Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation United States

Lyft Launches a New Self-driving Division and Will Develop Its Own Autonomous Ride-hailing Technology (techcrunch.com) 56

An anonymous reader shares a report: Lyft is betting the future of the road centers on sharing autonomous vehicles. It aims to be at the forefront of that technology with a new self-driving division and a self-driving system car manufacturers could plug into their self-driving cars. The company expects to hire "hundreds" of people for the new division by the end of next year and has just signed a lease for 50,000-square-feet on the first floor of a Palo Alto facility where it plans to build out several labs and open testing spaces. The building Lyft refers to as "Level 5" will be developing its new "open self-driving platform" and a combination hardware and software system still in development. Lyft hopes auto manufacturers will then bring in a fleet of autonomous cars to its ride-hailing network. The plan is somewhat similar to one Uber announced earlier. Lyft's larger rival uses Volvo's XC90 to test its self-driving tech on the roads. Uber announced earlier this year it was also partnering with Daimler to operate self-driving cars on its network.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Lyft Launches a New Self-driving Division and Will Develop Its Own Autonomous Ride-hailing Technology

Comments Filter:
  • Now all we have to do is worry about copyright lawsuits.

    That, and maybe asphyxiation.

  • "How hard could it be?" -_-

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I guess the real reason for autonomous vehicles is to eliminate jobs. Also the mindset of both Uber and Lyft. It was never about anything else and when it comes right down to it. Eliminating the human factor saves the most money. But of course the proponents will always argue these are jobs nobody wants anyway or are hard to find people to work them. Did you ever think that the people that do might not be able to find any other work qualified for. This person could then become another burden to society on w

  • They are claiming the tech will be open. I hope so. Open is the only way to do driverless tech. A bunch of different proprietary systems would suck. Especially when dealing with things like merging. Car to car and traffic device to car communication will be important. Although systems should be resilient of cars or devices that lie.

  • Once thing I've wondered: if autonomous technology is getting so close to fruition, how come transit systems like San Francisco's Bay Area Rapid Transit and the Washington DC Metro can't be the first things piloted by it? If an automobile can operate autonomously in a chaotic and messy environment like the streets of a city, a light rail environment ought to be trivial by comparison. Fixed path, limited access, pretty static environment. I'd think you could get the humans out of light rail long before cars
    • by Anonymous Coward

      how come transit systems like San Francisco's Bay Area Rapid Transit and the Washington DC Metro can't be the first things piloted by it?

      there's no point, labor costs for mass transit are small, one driver per train with hundreds of passengers

      taxis etc are one driver for one or two passengers, much more opportunity for cost savings

    • Some train systems have dual doors and are more autonomous. Right now it's taking a long time to get PTC rolled out.

    • by Xrikcus ( 207545 )

      Driverless trains are pretty common. The DLR in London had no drivers from when it opened thirty years ago.

    • One word, liability. That is enough right there but interaction with people plays into it too.

      For a car the cost of a driver is to hire one person for what? One passenger? Maybe four or ten? With a train you have hundreds of people to spread the cost of the driver and that person has the ability to do much more than any computer managing the train.

      For example, a minor mechanical failure could render a train or car powerless to move. Maybe it's just a screw loose, maybe there is a flat tire, or whatever

  • What keeps an unattended car from getting stripped to the frame? You might have GPS on the car, so you know the locations, you might have cameras, but they rarely provide a clear enough picture to catch anyone. Even so, this is all to respond after the fact, the car can still be stripped before law enforcement arrives. In cases when people are not at risk the police put them at a low priority, as they should.

    Not that many people care about getting caught, prisons are so overflowing in many parts of the n

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (10) Sorry, but that's too useful.

Working...