Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation United States

US Insurer Hikes Tesla Premiums Due To 'Higher-Than-Average' Claim Rates (theverge.com) 125

An anonymous reader writes: "National insurer AAA is raising its prices for Tesla's Model S and Model X, citing higher-than-average claim rates and repair costs for the two cars," reports The Verge. "According to a report from Automotive News, AAA said it could raise its premiums by as much as 30 percent for the vehicles. Other large insurers including State Farm and Geico told the publication they couldn't say whether or not they would also increase prices, but noted that data about claim frequency is always used to calculate insurance premiums." Musk claims that AAA doesn't know what they are doing, but fails to be specific as to what is incorrect about their data or its usage. [The company says the AAA has made its decision based on faulty information from the Highway Loss Data Institute.]
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Insurer Hikes Tesla Premiums Due To 'Higher-Than-Average' Claim Rates

Comments Filter:
  • Innuendo (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Okian Warrior ( 537106 ) on Monday June 05, 2017 @08:55PM (#54556393) Homepage Journal

    I've been following Tesla's stock price of late.

    It's at an all-time high ($347) going into the shareholders meeting, and most of the news is filled with innuendo intended to cause panic selling.

    Examples: "Tesla: Could confusion kill model 3?", "Is Tesla Inc Stock Worth All the Controversy?", "Tesla Cars: Easy To Total, Expensive To Repair", and so on.

    It's impossible to research stocks by reading the financial news nowadays. Lots of manipulation-driven reporting.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by gweilo8888 ( 921799 )
      Or maybe, Tesla actually has real problems it needs to resolve, but you're dismissing those concerns because standard Slashdot practice is to fellate Mr. Musk at all times, no matter how utterly absurd the idea. (See: Hyperloop.)
      • by Anonymous Coward

        That's an interesting exploration into fallacy. Pity a negative attribution fallacy is basically the same fallacy as a positive one.

      • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

        Sure, because if an entrepreneur doesn't get things 100% right, then he's a failure. But don't let the fact that 8 of 10 businesses fail within the first 18 months let that affect your opinion of Musk. What's his failure rate been?

        • by Desler ( 1608317 )

          GP didn't say he was a failure, but rightfully points out that Musk and his fangirl brigade can't ever accept that Tesla might have done someone wrong.

      • Standard slashdot practice may help rather than hinder Tesla efforts to fix its real problems.
    • Investing vs speculating might not be all black and white, but on a scale where do you suppose Tesla fits? Would it not be reasonable that "research" into a stock primarily driven by speculation, finds mainly speculation?

      • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

        Not a Tesla investor here, so I don't know much about it's valuation. But I do want to point out that I see them on the road multiple times a day here in the northern VA area (granted, this is a relatively wealthy part of the country), so that tends to make me believe there's a bit more to the company than speculation.

        • Not a Tesla investor here, so I don't know much about it's valuation. But I do want to point out that I see them on the road multiple times a day here in the northern VA area (granted, this is a relatively wealthy part of the country), so that tends to make me believe there's a bit more to the company than speculation.

          I see what you did there.. and I tip my hat to you.

          • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

            Not a Tesla investor here, so I don't know much about it's valuation. But I do want to point out that I see them on the road multiple times a day here in the northern VA area (granted, this is a relatively wealthy part of the country), so that tends to make me believe there's a bit more to the company than speculation.

            I see what you did there.. and I tip my hat to you.

            What? Did it move the stock price? This isn't exactly a place where big money hangs out.

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • but actually a major insurance company is making this decision not for the benefit of its shareholders

        Minor correction: AAA is a non-profit organization.

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday June 05, 2017 @09:23PM (#54556537)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • by EETech1 ( 1179269 ) on Monday June 05, 2017 @09:42PM (#54556657)

      I wonder if the autopilot requires any calibration to align all of the various sensors?

      If I owned a body shop, I would not feel comfortable repairing, and putting my a$$ on the line saying that all the complicated systems on that car were properly repaired without specialized training, equipment, and certification, and I highly doubt there's enough of them around to make it worth the investment.

      Let the Tesla service center deal with it!

      • by hawguy ( 1600213 )

        I wonder if the autopilot requires any calibration to align all of the various sensors?

        If I owned a body shop, I would not feel comfortable repairing, and putting my a$$ on the line saying that all the complicated systems on that car were properly repaired without specialized training, equipment, and certification, and I highly doubt there's enough of them around to make it worth the investment.

        Let the Tesla service center deal with it!

        If a repair shop doesn't know what liability insurance is, then he probably shouldn't be in the repair business anyway.

        Lots of independent garages make safety critical repairs every day (many of which require specialized training, equipment and certification), and they'll continue to do so when it makes sense financially. Though it may not make sense to invest in the tooling to service cars from a manufacturer that has only sold about 500,000 of them in total, versus, say, servicing a Toyota where millions

        • by Anonymous Coward

          You do know that your liability insurance premiums can skyrocket if you have liability issues, right?

        • Comment removed based on user account deletion
        • If a repair shop doesn't know what liability insurance is, then he probably shouldn't be in the repair business anyway.

          Liability claims always arise by accident but the insurer will most certainly nail you if you even make a slight habit of introducing liability claims. We haven't even mentioned yet the moral hazard of ignoring how he'd be sending innocent people off with cars not working properly. I'm sure you didn't mean to condone that but that's certainly what you made it look like. The guy is just trying to make a point that learning how to repair a Tesla vehicle is an investment he's not willing to make at this tim

      • Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)

        by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday June 05, 2017 @09:57PM (#54556751)
        Comment removed based on user account deletion
        • They'd also replace wiring harnesses rather than futz with it like on another car

          What? Why would there be any difference there? You repair the harness when it's cheaper than buying a new harness, depending on the number of hours you're going to have to invest. Added complexity in the wiring is irrelevant, you don't work on wires which aren't damaged, or which aren't part of your current problem.

          • Comment removed based on user account deletion
            • You haven't done a salt water flood car, apparently. You replace all the harnesses there because even if they work on the day it goes back to the owner, it won't work some time afterward. And there's literally no achievable way to get the corrosion out of the harness once it's tasted salt water.

              I wouldn't even think about touching a salt water flood car. Not even for a second. There is no part of the vehicle that does not affect negatively, except maybe the tires. Hell, I passed up a fresh water flood Land Rover.

          • Comment removed based on user account deletion
            • That's already the case with any electrical system. You fuck up the ABS or something and the person dies, they'll be in your shop asking you what you did wrong and how much insurance you have within a week.

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          The law needs to keep up with tech and make sure that the equipment needed to calibrate the auto-pilot and anything else is available to all garages. Same as the diagnostic codes via OBD-II.

        • Aluminum stretches when it bends. It's almost impossible to straighten a seriously bent aluminum part.

          Aluminum also age hardens. 50 year old Al cars are brittle. Their panels crack if a person leans on them too hard. Which matters because 50 year old Al cars are rare and very expensive (e.g. AC Cobras).

      • Tesla has been providing more training and certification of repair shops. Tesla had to address the problem that there were too few shops that were certified to repair the cars.

      • I wonder if the autopilot requires any calibration to align all of the various sensors?

        No the cruise control is not supposed to be driving the car on its own in any case. So any misalignment would automatically be picked up by the sensible driver who always keeps his hands on the steering wheel.

    • Why are the batteries going to hold up any less well than the engine block? They're down low and inside the frame. So an incoming car has to penetrate into the safety cage to get far into the battery pack. Classic off-center front end collision with an ICE the impact is taken directly on the engine whereas on the Tesla it just smashes a big crumple zone. Why would the engine, with all those moving parts, do well there?

      Having been in that exact accident with my old ICE, I know the engine didn't like it...

      • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

        by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday June 05, 2017 @10:50PM (#54556945)
        Comment removed based on user account deletion
        • It depends on which tesla and what it hits.

          The tesla is built a bit more tanklike (including steel rails) than many other sports cars. If you look on Youtube you can find many accidents where the tesla is drivable to even only mildly damaged and the other car is spectacularly totaled. And the driver in the tesla is in much better shape too.

          I don't own a tesla but I was surprised to see how durable they are.

          • Tesla is NOT a sports car. It is perhaps a muscle car. Far too heavy to be a sports car, to say nothing of the definition requiring two doors and seats.

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          The kind of severe accidents you are talking about where the battery might be damaged but an engine block would survive, like rear-end hard enough to "smear" the driver against the wheel or a bad t-bone will write the entire car off regardless. Maybe the law in the US is different, but in Europe you can't even fix badly damaged vehicles in many cases because they can't be proven to be safe in future accidents.

          What matters here is less severe accidents where the vehicle is recoverable.

          Tesla battery packs are

    • On a drive from Texas to California, two weeks ago, I saw a truck, painted with Tesla logos and Arizona plates, driving west on I40, in New Mexico.

      I thought, shit, must suck to have a Tesla in NM that can't even be fixed without shipping it to the next state over... but since the truck pulling it was a Tesla truck (Ford or Chevy pick-up, I think) I figured it was a warranty repair at least. There was no visible damage on the car.
    • 1) No used parts to pick, no clips to cut off of prior wrecks, etc

      Cut clips off? Tee hee. Nobody does that except for project vehicles or exotically expensive vehicles, except most of those are now made out of carbon fiber and you're not cutting a clip off and welding it back onto anything. Irrelevant in this market. Nobody wants a repaired vehicle at this price point.

      2) OEM parts are expensive!

      Have you priced auto parts? They are stupid expensive. Mercedes parts kind of win this competition, but oddly Ford parts are right up there.

      3) Batteries aren't going to hold up well in a crash, not as well as an engine block at least.

      The engine is a lot more than the block. In a crash, the average en

  • Over the last decade I have become convinced that nearly all (a vast majority) of Americans don't understand anything about insurance, don't understand what insurance is and how it works as a business.

    Lets say I start an insurance company and attract customers by offering car insurance that would have a high deductible and low monthly payments. Say 15,000USD deductible and maybe 50USD/month premium payments, so it makes no sense to approach me until your loss reaches 15,000USD but if it goes over that limi

    • by ghoul ( 157158 )

      If the healthcare industry actually ran like the car industry insurance would be compulsory. The ACA tried to make insurance compulsory. The Republicans fought it in court and the only way to get the indidivdual mandate through was to disguise it as a tax and hence reducing its effectiveness. The Republicans and Insurance lobbyists sabotaged the ACA at every turn and Obama made a series of bad compromises which ended up with the ACA not really solving the problem and giving Republicans ammunition. It would

  • Techno-Jebus forsaken by AAA?!
  • by iotaborg ( 167569 ) <exa@[ ]thome.net ['sof' in gap]> on Monday June 05, 2017 @10:09PM (#54556783) Homepage

    Just ran a quote for a new Tesla Model S 70 on Geico and it comes out to $270/mo, ouch. My few years old Subaru is only $75/mo with full coverage. Even a new Audi S6 would run me a far more reasonable $130/mo.

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • Audi A6/S6 is kind of an outlier with unusually low insurance rates for me, so admittedly I cherry picked that one (even A4/S4 is more expensive). Also never have been in a crash/no speeding ticket (though I did get a ticket for going too slow a year back... a different story). I did find that Geico has a lot lower cost than others in my area, not sure why. Just quoted a 2017 Miata and it's $80/mo with full coverage... even a new Prius would be more expensive... I don't get insurance rates.

        • by Dog-Cow ( 21281 ) on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @01:20AM (#54557389)

          Insurance rates are based on statistics. If a particular model tends to be involved in expensive accidents, it will have a higher rate, even if the car itself is junk. The statistics don't care why such cars are accident-prone or why they are expensive to repair.

          • Based on literally saving 50% by switching between one well known carrier to another I'd say insurance rates are based on bullshit.

            I'm tempted to chastise the one I switched away from who was charging me > $600 for 6 months and praising the one who is only charging me $300 for the same period - and who also did a much better job at paying claims when there was a tornado here, but I don't want to come across as a shill.

            I'll just say the "good hands" were in my wallet.

            I have a theory that since I initiall

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Sounds like Tesla needs to get into the insurance business. lol.

    • Insurance premiums are also set by credit rating in all but 2 states.
      A Tesla is marketed as a luxury car and has a complex drive system and a expensive battery and also very few third party parts so repairs are probably expensive.
      It is kind of the cost of doing business with this kind of car
      Prems should go down if/when Tesla's become more common and/or license parts

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.

Working...