Gmail Reportedly Has Been Blocked In China 145
An anonymous reader is one of many to point out a report that Gmail has been blocked in China. A years-long war between Google and China that highlights the ideological chasm between the two behemoths has now entered a new phase. On Monday morning, reports confirmed online chatter that Gmail has been fully blocked in China. And transparency advocates say they know exactly what's to blame: China's Great Firewall. "I think the government is just trying to further eliminate Google's presence in China and even weaken its market overseas," an anonymous representative of GreatFire.org told Reuters. "Imagine if Gmail users might not get through to Chinese clients. Many people outside China might be forced to switch away from Gmail."
So what exactly is it blocking? (Score:1)
"Imagine if Gmail users might not get through to Chinese clients. Many people outside China might be forced to switch away from Gmail."
, which would require blocking server to server traffic (and may cause more problems to China than the rest of the world). Is this what's happening or is it just something to "imagine", or a suggestion to the Chinese government on how to hit google harder?
Re:So what exactly is it blocking? (Score:5, Interesting)
which would require blocking server to server traffic
Since SMTP allows forwarding by other servers this would require deep packet inspection.
Re: (Score:2)
Since SMTP allows forwarding by other servers this would require deep packet inspection.
If you mean the SMTP protocol supports chained delivery routes, then I do not think this is true (at least not used in practice). However, business customers of Gmail (at least) can request that a different SMTP server than Google's be used for outgoing mail, and (of course) anyone using an external mail client can send using any SMTP server they like.
Re: (Score:2)
Since SMTP allows forwarding by other servers this would require deep packet inspection.
If you mean the SMTP protocol supports chained delivery routes, then I do not think this is true (at least not used in practice). However, business customers of Gmail (at least) can request that a different SMTP server than Google's be used for outgoing mail, and (of course) anyone using an external mail client can send using any SMTP server they like.
I run a personal mail server and know I know just enough to know that I have vast chasms of ignorance about mail and network rules/firewalls.
Wouldn't it be easier to filter outbound packets destined for Gmail's SMTP servers and prevent Chinese email users from sending email to Gmail users? (This is an honest question.)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you mean Google's MX servers (the remote end when sending email through SMTP). If so, in a word, "yes", much easier, assuming users are using SMTP servers based in China. Indeed, you could simply prevent the connections from ever taking place, simulating authentication errors.
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
China does DPI on basically all connections inside the country.
Man can't these dumb Chinks do anything original beyond slavishly copying us here in the west?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
just like NSA does on WHOLE internet traffic
Re: (Score:2)
Since SMTP allows forwarding by other servers this would require deep packet inspection.
Or simpler still, it could just be Chinese authorities purposefully messing with DNS propagation.
Re: (Score:2)
Dumb and stupid (Score:1)
Cut off some of googles services if your that paranoid etc...
But cut off googles email service when lots of your customers use it is just plain stupid.
But that sums up a lot of what the top guys in china seem to be..
What... (Score:4, Insightful)
“Imagine if Gmail users might not get through to Chinese clients. Many people outside China might be forced to switch away from Gmail.”
This isn't how the internet works.
Re:What... (Score:5, Interesting)
“Imagine if Gmail users might not get through to Chinese clients. Many people outside China might be forced to switch away from Gmail.”
This isn't how the internet works.
Its the way that many non net-neutrality lobyists want it to work. Except they have a capitalist vision of google having to pay to have people access gmail.
Re:What... (Score:5, Interesting)
Except they have a capitalist vision of google having to pay to have people access gmail.
wat. Of course Google pays to have people access gmail - servers, racks, drives, power, transit, staff, real estate all cost quite a bit. Where would they get those resources for free?
Re: (Score:2)
Except they have a capitalist vision of google having to pay to have people access gmail.
wat. Of course Google pays to have people access gmail - servers, racks, drives, power, transit, staff, real estate all cost quite a bit.
Chrisq's claim, as I understand it, is that Google would have to negotiate transit with each individual last-mile ISP to make Gmail available to the ISP's customers, or at least available at more than 1999 DSL speeds.
Re: (Score:1)
Then please let me know because I use google apps for business and I have clients in China who I can't afford to lose. I also need to access email when I'm physically in China.
Re: (Score:3)
Then please let me know because I use google apps for business and I have clients in China who I can't afford to lose. I also need to access email when I'm physically in China.
It's funny how these sorts of posts are always anonymous...
Re: (Score:1)
Your post is anonymous too unless your name really is "93 Escort Wagon".
Re:What... (Score:5, Funny)
Martha and I named him after the place he was conceived.
Re: (Score:3)
Dad! You promised never to tell that story!
I hate you!!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You might reasonably think that. You'd have it wrong, though.
The Great Firewall can trivially stop people from (directly) connecting to Google itself, and can stop Google from sending traffic directly to servers in China.
How, though, does the Great Firewall stop email from going between Google servers in the US
Re: (Score:3)
The bigger concern is that you may not be able to reach any users of the very popular (and state-supported) Chinese services. If you can't do business with people in China through Gmail (and corporate GMail is a significant portion of GMail), you will switch to a provider who does. Or Google figures out a workaround.
In other words, it's a real concern, but not one I would lose a tremendous amount of sleep over. I'd much rather worry about Chinese hackers absconding with my data than about the Great Firewall
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Imagine if Gmail users might not get through to Chinese clients. Many people outside China might be forced to switch away from Gmail.
This isn't how the internet works.
That isn't how the Internet is meant to work. But yes, they could theoretically block emails from whichever domains or IP addresses they want to, but this is beyond what they have been reported to have done so far.
To me the question is how does this impact trade and WTO rules and what if any retaliatory steps the US government is going to take against Chinese companies doing business in or trading with the US. Both sides have an interest in promoting free trade, but that requires an equitable two-way r
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know if that is there MO. Last time I was over (and admittedly it has been a while), the GFW was ISP based. Some stuff would work in one place and not another. I think that sometimes we overprescribe evil genius when the answer is just plain old incompetency.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes it is. They're blocking *everything* from Gmail, including the SMTP traffic. In other words, people with Gmail can no longer send email to or receive email from people in China. People outside China who need to have email to people in China may very well have to switch away from Gmail.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know that that's true. I can still send email from gmail to my stupid @qq address. Of course I have to be on a VPN now in order to access my IMAP servers at Google, which is new these last few days. Google webmail has been down about 90% of the time for the last year, but sometimes used to work late at night.
This blocking of IMAP (and presumably ActiveSync if Google still uses that, or whatever other proprietary protocol they may use in their various apps) is new.
In my one, single, Chinese test acco
Re: (Score:2)
It's a problem for a few Chinese companies I've seen - their whole company email is hosted on Gmail. (Not Google Apps, Gmail). It's not unusual to see contacts along the lines of Username-Company@gmail.com. Think what you will, but it's a completely logical thing - why spend money on email when someone gives it for free?
The regular Chinese consumer, though I've s
Re: (Score:2)
It's ALMOST Tuesday in China! 22:49!
Re:Hope it is blocked. (Score:5, Insightful)
I prefer China's overt censorship to the US version
I invite you to move to China and try making a statement like this, and see what happens.
China's politics and economy are more dynamic than the US one.
They're simply years ahead of us in greed, graft, and crony capitalism.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I invite you to move to China and try making a statement like this, and see what happens.
Well, I don't live in China, but I've done a lot of business in China, and work with someone who is just completing a PhD in economics while working in China and feeds me a stream of consciousness about the extent of overt and covert state meddling.They certainly don't hide their censorship, let alone have a problem with people complimenting them for it. What would you expect to happen, please?
They're simply years ahead of us in greed, graft, and crony capitalism.
Mmm, no. They're edging from the right gradually toward pragmatic social democracy, while the US (with the exceptio
Re: (Score:1)
All you can infer from my post is that Obamacare isn't "wacko religious neocon", which it isn't.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
>For instance: Ask your average Chinese college student whether they have freedom of religion / speech, and they will say yes. What they often dont know is that you can be arrested for talking to a minor about religion, or talking about religion outside of a state-sanctioned church. Ask the Falun-Gong about their thoughts on Chinese free speech.
But practically speaking, the average Chinese college student is correct. They're completely free, that is until they have a high-enough profile to attract attent
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
2) KKK may be "monitored", but they are allowed to speak, demonstrate, organize, and so forth as long as they commit no actual crimes (arson etc).
In the US the KKK is really close to the government. They, and other right wing advocates of violence, get away with a lot of stuff that would end up in big trouble for non-right wingers.
For example, the incoming House Whip, Steve Scalise, gave a well received speech to a white nationalist group in 2002 [reuters.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Watching this kind of demoning from US is humourous and based on zero understanding how how things work.
Watching the 50 Cent Army come out and defend Chinese repression of free speech is certainly interesting. You seem to think that the comments made here are without personal experience, like watching people get deported because they dared to speak something the government objects to. Do the people in Hong Kong right now also not understand how things work? What about Tianenmen Square?
You remark on the supposed inefficiency of the American system, which has been successful in America and the UK for several
Re: (Score:2)
What do you think they talk about there?
Definitely not Tienanmen Square. Or anything else blocked by the Great Firewall.
Re: (Score:2)
Look at this, we have a post on "Chinese censorship" and here is the first reference to Tienanmen square, an event that took place in 1989.
Whoever controls the Past Controls the Present.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
> In return Id challenge you to stand on a corner and preach the risen Christ, and see how long it is before thugs detain you and give you a 1-way ticket out of the country.
This seems to be pretty common outside of the Chinese faux Catholic churches I've been near. Shanghai, Suzhou, Nanjing. I say "faux" because the CPA controls the local flavor of Catholicism, and the government really has nothing to fear. Like many things, it's under control.
I'm certainly no China defender (nor a Catholic), but a lot o
Re: (Score:3)
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
... Suppression of free speech during the olympics? Definately not.
...
Just because you presume something, does not make it true.
Posting as AC for obvious reasons. I was an athlete during the games (from a western country). We had been told in no uncertain terms that many things were not permitted to be discussed with the media (or for that matter general public) and sanctions could be applied if they were.
Re: (Score:1)
And now that I hit submit, I realise that I should also add:
These terms were not a standard part of the olympic agreements. Neither Athens or London (the ones either side of Beijing) had anything even remotely similar.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Hope it is blocked. (Score:5, Insightful)
Centuries behind us, you mean? What you're describing was more or less standard in the USA in the last half of the nineteenth century.
Re: (Score:2)
Centuries behind us, you mean? What you're describing was more or less standard in the USA in the last half of the nineteenth century.
Think of it cyclically; the past is the future, as it ever was.
Re: (Score:2)
There is very few censorship agreements in the USA. Most of the so called hidden agreements are just the morals of the particular publisher.
Re: (Score:2)
There is very few censorship agreements in the USA. Most of the so called hidden agreements are just the morals of the particular publisher.
And some are laws that allow a publisher to inflict its will on third parties, such as intellectual protectionism/imaginary property laws.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face ... (Score:2)
"Imagine if Gmail users might not get through to Chinese clients. Many people outside China might be forced to switch away from Gmail."
China needs to keep up economic growth, or the people who have gotten used to being "middle class" over the last 15 years will not be happy. So, cutting off ways for small and medium-sized importers in other countries to get product info, quotes, arrange for shipping, etc ... not so good.
And of course, this will also hurt many external alibaba customers.
What next - forcing people to switch to China's dead Red Flag Linux [theregister.co.uk], just to spite the west?
Re: (Score:2)
How is GMail necessary to the growth of the middle class? There's 1.3 billion people who can pick from any other email provider. Compared to creating an OS from scratch, creating and running an email service is trivial.
Re: (Score:2)
How is GMail necessary to the growth of the middle class? There's 1.3 billion people who can pick from any other email provider. Compared to creating an OS from scratch, creating and running an email service is trivial.
Please re-read " cutting off ways for small and medium-sized importers in other countries to get product info, quotes, arrange for shipping, etc ... not so good. And of course, this will also hurt many external alibaba customers".
China's growth is predicated on trade. When you make it harder for the rest of the world to communicate with your small and medium-sized businesses, you hurt your domestic businesses, which impacts on overall growth. China's growth is already slowing, and this is the first time s
Old? (Score:2)
Re:Old? (Score:5, Informative)
I thought so too at first - China blocks access to any and all google services. But then I realized that the article (and title) are poorly worded. What China did (in addition to already blocking access to the actual google services) - is to block any email sent from/to anyone with a mailbox at gmail.com. That is to say - as a gmail.com user, you are no longer able to exchange emails with users of various email services based in China.
That is, in fact, somewhat bigger news - they are breaking an intercommunication capability.
Re: (Score:1)
Does that affect users of the gmail SMTP server or people who use a @gmail.com address?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure SMTP is being blocked entirely. I can still send email between QQ and my Gmail and Google Apps hosted accounts. What's *new*, though, is that I can't access the IMAP servers without being on the VPN. Once the mail leaves Google, though, it's arriving at QQ, and once the mail leaves QQ, it ends up on Google's servers. I simply need a VPN to get to Google's servers.
Yes, Google services (which are primarily web-based or rely on ports 80 and 443) have been mostly blocked for about a year, now, but
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have just recieved a test email from China to my @gmail.com address and it works no problem.
Re: (Score:2)
just saying....
Are you sure [go.com] about that?
Re: (Score:2)
Not if China blocks the VPN's handshake, as it has been seen to do.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Either way its difficult to defend the idea that China intentionally did this when google gladly censors their search results and complies with all local regulations.
They apparently stopped doing that a while ago. [blogspot.com]
“We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn,” Google wrote in a lengthy blog post. “We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.”
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe (Score:2)
Google services have been blocked for years in Chi (Score:2)
Google services, including Gmail, have been blocked for years, in China. Sure, a lot of Chinese use them with VPN, but Gmail being blocked in China is old news!
For some "strange" reason, Bing and Hotmail aren't blocked, though.
Re: (Score:2)
Time to divert investment away from China? (Score:2)
What if Apple were to move its manufacturing to India, for example? Do Apple fanatics really need to prop up a dictatorship (oligarchy) so they can have their latest "iWantThat"? The same goes for the other tech toys made in China. Lots of people are willing to fork over money for "fair trade" coffee, but don't think twice about where their latest gadget comes from.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're going to play the oligarch card, trying to cast primary blame on the peasants/consumers avoids the real issue. There is class warfare going on, but only one side knows it's a war. Right now the peasants are clueless, so they always loose.
China? (Score:2)
I didn't even know China users could use Gmail. I always thought it was blocked.
The great FIREwall of China! (Score:1)