Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter To Slash Millions of Followers (nytimes.com) 87
Twitter will begin removing tens of millions of suspicious accounts from users' followers on Thursday, signaling a major new effort to restore trust on the popular but embattled platform. From a report: The reform takes aim at a pervasive form of social media fraud. Many users have inflated their followers on Twitter or other services with automated or fake accounts, buying the appearance of social influence to bolster their political activism, business endeavors or entertainment careers. Twitter's decision will have an immediate impact: Beginning on Thursday, many users, including those who have bought fake followers and any others who are followed by suspicious accounts, will see their follower numbers fall. While Twitter declined to provide an exact number of affected users, the company said it would strip tens of millions of questionable accounts from users' followers.
Heh. Hasta la vista, "Influencers" (Score:5, Insightful)
I hope there's a ton of "influencers" in this purge. They're the most fakety-fake-fake of all "media personalities."
Re: (Score:2)
I hope there's a ton of "influencers" in this purge. They're the most fakety-fake-fake of all "media personalities."
Uh, there's a difference between a fake account and a fake personality.
A Kardashian is a fake personality.
A fake account is what a Kardashian buys to perpetuate their fake personality.
At the end of the day it won't matter. This bullshit move isn't going to restore trust any more than a little blue checkmark did.
Re: (Score:3)
Should be interesting to see if we will see a drop in followers for some of these celebrities.
I suppose it would be fraud. Claiming that you have X number of followers to people who pay to have you promote their stuff.
Re: (Score:1)
The British are a disease and the only cure is gas chambers and ovens.
What about dental care, diction lessons, and... are taste bud transplants a thing?
Re: (Score:2)
At least with Twitter yo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I saw an article recently about how the "influencers" have been demanding things like free stays at resorts in exchange for a post. Not being a user of these social media platforms I was amazed at the brazenness of even sending an email to a hotel in the Maldives or Scotland and even asking for such a thing.
The entitlement mentality is absolutely dumbfounding.
Re: (Score:1)
FAKE NEWS!
fAkE Noise!!
What sound stage made your bullshit post?
No, don't take my followers! (Score:2)
I've only got 42 as it is. I'm pretty sure 10-15 of them are real people, but if the rest are bots ... frankly, I don't wanna know.
Re: (Score:1)
42 is the perfect number of followers. I hope you don't gain or lose any.
I've lost about half of mine so far this year. I post mainly HR-related stuff for work, and it's I find it strange so many thousands of people are interested in what I post. We did a user conference in April, and several people told me in person that they had their Twitter accounts deleted and could no longer follow me. That pisses me off considering the amount of work I do to find interesting things to post, and it hurts my employ
And deleting tons of legitimate accounts (Score:3)
Our online marketing manager had her account deleted a few weeks ago, and her assistant's account was deleted sometime this year since January when she last used it. I just checked my account, and other people can't see my Tweets. Twitter is really shooting themselves in the foot with this.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
'Legitimate'. 'online marketing manager'.
You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
Oh Noes!! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Does this mean Kim Kardashian will no longer be the most popular woman in the world?
Wtf is "Kim Kardashian"? (paraphrasing Ozzie)
Seriously, the rest of the world doesn't know or care about a US reality TV starlet.
Well first off, you do know that there are "services" that people like Kim or anyone for that matter - can purchase to have fake accounts created to follow them, don't you? Those are probably a big part of this culling.
Second, you do appear to know who the diva is.
Third - Here's your whoosh!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As you keep mentioning her, not likely.
Thanks for adding to the conversation.
Point is a lot of the purge is likely from followers created by folks like these https://devumi.com/twitter-fol... [devumi.com]
Interesting that the company isn't accepting clients any more around the time Twitter is culling the herd.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually I did at first have to google that name. Then I noticed she's some sort of voyeur-TV celebrity of some sort.
Ya know, when I was young, being a celebrity meant that you could do something really well and that people admired you for it. Today it seems to mean more that you're too stupid for any kind of meaningful work, too lazy to do any non-meaningful work and too proud to go for social security.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, it would swing the opposite way and this strategy masked as, "Think of the children," is a smart business decision.
Twitter knows its vetting system (of magnitude "none") inflates its membership numbers and advertisers are not happy about it.
If Twitter can reassure ad buyers that the eyeballs are valid, revenue will increase.
There are other options (Score:3, Informative)
> Tell me something, liitle conservative snowflakes: Where are all the
> conservative youtube, twitter, facebook, snapchat, instagram, etc of
> this world ? How come no conservative has ever come up with ideas like this ?
Want Youtube without the lib-left censors? ==> https://www.bitchute.com/ [bitchute.com]
Want Twitter without the lib-left censors? ==> https://gab.ai/ [gab.ai]
Re: (Score:1)
But now people will just moan that bitchure.com isn't as popular as youtube.com and they aren't getting their ad money.
It's not enough that there are sites that will let them post almost anything, they have to be on the most popular one and fully monetized by freedom loving advertisers or it's an Orwellian hellscape of leftist censorship.
Re: (Score:1)
Does that moaning sound the same as pro-censorship leftists such as yourself screeching that anything that hurts their fee fees is white supremacist hate speech? Because that's how we got to this point.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting. One "overrated" mod, an AC comment, and one "underrated" mod in the space of a couple of minutes.
Who are you really AC? What is your username?
They may turn twiiter in to something (Score:2)
They may turn twatter in to something I can use. I've seen it as a garbage site from the beginning and due to this I have never created an account.
Re: (Score:2)
It's somewhat useful for customer complaints. I have a weather related list I use to track incoming hurricanes, blizzards and other natural disasters. And I have a list for NYC government accounts to track city related stuff if need be
What's it for? (Score:1)
Explain what twitter is for then GTFO my lawn.
Re: (Score:2)
Couldn't agree more.
If you have something to say that can be said in 140 characters, you have nothing to say.
Re: (Score:2)
Ego waking. I have followers, ergo sum.
Delete away... (Score:1)
i hope they dont slashdot me (Score:2)
i follow them and a few others, and thats all i do, i log on, read the new posts and leave, no tweets coming from me
Whack-a-mole (Score:2)
See subject.
Resrtore trust? (Score:2)
In order to restore something, it must first have exited, then been lost.
Nobody with any sense would have trusted Twitter in the first place, and those that do are gullible enough that they never lost it.
So what's to restore?
Pointless? (Score:4, Interesting)
Can they actually eliminate fake accounts faster than they are being created?
Re: (Score:2)
They just have to make fake account creation expensive enough that the problem is significantly reduced. For example, if they can spot when people are using profile photos harvested from other social media accounts then they will have to start investing a lot more time and effort in generating profile photos.
The other classic giveaway is claiming to be from Dudley when you only ever post from an IP address in St. Petersberg during Russian office hours.
Please, get it straight (Score:2)
They are not 'followers'. They are at best deluded users, and at worst actually nonexistent fake accounts.
All that will be lost is;
Twitter stock value
Twitter prestige
Users' padded, invalid stats
Users' prestige
Our last shreds of stubborn innocence
NextDoor next... (Score:2, Interesting)
When they figure out how to weed out fake account, could they share their knowledge with NextDoor.com?
Even the most obvious fakes are approved, and seldom deleted. In fact, complaining about the fakes will get you suspended.
In my neighborhood, we have/had:
- Jack Mehoff
- Pat McGroin
- Flappy Flapstick
- Elenor Capstick (seems innocuous, until "she" posts back-to-back comments with Flappy Flapstick)
- A fake reporter and fake executive producer of news from a local TV station. I reported it to the TV station. It
Re: (Score:2)
Fake accounts with non-paid follows? (Score:2)
Were I generating such fake accounts, they wouldn't only follow people who paid me. I'd give each account several interests - e.g. 'jazz', 'online gaming', 'San Francisco'. Then I'd have them follow several legitimate people for each interest, randomly chosen. Finally when I get a jazz customer wanting followers, this account is one of the ones that might randomly be chosen to follow the customer.
The point being that if this is how it is done, completely innocent people will see their follower numbers drop
mixed feelings (Score:1)
Every movie review (Score:2)
No comments about actors and their ability to act. No negative comments about the movie plot, script.
SJW on social media are ready to report and remove such accounts.
No blasphemy.
No memes about US politics.
No jokes about Spanish politics.
No funny images of French politicians.
No comments on how EU policy has failed in your country.
Social media is going to read like one big approve banner ad for any product, service, government, faith, publishe
Re: (Score:2)
Then finally we'll have the squeaky clean, wholesome news on the internet that we have had on traditional media for the longest time, which were so bland that people actually preferred being lied to by fake news than having to endure them anymore.
How about unbanning conservatives? (Score:1)
You fucking cunts.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Here, read this - https://www.dailywire.com/news... [dailywire.com]
Not for TOS or any of those other excuses you have.
Were the Jews kicking out Nazis from restaurants, houses, banning their speech, etc or were the Nazi's doing that to the Jews? Are you sure you know which side you're on? You might be a fascist and don't even know it.
Are Conservatives going around harassing people trying to eat? Are Conservatives going around vandalizing property? Are Conservatives going around saying crazy stuff like let illegal aliens jus