Windows Users, Get Ready For a Bigger-Than-Usual Patch Tuesday 63
A user writes with a report from The Register: October is stacking up to be a bumper Patch Tuesday update with nine bulletins lined up for delivery — three rated critical. Cloud security firm Qualys estimates two of the lesser "important" bulletins are just as bad however, as they would also allow malicious code injection onto vulnerable systems. Top of the critical list is an update for Internet Explorer that affects all currently supported versions 6 to 11, on all operating system including Windows RT. Vulnerabilities discovered in most versions of Windows Server, Windows 7 and 8, and the .NET framework are covered in the other pair of critical bulletins.
IE 6? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
I was thinking about something similar. For windows, what's an "acceptable" number of critical flaw patches? If you really think about it, the only possible answer is zero. Any answer greater than zero must be unacceptable. So why do people put up with it?
A similar topic comes up when people talk about pedestrian deaths. What's an acceptable number of pedestrian deaths in a year? If you're intellectually honest with yourself the only acceptable number can be none.
Re: IE 6? (Score:5, Insightful)
the difference is: when Linux has a critical bug, its front-page news; when Windows has a critical bug, its just another Tuesday.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
people still use windows ?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Google how to make it think it's an ATM and fire it up.
Re: (Score:3)
Noy unless it's running Windows XP embedded or PoS or Server 2003.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, all points of sale are pieces of shit.
Re: (Score:3)
IE 6 should be illegal.
Re: (Score:2)
Why?
It makes webmasters who charge by the hour very rich
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Damn right. This last batch was a bitch. It was a bitch batch. HaHaHa ...
Sorry.
Any standard source for reliable info on updates? (Score:2)
Does anyone know of a site or mailing list specifically dedicated to checking out the new updates and rating how safe and reliable they are to install? I've had far too many stability and performance problems after installing recommend updates to trust Microsoft's "Install this update to make {some important but unspecified change} to Windows" messages any more. However, life's too short to keep running a search on every update ID every month to see which ones are getting red flagged.
Re: (Score:2)
I share your pain. What I do is wait a week. Early adopters make good canaries.
Re: (Score:2)
Windows Secrets is a great site and the Patch Watch is invaluable in tracking patch conflicts and problems.
~~~
Think before swallowing Microsoft's blue pill.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks. I hadn't come across that site before, and it looks useful.
I need some comparisons (Score:2)
Windows Users, Get Ready For a Bigger-Than-Usual (Score:1)
Not something you expect to hear from a name like Micro Soft.
Once you go Microsoft, you never go back, because lock-in.
Re:Windows Users, Get Ready For a Bigger-Than-Usua (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
yah know ninite can solve that for you (and if you deal with a number of systems Ninite Pro is CHEAP and INCLUDES FLASH)
Re: (Score:2)
It's easier to just copy the latest installer into a flash drive from another machine. If you bake it in with Ninite it will be out of date in one month.
Re: (Score:3)
Chrome and Firefox also have regular updates patching security problems. We just don't get a note about it each month, it just shows up.
Meh (Score:2)
Sounds like everything I don't use in Windows is getting patched.
I always knew there was something wrong with .Net! (Score:2)
.net updates take time + gigs of ram to install (Score:2)
.net updates take time + gigs of ram to install.
about time for windows 7 SP2 and 2008r2 sp2 (Score:2)
Is should not take hours / need to install 150+ updates on fresh systems + the update rollup. It needs to be easier / take less time.
Re: (Score:1)
Is should not take hours / need to install 150+ updates on fresh systems + the update rollup. It needs to be easier / take less time.
Boy only if there was an OS that had updates every year and was shiny new and made for tablets. Then this problem would go away. See go use the latest if you do not want +200 updates and you will get all your work done with the newest blinding white office too with no distractions which is hipster certified
I am sure MS would never do that nor go to my local best buy and pay them to destroy copies of Windows 7 and office 2010 in the trash compactor so the only option is 8 and 2013 nahh wouldn't happen
Re: (Score:2)
Why don't you just make a slipstream CD/DVD with all the updates on it? It sure doesn't take that long to do and at this point in time if you're re-doing it on more than one machine per month you should have one anyway. If you don't know how this will give you the basic primer on it. [expertreviews.co.uk]
Re: (Score:2)
What happened to the "no support for XP/IE6"? (Score:2)
I thought Microsoft had dropped all support for Internet Explorer 6 and Windows XP?
If not, they should and force people still stuck on IE6 to upgrade.
Re: (Score:1)
I thought Microsoft had dropped all support for Internet Explorer 6 and Windows XP?
Yes, unless you're running XP embedded, or you pay microsoft for ongoing XP support.
IE6 is still supported on windows server 2003, so there will be patches.
Re: (Score:2)
Many businesses who are suffering with a MUST HAVE IE 6 app which is so tied to their business process that it would go under without it (like firing people and replacing them with software that uses IE 6) use Windows Server in a VM session with Citrix or a thin client.
Pretty pathetic and crazy but some will just not upgrade their apps as that would cost money. Sometimes it is cheaper to keep using IE 6 through server 2003 in a client.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, sometimes the apps aren't upgradeable. Like the developers who wro