Tim Sweeney Dislikes Windows 10 Cloud Rumors, Calls OS 'Crush Steam Edition' (arstechnica.com) 183
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: The rumor that Microsoft is building a version of Windows 10 that can only install apps from the Windows Store has drawn criticism before it's even official. Epic Games founder Tim Sweeney took to Twitter to attack the operating system. Although its real name is named Windows 10 Cloud, he's dubbing it "Windows 10 Crush Steam Edition." Sweeney is convinced that Microsoft wants to exercise total control over the Windows platform and destroy Valve's Steam. Last year, Sweeney attacked the Universal Windows Platform API. He claimed (incorrectly) that third-party stores such as Steam would be unable to sell and distribute UWP games, leaving them at a disadvantage relative to Microsoft's own store. He followed this statement with the claim that Microsoft would systematically modify Windows so as to make Steam work worse and worse, such that gamers grow tired of it and switch to the Windows Store. In his tweets, Sweeney recognizes that Microsoft wants to compete with Chrome OS. But he fails to understand what the company must do to actually offer that competition. He wrote that "it's great for Microsoft to compete with ChromeOS, but NOT BY LOCKING OUT COMPETING WINDOWS SOFTWARE STORES." This statement represents a failure to understand that "locking out competing Windows software stores" is, for this market, positively desirable. It's fundamental to preventing the hard-to-support free-for-all that a Windows system would otherwise represent. A later tweet does recognize the value of this lockdown, but Sweeney says that Windows 10's "great admin features to limit user software installs" should be used instead. This again suggests a misunderstanding of the target market: systems will be used with little to no supervision and with little to no administrative oversight. To compete against the Chromebook, Windows 10 Cloud needs to be locked down by default, and it must not offer any ready way to disable that lockdown. In his complaints, Sweeney also fails to consider what happens should the Chromebook threat go unaddressed: Chromebooks running Chrome OS will proliferate. These machines will not support third-party stores, they will not support Steam, and they will not support PC games at all. Sweeney may not want Microsoft to build this world, but even if Microsoft doesn't create it, Google already is doing so.
Remember, kids (Score:5, Insightful)
Windows ain't done until Steam won't run!
Re:Remember, kids (Score:5, Interesting)
"DOS isn't done until Lotus won't run."
It's been that way since the beginning. VCs (with the guts to risk pissing off the Monster from Redmond) would often ask a start-up what their contingency plans were in the event Microsoft would cripple their app. Or offer their own 'free' version bundled with the OS.
To be fair; this isn't about Microsoft killing Steam. It's probably more like selling it through the Windows Store. "You wanna do business in my town? You gotta give me a piece of da' action, see?"
Re: (Score:1)
After decades I have yet to see proof Microsoft actually did any of this.
And Lotus 123 ran just fine with every machine on which I used it.
Sweeney is full of it as are most MS haters.
Re: (Score:2)
You must be living under a rock then, anon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
That doesn't support your case at all. There's only one mention of Lotus on the page and it has nothing to do with crippling Lotus 123 from a technical point of view.
In fact, Lotus did it to themselves by failing to provide Win32 versions of their applications in a timely fashion.
Re: (Score:2)
As I recall it was discovery in the Comes case vs MS that proved it. They'd had meetings to brainstorm ways to make competing software have continuous 'difficulties'. Through the 80s MS hadn't updated their operating system. Dos 3.3 needed all sort of helper software to be able to function with a networ
Re: (Score:2)
So, killing Steam then? Because selling an app store in an app store doesn't make any goddamn sense.
(Not that killing Steam is a bad thing, mind you -- all DRM'd app stores are evil, including third-party ones.)
This is true (Score:5, Interesting)
for the moment. My percentage of games that will run under Linux is (very) slowly but steadily increasing.
Re: (Score:2)
What kind of story... (Score:5, Insightful)
What kind of hack news site PICKS UP AN UNFOUNDED RUMOR...then runs a story on the unfounded rumor just to discredit the author of the rumor based on previous rumors.
What..the fuck kind of news for nerds is this gossipy whining?
Re: (Score:1)
It's the kind that you love so much that you registered an account and posted on the articles you hate, for YEARS, only ever contributing to /. ad revenue in the process.
Complain all you want, until you take your business elsewhere, you're part of the problem too.
Same kind that is making SoylentNews sick... (Score:1)
It's this BeauHD guy who posts crap like this to *BOTH* sites, and somehow the staff on each just let it happen (For the record, SN is probably a bit more friendly to the conservative crowd (outside a few LGBT/SJW types) than slash nowadays, but similiarly containing of sensationalistic crap from serial posters like BeauHD.
It's like Roland Paqpiquille(sp) and company all over again!
Re: (Score:2)
BeauHD is some next level shitposting though.
Re:What kind of story... (Score:5, Insightful)
This site hasn't called itself "News for Nerds" in quite a few years now. [alistapart.com] Just look around and try to find that tag-line... It's long gone.
It's been one non-stop decline ever since the "Politics" section was created. First Sourceforge, then Dice, and now BizX have had no interest in the site's origins or credibility, and are only interested in the large audience they can abuse to drive-up ad impressions. Even clicking through to complain about what a shithole this place has become, is PROFIT for them, so they will keep it up. The trolls are profit, the paid shills are profit, the flood of crap on the front-page that has people yelling at their screen is profit for them. And that's the only thing they care about.
Sure the audience has continued declining, sure this place is a joke, sure in the long-term it's an increasingly less valuable property for the change, but they're going to cash-out as much as they can, as soon as they can, and not worry one bit about the smoldering ruin that's left.
Re: (Score:2)
That's simply not true.
"News for nerds, stuff that matters" is still there in the title bar on the front page. It just doesn't make part of the logo any more.
Also as for ChromeOS before Android applications: (Score:1)
It's terrible and not competition to Windows!!
Turn Windows into ChromeOS and chances are I'll make the switch back to Linux.
Whatever turning Windows into something with Windows store only is enough for that .. Maybe. I unlikely want to lose all chance to tinker with the main computer so to say.
The openness of the PC is what make it so great. Talk all you want about closed source OS but the platform has been pretty accessible anyway... at-least relative what one could imagine by now ...
"The Sony home-compute
Re: (Score:3)
This is the kind of news people are forced to resort to, when corporations like M$ a lying pieces of shite. Lie, lie, lie, it's all they do, they are disgusting. Now they biggest lie of all, they have the right to install software on the computer that you bought, that you paud of the OS, against you will, against your rights, what a crock of shite. Basically screw M$ and it blatantly corrupt theft of user rights, it is the biggest abuse of the public by any corporation in history and being backed up by a co
Re: (Score:2)
Remember, #FakeNews is only Fake News if it comes from a conservative paper. Everyone else has a completely spotless record!
Re: (Score:2)
But... (Score:2)
.. they already have "a version of Windows [x] that can only install apps from the [Microsoft] Store" or Microsoft blessed disks and its called the XBOX [insert any version here].
...Crush Steam? (Score:1)
Well, at least that would pretty much guarantee the year of the Linux desktop.
Re: (Score:2)
So it'll be the decade of the Linux Gaming desktop ?
As much as it pains me to take M$'s side . . . (Score:2)
Let's set the wayback machine to the days of XP. Microsoft had to put up with a near-constant stream of complaints that many machines running XP were exploited and buggy. There was a lot of evidence to support this - but in many cases, the bugs and exploits were due to end-users not patching/updat
Re: (Score:2)
Who gives a shit? I'll take buggy and exploit prone over treating the owner of the goddamn computer as a hostile enemy and/or a slave to be exploited any day!
Any company who decides their copyright should overrule the device owner's actual property rights must be destroyed for the good of society.
Re: (Score:2)
But what happens to the "personal" in personal computers? I shuddered 10 years ago when slashdoter LOVED iOS and Android but bashed Windows for control??? Really?!
With Windows you can at least talk to your hardware and do what you want on it. True it's harder due to security as security and UAC block things but you can work around.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh - I'll bet you thought that "My Computer" meant it was yours.
It does.
The hardware is yours, the data arguably so.
The data is also mine. Who are these people arguing otherwise?
Licensed software is not yours - you just have permission to use it.
Sad but true. I have never seen such a clear-cut argument as to why operating systems shouldn't be licensed.
I've sent feedback to Google asking that they restore widget functionality to the app. This is only the most recent example of such activity by Google
Windows store is to locked down for games (Score:2)
Windows store is to locked down for games (sandboxing) to work like stream and do they have any thing like the workshop?
You can install SteamOS on Chromebooks (Score:5, Interesting)
You can install Steam OS on Chromebooks, just as you can on Windows machines. Its just the game industry that needs to support Steam OS, and he isn't locked in to Microsoft any more. And no, he won't be locked into Steam OS either, because if they start demanding more, he can just clone Ubuntu himself and distribute his game as OS. As long as new computers will allow free OS choice, there is no problem.
On a dev mode Chromebook, data loss is the default (Score:2)
You can install Steam OS on Chromebooks
How so? I thought installing another operating system on a Chromebook was possible only if the firmware is set to developer mode, and if the firmware is set to developer mode, it prompts whoever turns it on to press Space then Enter to wipe everything. Someone who picks up your laptop and turns it on won't know to press Ctrl+D or wait 30 seconds for the beeping to stop waking others sleeping in the same household. Instead, he or she will just do what the screen says, not knowing or not caring about the ensu
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting, didn't know of this. I've done some reading and apparently there is a "soft" developer mode and a "hard" developer mode. The "soft" developer mode invokes pressing some keys and buttons to install a different OS, the "hard" developer mode involves changing the BIOS write protect flag by turning a screw/setting a jumper and then flashing a new firmware (Chrome OS has open source firmware so this is possible). With hard developer mode I think you can simply edit the firmware source code (if there
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
At some point, though, it becomes less of a hassle to just move out and into another apartment before putting up with an abusive and batshit insane landlord any longer.
Especially if the new apartment is in a nicer neighborhood, has lower rent and better locks at the doors.
But Tim's okay with iOS? (Score:1)
Tim's love and defense for Steam is admirable, but it's hard to take him seriously while he actively develops apps for iOS, which is the ultimate walled garden.
Re: (Score:2)
iOS is easy to avoid. Unlike Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
What was then known as iPhone OS closed up what was then known as Mac OS X.
Tablet with keyboard as laptop substitute (Score:2)
iOS is not on desktops quite yet, but it is on a laptop of sorts. Some analysts seem to be under the impression that an iPad with a keyboard cover [apple.com] can replace a laptop for many users.
Cloud version (Score:1)
If it's running in "the cloud" I doubt people will be playing games on it anyhow. Some things are best done locally with appropriate hardwar.e
Windows Vaporware Edition (Score:1)
DO IT! Lock out every other means of install! (Score:3)
I've been waiting for SteamOS to seriously take off.
For SteamOS to seriously take off DEVELOPERS HAVE TO EMBRACE LINUX.
For that to happen they need a good kick in the ass. Microsoft pissing them off would be a good kick in the ass. I haven't had a Windows machine since Win 2000 was still new up until about a month ago. I got tired of waiting for the promised Linux port of Giana Sisters Twisted Dreams, not to mention I'm really looking forward to South Park the Fractured But Whole, both of which are Windows only. I built a Wintendo with a monitor emulator plug so it just sits there and runs steam for Steam Casting to my Linux machine and the Steam Link I picked up for $20.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, if Sweeney hates Windows so much, why doesn't his team put more effort in making Steam OS better? The last time I tried it a few months ago, it was still pretty rough and the game selection was pretty puny.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm an avid Humble Bundler and I've been a Linux Gamer since my only real option was Quake, Unreal, and whatever Loki ported.
There is a HUGE and awesome selection of Linux compatible games on Steam.
Fine, not every AAA title you want is there, in fact being a AAA title tends to reduce the likelihood that it will be available on Linux AKA Steam OS, but the "shotgun buying" approach of the Humble Bundle has gotten me to try a bunch of titles I probably wouldn't have looked at otherwise and I've loved some of t
Re: (Score:2)
There's quite a few AAA titles and many B-list titles and many many indie titles.
Anecdotally, Alien Isolation, Chivalry, XCOM 1 and 2, Total War Empire and Attilla, Rocket League, Metro 2033, and Deus Ex: Human Revolution all run quite well.
I also play about a dozen indie titles.
There's literally more games for Linux now than I have the time to play or money to buy and more coming out every week.
What more could you ask for?
Did he not see Windows RT (Score:2)
Echoes of the 80's? (Score:2)
Short lived title (Score:2)
Take a fucking chill pill dude... (Score:2)
As far as I know, the whole Windows 10 cloud rumors came from a piece of code that indicates that there might be a version of Windows 10 codenamed cloud...
Anyone that goes as far as assuming and then proceeding to cuss at a company because of speculative information leaked in a piece of code should be looked upon and considered a crazy paranoid maniac. Your agenda is showing Sweeney. Get yourself a better hobby, this one is unhealthy for you.
The Ars Technica article isn't doing any better on that front too.
Crush Steam Edition? (Score:2)
I guess that makes the non-Cloud version Pound Sand Edition. ;)
You have Windows becoming an appliance (Score:2)
So -WIndows 10 cloud is about an appliance were the users can't even control which programs to run (previous instances of Windows Stores had virtually no apps) - and you have basically Ars Technica just licking Microsoft boots and endorsing it to very last bit. The only thing left to wonder is how much of Ars Technica revenue comes directly from Microsoft Marketing department.
Gabe with Valve warned everyone this was coming... (Score:2)
Gabe with Valve warned everyone when Microsoft introduced the windows store that they'd eventually try to kill outside software distribution. It's the entire reason he built SteamOS. Tim and the other game company CEO's happily dissed SteamOS for years.
Microsoft is going to try to kill outside distribution. They might even succeed.
Steam to become Windows Store (Score:2)
So what does he want? Is he pissed that Microsoft didn't just use Steam instead of the Windows Store?
Ooh, And How Do They Do That? (Score:2)
Gamers on ChromeOS? (Score:2)
Really? Are they hard core candy crushers or something? I get that you can play Quake in a browser these days, but do you see any serious gaming happening on a Chromebook?
Re: Meanwhile in the Apple ecosystem on iPads.. (Score:5, Informative)
TFA is either biased or uninformed though; ChromeOS supports side loading and is open source, so there really isn't any reason why third party app stores couldn't be used.
Sweeney may be correct in that even if Microsoft allows side loading, they can revoke it at any time and there's nothing anybody can do about it.
And yes, this likewise would be more comparable to the Apple model. Arstechnica seems to routinely be biased against Google though, so it would make sense if they just wanted to pick on ChromeOS.
Re: Meanwhile in the Apple ecosystem on iPads.. (Score:4, Funny)
I really wish they'd release steam for Android.
Some basic level of curation, better community for reviews, cross PC and Android purchases, I suspect instead Steam will go away as he fails to compete in a market he created (effective online distribution games store).
Re: (Score:3)
I really wish they'd release steam for Android.
Except that Android is in practice as locked down as Windows is since nearly all apps require Google services and you can't re-compile Android with Google services including the store.
Re: Meanwhile in the Apple ecosystem on iPads.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Except that Android is in practice as locked down as Windows is since nearly all apps require Google services and you can't re-compile Android with Google services including the store.
That doesn't seem to stop Amazon from running its own app store or distributing its own non-Google fork of Android.
Re: (Score:2)
The real issue here is that it should have never gotten to the point where the vendor "allowing" something or not was possible in the first place. The owner of a device -- i.e., the user -- should have 100% complete control over every aspect of that device, full stop. All DRM should be illegal!
Re: (Score:2)
The real issue here is that it should have never gotten to the point where the vendor "allowing" something or not was possible in the first place. The owner of a device -- i.e., the user -- should have 100% complete control over every aspect of that device, full stop. All DRM should be illegal!
We had it that way in the good ol' days of DOS. But still users flocked to AppStore when the iPhone came out like stray cats would run to a leaking milk truck! So what happend back then, when users could install anything they wanted without restrictions?
BonziBuddy! [wikipedia.org]
And not much has changed since then. Go to Joe Sixpacks PC and you'll find tons of malware, adware and who knows what. A friend had so many search bars in his browser, he couldn't see anything of the website anymore.
As nice as the idea of the free
Re: Meanwhile in the Apple ecosystem on iPads.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The copyright holder is not the owner. The Public Domain is the owner; the copyright holder is just borrowing it.
Re: (Score:3)
But again you don't want to actually *do* anything so you just continue to support closed hardware vendors, closed software vendors and the model that produces DRM content.
That's nonsense.
I refuse to buy Apple devices because they're locked down. That hasn't stopped millions of idiots buying them, and as a result skewing the market so that some software or other features are only available on Apple devices.
If I refuse to buy a Windows 10 device because it's locked down, that wont stop millions of idiots from buying one anyway, and skewing the market so that the games I want to play are only available on Windows 10 devices.
My options here are very limited.
Then go and fund open hardware development
Sure. Could you loan
Re: (Score:1)
even if Microsoft allows side loading, they can revoke it at any time and there's nothing anybody can do about it.
Even if Microsoft allows Win32 apps to be installed on Windows XP, they can revoke that ability via an update at any time and there's nothing anybody can do about it.
The logic here is completely false. Microsoft can do *ANYTHING* to *ANY* version of Windows and there is "nothing anybody can do about it". That's as true of Win32 as it is of UWP.
Re: (Score:3)
Even if Microsoft allows Win32 apps to be installed on Windows XP, they can revoke that ability via an update at any time and there's nothing anybody can do about it.
Are you high? If you revoked the ability of XP to run win32 applications, then what exactly would it even be able to run? There's no such thing as UWP for XP. Same is true of 7.
Furthermore, UWP was designed from the ground up for sideloading to be impossible and then only enabled after an update because nobody wanted to touch it so they're hoping that they can get at least some interest besides the zero interest it currently has.
Re: (Score:2)
UWP was designed from the ground up for sideloading to be impossible and then only enabled after an update because nobody wanted to touch it
Sideloading was possible in the first release of Windows 10, which was the first OS containing UWP.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And yes, this likewise would be more comparable to the Apple model.
This is what I don't get. If MS go more like Apple then I may as well buy Apple. The reason I stick with MS is the precisely because it works with most non-MS things.
Microsoft's strength is that they live in the happy place between locked ecosystem like Apple, and warts and all hairy old Linux. Seems a poor choice to give up the market segment they dominate to try and play me too with Apple or Google. Did they not learn from the Windows Phone disaster?
Re: (Score:2)
But consider it in the context of the average Chromebook user, they aren't going to be side loading 3rd party app store programs and they certainly aren't going to be installing a custom ChromeOS build if Google were to decide to halt side loading in the official version.
That's a totally moot point; the author was arguing that the only way Microsoft could match Chrome OS is to block the ability for third party stores to work because they can't work in Chrome OS either, but that whole premise is false to begin with. If somebody like Steam wanted to create a third party app store on Chrome OS, they very well could. However Microsoft does have a precedent of creating an OS (see Windows RT) where third party stores are just flat out impossible.
Furthermore, even if it wasn't moo
Re: Meanwhile in the Apple ecosystem on iPads.. (Score:1)
The difference is users expect something called Windows to run real Windows software, not worthless garbage apps. iPad isn't called "Mac Tablet".
Re: Meanwhile in the Apple ecosystem on iPads.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Microsoft is convinced that the name "Windows" actually carries some goodwill with consumers. Where they got that idea must be one of the best-kept secrets in the business world. The only time most people have ever heard of "Windows" is when their computer breaks and they have to call someone to fix it, either at work or at home.
The "Windows" brand has negative consumer value. Until someone at Microsoft wakes up and realizes that, they will continue to churn out flop after flop, from mobile phones to locked-down iPad competitors.
Re: (Score:2)
What part of the Windows franchise is earning $20B/year, except desktop OSes that people (think they) have no choice but to buy?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Yet nobody seems to attack Apple for exactly the same view on their iPads.
1. People attack Apple about this all the time.
2. Most people that buy iPads see the "walled garden" as a feature. They are specifically looking for something safe for their 5 year old to learn phonics. When people buy Windows laptops, they are expecting a general purpose computer.
Anyway, if you haven't read TFA, don't waste your time. The whole article consists of quoting Tim Sweeney, and they explaining why everything he just said is full of crap ... so then why bother to quote him? It is a pointles
Re: (Score:3)
It has to do with expectations.
When you hear Windows, you expect a general purpose operating system.
When you hear iPad, you expect a touchscreen that can run whatever apps Apple approves.
Re: (Score:2)
Because Apple did it the smart way. They started small and worked up from there. No one was REALLY bothered by software limitation on a phone. It's just a phone (at least back in the iPhone 1 days), and there are alternatives that are available if it really bothers you. Then they moved up to the pads, which were basically just bigger phones, so yeah, I suppose that's OK, too.
Plus, Apple has been software restrictive from day 1, so it's not really a bit surprise that their next device is a bit more res
Re: (Score:2)
and their desktop OS has been the Wild West for decades. Got an exe? Fire it up!
So was Apple, then they introduced GateKeeper and it wouldn't let you run executables until you go in to the settings and explicitly say you want to run unsigned code. In settings you had:
But in Sierra the only options are:
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I just checked, as I haven't moved to Sierra yet. No, it'll still let you open any app you download, you just have to double-click on it, go to security in the settings app and click on "open anyway" the first time.
What do you mean "No", that's exactly what I just said: it wouldn't let you run executables until you go in to the settings and explicitly say you want to run unsigned code. And in Sierra the "Anywhere" option does not exist anymore, they're certainly moving toward an "authorised" application model.
Re: (Score:2)
OSX 10.10 System Menu > System Preferences > Security & Privacy
--
"Religion focuses more on the external problem that follows the false Profits selling Heaven Insurance rather then teaching people how to be taught by the internal true Prophet.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> Not quite sure what you are trying to say. What you listed there is what I already listed,
I was just independently verifying what it looked like in previous versions via text since I didn't feel like to linking to an external screenshot image in case others weren't aware.
> Perhaps you aren't aware ...
Yes, I'm perfectly aware of Apple's shenanigans.
> macOS 10.12 (Sierra) is and the "Anywhere" option does not exist anymore.
It does still exist, it is just hidden by default (which is dumb.) On sie
Re: (Score:2)
> macOS 10.12 (Sierra) is and the "Anywhere" option does not exist anymore.
It does still exist, it is just hidden by default (which is dumb.) On sierra one must use the command line to disable GateKeeper and reboot for it to be active:
What I mean is the option isn't there anymore, it certainly looks like Apple is moving toward an authorised applications model.
Re: (Score:2)
This won't be a popular opinion around here but I think the 'app store' model is a fine thing for consumers. They really do just want an easy way to get and use stuff. Average consumers are genuinely incapable of administering windows systems safely. (You and I can. But we're not average consumers)
The problem is that once they build it for the "Average Consumers" they take away everything else leaving the advanced users in the cold. Hence Windows 7 still being large, and Apple and Linux having some uptics. Of course Apple is doing their best to run off the power users too...
Re: (Score:3)
The best and safest way to make money from software is to be a gatekeeper
Google Apple MicroSoft Steam Facebook Amazon all gate keepers. Have you got an idea for some software a song to release a book to write? If you are successful these leeches will take 30% if not that is your loss. There is no downside being a gatekeeper.
Microsoft wants to muscle out Steam that is bad for us at least with 2 of them there may be competition. Better still when both are optional.
Re: (Score:2)
This won't be a popular opinion around here but I think the 'app store' model is a fine thing for consumers. They really do just want an easy way to get and use stuff. Average consumers are genuinely incapable of administering windows systems safely. (You and I can. But we're not average consumers) Jailed and isolated applications from trusted sources ARE safer because you can cryptographic ally ensure they are not tampered with.
So Windows Apps will have all the applications that an average consumer needs? Have you looked at the Windows Store? The selection and breadth of Windows Apps is a joke. The Windows Store does not even have Office, MS own flagship applications.
Fortunately for Microsoft they have the money to bang at it for a decade until they finally get it right. UAP in windows 8/8.1 and RT was a complete shitshow. The store is a joke. The platform is a joke. The development environment was a clusterfuck.
It still is. For many Windows developers, I don't think the Windows Store is much of a draw at the moment.
Since windows 10 they've been improving things by leaps and bounds. Games actually work (And you can tab out of them in a blink, which is sort of impressive) and the store is less fuck-awful.
Well when you low, anywhere higher is an improvement. "Games actually work" isn't much of a rousing mantra when they worked before.
Windows 10 adds features and improvements with each major release and the UAP platform and the windows store do get better.
At the same time, MS works dili
Until there's Visual Studio UWP Edition (Score:2)
You might think Windows 10 Cloud would be ideal for a K-12 student. But then he takes a programming class in high school and discovers that neither Visual Studio nor any other major IDE with a compiler is available through Windows Store. What's he supposed to do then?
Re: (Score:2)
Then he should use an X server written in javascript, I suppose.
Re: (Score:2)
And run the clients on what, particularly when a student's parents don't subscribe to high-speed Internet at home? In case you meant that the student should use an X server on a Windows 10 Cloud laptop to view an IDE running on an application server operated by the school through LTE tethering, that tends to run $10 per GB in Microsoft's home country. How much data per hour does an X server transfer when running a popular IDE?
Re: (Score:2)
>> Re:10 cloud might have a place
That's right. it's place is here :
http://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.... [amazonaws.com]
Re: (Score:3)
builtin DRM
Publishers on Steam can choose to have no DRM whatsoever on their game. Blame the publishers, not Steam.
Re: (Score:3)
Because it would be AGAINST THE LAW. If Microsoft implemented DRM to disallow running non-"approved" programs and didn't "approve" Steam, Valve would have to break the DRM to make it work. Breaking DRM is a felony.
The DMCA and CFAA are assaults on the right to own property itself, because they subjugate the owner (of the computer)'s wishes to that of the copyright holder.
MS can't use DRM to lock out linux and even then (Score:2)
MS can't use DRM to lock out linux and even then no way that supermicro will lockout vmware or linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Nice try but no.
MS can revoke Linux boot at any time with UEFI "secureboot" key revocation
Re: (Score:2)
but will super micro and others give in? Maybe dell but not for servers.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure even Microsoft could survive the resultant lawsuits.
Re: (Score:3)
If it works, don't fix it? You know, one of the most fundamental engineering principles?
Steam is essentially a package manager, launch-menu and a shop. It works. If your fancy, gold-plated uber 4k display (Why are you not on 8k? Obviously you are a lamer...) does not give you the best experience for that, then that is a very minor thing because this is not an application you use intensively.
Re: (Score:3)
Not quite.
I can easily avoid Apple and its walled garden, so it doesn't bother me that they build one.
It's way harder with Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple only did it on the iPhone/iPad ... Microsoft thought it was a good idea to try to use the same model on PCs.
Microsoft should spend less time trying to imitate Google and Apple poorly.
Re: (Score:2)
I believe it's a matter of context.
To me, my handheld devices are appliances. my expectations of them are connectivity, flawless operation and and a constant deluge of new apps to amuse myself with. I'm happy to live within the Apple walled garden for this class of device. I don't want to spend any time worrying over the various security and abuse topics for these devices like I would for a truly open system
My desktop systems however, for these my expectations are for unfettered use as I see fit, with op
Re: (Score:2)
Have one computer for whatever is only available on Windows, and a different computer for the rest. Sounds extreme, but I do not really see any other sane option.
I plan to lock Win7 into a non-networked VM with Office for the rare cases I have to work on a word-document, win10 on a separate computer only for gaming with no email or browsing except gaming-related, and a Linux-box for everything else.
Re: (Score:2)
Uh... Tim Sweeney is the founder of Epic Games. He doesn't run Valve.