Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation Businesses

Tesla Is So Sure Its Cars Are Safe That It Now Offers Insurance For Life (mashable.com) 171

In the self-driving future envisioned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, car owners might be saying "goodbye" to a whole lot more than steering wheels. From a Mashable report: Musk is so sure of the safety features bundled into Tesla vehicles that his company has begun offering some customers a lifetime insurance and maintenance package at the time of purchase. No more monthly insurance bills. No more unexpected repair costs. "We've been doing it quietly," Tesla President of Global Sales and Service Jonathan McNeill explained on the call, "but in Asia in particular where we started this, now the majority of Tesla cars are sold with an insurance product that is customized to Tesla, that takes into account not only the Autopilot safety features but also the maintenance costs of the car." "It's our vision in the future that we'll be able to offer a single price for the car, maintenance and insurance in a really compelling offering for the consumer," added McNeill. "And we're currently doing that today."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tesla Is So Sure Its Cars Are Safe That It Now Offers Insurance For Life

Comments Filter:
  • Whose life? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by almitydave ( 2452422 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @01:43PM (#53924497)

    Insurance for life on Autopilot safety features? Whose life? Mine, or the car's?

    • by arth1 ( 260657 )

      This was my first thought too.

      I've seen "lifetime warranties" before that had tiny print saying the lifetime would end upon release of the next version.

      • I've seen "lifetime warranties" before that had tiny print saying the lifetime would end upon release of the next version.

        I'd like to see an example of that.

        • There's quite a bit of software which pulls this stunt.

          It's completely illegal for consumer sales just about everywhere but tends to be in B2B anyway - whilst still illegal in most countries the costs of pursuing it are usually higher than the benefits and regulators for the most part simply can't be bothered with this kind of misleading shit.

          Then there's the lifetime warranty that's only valid if you keep paying the maintenance charges - and at the end of 5 years or so, those start increasing by 100%/year.

        • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
          HP did that. "Lifetime hardware warranty", but the first hardware replacement after the part is EOL voids the warranty, as you get the new gear, and no lifetime warranty on that. I've seen that elsewhere as well. Should be billed as "One free HW replacement (unless we fell like giving you more)" warranty.
  • What if you move?

  • "For life" doesn't necessarily mean "for long".
    • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

      Most people rich enough to afford a new Tesla trade their car in every 2 or 3 years. So yeah, not long at all.

      • _Most_ people rich enough to afford a Tesla are also in the last 50% of their lifespan, probably the last 25% of their motoring lifespan. Now, how often they give their shiny bauble to the kids to play with is another problem.

      • by lgw ( 121541 )

        Most people rich enough to afford a new Tesla trade their car in every 2 or 3 years. So yeah, not long at all.

        Many people who drive a Tesla trade their car in every 2 or 3 years, and from habits like that never become wealthy.

        Most wealthy people who can afford a Tesla (just pay cash, not a big deal) got that way by not wasting money. The Model S seems to be setting down to having good reliability, finally. Seems like a reasonable car to keep for 20 years, with only the battery replacements as a significant expense.

        • I doubt battery replacement will be a big expense in 20 years. In real life, we've seen those batteries perform such that they should still have 94% of their charge capacity after 100,000 miles. At 20 years in and 12,000 miles per year, 240,000 miles, they'll quite likely have 85% of their capacity--which means the 150 mile range is a 136 mile range. With high-voltage DC J1772 combined charge connectors, you can power that up in an hour (Tesla has supercharger stations boasting something ridiculous like

          • 20 years, really? I with my laptop would have a 94% of its charge capacity after six months.
            • Then don't charge your laptop to 100%. Charge it to 80% and try not to let it go below 20% charge and you'll have a laptop that has 94% of it's original capacity after 6 months, 12 months... probably 48 months.

              It's when you charge it to 100% each time or drain it past 20% each time that the battery really starts to degrade.

            • by AaronW ( 33736 )

              At 100,000 miles the consensus is that an 85KWh battery still has 95% of its capacity. The batteries are also designed for automotive use with active heating and cooling as necessary. Laptop batteries are not designed for longevity, nor do they have active temperature control. Laptop batteries (and other consumer device batteries) are usually designed primarily with cost and capacity in mind. As long as they last as long as the warranty that's all they care about. Furthermore, laptops don't treat their batt

          • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

            >> At 20 years in and 12,000 miles per year, 240,000 miles, they'll quite likely have 85% of their capacity

            Not even close, especially in hot climates like CA and AZ. I used to work for one of the 3 big EV charging station companies and they also have a sister company that does EV battery testing for the government. I can tell you that no EV car battery lasts anything like 20 years. With a normal drive cycle its about 4 years max before you start noticing very significant amounts of dropoff (like 1/3)

            • by torkus ( 1133985 )

              Then there must be a awful lot of abnormal drivers...bc there are battery packs out there at 4+ years old (and older tech ones at 8+) which still work just fine.

              Time will tell ... but of course it already has and it disagrees with you.

              Thanks for preaching!

              • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

                > there are battery packs out there at 4+ years old (and older tech ones at 8+) which still work just fine.

                Sure they may still move, but you apparently intentionally missed my point.
                Please cite a single CREDIBLE source that shows there are any EVs out there that after 4 or 8 years of a normal drive cycle are not experiencing massive range loss.

            • >> At 20 years in and 12,000 miles per year, 240,000 miles, they'll quite likely have 85% of their capacity

              Not even close, especially in hot climates like CA and AZ. I used to work for one of the 3 big EV charging station companies and they also have a sister company that does EV battery testing for the government. I can tell you that no EV car battery lasts anything like 20 years. With a normal drive cycle its about 4 years max before you start noticing very significant amounts of dropoff (like 1/3) in max range, and depending on how determined to save money you are, it will be maybe 7-8 years max before even the most determined owner HAS to totally replace the battery.
              Tesla is also using the same battery tech as everyone else so they are just as susceptible, no matter what their glossy advertising claims.

              This is demonstrably false, as Teslas have been out for more than 4 years and are seeing minimal battery degradation. I have a 2012 Telsa (one of the first 2000 off the line) and the battery degradation is sitting at 96% of its original capacity. It has almost 100,000 miles on it. So I've lost 4% in 4 years and it's been holding steady for the past year at that rate. There are numerous other examples of this in the Tesla world. Do your research. Spewing false facts (ahem, I mean alternative facts) about EV

              • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

                >> Do your research.

                Like I said, I worked for one of the big 3 car charging companies and they had a branch doing research for the government. I know what I'm saying. Good for you with your car but your anecdote certifiably doesn;t hold up when you look at more than your car.

                • The plural of anecdote is data, and currently data from the deployed fleet of (very few) tens of thousands of Teslas demonstrates that loss at these levels is standard behavior and fully-expected of a Tesla battery in a Tesla car. Tesla's battery management system attempts to keep the battery at optimum temperature and avoid overcharge and undercharge.

                  Zero Motorcycles are similar. They recommend getting the Zero plugged into charging at a temperature above 0C, as extremely low temperatures will damage t

            • by AaronW ( 33736 )

              Tesla is NOT using the same battery tech as everyone else. Here's a good talk about them. [youtube.com]. Dr. Jeff Dahn is one of the foremost experts on battery failure.

              Tesla also has active battery thermal management using liquid cooling. The Nissan Leaf, by comparison, does not. Tesla's chemistry is also a lot better than the chemistry used in the Leaf.

            • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
              Yeah, the Lithium batteries in GM's EV1 were shit.
        • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

          I guess it depends on your annual mileage and how carefully you look after the car, but cars in general just aren't planned or made to last 20 years any more. Even if the car still runs, the interior will be worn out etc.

          Many car companies have started doing stuff like not supporting even top end models that are over say 5 years old with any more software updates (nav system map updates, bluetooth compatibility updates etc). Also you start not being able to get replacement parts for them any more, at least

          • by lgw ( 121541 )

            Some high-end cars are built not to wear out in that way. Any part made of rubber will fail eventually and need replacement, of course, but high end cars with e.g. more than one layer of door seal just hold up better. One selling point of the Mercedes S-class is the the interior holds up well over time, even with kids and pets and whatnot.

            The nice thing about an electric car is the minimal amount of drivetrain parts - there's so much less to fail due to age. No water lines or gaskets or vacuum hoses, bey

            • by torkus ( 1133985 )

              If a car is mechanically sound after 10 years and not a repair $ pit then replacing or rennovating the interior is certainly an option. Tesla doesn't completely change their car every 3 years which helps immensely.

              • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

                I think the real point is that if you can afford to buy a new Tesla and use it as a daily driver, car manufacturers think that you probably don't care about buying a whole new one every 100,000 miles (in my case that would be every 7 years) either.

            • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

              >> The interior might not be nice after 10 years (but then, Tesla interiors don't start out nice IMO), but the car will be reliable and the interior serviceable.

              I agree (especially about Tesla interiors being not nice) but the future problems with incresingly high-tech cars are going to be stuff like if you accidentally crack the screen, or if its backlight goes out or something, you wont be able to get a replacement for any money because they stopped making them 10 years ago, and without that screen

              • by lgw ( 121541 )

                if you accidentally crack the screen, or if its backlight goes out or something, you wont be able to get a replacement for any money because they stopped making them 10 years ago, and without that screen you can't control anything in the car.

                Heh, that was a (potential) problem with my 2003 Infinity, where the HVAC and entertainment system were on the same board. Very few of these cars were made, so it was $2k to get a replacement. But there's always a replacement somewhere.

                but I'd also keep a good ol supercharged V8 around for weekends

                Does anyone even make them any more? Superchargers seem to have fallen by the wayside as the engineering on turbos got better for low-RPM power. All the fun sports cars are V6s or heavily-boosted 4-bangers anyhow. It's the high RPMs that make the drama, far more than act

                • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

                  >> Does anyone even make them any more?

                  They are definately a dying breed but Jaguar do . My XKR is one (they stopped making them in 2015). The V8 Supercharged F-Type is still being made. I Haven;t checked but I'd guess that Aston Martin are still making the V8 Vantage S. I'd also be surprised if there isn't a factory V8 supercharged Mustang/Cobra or Corvette.

                  >> All the fun sports cars are V6s or heavily-boosted 4-bangers anyhow.

                  Debateable and probably VERY subjective, but a relatively small whi

              • by AK Marc ( 707885 )

                a P100D can probably accelerate faster but it's still about as emotionally sterile as a dentists waiting room.

                Ah yes, if all else fails, insult the emotions of an inanimate object. It doesn't care, and you look like an emotional fool.

          • by AK Marc ( 707885 )
            Cars in the '60s had 1 year warranties, maybe 2 year warranties. They weren't built to last. Today's car will last much longer than a '60s car. The problem with your perception is that the '60s cars you see were the top 1% of the millions of cars made then, or the ones that had 10x their purchase price paid to keep them like-new.
            • by JustNiz ( 692889 )

              Who's talking about cars from the 60's? I have a 1997 Toyota 4 runner, I bought it maybe 5 years ago for 4k, have put well over 50k miles on it including some fairly hardcore offroading, with never a single fault or problem. All I've ever done to it is oil and tyres. Its now got nearly 200k miles on it, still drives great and it still shows zero sign of anything about to break or otherwise be a problem. I think it has a very basic ECM but other than that, the most complex electronics in the car is the cass

      • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • by rtb61 ( 674572 )

      For life, means for the life of the company. How long would that be with life time insurance, one successful botnet hack and a million crashes in one day, would pretty much do it. I can accept automated transit in an enclosed transport system but out in the open, no fucking way, just no, fuck off, seriously no, nup, nu uh. I am not having some stupid hacked car drive me straight off a cliff or into a train or into opposing traffic, all because some script kiddy, bought some software off a psychopath hacker

  • by al0ha ( 1262684 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @01:51PM (#53924541) Journal
    I like to be supportive of Tesla, as the ideas are great, but based on past offerings this is likely get it while it's hot. Remember free supercharging for life?
    • Actually, if he's doing a lifelong, pay-up-front insurance model, it will be a lot more expensive to stop providing it later. The rates have to increase with cost and inflation (which will be slower than income increases), and such an insurance model is essentially flow-through and uses new money to pay for current service. It's the same way Social Security works.

    • Re:Supportive (Score:4, Informative)

      by EnsilZah ( 575600 ) <EnsilZah@GmGAUSSail.com minus math_god> on Friday February 24, 2017 @03:48PM (#53925351)

      As far as I know they offered free supercharging for five years, and anyone who bought a car in that time period still has it, hardly bait and switch.
      Do you expect a company to continue offering an option in perpetuity once it's been introduced, regardless of how the scale and economics change?

  • by kiviQr ( 3443687 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @01:55PM (#53924569)
    Brilliant idea a lifetime warranty that expires upon your death!
  • by Comboman ( 895500 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @02:26PM (#53924729)
    Dealers were upset at being cut out of the loop by Telsa (to the point of getting state legislatures to draft laws blocking Telsa's stores), just imagine how insurance companies are going to react.
    • >Dealers were upset at being cut out of the loop by Telsa (to the point of getting state legislatures to draft laws blocking Telsa's stores)

      The laws prohibiting manufacturers from owning dealerships were passed in the 1920s-1950s. (Before Elon Musk's father, Errol Musk, was born, and 60 years before 18 year-old Elon first came to North America). I guess those dealers must have psychic! Also very concerned about their great-grandchildren, since everyone involved in passing those laws are dead now.

      If you

  • by DumbSwede ( 521261 ) <slashdotbin@hotmail.com> on Friday February 24, 2017 @02:32PM (#53924761) Homepage Journal

    If you bought a chauffeur service you would expect the service to pay the chauffeur, maintain the car, and maintain the insurance. This isn’t much different (other than you own the car). Tesla is large enough to create the shared risk pool that insurance is founded on. Better yet, by also being the insurance it incentives them to make their cars as safe as possible. I don’t image regular insurance companies are too happy about this and will propose various strawman arguments in an attempt to keep Tesla and others from doing this once self-driving cars really get popular. In fact this all in one model is about the only way self-driving cars will be able to work. Self driving cars will only be safe as long as they are always maintained in top condition. Sensors have to be functioning and calibrated. Brakes have to be in good working order to maintain the cars safe expected stopping distance. Software upgrades are needed. Etc...

    Once driver error is not the major factor in accidents it just doesn't make sense to keep the old insurance structure as the fault will almost always be with the manufacturer. This does of course reduce the insurance company's incentive (in this case the manufacture) to really go after claims due to negligence, though that will still be a private legal suit option. Let make sure providing the insurance doesn't also take away your right to sue.

    • by Strudelkugel ( 594414 ) on Friday February 24, 2017 @04:38PM (#53925745)
      This an interesting example of financial engineering. Since legal theory seems to be heading in the direction of holding the manufacturer responsible for incidents involving cars with semi to full autonomous driving modes, why shouldn't car makers include insurance with the car? At that point it is just product liability insurance.

      The change will have an interesting effect: Over time, fewer drivers will have their own insurance which is going to shrink the risk pool. I don't know where the tipping point is, but some day the premiums for individual car insurance will skyrocket. What happens when the liability coverage for an individual driver with a good record costs $3,000? $8,000 / year? That's really going to increase the sales/use of self-driving cars. Manufacturers like Tesla might as well get ahead of the curve.
  • turns 16 and starts driving the shiny tesla, is he covered when he tosses it into ludicrous mode and slams into someone?

    • by linuxguy ( 98493 )
      I do not know the details of the Tesla plan, but I would think that at least in this respect, it would be similar to other insurance companies. Want to add more drivers to your policy? It will cost you more. Want to add a 16 year old with no driving history It will cost a lot more.
      • What if I am really rich and buy the 16 year old his own Tesla? I've seen benz's at the wealthy district high school. My point was just car insurance is based on a number of factors beyond the car like age, prior accidents/tickets... I'm not sure Tesla wants to do a standard rate and if they do, I certainly do not want to pay for it as I get a very good rate with no ticks/accs. As an example, the add for a friend's 16 year old son on a old car with no comp/coll was more than I pay for full coverage on a ver

  • Given the current regulatory climate [slashdot.org] governments are going to hold manufacturers' feet to the fire for failures caused by their software. Better to keep the risk cost in house where decisions can best be made about how to cover them than get third parties involved.

  • In my computer shop, we provide a lifetime warranty with all of the machines we sell. I've had customers act quite incredulous, but it really doesn't cost me much. Why? Because it's only to the original purchaser, and I know that nobody is going to keep their computers that long. For the few odd ones who do (just a week ago, I replaced an IDE hard drive in a Windows XP computer I sold new), I build a lot of brand confidence at very little cost to me -- the replacement part only cost a few dollars.
    Tesla
  • The only working economical model I see for lifetime car insurance is when the car maker is certain the car will quickly kill you!

"You can't get very far in this world without your dossier being there first." -- Arthur Miller

Working...