Data Research Reveals When Taking a Yellow Cab Is Cheaper Than an Uber 155
An anonymous reader writes A team of data scientists have come up with a system to identify times when regular yellow taxis are cheaper alternatives to an Uber [in New York]. Researchers from the University of Cambridge and the University of Nanmur in Belgium have compared a broad dataset of both yellow taxi and Uber fares in New York and have discovered that for a trip costing less than $35 Uber is often the most expensive option. The data scientists were able to reach this conclusion by comparing trip and fare data for each yellow taxi ride taken in 2013 and entering it into Uber's fare query system. Prices were taken from Uber's lowest-cost service Uber X and the NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission.
People don't use Uber because its cheaper (Score:2, Insightful)
They do it because of the smell.
Always more expensive? (Score:3)
I always thought that Uber was more expensive, the idea being you could usually get an Uber car more easily than hailing a cab.
Re: (Score:2)
This study seems stupid. They say they used uber's fare estimates? Why the hell would they do that? If they know time and distance (which the NYC taxi dataset provides), they can calculate exact fares. Uber X is priced just like a taxi...flag pull fee for getting in the car plus X dollars per mile and X dollers per minute of time.
NYC is a different market (and for a while, their Uber
Re: (Score:2)
Uber also has an $8 minimum fare in NYC...so any trips less than a coup
Makes sense (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Except that Uber drivers often DON'T know where the fare is going. They only know that if you enter it before pickup, and there's zero requirement that you do so.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Huh? How can Uber drivers self-select out of short trips if they don't know where the trip is going? Also, the system doesn't work that was, as I understand it. Drivers hit the on duty button on the app, then they're available, until they hit off duty. If they get an assignment, they can in theory turn it down, but do that more than a few times, and you'll be dropped off the system.
Re: (Score:2)
Huh? How can Uber drivers self-select out of short trips if they don't know where the trip is going? Also, the system doesn't work that was, as I understand it. Drivers hit the on duty button on the app, then they're available, until they hit off duty. If they get an assignment, they can in theory turn it down, but do that more than a few times, and you'll be dropped off the system.
It's not so much short trips as low paying trips, which normally would be a short trip. If Uber charged near what a cab would for trips they probably would not get many drivers as they pay would be relatively low and thus drivers would simply not make themselves available. I think it has much to do with the business model. Uber bills itself, to drivers, as a way to make money with their car. The drivers are already paying for it and use it for more than making money and thus need a higher level of payment t
Re: (Score:2)
Again, in NYC, all Uber cars (including UberX) are commercial vehicles with drivers who have TLC licenses.
Re: (Score:2)
Again, in NYC, all Uber cars (including UberX) are commercial vehicles with drivers who have TLC licenses.
Which is irrelevent to the underlying economic decision making process. If the same economics drove it you'd see prices converge to cab prices.
Re: (Score:2)
If the same economics drove it you'd see prices converge to cab prices.
Except that the operating costs for taxi drivers are heavily driven by the cost of the medallion (at least half of the per shift lease fee for an NYC taxi goes to generate a return to the medallion holder, not cover the purchase and maintenance cost of the vehicle). Uber takes that out of the equation, so that it's feasible to see drivers making more money working the same # of hours.
Re: (Score:2)
If the same economics drove it you'd see prices converge to cab prices.
Except that the operating costs for taxi drivers are heavily driven by the cost of the medallion (at least half of the per shift lease fee for an NYC taxi goes to generate a return to the medallion holder, not cover the purchase and maintenance cost of the vehicle). Uber takes that out of the equation, so that it's feasible to see drivers making more money working the same # of hours.
Exactly, which is why I said the economics of a cab are different than Uber's. A cab has a high fixed cost and thus the driver needs to cover that cost, even if it means taking 20 short trips instead of fewer longer ones. Short trips may even be better if the driver could be assured of minimal time between them. The driver has a number they need to hit on their shift to cover costs and make money, so they have an incentive to stay as busy as possible. The Uber drive doesn't have such high fixed costs, so th
Re: (Score:2)
I think the real concern with cab companies is the threat Uber is to the value of a medallion. If you've paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for a medallion, and are counting on it going up in value over time, anything that threatens that value must be crushed. If Uber were able to significantly dent cab demand in NYC and cab drivers decided to buy their own car to drive for Uber and not lease a cab, medallions would decline in value and people who have invested in them would lose serious money.
100% agree, and it looks like this is already happening.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01... [nytimes.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I think the real concern with cab companies is the threat Uber is to the value of a medallion.
100% agree, and it looks like this is already happening.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01... [nytimes.com]
It'll be interesting to see how that shakes out. I used to be medallion was a way to make a lot of money. What other asset worth hundreds of thousands could you sell to someone with virtually no credit, let alone the assets to cover a note like that? The beauty of it was the medallion was easily repossessed by prying it off the hood and was growing in value as well; and easy to resell. The borrower, OTOH, was likely to pay for the medallion first since they stood to lose everything if it was repossessed. Y
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, the big medallion holders (who hold most of the medallions) are definitely hurting.
This guy seems to be in default (apparently, he can't get drivers for his cabs, so they're not generating revenue - next logical step is to start discounting the lease):
http://nypost.com/2015/03/16/t... [nypost.com]
Also, check out the chart for Medallion Financial (ticker TAXI). Ugly.
Re: (Score:2)
The driver has no way of knowing how long of a trip you are taking until you get in their car. At that point they can't kick you out (well, they *can*, but if they make a habit of them, uber will fire them).
Besides, short fares aren't bad unless you have to drive a long way to pick them up. Like a yellow cab, there is a flag pull fee just for sitting down in the cab. A half mile ride is worth like 75% of a mile ride. Payment is instant in the app, so its not like you lose time while they fish f
Re: (Score:2)
What?
The driver has no way of knowing how long of a trip you are taking until you get in their car. At that point they can't kick you out (well, they *can*, but if they make a habit of them, uber will fire them).
Besides, short fares aren't bad unless you have to drive a long way to pick them up. Like a yellow cab, there is a flag pull fee just for sitting down in the cab. A half mile ride is worth like 75% of a mile ride. Payment is instant in the app, so its not like you lose time while they fish for money, give change, etc.
While a driver may not have knowledge of a particular trip they will, over time, develop a picture of what trips are likely to be and use that to base a decision on wether to be available for assignment. If they do not think they will make enough on trips they simply will not make themselves available; thus Uber, in order to have sufficient drivers, charges more in order to make taking trips, which may be short trips, attractive enough for drivers.If Uber paid drivers closer to what taxi drivers make on a t
Missing the point (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
yes
Re: (Score:3)
No, it's because the credit card company takes a cut of card transactions
I have a hard time with that. An off-the-shelf solution like Square [squareup.com] charges 2.75% without negotiation. I'd think a cabbie would rather collect 97.25% of the bill than 100% of nothing.
Of course, where you live, it is NOT prosecuted (Score:2)
Of course, where I live, it's illegal for them not to accept credit, as accepting electronic payment is a requirement to get licensed in the city. Refusing to process it is prosecuted as fraud.
Sorry, but that is bullshit. In the past I have had cab drivers do MANY things it is illegal for them to do - like demanding I add extra to the fee to pay for tolls.
The simple truth is that cab drivers are immune from pretty much any degree of shafting they care to employ on the customer - and they know it.
Re: (Score:2)
This used to be a serious problem in NYC, but I haven't had a driver try the "credit card machine is broken" scam on me in at least three or four years. They may try it on tourists, but NYCers have known for years that the law is clear - unless the driver informs you upfront that the credit card machine is broken (before he turns on the meter), then, if he refuses to take a credit card, the ride is free.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Exactly. I used to live in a "popular" neighborhood of Seattle (Capitol Hill) with a lot of bars and clubs. Every time I called a yellow cab (in the evening), they would never show up because they'd pick up someone along the way and disappear without notifying me. Every single time. The only way I could get a cab was to walk to a major street and try to hail one. Hugely inconvenient with the rain and steep hillside - this is for going out in the evening, so there's a fancy hairdo and high heels involved, an
Re: (Score:2)
Or maybe they were somewhat averse to picking up a transvestite? (Assuming you are male because you are on /.)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Also, I've never gotten into an Uber and smelt the stink of smoke, vomit, or pee. No Uber driver has whined or refused when I asked to be taken out to the avenues, bayshore, or the outer mission. And I've always been able to get an Uber in those neighborhoods with no more than about a 15-minute wait.
None of that is true of taxis.
Re: (Score:2)
> 2) when it's supposed to, and 3) I know ahead of time how much it will cost.
Until it doesn't because the drivers are gaming the surge pricing algorithm.
You can ride a cab for less than $35? (Score:2)
Or perhaps I'm just willing to walk further than some other people...
Re: (Score:3)
8 miles is a very long taxi trip in NYC - average is 2.6 miles.
Re: (Score:2)
8 miles is a very long taxi trip in NYC - average is 2.6 miles.
True. But a big part of the total fare is the "flag drop fee" and various fees that add up while you sit in traffic going nowhere. I'm pretty sure those didn't go down in past decades either.
Re: (Score:3)
Average fare in NYC is $13.40. Initial drop is $3.80-4.30, depending on time of day.
http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/do... [nyc.gov]
Been the opposite for me (Score:2)
I've never taken an Uber in NYC, so their mileage obviously varies. I have taken them in Indianapolis, Nashville,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And the great thing is if the Uber driver gets in an accident you know with certainty that there is little to no insurance to cover your injuries.
$20k won't cover one ER visit where they have to do emergency surgery. Hell spend a day in the ICU in some metro areas and you could easily top that even without surgery. I had a relative spend 3 days in an ICU in San Fran and bill was $92k.
Uber keeps pricing down by cutting corners on maintenance, insurance and driver wages. That's a wicked combination IMO. One o
UberX in NYC is Different (Score:4, Informative)
Just so folks know, UberX in NYC is unlike UberX in any other market, in that the cars are drivers are all licensed livery cars and drivers with TLC (Taxi and Limo Commission) commercial licenses and insurance. This is unlike the rest of the US, where UberX drivers and vehicles don't need commercial licenses and plates.
Only real difference between UberX and Uber Black in NYC is the quality of the car (usually Camrys or similar with UberX, and Town Cars or big SUVs with Uber Black).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
OK, to clarify, then, in NYC UberX drivers _do_ have TLC licenses and TLC-plated cars. In the rest of the country, they don't (whether or not they're supposed to).
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, I thought I was the only Slashdot reader in RI.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh no, not by a long shot. You should swing by the Hot Club, I know few on here that stop by there.
I dunno... Providence is such a long drive. It would take me like 45 minutes...
(Just proving my RI bona fides :)
Re: (Score:2)
So in other words - UberX in NYC obeys insurance and safety laws, while in other states it manages to be cheaper by skipping around them?
They claim they have insurance elsewhere. They're just not licensed with a particular government agency.
I think the safety law issue is a red herring. The reason you need to license cabs is that they make trips without any kind of recording of the event. If I get in a cab and pick you up on the curb, I could kill you and leave you in a gutter someplace and nobody would know you were ever in my cab. Systems that involve reservations are inherently more secure, because there is traceability.
I think that t
Re: (Score:2)
First time I took a cab (Score:2, Insightful)
I was new to the Seattle area and a college student, asked to be taken on a mainstream road in Bellevue (148th Street iirc), the cabby claimed not to be able to find it. Mind you this was 17 years ago and was 10pm, I was desperate to meet my roomate while he was still up and get into my new apartment. What should have been a $35 taxi ride cost $105. Gas was $1.16 in the area and I thought it was high compared to my area.
I already knew he ripped me off bigtime and couldn't happen with smartphones today ne
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty ballsy for a cab driver to claim not to know how to get to 148th Street.
"Do you know how to get to 147th street, asshole? WELL IT'S ONE BLOCK FROM THAT!"
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty ballsy for a cab driver to claim not to know how to get to 148th Street.
Ballsy or just stupid. Despite all the tests they are supposed to have taken on area streets, Seattle cab drivers seem outside their depth when going to anywhere outside of the core downtown and the airport. Several times I've got tired of them consulting road guides and talking to the dispatcher and just start giving directions: "Straight through the light, get on I-5, take the Olive St exit - this one right here!, left at the next light, take a right, stop next to that tree". I've never had similar situat
Re: (Score:2)
Tipping? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Tipping? (Score:5, Insightful)
The fare data does include tips. See bullet point #2 on the first page.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.0302... [arxiv.org]
Just use Lyft Line (Score:2)
I have been taking Lyft "Line" around and it's sweet.. They take you just about anywhere for $5. Yes, you have to stop and pick someone else up or drop them off usually but it's so damned cheap! This is one of those too good to be true things that will only last till the end of the tech bubble. Reminds me of getting Kozmo.com to deliver a snickers bar to your door during the last bubble.
Not in LA (Score:2)
I've taken at least 3 dozen Uber/Sidecar/Lyft rides , most expensive one was 28 bucks , i usually take short trips and it's not only cheaper, it's a LOT cheaper, if it wasn't for those options I wouldn't catch a cab because they are prohibitively expensive
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Experience (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In a yellow cab, you have to deal with often times 25 year old vehicles in poor condition, the dispatcher blaring on the radio the whole ride. You can call a cab, and there is no guarantee one will show up, and not to mention the tip you're expected to bestow.
This (dumb) article is about NYC, AFAICT. Things there are different. You don't "call a cab" (maybe in the outer boroughs, but my experience is in Manhattan), you stand on the side of the street and raise your arm. And the cabs I've been in lately w
Re:Experience (Score:5, Insightful)
What a complete and total pile of crap.
The average age of a NYC taxi is 3.3 years. They MUST be replaced after 6 years.
You can not call a yellow cab in NYC. Since you can't call one, your BS about one not showing up is false. You CAN call for a town car, which WILL show up, and has the same age limits as a regular cab, and WILL be a Lincoln Town Car or equivalent.
I don't know where you get your 'facts' from about Uber, but you sure as hell don't normally get a higher-end car or SUV. You usually get a Prius or Camry or something of that ilk.
Re: (Score:2)
The article was comparing yellow cabs to UberX.
Re: (Score:2)
The article is about NYC cabs and Uber.
Re: (Score:2)
it can only be cheaper all the time if the drivers are willing to work for less $$$$$$$$$$$$
NYC most uber drivers already drive car services and go with a garage. i bet uber is just there to fill in the gaps between fares
Re: (Score:2)
[citation needed]
Re: (Score:3)
I only respect laws designed to represent the interests of the citizenry as a whole--not the vested interests of one tiny class who bribed some politicians with campaign contributions.
Re:Experience (Score:5, Informative)
Do you actually have any idea at all what the regulations are for taxis? Here are some of the rules that 'only represent one tiny class':
Cars must be inspected 3 times a year. This includes safety and cleanliness, and accessibility.
Must have a rate card with FIXED (regulated) fares (none of this surge pricing nonsense) that the fares can see
All drivers must have valid Taxicab Drivers Licenses
Must have minimum $200,000 insurance per person
Must provide workers compensation coverage for drivers
Must operate each cab a minimum of 18 hours a day (again, none of this 'I'll only drive if the rates are high enough' crap)
Drivers must be trained for wheelchair passenger assistance (owner of the cab must pay for the training)
Must have braille and raised lettering plaques with the same info as the rate card (fares, complaint line, taxi ID)
Drivers license must be displayed in a lighted frame
Must have accurate taximeter
Must have operable air conditioning
Re: (Score:3)
Do you actually have any idea at all what the regulations are for taxis? Here are some of the rules that 'only represent one tiny class':
Here's the deal--no matter how good taxis are, no matter how much benefit they confer, no matter how much some people prefer them, there're some people who prefer Uber, or some other service, to taxis. Some people who have a choice choose Uber instead of choosing taxis. That means, to those people, that Uber is better, to them, than traditional taxis would be, to them.
Re:Experience (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem with that thinking is that nothing happens in a vacuum. You make it sound like Uber and the people who chose it have no impact on everyone else. When Uber comes in and gets to cherry-pick only profitable rides, and otherwise lower their price (by not doing all the things that regular cabs must do) that means the traditional cabs are not getting that business. They can't survive with their regulated rates and must-carry rules, time required on the road, etc. if they only get the unprofitable trips. That impacts not only the cab companies, but everyone who uses them, which is a whole lot more people than use Uber (236 million people per year in NYC).
If someone owns a factory they don't get to say 'yeah, everybody else has to obey EPA rules, etc, but those rules are really just to protect the existing factories, and my customers live somewhere else and don't care anyway, so we declare ourselves exempt from the law and will just dump waste into the rivers and air'. This is the same thing.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Dumping waste onto your neighbor's property (even gas, here), without their consent, is criminal.
Offering to give a person a ride at a cheaper rate than the alternative, without misrepresenting your product (and regular Uber users know what the product is perfectly well), with their consent, is not just legal, but beneficial to society as a whole.
If the problem is regulated rates, minimum road time, and so on... how about we fix that problem, instead of creating new ones?
What you're describing is called pro
Re: (Score:2)
Dumping waste onto your neighbor's property (even gas, here), without their consent, is criminal.
Offering to give a person a ride at a cheaper rate than the alternative, without misrepresenting your product (and regular Uber users know what the product is perfectly well), with their consent, is not just legal, but beneficial to society as a whole.
When was the last time you went for a ride with an Uber driver who just happened to be going to the same place as you? You didn't. Not once. Ever. Uber isn't a ride sharing service, it's an unlicensed livery service. If you and I are driving from Los Angeles to NYC together and we agree to split gas, then we are ride sharing. If I pay you $40 to take me to the airport after work, then you're providing a taxi service. See the difference? It's perfectly legal for you and I to carpool together. It's le
Re: (Score:2)
When was the last time you went for a ride with an Uber driver who just happened to be going to the same place as you? You didn't. Not once. Ever. Uber isn't a ride sharing service, it's an unlicensed livery service.
So?
If you and I are driving from Los Angeles to NYC together and we agree to split gas, then we are ride sharing. If I pay you $40 to take me to the airport after work, then you're providing a taxi service. See the difference?
So?
It's perfectly legal for you and I to carpool together. It's legal for me to buy you gas for giving me a ride somewhere. It's not legal (in many jurisdictions) to offer unregulated livery services.
So?
The people that those regulations listed by the GP are trying to protect are the passengers. Do you think that the taxi drivers want to be out there during unprofitable hours? That they want to charge the same rate at 5pm as they do at 1am? No. So I am not sure how you think those rules are protecting the taxi companies.
Government rules have strange ways of protecting industries, usually by shutting the door on new entrants to the market. I don't claim to be cognizant of exactly why, but just look at all the taxi cab drivers and owners protesting any relaxation of the above-mentioned rules and you'd guess it has to be benefiting them in some way, probably unfairly since it's the force of law.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't say anything about dumping on a neighbors property, I said polluting the air and water. And until the last 50 years or so, such polluting was NOT criminal, it was the normal way of life. It only became criminal when a LAW was passed (see how that works). Why was such a law passed? Because it was decided that the right of the population in general to have clean air and water was MORE IMPORTANT than the right of some people to choose to have cheap products, or the right of some people to make a p
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't say anything about dumping on a neighbors property, I said polluting the air and water.
How is that not the same thing.
And until the last 50 years or so, such polluting was NOT criminal, it was the normal way of life. It only became criminal when a LAW was passed (see how that works). Why was such a law passed? Because it was decided that the right of the population in general to have clean air and water was MORE IMPORTANT than the right of some people to choose to have cheap products, or the right of some people to make a profit/be in a business that they want to.
The passage of the law had very little to do with causing cleanliness of the environment and more to do with the fact it became economically viable to have such laws after technology had progressed to the point that cleanliness became economically viable.
Society has been becoming progressively less polluted for centuries. The Middle Ages had lakes so polluted they would CATCH ON FIRE. When's the last time you heard someone shout "gardyloo"? That's unfathomable nowadays.
I.e. su
Re: (Score:2)
In addition, they must pick up any fare who calls for service (none of this "I'm not going into THAT neighborhood" or "I'm not picking up THAT guy" crap).
But go ahead and get in that car with some random person.
Re: (Score:3)
How many of those regulations really offer any value in a reservation system like Uber? Why have the license in a lighted frame when you can just display it to the user on their phone or whatever? Why does the user need to see the license anyway?
Many of those regulations herald back to the day when enforcement of the law and recordkeeping was difficult, so they had to try to keep tabs on what was going on and deputize the citizenry.
I see variable fares as a benefit. Why not have reserve drivers who are w
Re: (Score:2)
The user sees the license so he knows that the person has a valid taxi license. Having a valid taxi license means things like he has not been convicted of a crime.
There is no area of the economy that has a 10x (let alone 50x) fluctation in price during the course of a day. Most areas would not see a 10x fluctuation in price over a decade. And when, by law, 3/4 of the cabs are on the streets at all times, there is no need for surge pricing.
Re: (Score:2)
The user sees the license so he knows that the person has a valid taxi license. Having a valid taxi license means things like he has not been convicted of a crime.
And that is necessary for taxis, since as a passenger all you see is a random yellow-painted car pull up which might or might not be a legally-licensed taxi. Also, it is important that they haven't been convicted of a crime, since the driver could shoot you and dump you in a ditch and nobody would know you had even gotten into the car.
With a reservation system like Uber the car that shows up is pre-identified, so you don't need any kind of further validation. Likewise, your trip was recorded in advance, s
Re: (Score:2)
I do not agree in the slightest that your ability to be safe (get out of town in an emergency) should be determined solely by your ability to pay. Maybe we should also let the firefighters decide they don't really want to work today, so if you have a fire we will only work if you pay us extra.
Re: (Score:2)
I do not agree in the slightest that your ability to be safe (get out of town in an emergency) should be determined solely by your ability to pay. Maybe we should also let the firefighters decide they don't really want to work today, so if you have a fire we will only work if you pay us extra.
Are you saying that individual employees should be compelled under force of law to perform a job against their will?
The $10 cabs that are already 100% saturated will still be around to not give you a cheap ride out of town even if the option to ride uber for $100 exists.
When you cap prices, it inevitably leads to shortages one way or another. The only time it makes sense is in monopoly situations. The whole point of services like Uber is to get rid of the monopolies. There is no reason there can't be 25
The value of Monopoly is you can ignore all that (Score:3)
Cars must be inspected 3 times a year. This includes safety and cleanliness, and accessibility.
I guess inspected does not mean fixed or repaired, based on what I've seen.
Must have a rate card with FIXED (regulated) fares (none of this surge pricing nonsense) that the fares can see
And then they tack on extra fees like tolls that they are not supposed to charge.
Must have minimum $200,000 insurance per person
Uber provides more insurance than that for drivers.
Must provide workers compensation coverage for drive
Re: (Score:2)
Cars must be inspected 3 times a year. This includes safety and cleanliness, and accessibility.
Fat lot of good that does. The dirtiest Uber I've ever been was is still 10x cleaner than the cleanest licensed taxicab I've ever been it. I guess driving a car for 18+ hours per day takes its toll.
Most of the regulations you speak of are from a bygone era. An accurate taximeter? Try GPS. Braille rate cards? The rider already has an accessible mobile device. You get the idea.
Maybe, just maybe, there is a problem with the standard taxicab experience. If taxicabs were better than Ubers, then there would be no
Re: (Score:2)
What you do is call the taxi commission, the number of which is prominently displayed (by law), including in braille and raised letters, in the cab. Who do you call when Uber 'accidentaly' charges the wrong rate?
Re: (Score:2)
What you do is call the taxi commission, the number of which is prominently displayed (by law), including in braille and raised letters, in the cab. Who do you call when Uber 'accidentaly' charges the wrong rate?
The TLC, which regulates Uber. In NYC, it's no different from any other black car service (and that includes UberX).
Re: (Score:2)
If the number has been scratched off it will be found at inspection. Same with seatbelts. Trips are recorded and reviewed by the T&LC. Do the things you suggest and get fined. Do it enough and lose your medallion. In NYC there is no charge for luggage in the interior or in the trunk.
Re: (Score:2)
And the compliance rates with these rules is?
As an ex (Aussie) taxi driver I can tell you that the rules are enforced by the transport cops who patrol the streets doing spot checks on trucks, cabs, and busses. There are heavy fines for both driver and owner, tampering with a sealed meter is considered fraud and can attract jail time. Small yellow lights on the top of the cab tell the cops what rate the meter is charging. Taxi's are also cleaned twice a day and can be put off the road by the transport cops if they are dirty. But hey, if you want to pay
Re: (Score:3)
So you'd be behind laws requiring a good driving record for drivers providing car-for-hire, requiring good maintenance for vehicles used for hire, requiring honest pricing, and some sort of way to check compliance with all of these requirements?
Only if those laws weren't REALLY designed to protect monopolies and money-making rackets for local governments.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I only respect laws designed to represent the interests of the citizenry as a whole--not the vested interests of one tiny class who bribed some politicians with campaign contributions.
You're right. It's not in the best interest of citizenry as a whole to have properly licensed and insured livery drivers. We're much better off when anyone with a smart phone and a car can provide taxi services.
Well they are insured and they do have a license, so I am not sure your point.
Re: (Score:3)
Well they are insured and they do have a license, so I am not sure your point.
They don't have a LIVERY license, and they don't have COMMERCIAL insurance.
You realize that there is a difference between standard car insurance and commercial livery insurance, right?
I'm sure you'll be happy to be sued when your Uber driver hits someone while transporting you and neither the driver's insurance nor Uber is willing to pay.
Re: (Score:2)
They don't have a LIVERY license, and they don't have COMMERCIAL insurance.
In NYC, they do, even UberX.
Re: (Score:2)
You do realized that they do have commercial insurance through uber right?
http://blog.uber.com/rideshari... [uber.com]
Re:Experience (Score:4, Informative)
I do not know about New York, but if you take an Uber car and get into an accident, do not count on the driver's insurance. It was invalidated the second you got in the car, having promised to pay him.
Re: (Score:2)
http://blog.uber.com/rideshari... [uber.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Well they are insured and they do have a license, so I am not sure your point.
In NYC, they do have proper insurance and licensing, yes. But the GP's statement suggested that these regulations existed strictly to protect the interests of taxi drivers and that there was no actual benefit to society. The GP forgets that these laws were introduced with public safety in mind.
Unless Uber is underwriting all of the insurance on their non-professional drivers, I doubt that Uber's policy offerings are of much value to those who may be harmed in an accident. To my knowledge, no one has made
Re: (Score:3)
Besides there is nothing preventing the pro-cab drivers from participating in the Uber market place. Maybe they need to spend less time whining and more time driving.
Re: (Score:2)
Which, at least in NYC, Uber does. It's legally no different than any other car service.
Re: (Score:2)
Reading comprehension issues, much? The study compared UberX, not Uber Black or any of the other higher tier Uber offerings.
As long as we're taking note of higher-tier Uber offerings, let's not forget this one. [theonion.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, those $800,000 medallions [nycitycab.com] don't pay for themselves, you know. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
"We were at a left turn lane to get onto a feeder, not moving, and every 10 seconds or so the price was going up 20 cents."
Um, that's how cabs work. Time or distance; the meter switches automatically. You are buying the services of a car, and traffic is (generally) out of the driver's control. Note that they make a lot more when they bill mileage, so it's in their interest to get you to your destination faster.
Re: (Score:2)