Estonia To Become the World's First Free Public Transport Nation (citylab.com) 143
On July 1st, the country of Estonia will create the largest 24/7 free public transit zone in the world, making it feasibly possible to travel by bus from one end of the 1.3 million-strong Baltic nation to the other without paying a cent. CityLab reports: Estonia is already a world leader in free public transit: In 2013, all public transit in its capital, Tallinn, became free to local residents (but not tourists or other visitors, even those from other parts of the country). The new national free-ride scheme with extend this model even further, making all state-run bus travel in rural municipalities free and extending cost-free transit out from the capital into other regions. The plan will not, however, extend Tallinn's existing free public transit policies to other Estonian cities, and it also won't make riding Tallinn transit free to visitors (at least, not initially). So while most of the country's land area and population -- which is overwhelmingly concentrated around Tallinn -- should get fare-free daily lives, it's not precisely the case that no Estonian will ever buy a bus ticket in their own country again. Further reading: Pop-Up City
Re:great! (Score:5, Informative)
Given their fairly low homelessness rate (about 1/3 of US) that is not such a pressing need as it would be in some other places.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Estonia is small, which helps looking after your people.
Come on, what kind of argument is this?! US has more homeless veterans than most other countries have military personnel in total, that shouldn't be possible when talking about the most wealthy country on the planet
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Estonia is small, which helps looking after your people.
USA has a 3x higher GDP per capita and a higher urbanisation rate making it easier to look after people and you more capable of doing so.
Maybe you need to find a different excuse.
Re: great! (Score:1)
Automobiles largely donâ(TM)t make sense in most of Europe. Cities are built on human scale without the suburbs we had to build to get away from our wonderful diversity here.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: great! (Score:2)
I've traveled all around Europe and what you say doesn't ring true at all.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Estonia is not a poor country. Per capita GDP there is close to France and higher than Portugal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Once more, with emphasis (Score:5, Insightful)
Once more, with emphasis:
Conservatives know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
Conservatives know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
If the price doesn't reflect the value then you're doing it wrong.
Re:Once more, with emphasis (Score:5, Insightful)
Conservatives know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
If the price doesn't reflect the value then you're doing it wrong.
If you don't know what the value is, how could you possibly determine whether the value is accurately reflected by the price?
Re: Once more, with emphasis (Score:1)
Or more specifically, there would be no *excessive* profit margin for anyone. You would pay for the raw materials, labor, delivery and there'd be no room for a charismatic white dude to swoop in and act like he did it all by the sweat of his brow and quick wit, and thus demanding 1000x the wages of the rest.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Again, precisely the point. How much is water worth to you? The cost to provide water is virtually free, but the value to keep you alive makes it nearly priceless. Those who need a glass of water and have $1 would end up spending $1. Those with $1 million would have to spend $1 million or attempt to work around that and in total spend $1 million as everyone who sells you the components of a rain collector, desalination plant, or whatever wo
Re: Once more, with emphasis (Score:2)
You think that people are being forced at gunpoint to use public transport in Estonia? Are you sure you read the article?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Most probably not. My bet is that they are IYI's who might know what a few parts cost but neither have any idea of how these parts interact with the whole, nor the cost of denying people who aren't fortunate to be able to afford the thing directly. IOW, stupid twats who can't think any further than their own wallet and the immediate future, like the next two seconds.
"Conservative: prick, selfish, reactionary, regressive, hypocrite, bigoted, narrow-minded, useless".
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The travelers surely have to prove their identity using a smartphone or national ID at each trip.
Only in the cities. According to TFA, In rural areas there will be no checks at all.
Estonia is experiencing a population drain out of the countryside and into the cities. Young people are especially likely to leave rural areas for jobs in the cities. Free-at-point-of-service transportation is designed to help reverse this trend.
This is actually a dumb goal. People in cities tend to be far more productive, and have a lighter environmental footprint than rural people. Urbanization should be encouraged.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I guess it depends on what you mean by free (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, everything has a cost. We're not Gods and we can't make matter and energy from nothing. But you need to consider the costs of the alternatives and that in many cases the alternatives are inevitable. It's like the American Healthcare system. We're gonna spend an extra $17 trillion on our private employer funded healthcare vs single payer in the next 10 years (much of that profits for Pharmaceuticals & health insurance companies). We could pay off the national _debt_ with that kind of dough...
Re: (Score:3)
I don't live in Estonia, but we have a pretty decent public transport network here. During rush hours, the trains are packed full of commuters, despite the fact that tickets are not cheap. If they were to make it free, the trains would be filling up even more with people going shopping and doing other fun but unproductive things, and probably force more commuters into their cars.
Re: (Score:2)
An obvious solution would be to add capacity. This can be more frequent trains, or adding a few cars to each train.
Another solution is to change the cultural expectation of what a "full" train is. Take a ride at rush hour on the Yamanote line from Shinjuku to Shibuya and you will realize that trains can hold a lot more people than you think.
Re: (Score:3)
Someone has to pay for all that "free".
A new train will cost a nation real money to make/import.
Most people get a free ride? Thats no extra money to pay for the new service.
A tax rate has to then be set to cover that "free".
What to do with capacity during hours when its not needed? Just keep it all moving around a city? Thats a lot of extra power to pay for to move then near empty
Estiania, IT, outsourcing, Headhunting and Pub-Tra (Score:3)
You would think, but that is also a very narrow view, especially after actually visiting Tallinn.
Train is not as important as light rail(actual rail, and busses with power wires on top), combined with flexible bus routes.
A quick summary would read something like:
As a former communist nation, Estonia has a spread out infrastructure, with a lot of smaller towns surrounding Tallinn, and a lot of space between the populated areas and the industrial areas. A Soviet war insurance one could call it, but not centra
Re: (Score:2)
Gee, that could never help the economy. The last thing a country wants is to remove major impediments to commerce.
Re: (Score:1)
I don't live in Estonia, but we have a pretty decent public transport network here. During rush hours, the trains are packed full of commuters, despite the fact that tickets are not cheap. If they were to make it free, the trains would be filling up even more with people going shopping and doing other fun but unproductive things, and probably force more commuters into their cars.
This seems to be a capacity planning issue, not a price issue.
Re: (Score:2)
fun but unproductive
There are very few fun things which don't contribute to GDP and thus the economy. Going shopping is at the very bottom of that list. The social benefits of getting people to spend money can have a huge effect on a country.
Re:I guess it depends on what you mean by free (Score:4, Funny)
Modern cars produce more as they get older (Score:2)
Once more, with eye-rolling (Score:2)
free [wiktionary.org] (selected definitions):
Generous; liberal.
Thrown open, or made accessible, to all; to be enjoyed without limitations; unrestricted; not obstructed, engrossed, or appropriated; open; said of a thing to be possessed or enjoyed.
Obtainable without any payment.
Invested with a particular freedom or franchise; enjoying certain immunities or privileges; admitted to special rights; followed by of.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Generous; liberal.
Thrown open, or made accessible, to all; to be enjoyed without limitations; unrestricted; not obstructed, engrossed, or appropriated; open; said of a thing to be possessed or enjoyed.
Obtainable without any payment.
Invested with a particular freedom or franchise; enjoying certain immunities or privileges; admitted to special rights; followed by of.
So, none of those definitions apply to this Estonian system.
What? What are you smoking, how much does it cost, and what are the other side effects?
There must be some other type of "free" the author is thinking of. It's not generous
"showing kindness toward others"
I think you should consider learning to google. How old are you? How long have you been on the internets? You should know this by now.
it's paid for by mandatory taxes.
Not this "Taxation is theft" tripe again. That shit is only spewed by selfish pricks who want to justify taking and never giving.
It's not unrestricted
All citizens may use it regardless of social status, to use it to go anywhere it goes. That's quite unrestricted.
and it wasn't obtained without payment.
It is for those c
Re: (Score:2)
I don't like a lot of the way taxes are spent, but that doesn't invalidate the concept of taxation. Being upset at how politicians spend money rather invalidates the concept of hands-off government. You can't just sit back and trust it to work in your best interest.
Re: (Score:1)
WTF are you smoking? Of course its theft. Theft by definition is: to take without permission. I DON'T GIVE MY FFFFFING PERMISSION!
Re: (Score:2)
WTF are you smoking? Of course its theft. Theft by definition is: to take without permission. I DON'T GIVE MY FFFFFING PERMISSION!
That's exactly what you did when you sat back and did nothing to change the situation except cry about it on Slashdot.
Re: (Score:1)
Theft is also to take something without paying for it. So if you are living in a Western society, you are benefitting from everything provided by the government (laws, infrastructure, military, police, fire departments, crop subsidies, etc). Therefore just by living in the country and taking advantage of these things, you owe the government...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Once more, with eye-rolling (Score:1)
You mad, bro?
Why be so angry that somebody else sees shades and hues, where you see only black and white? You aren't stuck being in such a monochromatic world, it's your choice. So bug off reacting so strongly.
Yep, Taxation is not theft (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
There is no such thing as free.
I know that it is a sin here on Slashdot, and this is even on Pentecost Sunday, but . . . I read TFA:
And while outsiders might assume the government’s costs to be prohibitive, it won’t actually be that expensive to implement.
That’s because Estonia’s public transit already gets extremely generous subsidies. The state-owned railway operator Elron, for example, will get a €31 million boost from taxpayers next year. The rural bus routes due to go free, meanwhile, are already subsidized to up to 80 percent of cost as it is. Making them entirely fare-less should only cost around €12.9 million ($15.2 million) more—not a vast amount for even a small country such as Estonia.
So the Estonian taxpayers are already footing most of the bill.
This idea would never float in the US. While Americans are OK with using trains and subways as public transportation . . . taking a bus is seen as something for the lower classes.
Unless it is a private Google or Facebook bus.
In Europe things are a big different and folks from all economic levels take buses. I used to work in Walldorf, German
Re:Once more, with emphasis (Score:4, Interesting)
In Europe things are a big different and folks from all economic levels take buses. I used to work in Walldorf, Germany . . . home to SAP. Those well earning folks would take a train from scenic Heidelberg to Walldorf, and then jump on a public bus to SAP.
In the USA, I don't want to take a bus, because they are dirty boxes filled with filthy heathens. When I was in Panama, I used buses more than rental cars or taxis. People were in general quite polite and helpful there, and their long-distance buses were universally nicer than Greyhounds. It's not that I'm allergic to buses. I just know what being on them is like in this country, and I'm not interested. I grew up riding the bus everywhere to which I didn't bike or walk, because we were poor AF. Miss me with that shit.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Is it really that bad everywhere?
I can't speak to everywhere, only bits of California where I've used buses. When I lived in Texas I had no trouble coming up with cheap cars. Most of them sucked, but I could just get another one.
Re: (Score:1)
In CO, buses are clean and a joy to ride in. Most of the time I don't even drive into Boulder anymore, just get to a Park and Ride, hop on a bus and relax.
Re: (Score:2)
There are plenty of things that are free. You (and others of your political persuasion) just don't know what the definition of free is,
Re: (Score:1)
You remember the name of the town, don't you?
No
Re: (Score:2)
Some people hate any government assistance of any type. Providing bus service is not much different than paying to maintain roads, and improves the economy. Still, those people sometimes want all roads to be either toll roads or dirt roads for horses...
Re: (Score:2)
Overall it could help the economy. More people able to get to more jobs, more people able to go shopping to more places, etc. Sure, if people are in walking distance it doesn't help much, but if you have to go over 5 miles and you don't have your own transportation it's a major hindrance. I know people who have had to give up jobs for these reasons.
Re: (Score:3)
Another thing to note is that people who walked from place to place may be tempted to take public transit.
This is bad for transit (higher crowding) and bad for the city (less street-side commerce, higher centralization of commerce, less vibrant street).
Your argument doesn't hold up.
Within the city of Tallin, public transport was already free. It doesn't seem to have caused the problems you describe.
And I doubt your argument applies outside of Tallin, as Villages and Towns usually are not really in walking distance.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Generally cities have just a single transit system, you take their bus, or you drive. The service is mostly subsidized everywhere as well. Funds do show up though with free bus service, it can reduce wear and tear from autos; the political fights about commuting funds tend to split between improving mass transit or adding new roads.
Re: (Score:2)
Funds do show up though with free bus service, it can reduce wear and tear from autos;
No, it cannot. Autos do essentially no damage to properly constructed roads. Buses and other Class 6+ vehicles, on the other hand, involve drastically larger forces applied. Whether we're talking about the total torque applied, side loading in turns, or simply the pressure per square inch exerted on the roadway, light vehicles are basically irrelevant. Think about a typical class 6 school bus, with an unladen weight of around 20-24,000 lb. That's got six tires, and those tires are designed for low rolling r
Re: (Score:2)
Your "properly constructed roads" is a "No True Scotsman" dodge. Roads that carry only local car traffic (i.e. roads that primarily exist to provide access to the houses along it, little or no "pass through" traffic) are built to standards that cause that level of traffic to wear them out in about 40 years. Building them to last longer would be a waste of money because the extra is being spent 40 years before it is needed, at interest cost. (Another 19-year-old 2nd-year engineering student in my class w
Re: (Score:2)
Your "properly constructed roads" is a "No True Scotsman" dodge.
No, it isn't. All I mean is that they are not in a gross state of disrepair, which usually is a result of inadequate development of the road bed. It can also be a result of inadequate maintenance, when you don't repair damage done by weather. Or in cases of extreme incompetence or malfeasance, the incorrect asphalt mixture can be used, and then the roadway can become soft and pliable during extremely hot weather conditions and mere automobiles can damage it.
Otherwise, passenger cars and light trucks do esse
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
this is not the u.s., it'll be just fine:
they like transit there, they use transit there, petrol is expensive, cars are a luxury, cities are more compact, government more in-tune with society's needs, and no clueless morons with tacky red hats to raise a stink if the government actually provides public services.
so, pretty much the opposite of what you're used to.
The Roads Must Roll (Score:3)
For some reason, this made me think that it would be like the whole nation was conveyor belts, just step on and go anywhere. Obviously, this is is true of any nation with roads, but the "free" thing makes a psychological difference: you spend money to go places you have a need to go, but if it's free, you might wander anywhere aimlessly, like a man out for a walk.
The conveyor belt image sent me over to my Heinlein collection to carefully re-read the start of "The Roads Must Roll", confirming what I'd suspected: Heinlein never mentions payment. The entrance to the Road lacks all toll-booths or other mentions of payment. Indeed, how could there be when he describes that you can get on anywhere, just step on the outer 5MPH strip going by, and work your way inward to faster strips if you aren't travelling locally. There are, however, many paragraphs expended clarifying that the whole economy is dependent on them, and they re-designed all their cities around them.
I think Mr. TANSTAAFL actually proposed that moving mechanical roads would be like the asphalt roads they replaced: just free for all to use. The same concept of "public road" that every government ever had to maintain (at great public expense, your city streets department is likely more expensive than either water or sewer) just had the cost of maintaining mechanism tacked on. They already had to up the roads budget 500% to install and maintain asphalt instead of dirt decades ago, this is just the same increase again as society became another 500% richer from the "Douglas-Martin Sunpower screens" and so forth.
Pigeonholing Heinlein as a libertarian, or militarist, or whatever, was never wise; the guy had his opinions, but his imagination that roamed over all sorts of ideas always ruled over that when he had an idea he couldn't resist.
Re: (Score:2)
Unexpected as it may be - it works (Score:5, Informative)
You need to keep in mind that setting aside who pays for it, public transportation is just cheaper than a car in every way. You need less infrastructure and roads are expensive, a bus just takes less room than equivalent amount of cars, on roads and on parking lots. A bus itself is cheaper than equivalent number of cars, as Estonia has to import both, public transport is good for import/export balance. Buses use less fuel per passenger than cars, again something you don't need to import as much. And the improved air quality is worth something too.
From state perspective, more public transport is a very good thing and if done right its pretty convenient for a citizen too. You can look at it as extra tax on car owners, not a very big tax at that.
Re: (Score:3)
No, we wont (Score:1)
Free public bus transport was the initial idea. Now nobody is sure because there is so much hurry and miscommunication involved. There was and idea that counties can choose: to open new bus routes, lower the ticket price or to set the ticket price to zero. Many counties would prefer to use the money to open new routes so that is will help more people.But now the central government declared that the counties that will not give free rides to everyone cannot give free rides to anyone. There is a long-standing
How do they know who is a visitor? (Score:2)
Are they just guessing based on people's appearance? Is it on the honour system? How do they know who is a local and who is a visitor? Or do they make even locals use some kind of card to identify themselves?
Good for them (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Their ENTIRE NATION is just a little smaller than the state of OHIO. They geographically have LITTLE area. Try doing that in the ENTIRE United States! More fake news, so to speak.
US population is 250x and land mass is 220x of Estonia so density is quite similar. Then of course the US has much more mountains, desert and Alaskan wilderness, and you don't need to build public transport *everywhere* only the main towns and cities.
#Fake brain, so to speak....
Other way around in Basel (Score:2)
Great move (Score:2)
Before anyone says "We can do this here, too!": (Score:2)
A possibly unusual libertarian perspective . . . (Score:2)
Libertarians such as myself believe in limited government. They are therefore assumed to be in total opposition to transit. But that's not always the case. While in a perfect world, markets would evolve to address transportation and most if not all other human needs, the world in which we actually do live is one in which cars, roads, oil, and other car-related infrastructure has been heavily subsidized in many places, for decades. Particularly in the U.S. where I live. This has created unsustainable an
Misleading (Score:2)
The original article is somewhat misleading and so is the summary, and by extension, also the discussion.
Yes, the Central Party wanted to push free overall *local* public transport, the kind that does not cross county borders. That did not come to pass. Instead, they instated a programme that encourages local transport operators to set up such free lines, only that it is not mandatory. Those operators that decide to enrol in the programme will get subsidies, those that don't, well, won't. But there will be
Re: (Score:1)
Estonia is NOT, repeat NOT the USA.
Stop trying to fit their society into your warped view of the world.
The USA in many respects is the cesspit of the world and with your current POTUS, is not something to be proud of.
Unless, you are one of the knuckleheads who voted for him.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Melbourne has a free tram zone, which is great if you're a tourist staying in a city hotel or one of the handful of people that live within half a km of the CBD. It's completely useless for commuters that incur a Zone 1 fare to travel to and from the suburbs.
Re: (Score:2)
However this type of whining about Lucky Ducky's isn't exactly anything new...