ODF Support In Google Drive 40
An anonymous reader writes: Google's Chris DiBona told a London conference last week that ODF support was coming next year, but today the Google Drive team unexpectedly launched support for all three of the main variants — including long-absent Presentation files. You can now simply open ODT, ODS and ODP files in Drive with no fuss. It lacks support for comments and changes but at least it shows progress towards full support of the international document standard, something conspicuously missing for many years.
Re: who needs comments (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
People who are working on the same content, and doing revisions in cycle, writing a book chapter... (I just did this Monday)
Git/etc do NOT work for the type of work you do editing papers/books/etc
Re:International document standard? (Score:5, Informative)
You seem to be either creating an odd situation on purpose, or getting stuck on one you've come across. When you grab a section of formatted text from a PDF, LibreOffice considers it a unitary chunk -- and tries to keep it together. If you want to break this, or have LibreOffice treat it differently - there's a pretty wide variety of methods to do so:
First method: grab the bit above your graphic - paste it, then paste your graphic, then paste the text below it.
Second Method: paste as unformatted text, either by using paste-special "unformatted text" or washing in through notepad. If I want text, not formatting, I habitually wash it through notepad. Open notepad and paste in text, highlight and copy.
So I'm not sure which part you object to and I don't know what your desired behavior is, but for me LibreOffice's behaviour is very reasonable -- and when I want it to do something different, it's fairly simple to accomplish.
If you want to point out a real weak point in Libre Writer? Labels. Labels implementation is still (I think) both bad and confusing. I know it is confusing. I wish I had time to look at it and offer to help fix it. For now, I just hope someone else does.
- Jeff
Re: (Score:2)
LibreOffice isn't intended to be simply a slavish function-by-function replacement for MS Office. Not everything MS Office does is done well.
Actually, MS Office has some real warts inside. Look at a table in its RTF form and you can see one of the most blatant, as the "table" isn't really a table.
If you're used to doing things one way, even a superior replacement is likely to offend. Sometimes, eventually, you may come to prefer the new way, though.
Working with framed objects in LibreOffice is not intuitive
Multi column - FAIL (Score:1)
GDrive, by default, converts it and removes the column formatting.
Still not as good as OneDrive then.
Shame on you Google.
This is huge (Score:5, Insightful)
I have been wishing for ODF support in Google Docs since forever. This one feature is what makes it now really feasible for me to start using the Google office tools - becauses I can then open the documents with a myriad other suites that work with ODF!
Re:This is huge (Score:4, Interesting)
Plus, Microsoft Office just became less relevant and must now play catch up in order to remain competitive.
This is huge news for the ODF Standard, and for all the municipalities, universities, etc. who must break free of Microsoft Office Lock-in and 'taxes'.
Re:This is huge (Score:5, Interesting)
Latex has it's good and bad points.
good points
maintains mental distinction between input and output
maintains a reasonable level of semantic information
reliable and reasonablly fast for large documents
produces really nice typeset output
handles equations well
handles captioning and cross-referencing well
makes a reasonable job at layout before tweaking
bad points
only a few image formats work, with traditional latex it's EPS or bust, pdflatex is a bit better but it still pretty limited with PDF being the only vector format supported (which is fun as most pdf creators don't want to create arbitary sized pdfs so you often have to print to pdf then use a seperate tool to remove the borders) and the only bitmap formats supported being png and huffman jpeg (at least in my experiance artimetic coded jpeg doesn't work and gives an unhelpful error message, that caused some head scratching)
the layout engine is reasonablly smart but not smart enough to get a layout i'm happy with without tweaking and the compile-build-view cycle gets annoying during layout tweaking.
the whole system feels like hacks built on top of hacks. The parameters to hyperef to avoid ugly boxes don't work in all versions (not sure if they work in the latest now, I certainly remember having to downgrade when working on my thesis because of this). Hyperref links go to the float caption rather than the float itself unless you add another hack package called hypcap but that in turn requires further hackery to work with custom figure types (such as figures placed by the side of the text rather than inline with it..
table handling leaves a lot to be desired requiring significant manual tweaking for any nontrivial table.
there are way too many markup sensitive characters, this means that significant editing is often required after pasting in plain text.
requires running a bunch of tools in the right order and sometimes multiple times to process a document
Thats my experiance from writing a phd thesis with the thing anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Why must it play catch up? MS Office in later versions opens ODF files just fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh. Thank you for clarifying what I wrote earlier. This is good to know.
Re: (Score:2)
Does MS Office save ODF files okay also? Like a round-trip?
Does MS Office save ODF files okay (Score:2)
In a word: no. A colleague who knows I prefer LibreOffice thought he was being helpful by sending me a presentation for review in odp format. He'd created and saved it in Powerpoint.
Guess what? LibreOffice can't make any sense of it. Google Docs can't make any sense of it. But Powerpoint doesn't have a problem with it. If I open it with an archive manager it seems to have the right kind of structure, but the content xml file is so full of boilerplate (font definitions and other crap) that I can't actually f
Exporting? (Score:4, Interesting)
Google's Beta (Score:4, Insightful)
"Features and services may be introduced and withdrawn without notice. Good luck relying on any of them at home or work."
Re: (Score:2)
Google is very strategic. (Score:4, Interesting)
Google went about it strategically. First it peeled of the low hanging fruit, people who don't need all the bells and whistles of a full suite with Google docs/apps. Then it leveraged the central server doing the edits, to create a collaborative edit features that were well ahead of MsOffice when it was introduced. Priced it cheap, pitched it to the enterprises. When it was forcing Microsoft to scramble to offer collaboration tools, Apple helped in the upgrade tread mill battle. In an earlier era, the top exec gets the latest and greatest laptop every six months with latest Office pre-installed and starts belting out documents in the latest format. IT will upgrade rest of the corp. But Apple took all the top execs with its iPad, and now PC is not the latest toy these top honchos were getting. Side effect: The corporate upgrade treadmill slowed down significantly.
Now it is going for the last section that really needs all the bells and whistles of a full fledged office suite. Instead of spending the money to reinvent the wheel inside google docs, it is just using the well established code base of OpenOffice and the ODF. Even though Microsoft lost the mind share and the market share in percentage terms, its cash cows were producing milk at the same old prodigal rate. Cutting off a significant portion of the MsOffice revenue stream is important for Google's business ops in other spheres. Else Microsoft will under cut it. It even tried to pay people to use Bing.
Google does not really want to make much money off its google docs franchise. It uses it just to crimp the revenue stream of Microsoft. It is making money elsewhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
...It will sustain losses year after year to deny revenue to the competition. Once the competition folds it has the market for itself. Look how long it was able to sustain losses to gain dominance with XBox franchise.
It didn't work [vgchartz.com] and Microsoft has little hope of ever recovering its losses. [gamasutra.com]
Must not yet have made it to my part of the US (Score:1)
Zoho has your back, but nobody seems to know.... (Score:3)
Zoho Docs [zoho.com] has supported ODT for some time. It's sad so few know about it. Their app Zoho Writer [google.com] even supports editing ODT on android (and perhaps other platforms?). I was amazed when I stumbled on this functionality entirely by accident. The Zoho Writer app also supports opening files from Google Drive and Dropbox... so technically you could say that it supports editing ODT on those platforms as well.
Furthermore, Zoho has a desktop file sync client that supports Linux, unlike Google who has has seemingly utterly failed to provide a linux client despite promising it when Drive launched.
Way too little, way too late from Google, as far as I'm concerned.
(My documents are fairly simple, so I'm not sure how technically complete the ODT support is. But it's worked for me.)
Re: (Score:2)
Google's support for critical open source infrastructure like Libreoffice has in general been pathetic. Much of the blame for that would appear to lie with that same Chris Dibona.
Excellent! Finally, standard formats (Score:2)
Unexplained acronyms (Score:2)
What would a lazy slashdot post be without a few unexplained acronyms?
Next up, support for PQZ, RUO, U89, and VUI files!
WTF? (Score:2)
What business of a storage medium is it to tell documents what format they can be?
We wouldn't accept it if a usb stick refused to work with autocad files. How is this different?
I store all sorts of gunk on Google Drive and I don't expect it to 'support' or not 'support' it. I just expect it to hang onto it.