antidepressants part of the problem? (Score:2)
"Fat? No, I'm efficient!"
Though I agree in sentiment, there's still the case that if you don't eat more than X weight of food, you can't put on more than X amount of weight.
The ones who are happy being fat, fine. The ones who are trying to lose weight and can't because of their "hunger"... that's the problem. Because it's hardly ever a celery that they pig out on, but chocolate and other high-fat foods.
It's still down, in the end, to a question of willpower. If you want to slim, you'll allow yourself to feel a little more hungry and - at the same time - find ways to cure the hunger that don't involve fat.
Your gut is just as adaptable as any other part of you - it can learn, given time. And though I don't want to trivialise the effort of losing weight, especially if you have medical conditions or even just suffer from the inherent medical conditions of being overweight (such as it being more difficult on your joints to exercise), there's still a willpower game at play here.
I'm sure there are people who struggle 24 hours a day against hunger and lose. And I'm sure there are a hundred times as many who win for as long as they want to and then give up. And I'm sure there are a hundred times as many again who say they are trying, and don't even bother.
There are weight-loss TV programs where they "stalk" the contestants. They know they could be watched. They know they have cameras in their house. They know they have to cut down. But still they have midnight snacks and go shopping for high-calorie food (if it's not in the house, at least you have to expend more effort than normal to go get it if you have a craving!).
Not everyone is a lard-ass. But equally not every overweight person struggles against an unbeatable desire to eat only high-calorie food.
I've found antidepressants have negatively impacted my ability to keep my body where I want it to be, as odd as that sounds.
I'm taking an antidepressant for OCD problems, and since I've been taking it, I've had a significant reduction in trichotillomania (hair pulling) as well as other OCD problems and face numbness from extreme anxiety. However, I find that the antidepressant has neutered the highs as well as balancing the lows. I find I'm more complacent with things that bother me about myself, muting t
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The fat community does nothing but road block people trying to lose weight. So fuck them. They sit there with a poor me complex and rail against anyone actively doing something
Re: (Score:2)
I've watched
Clearly you know what's going on then. /sarcasm
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Gender-swap porn just got a lot more interesting. (Score:1)
Gender-swap porn just got a lot more interesting.
I'm just saying.
It would not me a robot (Score:3)
The word you are looking for is Waldo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R... [wikipedia.org]
Showing what it's like to swap bodies (Score:3)
Why do I^Hyou have the feeling that ''Showing" what it's like to swap bodies doesn't quite cut it?
The not-so-cool psych experiment to participate in (Score:1)
It sounded really cool until it got to the part where they "mildly shock."
Re: (Score:2)
Never mind human. Be more creative. You can have the humanform robot for working, then switch to your customised Creature from Outer Space body for partying.
once again, porn drives tech (Score:2)
Tell me that this doesn't scream for implementation with porn?
LOL ... (Score:2)
LOL, what could possibly go wrong?
There's a super(hero|villain) origin story in here waiting to happen.
VR, dodgy electrical shocks, a budding young scientist, a Microsoft product ... quick, someone should sell this to Marvel. =)
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, what could possibly go wrong?
There's a super(hero|villain) origin story in here waiting to happen.
VR, dodgy electrical shocks, a budding young scientist, a Microsoft product and Facebook... quick, someone should sell this to Marvel. =)
you forgot :P
Where have I heard this before? (Score:4, Interesting)
You want to go skiing without leaving your den, you can. But I'm assuming a guy like you, you wanna go skiing you fly to Aspen. That's not what you're interested in here. It's about the stuff you can't have... right? The forbidden fruit... see that guy, with the drop-dead Philipino girlfriend? Wouldn't you like to be that guy for twenty minutes? The right twenty minutes? ... You want to be a girl... see what that feels like? ... It's all doable.
- Lenny, Strange Days [imdb.com]
Easy (Score:2)
"... the body they see does the same (those electrical stimulators mildly shock muscles to force a friend to mirror the user's movements). It's an imperfect system, but a fascinating example of the power of virtual reality. What else might we use VR systems for?"
Are you kidding? Brainwashing!
My guess is strapping somebody on a bench with an OR and giving him violent electroshocks to the testicles each time they see a Qur'an or a half-moon in their virtual reality and an electric orgasm if they see ham and
Forever Peace (Score:2)
MIT professor (Score:2)
telepresence delusion known for decades (Score:2)
Imagine the Possibilities (Score:2)
2. Another remake of the "Body Snatchers?"
Computer Implant Take Over (Score:2)
What if one of the users is a computer AI. It takes over the body of the other by providing those stimulations that force the user to move their body. Now the computer has a body. Rather than a simulation it is possession and possession is 9/10ths of the law...