Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Australia Transportation

Chinese Ride-Sharing Giant Didi Chuxing Picks Its First English-Speaking Nation: To Enter Australia on June 25 (cnet.com) 71

Posted by msmash from the aggressive-expansion dept.
From a report: Ever since outperforming Uber in its home base of China, speculation has mounted that ride-hailer Didi Chuxing would eventually branch out to the rest of the world. Didi's first launch in an English-speaking country comes on June 25, it was announced Thursday, when it'll start operations in Melbourne, Australia. The company has already begun recruiting local drivers. While you might not have heard of it, Didi is China's most popular ride-hailing service, and in 2016 absorbed Uber China in a deal worth around $35 billion.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Chinese Ride-Sharing Giant Didi Chuxing Picks Its First English-Speaking Nation: To Enter Australia on June 25 More

Chinese Ride-Sharing Giant Didi Chuxing Picks Its First English-Speaking Nation: To Enter Australia on June 25

Comments Filter:
  • They speak English in Australia??
  • They're a taxi service skirting labor laws. Nothing about them has anything to do with sharing. It bothers me to see the way mega corps can so easily shape are narratives. Are we that dense?

    • On average, yeah.

    • Re:Can we not call them ride sharing? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 ) on Thursday June 14, 2018 @09:40PM (#56787756)

      They're a taxi service skirting labor laws.

      Didi is not Uber. In China, if you want a taxi, you can use Didi to hail it. Traditional taxis and "ride sharing" are integrated into a single service.

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Puls4r ( 724907 )
        I'd like to start by saying hello to our new ride-share overlords..... You may be right. I'm not that up in businesses in China. What I DO know is that China's lack of monopoly and anti-trust laws mean that they have mega-corporations there. Those mega-corporations are taking advantage of Chinese law (American's can't entirely buy a Chinese company). They are are also taking advantage of American law that limits just how large a company can grow inside America.

        That has allowed Chinese corporations t

      • Re: (Score:1)

        by AvitarX ( 172628 )

        So like Uber in San Francisco?

    • They're a taxi service skirting labor laws...It bothers me to see the way mega corps can so easily shape are narratives.

      So you want to choose the narrative for us?
      In my own mind it's both. Some drivers are full time time, and for them they are simply an improved much better taxi service that outdated laws have failed to recognise. The law will catch-up soon and then you can rest easy.
      For the rest, they are part time ride share type drivers. I have a few friends who are registered drivers and this is how they use the sevice. Again the law will catch up soon and recognise the technology has made the 19th century laws obsolet

      • Ride sharing is nothing to do with whether it's part- or full time.

        It's a ride share if the driver was going there anyway.

        • Ride sharing is nothing to do with whether it's part- or full time.

          It's a ride share if the driver was going there anyway.

          Says you. The law (according to the drafts I've heard about) will say different.

          • When you were at college did you have a section on the noticeboard for ride shares? "Going to Newcastle. Depart Friday 18:00. Return Sunday p.m. 2 places. Split petrol x ways. Dave Lones, physics III".

            LOL, silly me. You - at college!

            Do you think you can ignore food hygiene regulations by calling your restaurant a meal share and having an app?

            • When you were at college did you have a section on the noticeboard for ride shares?

              Your experience should be the standard that all shall live by. Cool story....

              Do you think you can ignore food hygiene regulations by calling your restaurant a meal share and having an app?

              You mean like how kids sell cakes and lemonade on a street stall? Or people donate food to others in need? I had a friend over last night for dinner and we shared a meal. OMG regulations are being broken!!! Lock them up!!!!
              You do realise that the law is a living process that evolves and responds to its environment? The law will adapt to Uber type services, regardless of your personal problem with the phrasing used.

      • technology has made the 19th century laws obsolete.

        Well, they're 20th century laws, but what do you think the point of them was? Because, where I am, I definitely see similar problems to what caused the taxi laws to go into effect.

        • technology has made the 19th century laws obsolete.

          Well, they're 20th century laws,

          The first recorded taxi services were around in the 17th century. The modern taxi service which we know today was created in the 19th century.

          but what do you think the point of them was?

          The same as most archaic laws, to protect the wealthy and their monopolistic business practices and prevent competition.

          Because, where I am, I definitely see similar problems to what caused the taxi laws to go into effect.

          The biggest problems identified globally - not just 'where you are', is unreliable and illegal behaviour of taxi drivers/services and corruption. Technology solves a lot of these problems (or at least reduces the opportunity) by introducing full a

          • Most of the laws came about once cars existed, because the taxis were causing far too much traffic. Most laws don't have any relation to a monopoly, although their prices are regulated to avoid the fares going up too much because of the artificially limited supply. Technology can help prevent illegal activity, but ride sharing is still producing vast traffic jams. Especially around events.

    • Except it's BETTER than a taxi service. You know the cost up front: no worry about being ripped off by a taxi driver who takes the long way for a few extra bucks. Also the ability to review drivers means they try a little harder to be friendly.

  • Unfair advantage? (Score:3)

    by Midnight Thunder ( 17205 ) on Thursday June 14, 2018 @09:12PM (#56787672) Homepage Journal

    Didi like a lot of Chinese companies seem to benefit from a lot of protectionism in China to grow and evolve. Surely this is giving them an unfair advantage when they decide to jump into other markets?

    • Hahahaha, if Uber make this point it will be peak irony.

    • Didi like a lot of Chinese companies seem to benefit from a lot of protectionism in China to grow and evolve. Surely this is giving them an unfair advantage when they decide to jump into other markets?

      Evolution is unfair by it's nature. This is why we need smart policy makers to stay ahead of the game, not a tangerine blowhard who behaves like a baby.

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      By that argument no foreign company should be allowed to enter the European market because they had the unfair advantage of growing and evolving without our increasingly crippling regulations.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Most countries have similar protections for taxi services though. Licencing, medallions etc. that all limit the ability of new players to enter the market.

      Most Didi drivers seem to be working for taxi companies anyway, a lot like how most Uber drivers in the UK seem to be working for taxi companies too. Maybe they have to in order to get the taxi licence or something.

  • Chinese investing in Australia (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward

    As an Aussie, oh,... who could've guessed?

    I mean our housing market is close to as bad as Vancouver thanks to them. They have picked up an IMMENSE amount of farmland in the past decade. There's been an utter plethora of money scandles with business and government.

    What could go wrong? You know besides the locals being unable to afford a home anymore? But fuck them, they're poor.

    This country is turning to the shit, fast, very very fast.

  • pick the hardest... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by johnjones ( 14274 ) on Thursday June 14, 2018 @09:53PM (#56787798) Homepage Journal

    Didi Chuxing are going to have a hard time expanding beyond tourists....

    WARNING for tourists hey if your washing your money in a Melbourne Casino why not let the Chinese state track how much time you spent at the tables...

    have fun

    John

    • Who needs to go all the way to Melbourne for that sort of thing when Macau's right next door?

    • Indeed. With the Chinese state already building their Social Credit System, expanding Chinese services like Didi Chuxing abroad is a great way to keep their citizens within the Chinese Internet ecosystem while they're overseas where they can be tracked, monitored and scored. Uber has already demonstrated the kind of abuses and tracking that can be done, now take those possibilities and apply them to a state coordinated environment where they deliberately take that information to score you! Oh, you're goi

  • The Google Translator called, it wants its translation back. Recall.

  • no seatbelts, no airbag, no windshield
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

  • Didi overperformed Uber (Score:3)

    by poity ( 465672 ) on Friday June 15, 2018 @06:13AM (#56788894)

    ...in not getting randomly raided by Chinese authorities on a regular basis.

  • China no doubt either hampered Uber, helped Didi, or more likely both, and very possibly is just faking the performance statistics of both so they get their own state-owned-and-controlled company a foot in the door. Also no doubt there will be cameras and microphones in all the cars recording everything that's going on, maybe even hacking people's phones. You're nuts to use their service, ever. Of course I'm no fan of Uber either, they're just a bunch of criminals.

Slashdot Top Deals

Every nonzero finite dimensional inner product space has an orthonormal basis. It makes sense, when you don't think about it.

Close