Google+ Will Make Your Videos Look Better 37
ErnieKey writes: A new Google+ feature for uploaded videos has been released that automatically enhances lighting, color, and stability. Soon, it'll also enhance speech in videos. "As more and more people now also take videos with their smartphones, it makes sense for Google to bring some of the technologies it has developed for photos (and YouTube) to these private videos, as well. Google has long offered a similar feature for YouTube users, so there is likely some overlap between the two systems here. While YouTube offers the option to 'auto-fix' videos, though, it doesn't automatically prompt its users to do this for them. YouTube also offers a number of manual tools for changing contrast, saturation and color temperature that Google+ doesn’t currently offer."
Missing feature (Score:5, Funny)
Automatically fix the dreaded Vertical Video Syndrome [youtube.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Automatically fix the dreaded Vertical Video Syndrome [youtube.com].
^^^ YES YES YESSSS!
Come on people, how hard is it to hold your phone like, you know, a regular camera when you're using it like a camera?
Re: Missing feature (Score:3)
how hard is it to rotate your phone 90 degrees? Vertical and horizontal composition have been valid for 150 years - don't blame photographers for 90lb CRT's or lazy web design.
Re: (Score:2)
how hard is it to rotate your phone 90 degrees? Vertical and horizontal composition have been valid for 150 years - don't blame photographers for 90lb CRT's or lazy web design.
When those videos are re-broadcast on TV they're seriously messed up. They have to be down-rezzed because the vertical resolution of an HD tv is 1080, while the vertical resolution of a smartphone video is significantly more. So you end up with these fugly videos that only take up 1/3 of your screen width on an HD tv.
Re: (Score:2)
Some of us don't use a phone to watch YouTube. It's easier to rotate your phone 90 degrees to watch landscape videos.
That's true for static paintings and photos. Movies and videos, however, were always in landscape mode (4:3, 16:9, etc). Vertical videos only happened when phones were able to record videos.
So... What, Exactly? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Automatically fix the dreaded Vertical Video Syndrome [youtube.com].
You owe me for the last hour I spent watching all their videos.
Re: (Score:2)
Make sure you watch their product review of the Rotato Express and the one about time travel.
Re: (Score:2)
The fix is quite simple: the video recording software on mobiles should display a warning: "Warning: Hold phone horizontally to get a better video" or something like that. Of course, the warning should be easily dismissible if you really want to shoot a VV.
Youtube fixed my shaky phone video (Score:4, Funny)
Youtube said my shaky phone video looked shaky, would I like it to fix it? OK, I clicked. Why not?
The fixed video [youtube.com] is a lot less shaky! I'm pleased. The parts where the girls are lifting up their dresses to show me their underpants are still dark, because they only did it in the shadows of the dance floor. But perhaps google will be fix that too some time?
Re: (Score:1)
It's hard to understand why Google does not jump on this flourishing business.
...
Weird, you'd think that at least companies like Google are smart and modern but apparently not.
Remember Tumblr? Yahoo acquired it a number of months ago and changed it because the openly searchable explict content made the industry and Yahoo's investors worried. Stuff is still there, but supposedly less visible in ways I can't care to google. Remember explicit Yahoo groups in the late nineties? Rife with immoral stuff, and an early form of today's meetup. It was very easy to browse thousands of entries. Those "Adult" groups are still there, but their directory indexing changed to make bulk listing le
How about you leave my damn content ALONE? (Score:2, Interesting)
Offer it as a feature but don't goddamn adjust it automagically FOR me. I might want to push something that's "got a problem" for artistic or statement reasons, Google.
Seriously, Google...when did "Do no evil" go by the wayside? You've had the motto. At some point you've kept to it. At some point later you threw that out the window and it's SHOWING...BADLY.
Re: (Score:2)
How about you leave my damn content ALONE? [imgflip.com]
Re: How about you leave my damn content ALONE? (Score:4, Informative)
It is optional, you dork, just like auto -awesome is for pictures.
"Don't be evil" like applying contrast boosting filters to video they host is evil.
Fuck off, Google (Score:1)
You incorrectly labelled 80 out of 120 of my videos as infringing music copyright (none of them did).
I used your "music swap" feature, and now all the previously silent videos have shitty music on them. Furthermore, none of the videos "belong" to me any more, so I can't (for example) monetize them.
No doubt using Google's special effects will transfer all ownership of your videos directly to Google. Fuckers.
Re: (Score:2)
coming soon... (Score:5, Insightful)
Dear G+ User.
We wanted to let you know that your recently uploaded video "catsoncatnip.mp4" was automatically processed and several fixes were applied. We hope you like the results.
Also, in order to improve the user experience, we embedded a few targeted ads into your content. We are sure you won't mind as we have judged them to be unobtrusive.
Thank you for using G+
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't like it, pay for service and you won't get ads.
It's not complicated, many of us have been doing it for years. Apps for your Domain solved the advertising issue.
Re: (Score:2)
i wasnt aware youtube and g+ allowed me to pay and skip ads.
could you send me a link?
They already offer this for pictures... (Score:2)
You know.. (Score:1)
I started using youtube more often, and I have to say that YT and G+ and the host of services offered are such a jumble of confusing settings and functions.
It's irritating, Google needs to clean it all up and offer something cohesive, functional.
Re: (Score:2)
True. The worst bit is they keep moving or taking away functionality. I used to enjoy using G+ pictures. Now it is a nightmare
Re: (Score:1)
Thank you, I was feeling like I was the only one, it's usage and GUI are becoming cryptic
They Offer "Corrections" On Youtube (Score:2)
Re: They Offer "Corrections" On Youtube (Score:2)
Cool, then don't push the button. Thanks for your contribution.
About time for bug fixe (Score:1)
How About A Working "Search" (Score:1)
I'd be happy if they'd just provide a valid search feature. Not sure what their reasoning is, but each year it sucks harder. Worse, it provided more features and relevant returns 10 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Since then, I understand that speech to text, author tags, and discussion comments all factor into the keyword pool. The pool is polluted as well as an active target for SEO schmucks. They also need to get rid of the thumbs up / down moderati
Multitrack Audio (Score:2)
I am almost completely fine with the MPAA / ASCAP / etc. pulling videos with music tracks under DMCA if it would teach amateurs to stop adding so
Shake correction makes me physically ill (Score:1)