Wal-Mart Says It Is 6-9 Months From Using Drones To Check Warehouse Inventory (yahoo.com) 106
Multinational retail corporation Wal-mart announced on Thursday that it is six to nine months from starting to use drones to check warehouse inventories in the United States. The drones, which are capable of operating on autopilot, fly through the aisles snapping 30 images a second, and deliver real-time data to employees about whether the correct product is shelved in the proper place. From a Reuters report: Finding ways to more efficiently warehouse, transport and deliver goods to customers has taken on new importance for Wal-Mart as it deals with wages costs while seeking to beat back price competition and boost online sales. Wal-Mart said the camera and technology on top of the drones have been custom-built for the retailer.
Gary is NOT a drone! (Score:3)
That was a mean thing to say, Walmart.
Re: (Score:2)
Have you met Gary?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
now...the Drones of Walmart (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
There's a website for that. Not for the faint of heart.
http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/ [peopleofwalmart.com]
Re: (Score:2)
That's the joke.
No, that's the link. ;)
corporatespeak (Score:2)
This means "maintain high margins by laying people off"
Re: (Score:2)
This seems like something that will add capabilities not possible or practical with their current workforce.
Re: (Score:3)
This seems like something that will add capabilities not possible or practical with their current workforce.
It will synergistically disrupt platforms while enhancing cloud value.
Re: (Score:2)
And we all know what happens to populations in countries with nothing to export.
Re: (Score:2)
The population becomes the export.
Worked for Scotland. There's a reason why every engineer on every ship on earth or in sf books is named Scotty, and it's not all due to James Doohan. (and they have whisky and woolens to export too!)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you truly believe the value-added by a full-time Walmart retail employee is entitled to the type of compensation to support a family?
If Walmart cancelled their annual stock buybacks, they could afford to pay a living wage to employees.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you saying Walmart employees are zombies?
Re: (Score:2)
But why do you think they should pay living wages to run a check out counter? You are quickly costing families out of a job.
I know several families where 2 people work and make a livable wage. Raising those wages will cut at least one of them out of a job and destroy that family's income.
Re: (Score:3)
But why do you think they should pay living wages to run a check out counter?
Get families off of welfare and stop taxpayers from subsidizing Walmart's profits.
You are quickly costing families out of a job.
Wrong! Walmart's business model need to change. Of course, Wall Street won't be happy if they stop buying back stock shares to support Main Street.
Re: (Score:2)
Your entire argument is flawed: WalMart should give that money to me, not anyone else. I mean, if we're going to start telling companies what to do with their money, any option other than "give it all to lgw" is clearly the wrong option. Stop being so greedy!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Get families off of welfare and stop taxpayers from subsidizing Walmart's profits.
By providing these people with jobs, Walmart is reducing the amount of welfare they would otherwise receive. If you demand that every employee receive a "living wage" that can support a family, then Walmart is going to replace many of those employees with drones/self-checkout/stocking-robots/etc. and the welfare bill will go up, not down.
If you go into a Walmart, you will see some employees in wheelchairs, some have Downs Syndrome. Many of these people would be otherwise unemployable. They are at the bot
Re: (Score:2)
stop taxpayers from subsidizing Walmart's profits
Um, what?
Reality is the precise opposite. Minimum wage is an example of government forcing Walmart, and other employers who utilize low-skilled labor, to subsidize welfare. The system quite unfairly gives an advantage to businesses who profit from highly skilled workers.
It should be the other way around. Since the government is built to act in the interest of society, it should directly redistribute wealth within society to support welfare values. A progressive tax structure is actually a much fairer wa
Re: (Score:3)
Reality is the precise opposite.
Doubt that. Walmart is a bad corporate citizen. Taxpayers have been subsidizing Walmart's profits for years.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/15/report-walmart-workers-cost-taxpayers-6-2-billion-in-public-assistance/#3301bbfa7cd8 [forbes.com]
Taxpayers are also subsidizing security for Walmart with police calls.
http://www.tampabay.com/projects/2016/public-safety/walmart-police/ [tampabay.com]
Re: (Score:2)
You are missing the point.
Walmart and other employers should bear zero responsibility for the goals of society. Walmart's only purpose for existence is to create profit for its owners... that's it! The fact that they have to employ over 2 million employees to do so, and contribute to our economy in significant ways, is simply a side-effect that happens to benefit society by helping to drive our economy.
Society should pay for social programs. How can we do that? Taxes. Government is the primary vehicle
Re: (Score:2)
When was that time?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you truly believe the value-added by a full-time Walmart retail employee is entitled to the type of compensation to support a family?
If Walmart cancelled their annual stock buybacks, they could afford to pay a living wage to employees.
Riders of the Living Wage
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, functionally it does.
Got a problem with that? Do you truly believe the value-added by a full-time Walmart retail employee is entitled to the type of compensation to support a family?
alternately, do you truly believe the value of supporting a family is equal to the compensation of a full time Walmart retail employee?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: corporatespeak (Score:2)
5% EBIT percentage and 3% net income applicable to common stock, relative to revenue for the year ending January 31, 2016. You are welcome.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This means "maintain high margins by laying people off"
My hypocrisy detector is beeping. How many unnecessary people do you employ?
Good Ole WallyWorld... (Score:1)
Weren't these folks the same ones that pioneered importing everything from China back when? Now, everyone has to do it to remain "competitive". Now, robots staffing the warehouses, what next? Will they also replace the single employee that covers pretty much the entire sales floor with custom Cortana based customer service bots?
At the end of this mad race to the bottom we call capitalism who will be left with jobs so they can, you know, shop at Wal-Mart?
Re: (Score:2)
Will they also replace the single employee that covers pretty much the entire sales floor with custom Cortana based customer service bots?
http://www.kurzweilai.net/imag...
Re: (Score:2)
Walmart is Inexpensive (Score:3)
People shop there for inexpensive stuff. Some of that stuff is made in China, so substitute "cheap" for "inexpensive," but the premise is the same. I shop there when "cheap/inexpensive" is what is driving the purchase. When "quality" is driving the purchase, I shop elsewhere. I have a choice, and I make it. Some people are poor, do not have a choice, and shop at Walmart all the time. Thank God for Walmart.
Let robots and automation take over whatever jobs they can, and free Man to do the jobs only he can
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>
At the end of this mad race to the bottom we call capitalism who will be left with jobs so they can, you know, shop at Wal-Mart?
I've seen that movie. It's called Idiocracy and the computers that ran Brawndo fired the CEO due to stock price drops. Even the CEO wasn't as important as the computers that ran the company.
Seems Too Expensive (Score:2, Interesting)
Why wouldn't static cameras work better? Or even cameras that travel along ceiling rails and can zoom in to the specific product location. Those sound cheaper than custom-designed drones.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Seems Too Expensive (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
You have to hire someone at the location in the United States to install fixed cameras or rails. Then you have to have someone service/upgrade them as they break and get old. A drone can be manufactured in whatever place is cheaper than China now and thrown away when it gets broken or outdated. Drones can be programmed (and reprogrammed, when the warehouse layout changes) in one salaried employee's unpaid overtime.
Re: (Score:2)
How about collapsible aisles to maximize the store surface? People just punch whatever items they want on displays at the checkout counters, the required aisle opens up, a drone gets the item and the aisles collapse back together?
To which a troll would reply "How about floating packages hosted in the cloud and brought to you by rainbow-farting unicorns?"
Re: (Score:2)
Why wouldn't static cameras work better?
Because you would need a lot of them. Maybe one for every pallet rack. A Walmart distribution center contains thousands of racks.
Or even cameras that travel along ceiling rails and can zoom in to the specific product location.
You would need rails for every aisle, and very high res cameras to see pallet barcodes from a 48 ft ceiling at a high angle. They would be way out of range of any passive RFID pallet tags.
Those sound cheaper than custom-designed drones.
The drones are mostly off-the-shelf. Only a few components are customized. You would only need two or three drones per warehouse (one working, and one or two backups). That would be way che
Re: (Score:2)
A lot of National Part Distribution Center's(NPDC's aka the big auto company warehouses) have already tried all this stuff(cameras, RFID's, drones, fully automated systems, etc), walmart could save themselves time and effort and simply look at trials that GM/Ford/Chrysler/Honda/Toyota places and find out that none of it works and people on the ground does. Or they can just enjoy wasting the money on it. If it's one thing I've learned it's that when a company's top people get an idea in their head that some
Re: (Score:2)
Or they could realize that tech improves in both capability and cost effectiveness, and drone tech in particular has been improving rapidly. So it is likely a good time to revisit the idea.
I own a quadcopter drone. I am also an embedded system programmer. I used to work in a warehouse, drove a forklift, and participated in many inventory audits. Maybe I am missing something, but I just don't see any roadblocks to making it work. The biggest obstacle would be the lack of GPS inside the warehouse, but an
Amazon behind? (Score:4, Insightful)
snapping 30 images a second (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's probably 29.97 tops!
Wal-Mart wages (Score:4, Informative)
"... as it deals with wages costs ..."
LOL! Wal-Mart has to "deal with wages costs!" HAHAHA! That's a good one! From the company that pays starvation wages and accompanies pay checks with info about where to apply for food stamps!
Re: (Score:2)
OK then... (Score:2)
gotta take an umbrella, some stick or a fly swatter with you when you go there and the things are flirring around to hit them if they come too close.
Also, how would they count tightly stacked small boxes in rows of 1' deep shelfs?
Wmart saving even more on sub-living hourly wages using retirees on medicare shaving off some bucks and loading it on the general population.
Yeah! Capitalism is better than Socialism (not my statement, but another guy's who was unable to define what those terms mean and where pur
Because drones (Score:5, Insightful)
Surely they're not just relying on video alone. Maybe RFIDs play a role too. Otherwise, this seems like a really expensive and error-prone way of managing warehouse space. Other warehouse inventory systems would seem to be more accurate and cheaper (things like pick-to-light; put-to-light, etc).
Re: (Score:2)
I also wondered why they would design a drone to do this instead of just using RFID tags. Back in 2003 Wal-Mart announced they were requiring their largest suppliers to integrate RFID tags into packaging.
Did Wal-Mart love RFID to death? [zdnet.com]
Won't do any good (Score:2)
Their problem seems to be related to the inability to move their products from their store warehouse to their shelves so the public can actually purchase the products.
Walmart has employees? (Score:2)
Whenever I encounter a blue-uniformed worker in the store other than at checkout, it's a vendor doing the employees' work for them.
Hope you're happy.... (Score:4, Insightful)
all you out there clamoring for $15/hr minimum wage. This is the beginning of the end of low paying/entry level jobs. We're seeing this in the fast food industry as well with automated french fry machines, and probably burger makers soon too. When government decides to get involved and try to tell businesses how to do things this is the predictable response.
When you are in a low margin business like fast food, or WalMart for that matter, you simply can't make a profit paying people $15/hr for entry level jobs that require little to no skill. So they turn to cheaper robots. So instead of a bunch of $10/hr jobs you end up with zero, or close to zero, $15/hr jobs.
Re: (Score:3)
Let's do a thought experiment with some made up, but representative numbers.
We have French Fries 'r Us, which is open 16 hours per day. Each day, they have 2 employees dedicated to making the french fries (each doing an 8 hour shift), and the owner is considering automation to eliminate the position of Fry Frier. He finds that the French Fry Machine can be purchased for $180k.
Paying each of his 2 full time Fry Friers $15/hour comes to ~$62k per year. So, the machine has a 3 year ROI, what a deal! He dec
Re: (Score:2)
That's an interesting analysis. Tasks that can be automated WILL be automated. It's only a matter of when and to what extent. In the Auto industry we have seen what it might look like already. You have robots that can create thousands of perfect welds, better than any human could do. Then you have a human to inspect the welds to make sure nothing was missed. That's the model. Robot makes the fries, human inspects the fries before they get served to anyone.
As you pointed out above, raising the minimum wage (
of course (Score:2)
make america shop again (Score:2)
Do you know how much Mexico is making from the United States? That's peanuts,
Wow. Robots are taking all our jobs :-) (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Can we also program the drones to crash into mobility scooters if visual analysis determines the rider to be a skinny ass punk?
FTFY
Re:Put some in the stores too (Score:4, Insightful)
The test for whether or not someone ought to be provided a mobility scooter is "can they comfortably walk through a Wal-Mart in order to retrieve the item they want to purchase?", and has nothing to do with what the specific reason for their being uncomfortable with walking that far might be.
Wal-Mart's prime competitor is one which requires zero walking, so it makes sense to offer a reduced-walking option for any customer who might desire it.
Re: (Score:2)
Wal-Mart's prime competitor
I bet next you'll tell us that was unintentional.