Yelp Accused Of Hiding Positive Reviews For Non-Advertiser (cbslocal.com) 156
A Dallas business owner is accusing Yelp of hiding good reviews of his coffee shop after he refused to pay them for advertising. From a report on CBS Local: Bob Sinnott owns Toasted Coffee + Kitchen in Lower Greenville. He said after months of non-stop phone calls from Yelp, he claims his favorable rating dropped after he finally told the company he would not pay for advertising. "What I would compare it to, the mafia," said Sinnott. "You know, you do business with me or there's retaliation." Sinnott feels Yelp is hiding many of his 5-star reviews in the "not recommended" section because he chose not to pay for Yelp services. "The sales pitch is, pay us a monthly fee and we'll your help page," said Sinnott. He claims there were constant phone calls and emails from Yelp pitching the company's services. "It became what I would call borderline harassment," said Sinnott. After posting on Facebook about his experience, Sinnott said his rating went from a 4-star to a 3.5-star rating. Google rates Toasted at 4.1 and Facebook has the business at a 4.6 rating.
Is Yelp still a thing? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: Is Yelp still a thing? (Score:5, Interesting)
Of course they are! Itâ(TM)s the number one resource for people searching for local businesses. And they are and have been hurting small businesses who donâ(TM)t submit to their extortion tactics FOR YEARS.
As an admin for two small business, I have a ton of first hand experience.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Of course they are! Itâ(TM)s the number one resource for people searching for local businesses. And they are and have been hurting small businesses who donâ(TM)t submit to their extortion tactics FOR YEARS.
As an admin for two small business, I have a ton of first hand experience.
OK, we live & learn.
I'll be skipping yelp henceforth.
Re: (Score:3)
Of course they are! Itâ(TM)s the number one resource for people searching for local businesses. And they are and have been hurting small businesses who donâ(TM)t submit to their extortion tactics FOR YEARS.
As an admin for two small business, I have a ton of first hand experience.
Why are people still shocked to learn this? All review sites who use advertising use standover tactics like this, Yelp, Trip Adviser, the lot. I've never heard anything nice about review sites from hoteliers but they're completely dependent on these con men (con sites?) for business.
Re: (Score:2)
Did we ever do that? (Score:5, Informative)
Google reviews are a wasteland anywhere I've ever looked. Yelp is still what people actually use if they want real info. Google Maps, for example, claims a local comedy club that has been closed for a year is still open... Yelp knows.
Re:Did we ever do that? (Score:4, Insightful)
The reviews themselves are worthless. It's the rating tie in with google maps which makes them better than Yelp. It's at a glance information and extremely persuasive.
Ratings need good reviews to be reliable (Score:2)
I agree the rating is what is most useful, but there is where Google reviews fall down for me. Many of them seem highly questionable. Some Yelp ones are too but way more of them look like they are from real customers, so therefore the aggregate Yelp rating a trust a lot more than the Google rating.
That's really why I called the Google reviews a "wasteland", because it's either crickets or shady stuff. I guess it is persuasive, or people wouldn't try to game it...
Reviewers on Yelp also leave way more deta
Re:Ratings need good reviews to be reliable (Score:5, Insightful)
But, on Yelp, you see bad reviews for places that don't pay Yelp protection money, and the reverse for those that do. So it's far less trustworthy than asking your local astrologer.
Re:Ratings need good reviews to be reliable (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't like the lack of data on Google Maps, submit
I do submit reports of issues to maps, I've done so many times.
But, come on - a YEAR closed and Google cannot figure that out without user input (or maybe they did have user input, I know I've submitted changes to Google that never took effect)?
We are not talking OpenStreetMaps here! Yelp knew (as I said) even Apple Maps simply didn't have a listing anymore. It's not like it is hard to make sure business listings are correct every year.
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, I'll grant you that. I've seen issues for all kinds of things. I have had to submit things like pronunciation changes because... well, who comes up with these pronunciations? I don't even live in an obscure area (fourth largest city in the US), but it has no clue on certain things!
I guess it depends on what sources of information they can use. I would even think changes to the signs collected during a Streetmaps run would help, or information on a business at an address and possibly suite number fo
Re: (Score:2)
It's not like it is hard to make sure business listings are correct every year.
Now that's funny.
Re: Did we ever do that? (Score:1)
Yelp knows that they quit paying (Score:2)
Yelp knew when they quit paying Yelp to show the reviews accurately.
Re: (Score:2)
As I mentioned in another post, my problem is when I'm travelling and only have my phone to look stuff up with, and it seems like Google gives me different results on my mobile than it does on my laptop. What I mean is that searching for "something near me" when I'm travelling often doesn't give me what I want from Google. I don't know why.... I'd give more details, but it's been a while because I started using Yelp more because of the problem.
I think in both cases you might get more sponsored results, bu
Re: Did we ever do that? (Score:3)
It seems that a lot of sites automatically crank up the "fuck you, user" settings when accessed on a mobile device.
Re: Did we ever do that? (Score:2)
I've edited the map so often that Google now *trusts* me. The last few edits were accepted immediately, apparently without human review. I'm really not sure how I feel about that.
I'd feel a lot better if the law made all user-contributed data public domain. I am very happy to contribute to the common patrimony, to the general expansion of human knowledge. I don't particularly mind that Google makes money off that information. But I really hate that Google has the right to exclude the public from data the p
Not much correlation with my experiences (Score:3)
Yelp is still what people actually use if they want real info.
I've never gotten much useful information from Yelp. Yes there are reviews but I've never found the to have a strong correlation with my own experiences at the locations being reviewed. Basically I no longer waste any time looking at Yelp for opinions.
Re:Is Yelp still a thing? (Score:5, Interesting)
Sort of..... I suggest watching Louis Rossman's Yelp-related videos; I saw a few years ago --- they were an eye opener regarding their Salespeoples' practices, to say the least.
SPOILER: There's a really aggressive sales person involved who was happy to violate users' privacy AND there are fake negative reviews involved that were posted against the business after the Yelp salesperson was told NO.
Re: (Score:3)
>I suggest watching Louis Rossman's Yelp-related videos
I don't have the time. Is there a version of the Louis Rossman videos where he doesn't spent 45 minutes talking about a 2 minute topic?
Re: (Score:3)
I'm a big fan of the Chrome plugin called Video Speed Controller. You can bump the playback speed of HTML5 video all the way up to 10x. Just be warned that sound cuts out around 4x. But for those videos that you want to breeze through to find the meat, it's really handy to jump up to a multiple and then back off that speed when you find what you want. [There are hotkeys for jumping around speeds.....as long as the video player widget has focus.]
It's also handy for speeding up commercials in your online
Re: (Score:1)
I don't have the time. Is there a version of the Louis Rossman videos where he doesn't spent 45 minutes talking about a 2 minute topic?
You are posting to slashdot so obviously you do have the time and are just being lazy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't have the time. Is there a version of the Louis Rossman videos where he doesn't spent 45 minutes talking about a 2 minute topic?
You are posting to slashdot so obviously you do have the time and are just being lazy.
No and yes.
Re: (Score:2)
It seems like you're basically asking for someone to have done 14 hours of editing work so you could avoid focusing on something significant for an hour or so .
I already gave you a TL;DW summary; the case history is essentially yet more evidence against Yelp sales team practices though.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know anybody who DOESN'T use yelp. Despite its supposed problems you can feel safe knowing that a 4.5 star restaurant is way the fuck better than a 2.5 star review.
Google reviews has way less reviews than yelp. Here in the Bay Area Yelp has twice as many reviews as Google Maps (looking at a couple of restaurants that opened in the past few years). I'm sure they ultimately reach about the same conclusions, and for most restaurants with dozens of reviews it just comes down to personal preference.
Re: (Score:2)
I've never used Yelp. It's seriously "not a thing" outside the USA>
Re: (Score:2)
Some digital assistants use Yelp to make recommendations I think.
Re: (Score:2)
didn't we all pretty much move on to Google ratings on Google maps?
No, the number of ratings (and quality as well) on Yelp are much higher than on Google maps. If you search a place in Google search, often Yelp is the first thing to come up.
Re:Is Yelp still a thing? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm now eagerly awaiting the submission for "Yelp rebrands itself YelpCoin"
Re: (Score:2)
Yelp is integrated into Apple Maps, which probably brings them some traffic if you're using Siri to search for stuff.
But, yeah, Google has stolen a lot of market share from them.
Re: (Score:2)
It's what Siri defaults to using, so yes.
And, YES, Siri is still a thing :)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Is Yelp still a thing? (Score:2)
In the near future, possession of a Slashdot account will by itself be sufficient for a wrongthink conviction.
Re: (Score:2)
Same For Negative Ratings (Score:5, Interesting)
Lack of Transparency Seems Legitimate (Score:5, Informative)
If you poke around Yelp's site, they talk about how paying them can result in better placement, targeted advertising, etc. That seems expected and fair behavior.
I can't find anywhere that it would infer that your aggregate rating will be affected by whether you pay them or not. In fact, on their About page [yelp.com], they state "Paying advertisers can never change or re-order their reviews." (which, I guess, does not exclude Yelp themselves from doing it). The perception is that the ratings are organized and aggregated based upon algorithms. If the reality is that it's also based upon whether Yelp is getting paid by the business in question, that seems shady. It certainly should have an impact on consumers' confidence in Yelp aggregate ratings.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
>the mafia don doesn't explicitly say your shop will be spared/burned to the ground
>in writing
you don't say
English lesson of the day (Score:3, Informative)
No, the mafia don *implies* that harm will come to you.
From his speech, you *infer* that he is threatening you.
https://www.vocabulary.com/articles/chooseyourwords/imply-infer/
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
In the bar/restaurant industry, this is pretty common knowledge. Its a protection racket.... "It would be a shame if you didn't pay us and then something terrible happened to your reputation." To be clear, no one thinks they overall score is affected, but which reviews people see. I've worked several places that have been threatened like this. Yelp can burn in hell.
Re: (Score:2)
These sites are prejudicial just in who is listed and who isn't to begin with. Maybe it's easy to get stuff onto Yelp, but I found for example that Tripadvisor neglected to add restaurants I suggested and provided full information and photographs for, probably because they neglected to buy any advertising.
Request them to remove the data completley. (Score:2, Insightful)
Remove Everything. The page about your business, the lot. You don't want your business on such a site.
Otherwise you'll sue for defamation.
Do you have an archive.org of the original page? That'll make suing easier. Phone records, copies of emails, etc, etc.
Yelp isn't a thing anymore. It should have dinosaured a long time ago.
Google reviews have funnier owner responses (Score:5, Funny)
Just check out this gem from Google Maps:
Response from the owner 4 years ago:
This is the fat slob.
I wanted to put some context around Mr Scaccia's review.
First, no disputting it, I'm fat. I take issue with the rude and slob parts. I shower every day. I say please and thank you. But, fat, unfortunately I can't dispute that.
OK, let's talk about our interaction yesterday.
It goes on from there to explain to this bozo how a line in a Texas BBQ joint works. You place your order, then you sit down. It's common courtesy.
Re: (Score:2)
Just check out this gem from Google Maps:
Response from the owner 4 years ago:
This is the fat slob.
I wanted to put some context around Mr Scaccia's review.
First, no disputting it, I'm fat. I take issue with the rude and slob parts. I shower every day. I say please and thank you. But, fat, unfortunately I can't dispute that.
OK, let's talk about our interaction yesterday.
That's awesome. That's how you handle all this social media carp today.
Re: (Score:2)
Got a link? I'd like to see the whole thread.
Re: (Score:2)
Same thing happened to me. (Score:5, Interesting)
I had a multitude of 5 star ratings and daily calls from Yelp, congratulating me on my reviews and suggesting advertising was the best way forward, nearly all went to voicemail. One day after I did actually speak to someone and indicated I was not interested, nearly all my top reviews, which had been up for months beforehand, disappeared. Yelps 'automated' AI system, according to them, had deemed them non-trustworthy - remarkable that the AI should have, after all this time, suddenly decided that those reviews which were up just 24 hrs previously, were no longer valid.
At that point I shifted focus, left a placeholder in my business description indicating what had happened and removed all reference to Yelp from my web site, email and marketing. I moved over to Google Business, which, despite some hiccups (no 'by appointment only' option, no easy URL to direct clients to for leaving reviews...) has worked very well for me with a good 80% or more clients indicating that they had chosen me as a result of my web site, portfolio (I'm in a creative field) and reviews that showed up. Ironically, I have spent money on adwords and would probably have done the same with Yelp had their 'AI' system not treated me in such a grossly unfair manner.
Re:Same thing happened to me. (Score:4, Interesting)
Same here. I owned a martial arts studio and as the school grew, our yelp reviews started trickling in, positively. Soon, I got a call from Yelp saying how great it was my business was growing and they were there to take it to the next level. I found the pricing quite expensive and declined. Within a few days, 50% of the positive reviews disappeared, pushed off to "not recommended" land. This process repeated over the next 2 years. Every 6 months or so, they would allow the positive reviews to accumulate, I'd decline, then those positives would be pushed to "not recommended".
You some words out (Score:1)
"pay us a monthly fee and we'll your help page"
You some words out.
Re: (Score:1)
No, they just two swapped words.
I have a great idea! (Score:4, Funny)
The yarr stands for yet another reviewer reviewer, modeled after yacc yet another compiler compiler.
It is meta reviewer site where we review the reviewer. Users look at all the reviews from many reviewers, yelp, trip advisor, google maps... Then compares the expected experience, expected price to actual price and actual experience.
Now the owner of yarr will become yaee, yet another exhorter exhorter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
exhorter? extorter?
I thought it was already well established (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The trick is to READ the review content, specifically the bad ones. Then determine if the business sucks or person leaving the review is the idiot.
Re: (Score:2)
Like a decade ago, Yelp was accused of taking bribes-for-reviews and vigorously denied it, and it seems more likely some Yelp salesmen said it when it wasn't true. Whether you believe that or not, Yelp made their invisible reviews visible and of course if salesmen start openly claiming buying ads will help their reviews then customers would distrust Yelp. Somebody would be sure to record the interaction as well. It would kill Yelp's credibility and I really don't think they would do this except perhaps w
Re: (Score:2)
A friend of mine used to work for Yelp back in those days. What he told me was that the sales types absolutely did not have the ability to change anyone's reviews or score in exchange for ad purchases. There were no tools to allow them to do so. And they did not have write access to the data in any other capacity. And part of his job was to keep any unauthorized access, external or internal, from said data from happening.
He also told me that Yelp's sales people were the "slimiest pack of lying shit-weas
Re: (Score:3)
In fact one of the comments makes the point that the 9th circuit did not say that it's legal for Yelp to manipulate reviews based on payment:
Re: (Score:2)
Going to the actual case, it looks like you are correct:
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/09/02/11-17676.pdf [uscourts.gov]
Re: I thought it was already well established (Score:2)
What a surprise... a kangaroo court sided with Big Money against the public interest. It's DUH LAW!
Re: (Score:2)
Alternately, perhaps the court enforced the law as written. There have been some pretty unpopular decisions because of that.
Re: (Score:2)
As I said - it's DUH LAW!
Re: (Score:2)
If it was DUH LAW, you can hardly blame the court for it, and hence the phrase "kangaroo court" is inappropriate.
Re: I thought it was already well established (Score:2)
A court that eagerly enforces badlaws is contemptible, and well deserving the title "kangaroo court".
Re: (Score:2)
The reason we aim for a government of laws is that it's safer. If judges start throwing out laws because they don't like them, we get cases like lynch mob prosecution being dismissed. Since your complaint is that Yelp wasn't punished, I have to believe that you're concerned with lack of punishment as being unjust in some circumstances.
The proper thing to do is to lobby the appropriate legislative bodies to change the law, not to make it up on the spot.
Re: I thought it was already well established (Score:2)
Pardon me, brother, can you spare a few tens of millions of dollars? I need to "lobby the appropriate legislative bodies".
Re: (Score:2)
It's easy to find who your representatives are, and they normally make it easy for you to express your opinions to them. They're normally interested in being re-elected, and not that many people do express their opinions, so they'll probably be somewhat receptive to well-stated opinions. People without financial backing have managed to create movements that affect legislative actions before.
In any case, you're blaming the wrong people.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you work for the regime?
Your junior high civics textbook description of the legislative process is naive at best, or willfully ignorant. Have you ever actually tried contacting your legislator? Unless you're offering a big fat lawful-bribe, they don't give a rats ass about what plebians think.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't work for the regime, and I have contacted legislators. You're just being defeatist.
Totally true (Score:2, Informative)
We've experienced the exact same thing, persistent badgering by a sales person, had over 30 positive reviews... Finally told sales person no, suddenly all reviews are filtered. They claim their algorithm determines review placement exclusively, but it's utter bullshit.
Use the BBB, Yelp is a scam (Score:2)
What we need is an honest, non-profit version of Yelp that helps you know if the business is good at what it does and customer service... Oh wait, we do have that, its called the BBB.
I refuse to use Yelp or Google because both are easily gamed by businesses and damaged by one or two unhappy asshole customers.
Re: (Score:1)
There is no profit margin in an honest review service. It will be replaced by a dishonest review service as soon as business school trained middle management gets involved in any company that provides this.
What? (Score:2)
Well I can see why he wouldn't agree to pay. Yelp wont even tell him what they are going to do!
Legalized Extortion. (Score:1)
Ah (Score:3)
Guess what, i run a couple webshops for third parties, and I can clearly relate this, the companies that spend on adwords are the only ones with decent rankings on google.
Re: Ah (Score:2)
Remember when Google used to have *good* search results? I miss the old, honest PageRank algorithm.
This has been my experience also (Score:5, Interesting)
I regret ever trying to do business with Yelp. In my case it was trying to close my account when I realized it wasn't driving enough business my way to justify the cost. One of several problems is that your reviews don't go away when you terminate your account, and Yelp then has all the leverage of what reviews they want to display.
Part of the leverage is that Yelp controls the first several listings you get when you google a particular type of business. So people have to scroll way down before they get to my own professional website. It really does seem like the game is, you pay Yelp or, "you know, it's a terrible thing that can happen to a business. Just terrible. You wouldn't want that to happen, would you?"
As it is always with review sites (Score:2)
Any service that exists primarily to accumulate reviews of businesses or people aims to shake down said entities eventually. Either because that's a nice set of reviews there, and it would be a shame if anything happened to them (as in this case), or because you'll eventually get yourself into an unfortunate situation and they know somebody who could make it go away.
And now for something completely relevant (Score:2)
Obligatory Monty Python [youtube.com], showing how it works.
Already been through courts; yelp has won so far (Score:5, Informative)
This mafia-like behavior from Yelp has already been through the courts, and they've won so far (circuit court level): http://www.sfgate.com/news/art... [sfgate.com]
Re: (Score:3)
One would think so. It is a rather incredible decision. Here's a legal summary which includes a link to the full text of the decision: https://apps.americanbar.org/a... [americanbar.org]
[U]nless a person has a pre-existing right to be free of the threatened economic harm, threatening economic harm to induce a person to pay for a legitimate service is not extortion.
WTF??? What is a "legitimate service"? I guess the mafia has been doing it wrong this whole time. If only they had been offering a "legitimate service" with a threat of economic harm, rather than a questionable service with a threat of physical harm, they would have been in the clear.
Perhaps I'm missing something though. Here's another artic
yep (Score:1)
I gave it a 5 ... (Score:2)
... just for the halibut.
Review of Slashdot (Score:2)
Times Change... (Score:2)
Yelp is like the mafia! (Score:2)
Re:Their website... their rules (Score:5, Informative)
Censoring positive reviews while showing negative reviews is plain extortion when you act as an honest authority. Possibly even defamation, since they're manipulating the facts.
However, they have been sued unsuccessfully before [sfgate.com] over this and the court seemed to think it was fine.
Re: (Score:3)
Censoring positive reviews while showing negative reviews is plain extortion when you act as an honest authority. Possibly even defamation, since they're manipulating the facts.
Unfortunately, no. They're not lying, but rather staying silent regarding good things. For example, this post doesn't say anything about your personal qualities - does that make it defamatory, because I didn't say that you love puppies or once saved a nun from a fire? No... Like me, Yelp is under no obligation to say good stuff about merchants, as long as they're not actually lying.
Now, this should reduce their credibility and people should stop using them, but calling it defamation is probably a step too
Re: (Score:2)
Publishing disproportionately negative reviews if you don't pay them is definitely extortion and possibly also defamation.
Re: (Score:2)
Publishing disproportionately negative reviews if you don't pay them is definitely extortion and possibly also defamation.
Not defamation for the reasons I explained in the post you responded to.
It could qualify as extortion, but that's also questionable. Extortion, under Federal law (18 USC 875(c) [cornell.edu]) requires a threat to injure the reputation of the addressee. However, Yelp isn't writing the negative reviews - customers are. Arguably, the business' own actions have damaged their reputation: i.e. if the business only had glowing reviews, then Yelp would have no negative reviews to publish.
If anything, Yelp is not threatening to
Re: (Score:2)
Because the first place you go for honest reviews of a business is their own website? It sounds like you were raised by rabbits, because you have no ability to reason.
Re: Their website... their rules (Score:2)
Just make sure your competing website is also backed by hundreds of millions of dollars stolen from the public by the Quantitative Easing programs.
Re: (Score:2)
An interesting question is "Who is this they?". If it's various malicious salesmen "getting even" with businesses for refusing to buy from them it's one thing, if it's company policy it's another, and if it's just the way the incentives to the salesmen are structured without any official policy, or even against official policy, then it's a third.
It seems pretty clear that the "malicious salesman" thing happens. But what's the backstory?
Re: uh yeah (Score:2)
Yelp used to host a lot of tech meetups at their headquarters in SF. So I've met a few Yelpers. The engineers seemed like your typical startup drones - nice enough but pretty clueless.
The managers on the other hand seemed really shady. Like they know just how crooked the company is, but goddamit they hope to get rich based on that crookedness.
Re: (Score:2)