Intel Lays Roadmap For 100-Fold AI Performance Boost With Nervana and Knights (hothardware.com) 44
MojoKid writes: Intel is laying out its roadmap to advance artificial intelligence performance across the board. Nervana Systems, a company that Intel acquired just a few months ago, will play a pivotal role in the company's efforts to make waves in an industry dominated by GPU-based solutions. Intel's Nervana chips incorporate technology (which involves a fully-optimized software and hardware stack) that is specially tasked with reducing the amount of time required to train deep-learning models. Nervana hardware will initially be available as an add-in card that plugs into a PCIe slot, which is the quickest way for Intel to get this technology to customers. The first Nervana silicon, codenamed Lake Crest, will make its way to select Intel customers in H1 2017. Intel is also talking about Knights Mill, which is the next generation of the Xeon Phi processor family. The company claims that Knights Mill will deliver a 4x increase in deep learning performance compared to existing Xeon Phi processors and the combined solution with Nervana will offer orders of magnitude gains in deep learning performance. "We expect the Intel Nervana platform to produce breakthrough performance and dramatic reductions in the time to train complex neural networks," said Diane Bryant, Executive VP of Intel's Data Center Group. "We expect Nervana's technologies to produce a breakthrough 100-fold increase in performance in the next three years to train complex neural networks, enabling data scientists to solve their biggest AI challenges faster," added Intel CEO Brian Krzanich.
the blockquote is reversed (Score:2)
100-fold faster generation of bullshit (Score:3, Interesting)
What a load of PHB bean-counter marketoid bullshit.
"Data scientists" still care jack shit about reality. 90% of today's "machine learning" [sic] work is about justifying the bias. The rest 10% is about tracking you and taking away your freedom, replacing your reality with an echo chamber, while making you pay for it.
We expect Nervana's technologies to produce a breakthrough 100-fold increase in performance in the next three years to train complex neural networks, enabling data scientists to solve their biggest AI challenges faster
100x faster generation of bullshit still achieves nothing but bullshit. It's not about always about how fast you do it.
Re: (Score:3)
replacing your reality with an echo chamber
So, it's a Slashdot replacement? In that case, booo!
Re: (Score:2)
I concur 100% !
Only a complete and total idiot attempts to call Code + Data == A.I. We already have a name for that: Algorithm.
The complete and total fail of the Standard Model [wikipedia.org] is that consciousness, let alone intelligence, doesn't even exist! They just "magically" emerge out of nothing. /sarcasm Yeah, right. Can I have some of what you're smoking!
This obsession over Artificial Ignorance (A.I) compared to actual intelligence (a.i.) is total joke. There is NOTHING artificial about intelligence -- either you
Re: (Score:2)
A.I. = algorithm intelligence ?
Re: (Score:2)
"consciousness, let alone intelligence, doesn't even exist! They just "magically" emerge out of nothing. /sarcasm Yeah, right. Can I have some of what you're smoking!"
Everyone knows they magically emerges out of God's bollocks, which magically emerged out of nothing - or has been eternally dangling over the multiverse or some other bullshit fairy tale
Re: (Score:2)
You DO realize Science preaches the exact same thing, right?
Energy can not be created nor destroyed, therefore it has always existed.
Who the fuck cares if someone calls it God while others call it Energy ???
Re: (Score:2)
"Energy can not be created nor destroyed, therefore it has always existed"
Yeah, that part after the therefore is an addition of yours while conveniently leaving out that the conservation of energy applies to closed / isolated systems.
And even allowing for your creative rewording, that DOES NOT imply a supreme being with infinite power, knowledge & intelligence
Re: (Score:2)
> Yeah, that part after the therefore is an addition of yours
Are you really that retarded? If something can't be created nor destroyed then BY DEFINITION it has existed for infinity.
It is like looking at circle and asking where the beginning or end is. There isn't one.
> while conveniently leaving out that the conservation of energy applies to closed / isolated systems.
The universe is a closed system.
--
2024 is the year that Junk Science of Darwinism vs Junk Faith of Creationism are BOTH shown to be in
Re: (Score:2)
> Yeah, that part after the therefore is an addition of yours
Are you really that retarded? If something can't be created nor destroyed then BY DEFINITION it has existed for infinity.
It is like looking at circle and asking where the beginning or end is. There isn't one.
> while conveniently leaving out that the conservation of energy applies to closed / isolated systems.
The universe is a closed system.
--
You have no idea what you're "defining". We don't know how our universe came to be or where the "energy" came from.
We don't even know what "energy is; it's a concept
And calling it "God" , whatever it is, is primitive thinking
Re: (Score:2)
> I don't know how our universe came to be or where the "energy" came from.
FTFY.
Why do you assume everyone is as ignorant as you??
Just because _you_ don't know doe NOT imply no one else doesn't know. This is the height of arrogance.
You haven't had my experiences -- you don't have my knowledge. As a mystic I'm quite well aware were the Universe and Energy come from. If you can't even understand basic concept of Infinity or Existence then labeling someone who is aware of God as "primitive thinking", iro
Re: (Score:2)
"Thankfully there is also a place to get educated: It is called School and University. You might want to try it sometime"
Please tell me which ones gave you passing grades so I know where not to apply.
"As a mystic I'm quite well aware were the Universe and Energy come from"
thanks, Doctor Strange but I'll pass on your "school" of "thought"
Re: (Score:2)
Your fallacy is assuming Experiential knowledge can be taught.
If you would spend less time shooting the messenger and more time listening to the message you might actually learn something.
Re: (Score:1)
add-in cards for gaming (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:h1 (Score:1)
Neural Nets (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
That's pretty awesome, its one thing to use a machine to do something faster than a human can, its completely different thing do use a machine to do what human doesn't know how to do.
Indeed! I would go so far as to say that if the IBM's Watson/Jeopardy stunt doesn't impress you, then you haven't understood the problem.
Show Some Love For Genetic Algorithms (Score:3, Informative)
Show some love for Genetic Algorithms. Sure you may have to thoroughly verify that their 'better than a programmer' optimal solution is actually a correct solution but- they have existed for a long time even if as yet unspectacularly leveraged (in publicly visible ways that would have made them rank in your book)
Re: (Score:2)
What is this, the 1940s? All this AI "research" and neural nets are the best they can come up with?
After 4 billion years of evolution, neural nets are also the best that natural intelligence has come up with.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Cut Google electric bill by a not small amount
https://deepmind.com/blog/deep... [deepmind.com]
Effective power savings of 15%
Re: (Score:1)
Nervana and Knights (Score:2)
Sounds like a rock group
Do the Knights include Sir Elton John, Sir Paul Macartney and Sir Rod Stewart?
"We'll kill the fathead, coughed the knight, so stick around"
Re: (Score:2)