Netflix CEO Predicts Mobile Operators Will Soon Offer Unlimited Video (phys.org) 36
An anonymous reader shares an AFP report: Netflix head Reed Hastings predicted Monday that mobile carriers will soon offer data plans that give users unlimited video streaming to meet the rising popularity of watching TV and movies on mobile devices. Carriers offer unlimited data caps but they are usually very expensive. But Hastings said he believed mobile carriers will eventually create a two-tear system where video data is unlimited to meet the growing demand for watching TV series and movies on mobile devices. "What we are going to see I think is a number of companies pioneering new ways of offering services to the consumers where it is unlimited video data but it is limited to say one megabit speed," he said. "So it is a slower speed but you get unlimited data on that and that turns out to be very efficient on network so an operator can offer unlimited viewing."
Bit of an overreaction? (Score:3)
But Hastings said he believed mobile carriers will eventually create a two-tear system
How many tears does he think we shed with the current system? Hopefully the new plans will decrease sadness.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Cry-yyy-yyy-ing over... bandwidth."
Re: (Score:3)
How many tears does he think we shed with the current system? Hopefully the new plans will decrease sadness.
No, you doofus. Do you even English? He wants to create a two-tear system... as in a tear in space and a tear in time, which deliver video without the normal data constraints.
Re: (Score:2)
But Hastings said he believed mobile carriers will eventually create a two-tear system
How many tears does he think we shed with the current system?.
Lots. And it is tearing me apart.
Re: (Score:2)
maybe 10 years but wireless still has some technical issues that wired telecom doesn't have
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly!
Verizon and AT&T have home Internet businesses already that they don't want to cannibalize. Sprint and T-Mobile just need to expand their capacity, but it's just a matter of time before they start offering home Internet over LTE. This will be a bloodbath for Comcast.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, math amd physics say no (Score:2)
> I'd like to see wireless data buckets being large enough so that most people don't need home internet.
Unfortunately, the math and physics are such that won't happen. Not if people want to stream HD video for hours at a time. Basically the only way to make it appear as though you had that would be for the ISP to install a wifi access on each house (or two) and pretend it's not home internet service. The cost would still be the same, the only difference would be the ISP owns the access point - but the
Oh great (Score:2)
Now we can be stupid on the go.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but taking selfies and tits/ass shots requires some initiative.
Re: (Score:2)
netflix has the money and tech to deploy the servers and the software to allow the carriers to do this. unlike say your small startup
Re: (Score:2)
There are two parts to the distribution of the video to a cell phone.
The wired part from say, Netflix to the carrier. And then the wireless part from the carrier to your phone.
What is currently limited/expensive and the reason why carriers limit speed and/or put monthly cap is the wireless part. Placing a Netflix data center within a carrier's facility won't save them more than say, 1% of the total cost of delivering the video. It's marginal. So the small startup with a single server for the whole world can
Re: (Score:2)
Net neutrality is a dead man walking. I'm sure it will be repealed in very short order.
Isn't this a thing already (Score:1)
T-Mobile has done this at 1.5mbps for quite a while.
ATandT does 3mbps
Sprint I think has a similar too.
This seems like a pretty safe assumption, since it's been happening for a while and is currently expanding.
Funny (Score:1)
If you make video unlimited... (Score:2)
should be from the good-luck-with-that dept. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Each user of the service has to have enough of the network to the tower for 24/7 use at a set speed.
So the network to the tower might need some work.
If one tower was used to offer voice and some data to many users, more towers might be needed so all users can enjoy a 24/7 service per device.
Towers that got designed to share voice and very limited data plans will need work.
After the towers get upgraded, a new network can be offered.
How
A "two-tear system"? (Score:2)
Well, that would be a considerable improvement from the number of tears induced by existing plans.
Re: (Score:2)
And, No, I am not suggesting he meant a two-tier system.
Two-tear is correct as you say. But you went in the wrong direction. He did not mean crying was reduced to two single tears. Rather, he meant that the new wireless plans will make you cry twice. Thus increasing the tears.