Android is About To Eclipse Windows as the World's Most-Used Operating System (cnet.com) 169
John Falcone, writing for CNET: Android is poised to overtake Windows as the world's most-used operating system. That's the word from web analytics service StatCounter, which monitors worldwide web traffic with an eye towards device operating systems. The firm found that 37.4 percent of devices online were Android -- just a hair behind Windows at 38.6 percent. Perhaps the bigger concern for Microsoft are the trend lines, however: Windows is on a steady march down from 82 percent in 2012, while Android is mirroring it upward from 2.2 percent in the same 5-year period.
YEAR OF LINUX ON THE TABLET (Score:2, Insightful)
All hail Linus, creator of Linux! May he live long, and may he father many more kernel releases to come!
Re: (Score:2)
Year of Linux on the Tablet ? Nope
It's the Decade of Linux on the phone !!!!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>> Except that Android is nowhere near being king of tablets. It is not even close to being 2nd. :
B.S.
Android is powering 62-68% of tablets.
Source
https://www.statista.com/stati... [statista.com]
https://www.netmarketshare.com... [netmarketshare.com]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Dunno (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
One is also free and the other is not. Thus one is still making infinite times more profit through licensing than the other.
Re: (Score:2)
OS/2 had license fees too... how'd that turn out for 'em? ;)
I guess the point is, license fees haven't much to do with the future viability of a given OS.
Google Play Store and exFAT (Score:3)
You appear to be under the impression that Android is free software, and therefore, the royalty for putting Android on a device is zero. AOSP is free software, but Google Play Store and Google Play Services are not. Furthermore, makers of Android devices with a microSD slot that supports SDXC have to pay an exFAT patent royalty to Microsoft.
Google Play cert fee and M$ patent royalties (Score:2)
Google Play is "free as in beer".
The article "The hidden costs of building an Android device" [theguardian.com] by Charles Arthur and Samuel Gibbs states that as of three years ago, the compliance testing to qualify for a Google Play license cost tens of thousands of dollars, or on the order of $1 per device. Even though the article states that the amount is payable to approved "third party testing facilities," not directly to Google, the article does not mention how much Google charges said facilities to become approved.
The article "Why Microsoft Makes $5 [howtogeek.com]
Re: (Score:2)
From the about section [opengapps.org] of the page whose URL appears in your comment:
If you install Open GApps on a device other
Re: (Score:2)
As for removable SD cards, they normally come preformatted with FAT or exFAT which Android can read and write to which in turn avoids the exFAT royalty.
I don't see how that works if the patent is on the process of reading and writing novel data structures that a Microsoft employee invented for exFAT.
Re: (Score:1)
Really? You downloaded "the latest Android"? Which version is that? Which repository did you use?
If you've come to expect a bitchfest after every update, why are you updating?
Re: (Score:2)
Only if you think they will stay distinct forever. How low does the Windows share need to go before people start to make the same old argument they always did: Why should I buy this other OS when it doesn't run all of my existing software?
If Android continues to mature and tablets get more capable, why not expand into PCs? Already you are seeing Chromebooks which can run Android software. Will Windows be forced to adopt an Android environment as well? Will Adobe make a Photoshop for Android laptops? I think
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft still has MS Office and the Backoffice software, and this is where its hegemony remains. It long ago showed its willing to bring the software to other platforms with the Mac versions, and it has put its toes in the Android waters, so I think pragmatism is winning the day. I think MS is fully aware that it has not been able to meaningfully challenge Android and iOS in the mobile and smart device markets, and it must surely know that Google certainly has eyes on bumping further into the traditional
Re: (Score:2)
Nota Bene: Microsoft is making a *Linux* version of MS SQL Server... so yes, you're correct in that Microsoft can adapt as needed.
That said, it still brings up GP's point: Eventually a tipping point will be reached, where people start asking "why bother buying Windows when all my stuff either runs on a web browser or it runs on {something with a Linux kernel under it}?
We'll know when that tipping point is reached when OEMs start defaulting their consumer devices to ChromeOS (or whatever), instead of default
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not really much of a merger anyway - ChromeOS is just Chrome and some glue running on a Linux kernel. Android is a much more full-featured OS also built on Linux that also happens to run a mobile version of Chrome as an app. Port the full version of Chrome and some of the glue over to Android and you have all of the functionality of a Chromebook. I could see them selling two versions of the same machine - a locked-down ChromeOS-branded machine for schools and such and a more open Android version for th
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Microsoft is supposedly readying a Chromebook competetor - defined, I guess as a low-cost, stripped down laptop that can only run 'modern' apps. Replacing the Chrome browser (and its apps) with Edge and Android apps with Windows app store apps. I guess if 'app store apps' includes WIN32 stuff that's been made app store ready, they might have something that could sell. But if it's just a stripped down version of Windows, with all the complexity, but none of the 3rd part apps, it's not really a bette
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, they are better than netbooks. They have a reasonably-sized screen, their battery life is half a day, and they are inherently limited by running only a web browser. You don't get any delusions of grandeur and try to run Photoshop or Eclipse on it. If you have kids, the Chromebook is awesome. It costs around $200, does everything they need for school, and they quite literally cannot fuck up the software.
Re: (Score:2)
Never gained widespread adoption? They outsell both Mac and Windows laptops in terms of unit sales [marketwatch.com]. They are ubiquitous at schools. You can buy them at Walmart and Target. If you have more recent information showing a downward trend, by all means share it.
Re: (Score:2)
The actual trend is 30-40% YoY growth [trendforce.com] to 10M and with 260M PCs total it has about 3.8% of the PC market, if you count only notebooks it's 156M and 6.4%. That said, if you check StatCounter then ChromeOS comes in at 0.83%, less than Linux at 1.53% so accumulated they're still a very small part of the people browsing the web.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe it is nation-dependent? PC and now Mac sales have taken a bigger plunge in the US than worldwide. StatCounter unfortunately is counting all users, not just people who purchased a PC last year. One of my PCs at home is a Core2Duo, and I'm sure I'm not alone. My Mac is from 2009.
For instance, Windows 10 (a better proxy for recent machines sold vs ChromeOS) has a 25% web share - and that includes desktops.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft was pushing windows 10 upgrades very heavily on anyone running 7/8, not just selling it with new hardware... A significant portion of that 25% will be upgrades (intentional or otherwise) from earlier versions.
Re: (Score:1)
Comparing apples and oranges makes a whole lot more sense than comparing two distinct OSes which run two distinct classes of devices.
That sounds like the pathetic excuse of a Windows fanboi who is desperately clinging to the past. Android is usable as both a mobile OS and a desktop OS; something that Windows was never able to accomplish.
Re: (Score:2)
For how long has Android been usable on the desktop? I can see three possibilities; to which are you referring?
Re: (Score:2)
Uhh, Google Play Store is just an app and is installable on ANY Android distribution.
Installing Google Play Store on a device that is not licensed to run Google Play Store is infringement of copyright, which incurs severe civil and/or criminal penalties under United States law and the laws of other Berne Convention contracting states.
Official Remix OS devices come with Google Play Store.
That was true prior to Remix OS 2.0.307. As of Remix OS 2.0.307 and later, Google Play Store is no longer included in Remix OS. From the article "Remix Mini users will lose access to Google Play if they install the latest Remix OS update" [techcabal.com] by Osarumen Osamuyi:
Re: (Score:2)
Installing Google Play Store on a device that is not licensed to run Google Play Store is infringement of copyright
Bullshit.
Have you a citation that using GApps without permission does not infringe?
That's only if the user updates. They can then install GApps to completely and legally restore Google Play.
Have you a citation that installing GApps on a device that is no longer licensed is legal? I agree with your claim that it is possible, but I dispute your claim that it is legal.
Windows 8 Metro apps are fullscreen, full stop. The only way they wouldn't be is if you BUY commercial software hacks.
Then to what feature are "How Do You Snap Apps In Windows 8?" [worldstart.com] by cynthia of WorldStart and "Snap an App Alongside the Desktop on Your Windows 8 Tablet" [dummies.com] by Andy Rathbone referring?
What do "most people", those who you claim "are happy using a tablet or smartphone", do when they need to type something substantial?
EVERYONE uses smartphones and tablets, far more than people using PCs.
Then what does "EVERYONE" use when they need to type something substantial into a
Re: (Score:3)
Still apples and oranges. (Score:2)
Windows is a desktop operating system with its install base there, Android is a tablet/phone OS with all of its install base there. It's like saying coffee makers are about to eclipse ovens as the most used appliance....ok? Still need the oven for its purpose.
You are right that usage behaviors are shifting but Android is not a desktop operating system so comparing the two is just silly. We know they both are trying to break into the other market but that ship has sailed, so yes the on 15$ tablets at Walm
Re: (Score:2)
"the *OS* on 15$" is what I meant to say.
Linux *scalability* - far wider than Windows (Score:2)
Linux scales to far larger systems [themerkle.com] than does Windows. Microsoft does not run on the top 500 machines.
Microsoft has been squarely beaten in mobile and enterprise systems. Microsoft is now the "OS of the gap" and is being crushed in the vice of Linux market share.
Re: (Score:2)
Great, linux is a big competitor to microsoft. What does it have to do with this article or what I said?
Re: (Score:2)
But the point is that a desktop was always a toy for geeks and not really a suitable tool for typical users, it just happened to be the only thing available that fulfilled several requirements those users had such as browsing and email. Think of all the unnecessary complexity and knowledge required to keep a typical desktop os working and malware free - not suitable for typical users.
Now there are more suitable tools available for those average users, so users are moving to them.
Re: Dunno (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
two distinct OSes which run two distinct classes of devices.
Which both can access... email, social media and messaging services. Which is what most people need anyway.
:)
Let's face it, Windows is becoming less and less needed, which is good
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Both will play the cat video. Both will not easily handle the word processing/speadsheet using that many people do.
Not really (Score:2)
Especially if the two OS/devices are used for the same thing... chat, email, web browsing, videos...
Only now? (Score:2)
Apples to something less healthy, like Nougat/Lollipops?
Seriously, I thought Android had already eclipsed Windows simply on the number of units installed since there are already billions of Android devices out there, while Windows has yet to reach or just gone past the billion dollar mark on the more costly desktop.laptop platforms. In the third world you can buy a cheap smart phone running some old unsupported possibly malware infested version of Android for a fraction the price of the least expensive net
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah one on the archaic desktop that is in and of itself hugely losing market share (the desktop itself) and the other a Linux distribution (so sneaky numbers, seperating one Linux distribution from the other Linux distributions), winning in the expanding markets, phones, TVs, cheap notebooks, tablets and servers, well pretty much the entire rest of the growing computing market. M$ is dying and made a panic grab at future revenues, that panicky grab instead of being a positive step being a hugely negative o
Netcraft confirms... (Score:2)
Re:Netcraft confirms... (Score:4, Funny)
Netcraft confirms, this joke is dying.
Is this one still funny? (Score:2)
"Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect."
- NYTimes article, Questions for Linus Torvalds [nytimes.com] by David Diamond (at the end)
Bill, Steve, and Satya have probably discussed this at some length. To be a fly on the wall...
Data? (Score:5, Funny)
They sure seemed to rely on Data much more than their ship's onboard computer. One would think they would either upgrade the ship's computer to how Data was configured or just plug Data into the ship.
Despite the number of windows on the Enterprise, they still relied on an Android.
Bad news (Score:2, Funny)
So Windows is finally going to be replaced by something much worse? (Both in terms of usability and openness)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't get it, do you think that Android is better than Windows?
And the point here is? (Score:2)
Two different operating systems that have virtually no overlap. This isn't telling anyone anything.
Re: (Score:2)
It tells me that handheld portable devices are outnumbering windoz desktops in shear devices shipped and in operation... But we knew that already.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They have virtually no overlap in approximately the same sense as land lines and cellphones have no overlap.
For a long time most people kept their landlines (Windows PC's) and added a cellphone (iOS or Android). Then gradually, as they moved - or their old landline phones broke - or they changed cable providers - or kids got their own homes, they kept their cellphones and gave up the landlines. So, the comparison is pretty apt. Presumably at some point large swaths of the population won't buy a new PC wh
Re: (Score:2)
But new businesses (parallel = kids moving out of their parents' houses), may well opt for Chromebooks or Macs or 'anything that can run web apps'/.
Good luck getting through a computer science degree in college, or even just the semester of introductory programming that all freshmen at a particular college take, with just a Chromebook.
Re: (Score:3)
The vast majority of PC and/or cellphone users is not made up of Computer Science students or power-gamers. Are you so insular that you don't get that?
Re: (Score:2)
kids moving out of their parents' houses
Good luck getting through [...] the semester of introductory programming that all freshmen at a particular college take, with just a Chromebook.
The vast majority of PC and/or cellphone users is not made up of Computer Science students
The majority of kids moving out of their parents' houses and into a freshman dorm are computer science students if only because college imposes it as "general education requirement", much like humanities for engineering students. Even some high schools are making programming a required subject. See, for example, Arizona Bill Would Make Students In Grades 4-12 Participate Once In An Hour of Code [slashdot.org].
grossly overestimating... (Score:2)
I think you are grossly overestimating the cross functionality between tablets/phones and desktop/laptop devices, sure they kind of both *do* the same things but they are used for very different things. Yes people are using their phones/tablets more but they are using them more for the trivial things like angry birds or facebook. The moment they need to work on something serious like photo editing or an excel sheet etc they realize they need a desktop/laptop computer.
So yes, if Android OS starts gaining a
Re: (Score:2)
Again. What percentage of casual home PC users does photo editing (beyond what they can do on their phones) and/or works on spreadsheets (beyond what they can do in Google Docs or Office 365)? Hint - probably less than 50% these days. And some of that 50% only uses their PC's for that - because they're already there.
If you're not inclined to believe this (based on your personal sampling), take my word for it - Microsoft knows it. And they're doing their damnedest to make sure there's a place for them in
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know about photo editing, but I tried editing spreadsheets and/or documents on my phone. Once. I never tried it again, and IIRC that was Google Docs. Android (and iOS) just plain suck for that.
Re: (Score:2)
But it doesn't suck because of Google Docs - it sucks because it's a small touch-screen device. A Chromebook or an Android laptop would be fine for that.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree that Google Doc isn't the problem. Android is. It's not the small screen either, as a tablet should be big enough. IMO, it's the touch-screen and the fact that everything is full-screen.
and the winner is Linux !? (Score:2)
Manure entrepreneurs (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also as more business apps get ported to android expect to see more and more instant device docks. Where a device gets docked and then powers a full screen keyboard and mouse. This has been tried over and over again however the hardware just wasn't good enough and the software stacks had stupid limitations. Now the hardware is there( se Nintendo switch). But software is still behind.
Linux won (Score:3)
Yes, we've won the desktop wars. Even if we had to cheat by slipping into mobile some 10 years ago and waiting for mobile devices to become nearly as capable as desktops.
PS - My first Linux portable was an Agenda VR3 [wikipedia.org] (a 64-bit MIPS) some 15+ years ago.
Wow. (Score:2)
I'm just amazed this wasn't already the case years ago.
It seems hard to believe that until now that there really are more PCs running windows out there than all the people with android phones in the world.
I wonder if they've still been counting windows licences for PCs that have actually been disposed of/recycled years ago, and those running Linux and other OS's just because they actually got sold with a windows licence?
Crap headline (Score:5, Interesting)
The article headline is crap. Android/Linux total users passed Windows in long ago. The article should have said that, those users now create nearly the same amount of web traffic as Windows PCs.
Linux on the Desktop? (Score:2)
Still no.
IDE's (Score:1)
IDEs are for girls
Re: (Score:2)
No - though the Linux desktop "OS" has truly become thought of as being called "Linux" (despite containing a lot of other software - though even I can't possibly be bothered to call it GNU/Linux), in this case Linux truly is just the kernel, and Android is the OS.
Re: (Score:2)
The difference in a typical Linux distro (as opposed to Linux proper, which is just the kernel) versus Android is the userland. Different libraries, etc. For example, on Android, usually a form of Busybox is often the shell, because it is a statically linked executable and requires nothing else to be installed.
Android and its security model isn't bad, although it would be nice if it were designed from the ground up with "ask on first use" permissions, as opposed to having them strapped on in a recent rev
The other problem: All maximized all the time (Score:2)
Another big problem with the Android userland is that from the start through Android 6 "Marshmallow", stock Android supported only one application on the screen at once, as opposed to the tiling or floating window management policies that X11 window managers for GNU/Linux support. Got your phone plugged into a 1080p monitor? You can't view a web browser or PDF reader in half or your notetaking app in the other half. Using a 10" tablet? Enjoy your 10" full-screen calculator app. Android 7 "Nougat" finally fi
Re: (Score:2)
Another big problem with the Android userland is that from the start through Android 6 "Marshmallow", stock Android supported only one application on the screen at once...
Truly barbaric and a huge step backward in time. The best you can say about it is, it's not worse than iOS. But that is not saying much.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not a problem given the target platform for Android - phones, phablets and tablets.
My Nexus 7 (2012) tablet's display is larger than two phones' displays put together. There also existed Android tablets with even larger displays, such as 10 inches. So why did Google not add to the version of Android shipped on the Nexus 7 (2012) tablet the ability to run two phone-sized apps side by side to fill the tablet's screen properly?
If you want what you are describing, you should use ChromeOS, which is to Android what OS-X is to iOS
Until very recently, Chrome OS could run only web apps and Chrome OS packaged apps from Chrome Web Store, not Android apps from Google Play Store. As I understand it,
Limits of manufacturer-customized Lollipop (Score:2)
stock Android supported only one application on the screen at once
My G3 came with Android 5 and supported running two apps side by side
That was a manufacturer customization, not stock Android. Some Samsung devices received a similar customization. Usually it involved zooming out, so as to maintain a requirement in the Android 5 "Lollipop" Compatibility Definition Document (CDD) that the screen size presented to the application not change after installation. But zooming out had the downside of often making text unreadably small. Some implementations, such as Samsung's, additionally allowed applications to opt into a tiling window management
Re: (Score:2)
Irrelevant. You claimed that Android was completely incapable of showing more than one app. That's false.
My comment did not use an intensifier to the effect "completely".
Doesn't matter if it was using a customization.
Yes it does, because my comment explicitly mentioned "stock Android".
It sounds like your argument is to the effect "The features of stock Android are irrelevant because end users can count on manufacturers to provide needed customizations and on app developers to support said customizations." If so, then what fraction of tablets that shipped with Android 5 or 6 contained a multi-window customization? If less than a majority, this means that an
Re: (Score:3)
on Android, usually a form of Busybox is often the shell, because it is a statically linked executable and requires nothing else to be installed.
No, Android uses Bionic, which is a libc workalike, like Busybox, but is not Busybox. Google uses Bionic for Android in part because it is somewhat more compact, but mainly to escape the GPL. These inaccuracies make me wonder about the accuracy of your other claim:
Android and its security model isn't bad
Really? In truth, the Linux security model is pretty good, but the crap that Android piles on top is hastily conceived, leaky and widely exploited.
Re:Android is not an operating system (Score:5, Informative)
though the Linux desktop "OS" has truly become thought of as being called "Linux" ... in this case Linux truly is just the kernel, and Android is the OS.
Not so. Android is an OS only according to marketers and those who believe them. For anybody who will trouble themselves to understand the textbook definition, [wikipedia.org] Linux is the OS (e.g., it schedules, manages virtual memory and devices, enforces security) and Android is a platform, not an OS (e.g., Android does not schedule, does not manage virtual memory, does not implement device drivers and does not provide the base security mechanism).
Now, I would not be surprised at all to see this post modded down once again by some morally challenged Google or Apple employee with too much time on their hands and too much skin in the game.
Re: (Score:2)
While you're technically right, the common meaning of an operating system includes its libraries, shell (including graphical) and usually basic utilities. Even your link at the top of the page (4th paragraph) says,
Re: (Score:2)
Consider the following two statements:
1) A dog is a kind of animal.
2) Android is a kind of Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Better is,
1) A dog is a kind of Canine
2) Android is a kind of Linux
Wolf, Coyote, Fox, Dog, all similar at the low level, can even interbreed
GNU/Linux, X/Linux, BSD/Linux, Android, all similar at the low level, I have Debian, including X, running on my Android phone in a chroot. Sorta like interbreeding.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, but BSD/Linux, what is that? Did you mean GNU/kFreeBSD?
Re: (Score:2)
I was thinking Linux kernel with BSD user land instead of GNU. Not sure if anyone actually ships such a distribution.
Wikipedia (Score:2)
Android, a popular mobile operating system based on a modified version of the Linux kernel
[table] Operating system - Android [table]
Android was first (currently not replicated by others, in a single year) operating system
from your textbook [wikipedia.org]
Android (stylized as android) is a mobile operating system developed by Google
from another page of the same damn textbook [wikipedia.org]
From the wiki 'textbook',
Linux is an OS, Android also an OS, Windows also an OS, and MacOS also an OS.
Linux kernel is the kernel. Android uses Linux kernel. Windows uses NT. MacOS uses Unix.
In my book, Linux is a fat bird and Android is an edible robot. your augment is invalid.
Re: (Score:2)
Linux is the kernel. It's not a SYSTEM. The entire thing, that lets you DO stuff, is a SYSTEM
Oh, you mean like a Linux distribution? Android is a kind of Linux distribution, nothing more and nothing less. And therefore a kind of Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
As for textbook definitions, they're no more than the opinion of whatever person or persons wrote or edited the textbook.
Sorry, no. These textbooks are the textbooks of the people who built the operating system. I suppose you want to call a math textbook just a matter of opinion of the author as well? Maybe so, but the math itself is not an opinion.
Whatever THEY think, try running the Linux kernel by itself. Put the kernel on a disc of some kind ALONE, no LILO, no GRUB, no Chainloader, nothing, JUST the kernel, and try to boot from it.
Every heard of initrd? It's part of Linux, includes a complete user space. That is enough to boot Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
No.
Android really is a Linux-based OS, just as much as your Fedora desktop or Raspbian data logger. Just because it's no longer GNU/Linux doesn't make it not Linux.
Take *that*, Richard Stallman.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Android is open source. ( Mostly)
It is what you want to do with it.
You want to do a surveillance tool ? Go ahead.
Re: (Score:2)
What in the heck are you doing with your android?
I've never had an issue with my Note4 which is 4 years old now. Not once. Now I haven't jail broken it but run the stock OS from my carrier or run anything but well known and respected applications. I have one free "Malware scanner" but it's never caught anything. Everything works just fine.
If you are constantly having issues with your Android, I figure you are not applying due diligence about security for your activities. I suggest you figure out why you
Re: (Score:2)
I take issue with the suggestion that "jail breaking" (I don't know if you mean rooting or unlocking the boot loader) is inconsistent with good security practice. But perhaps that is not what you meant.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm thinking about getting SU to root. It is a common security practice to avoid having things running with root privileges when ever possible. In nearly all cases there is zero real reason to have root on an Android device for the average user. I know folks that bypass this protection in the system in an attitude of defiance (Hey it's MY device and if I want root, I'm entitled to it!), which from a security prospective is stupid, even if it makes you feel like you are in control.
Personally, I have acce
Re: (Score:2)
I'm thinking about getting SU to root. It is a common security practice to avoid having things running with root privileges when ever possible.
When you root your phone, it doesn't just run everything with root privileges. If an app needs elevated privileges it asks the user for approval and the user can approve or deny the request. The OS will not grant access to anything requiring root without going through the approval process.
Re: (Score:2)
I fully understand that, but why on earth does an app need root on a device?
Unless you are messing around with the hardware in the device in ways the manufacturer didn't intend or trying to hack a service you carrier usually charges for what does an app need with root? Nothing that I've heard of was worth given root to an app so why open up the path to give something root? It must makes your device more easily hacked. Take it from this ole' Unix admin with decades of experience, don't use root to run any
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you are messing around with the hardware in the device in ways the manufacturer didn't intend or trying to hack a service you carrier usually charges for what does an app need with root?
1. What's wrong with messing around in ways the manufacturer or carrier didn't intend (short of violating contracts)?
2. other reasons:
- disable or uninstall apps that came with the device
- some ad blocking services require root
- automation and system control (e.g. Tasker)
- over or underclock CPU
- better backups
If your user application simply MUST have root to run, you are either an idiot, a newbie or a hacker who doesn't care about security.
Well, I'm sure you know better than the developers of (paid) Android apps with millions of downloads.
Besides, this is roughly the same thing Windows used to do with that crazy popup warning about giving a program administrator privileges... How well did that work out?
Except that very, very few people root their devices, and the ones who do are almost exclusively te
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, I'll chalk you up to the "I need root because it's MY device" crowd... Which is fine... But my point here is you are taking a security risk when you do this stuff.
Seriously, I don't care what you do with your device, but if you do this to your phone, don't complain to me that Android is now subject to malware and other problems. It's not. If you don't take unnecessary risks your chances of having a security issue with Android is pretty slim.
Personally, I don't do this stuff to my PHONE. Why take the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Same reason OS X isn't considered just a GUI while it sits on top of BSD?