Invisibility Cloaking Takes a Big Stride At a Small Scale 18
jan_jes writes: Scientists have devised an ultra-thin invisibility "skin" cloak that can conform to the shape of an object and conceal it from detection with visible light. Although this cloak is only microscopic in size, the principles behind the technology should enable it to be scaled-up to conceal macroscopic items as well. The scientists used brick-like blocks of gold nanoantennas to form the 80-nanometer-thick cloak, which conformed to the arbitrary bumps and dents in the 1,300-square-micrometer sample object. The cloak, a metamaterial engineered to bend light in ways not seen in nature, was able to reflect red light as if it were bouncing off a flat mirror.
you know that... (Score:1)
You already can't see microscopic things...
Re: (Score:1)
Except in a microscope.
That's kinda what those things are for.
If it ever gets human-scaled (Score:1)
If it was used to make black dresses, the wearer’s head and limbs might appear to float around a dress-shaped hole.
We now have a whole new technology for rich idiots to prank each other with. Or just make dressing up as headless horsemen for Halloween easier.
Re: (Score:2)
That section was talking about the recently created superblack nanomaterial. Not this cloak.
visible light is over-rated (Score:2)
More like a cloth mirror, but still impressive (Score:5, Interesting)
Quite interesting, seems to be using diffraction patterns of these bricks. Reminds me of the Material Science 201 class where they talk about X-Ray diffraction pattern of crystalline structure, the Bragg's equation, 2 d sin(theta) = n lambda from the dim recesses of my memory. I could not get it then how the powdered substance with structures oriented in all the planes could be understood by the neat rows of dots, one incident and one reflected ray shown in the diagram. I don't get it now how this cloth could create that diffraction pattern.
Nothing to see here (Score:1)
move along!
Unfortunately, immediately after they applied the (Score:5, Funny)
coating, they lost the prototype and it hasn't been seen since.
so if you made a full size one ... (Score:3)
Sorry, but premise makes no sense. Invisibility requires that you process the image as seen from the viewer, then somehow project that image to the viewer on the surface of the cloak. Way, way, way different than what this might scale up to (if ever).