Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications Cellphones Network Verizon

Verizon Confirms That It Will No Longer Activate 3G Phones (droid-life.com) 109

According to Droid Life, Verizon is no longer activating 3G-only phones. Instead, they will only accept 4G LTE-equipped phones going forward. Here's what Verizon had to say about the matter: "For several years we've been been publicly saying that our 3G CDMA network will remain available through the end of 2019. Virtually all traffic on our network is on our 4G LTE network. To facilitate a smooth transition to 4G LTE capable products and services, we are no longer allowing devices that are not 4G LTE capable to be activated on our network." From the report: Now, as is noted in the statement above, Verizon has committed to shutting down its 3G CDMA network by the end of 2019. They also stopped selling 3G devices some time ago, I believe, and even started selling LTE-only flip phones to replace them. [...] On a related note, an earlier leak suggested that Verizon may stop some older LTE devices from being activated too. The documentation there said that CDMA devices as well as devices that do not support HD Voice or VoLTE will not be accepted.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Verizon Confirms That It Will No Longer Activate 3G Phones

Comments Filter:
  • I use 2G and 3G systems for my data logging projects. They are much cheaper. Eventually I am afraid I will need to use a full 4G LTE system (at least in the US).
    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      If you managed to deal with moving from telegraph to telephone, I'm sure you'll handle this transition as well.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      For your use case, rather than full LTE, using LTE-M (AT&T, Verizon) or NB-IOT (T-mobile) might be useful. Other technologies are Lora and Sigfox. All of these are low throughput, and low energy. Lora and SigFox use unlicensed spectrum, with all the associated benefits and drawbacks. (Also, although the spectrum is unlicensed, the devices themselves do comply with restrictions e.g. duty cycle).

      • I currently use NB-IOT, although it doesn't reach everywhere I need. I just bought a LoRa module to test things out recently too. A lot of interesting things are going on in that area!
    • Re:Data logging (Score:5, Interesting)

      by mjwx ( 966435 ) on Tuesday July 17, 2018 @07:23AM (#56961750)

      I use 2G and 3G systems for my data logging projects. They are much cheaper. Eventually I am afraid I will need to use a full 4G LTE system (at least in the US).

      As you specified "at least in the US" you're probably living in a country that chose GSM from the very begining. Verizon does not have a "3G" GSM network such as HSPA, they went with CDMA which was a slower, more dead end technology. They're one of the last networks to get rid of it.

      If you want to use 3G GSM devices in the US, you need to go with AT&T as they're the only company that implemented an internationally compatible version of 3G GSM.

      • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

        CDMA is not dead. Current LTE is a more advanced version of CDMA and called something else because Qualcomm submitted it to a standards body.

        Verizon's CDMA was designed for voice and data was added on as a second thought. While modern versions of CDMA are designed for data and voice.

        what you call GSM is the old voice only TDMA tech which was competing with CDMA for voice

        • by Anonymous Coward

          No. WCDMA (UMTS) was a more advanced version of CDMA that used a wider band and allowed to both carry on a data call and a voice call at the same time along with higher bandwidth. CDMA was a 2G standard while EV-DO was the 3G equivalent built on top of CDMA. WCDMA was the 3G built on top of GSM leveraging technology from CDMA.

          LTE uses OFDMA which is more closely related to the TDMA that GSM used than CDMA in that CDMA everyone is on all frequencies all the time and use orthogonal codes to get an individu

        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          Comment removed based on user account deletion
          • Comment removed based on user account deletion
            • I'm not disagreeing, but trying to point this out as a service to other readers:

              From the Cellular network standards navbox [wikipedia.org] at Wikipedia

              E: Europe / the world;
              A: Americas, including the U.S.

              2G:
              E: GSM
              A: cdmaOne (IS-95), D-AMPS (IS-54 and IS-136)

              2G transitional (2.5G, 2.75G):
              E: GPRS, EDGE/EGPRS, Evolved EDGE (little-used / not implemented)
              A: CDMA2000 1X, CDMA2000 1X Advanced

              3G:
              E: UMTS;
              A: CDMA2000 1xEV-DO Release 0 (TIA/IS-856) (May have also been adopted in Europe, but I'll assume not i
              • by segin ( 883667 )
                CDMA2000 1xEV-DO is used in Europe on a few networks. Norway recently had an operator switch their 450MHz network from CDMA2000 EV-DO to LTE, Ukraine has one, mostly old Soviet bloc nations have 'em left. They're dying, though.
        • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

          by mjwx ( 966435 )

          CDMA is not dead. Current LTE is a more advanced version of CDMA and called something else because Qualcomm submitted it to a standards body.

          Nope, LTE is the "4th" (3.5th actually) generation of the GSM standard.

          WiMax was meant to be the replacement for CDMA although it wasn't developed from CDMA. WiMax has also died a well needed death.

          Verizon's CDMA was designed for voice and data was added on as a second thought. While modern versions of CDMA are designed for data and voice.

          what you call GSM is the old voice only TDMA tech which was competing with CDMA for voice

          Nope, what I call GSM are the group of technologies including GSM, UTMS, HSPA and LTE which colloquially fall under the moniker GSM.

          • by SumDog ( 466607 )

            Wi-Max was pretty fast though. I used both Sprint Wi-Max (on the HTC Evo) and Vivid Wireless (Wi-Max in Australia) .. I mean they weren't great compared to wired of course, but they were both pretty decent.

          • by msauve ( 701917 )
            GSM used TDMA, competing with Qualcomm's CDMA in some locations. Eventually, GSM (standardized by ETSI) networks changed to UMTS (standardized by 3GPP) which used CDMA modulation in recognition of its benefits. (about the same time, CDMA, the air interface, moved to CDMA2000).

            Now both are moving to LTE, which is based on OFDM modulation.

            Although it's common to colloquially include UMTS and LTE in GSM, technically, GSM is going away (if not gone already) - neither UMTS nor LTE are part of GSM, and LTE is c
      • by segin ( 883667 )
        T-Mobile also operates a GSM/UMTS/HSPA network on a standard band (Band 2, 1900MHz PCS.)
    • I wonder if Verizon will resell any 3g capacity to MVNOs you might be able to use.

    • I use 2G and 3G systems for my data logging projects. They are much cheaper. Eventually I am afraid I will need to use a full 4G LTE system (at least in the US).

      You do not need to use a "full 4G LTE" system for data logging. Neither in the US, nor anywhere else. You WILL need to abandon 2G and 3G pretty much worldwide between 2020 and 2025, but do not need full 4G LTe for M2M communications (which includes data logging)

      You can use LTE-M, a simpler variant of LTE, aproved in 2013 specificaly for M2M (like data logging) communications.

      It goes easy on cost because of simpler modems and economies of scale because it is a pretty much single standard, and is very light o

  • How much of Verizon's spectrum is currently allocated to 3G? How much will this move free up for its 4G and future 5G networks?
  • Really? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by demon driver ( 1046738 ) on Tuesday July 17, 2018 @07:16AM (#56961722) Journal

    Funny! I have several persons in my circle of friends and acquaintances who still use 2G phones and don't want anything else. And why should they? Why should someone need to use the internet at all with their mobile phone? But then again telcos won't try to switch them off anytime soon in the country where I live, I guess.

    • Re:Really? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by kerashi ( 917149 ) on Tuesday July 17, 2018 @07:56AM (#56961826)

      This will hit old people with flip phones the hardest. My dad uses one of these, he has one particular model he likes, and it naturally is not a 4g phone. He doesn't need a smart phone, given his tendency to leave it unplugged for days and the fact that he is so computer illiterate that he has trouble with digital gas pumps (he's bought a few car washes that he didn't want trying to get it to print a receipt). And I have an elderly friend who has an earlier version of the same phone, probably over 10 years old and still going. But I guess they aren't profitable enough to care about, compared to those on the smartphone upgrade treadmill.

      • he is so computer illiterate that he has trouble with digital gas pumps (he's bought a few car washes that he didn't want trying to get it to print a receipt).

        I've nearly done this because either the screen is hard to read with the sun shining on it or the buttons are so worn it's difficult to see which the "Yes" and "No" buttons are.

      • by schnell ( 163007 )

        But I guess they aren't profitable enough to care about, compared to those on the smartphone upgrade treadmill.

        The real business driver for shutting down older generation networks isn't the profitability or lack thereof of the phones and their subscribers, but instead the profitable use of that spectrum. If you have a band that is allocated to 2G and it has only a few subscribers on it, that spectrum license would be much more profitably (and efficiently) used on a newer technology with more users on it. The carrier also gains a benefit of sunsetting older networks by being able to remove gear from the tower and bei

        • The carrier also gains a benefit of sunsetting older networks by being able to remove gear from the tower and being able to repurpose that "real estate" for additional radios/equipment supporting high-demand newer technologies.

          Plus they won't have to maintain gear that may be harder to find replacement parts for.

    • Funny! I have several persons in my circle of friends and acquaintances who still use 2G phones and don't want anything else. And why should they? Why should someone need to use the internet at all with their mobile phone? But then again telcos won't try to switch them off anytime soon in the country where I live, I guess.

      Actually, maybe in the country were you live those 2G and 3G phones will be swtiched off sooner than you think.

      I live in Venezuela, and it will happen, In india is happening already. Only africa remains a question mark about 2G 3G shutdown.

      See, spectrum is expensive, equipment shelters are overcrowded, spectrum is super-expensive, communities are reluctants to allow new anteannas (for "reassons"), and 5G needs lots and lots of small coverage antenas.

      So, a way to 5G is to eliminate the 2G and 3G equipment (f

      • Developing economies, like Venezuela, are very unlikely to shut down 2G and 3G networks even in the long term. Venezuela in particular is also unlikely to introduce 5G within the next five years.

        wrt 2G and 3G, Africa and South Asia are just as unlikely to phase these technologies out; though 5G is likely to be introduced in some markets, after 5G implementations in Northern Europe will be rated stable. 5G was launched on 27 June 2018 in Finland and Estonia.

        The situation with mobile tech adoption in In
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday July 17, 2018 @07:19AM (#56961736)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • Welcome to New Hampshire...

      You'll only get decent coverage near Manchester, Concord, Hampton (seacoast area, but not Rye or North Hampton) and Portsmouth / Dover areas...

      • The problem with 4G in portsmouth is that Nyarlathotep is interfering with 4G signals so that people can not post acurate photos of him before they succumb to maddness, and their phones are destroyed.

    • Cell phones work in New Hampshire? Who knew?

      • Comment removed based on user account deletion
        • "Well, in Vermont they don't work at all "

          Not so. There are several places in Vermont where if you stand in the right spot and hold your phone just so, you can sometimes get one or even two bars on your cell phone.

          Seriously, cell phone coverage in Vermont used to be pretty bad to nonexistent. But for the past decade or so, it's been much improved. Heck, in some places you can even get a signal indoors these days.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      "All our traffic is 4G, because those poor 3G plebs can't get any bandwidth from the one tower per 400 sq miles we've deigned to provide them with"

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I don't think that by the end of 2019 the places that I go where my phone switches to CDMA are going to have LTE support. Sure it works in the cities. But driving from city to city all I can get is EVDO, sometimes 1xRTT. I doubt that Verizon will have all of those cell sites converted to LTE by the end of 2019.

    Does this mean a reduction in coverage? The only reason to go with Verizon is that it works everywhere. When I'm driving in the boonies and still need to take a work call -- that's why I pay through t

  • Most operators around the world, specially in developed countries, are planning to shutdown 2G and 3G services. The sunsetting is expected in most of the world between 2020 and 2025

    Some operators on the loosing side of 3G (CDMA2000-EVDO and TD-SCDMA) are shooting down 3G first, and then 2G. Other operators are shooting down 2G first, keeping 3G to support Voice, in order not to pay for VoLTE Licenses. Yet others plan to keep 2G in a restricted mode for M2M Communications (think smart meters, IoT, etc.).

    This is actually a Good thing. We had 3 standards for 2G (GSM, IS-54/136 a.k.a. TDMA and IS-135 a.k.a. CDMA2000), then we had 3 3G standards (CDMA2000-EVDO, WCDMA and TD-SCDMA). Then we had two (or three, depending on how you count) standards for 4G (802.16m a.k.a. WiMax, FDD-LTE and TDD-LTE ).

    You can imagine how crowded a radio shelter is nowadays. How much electricity it consumes, how much heat it generates, and how costly the O&M contracts and logistics of all that gear is...

    And how crowded the spectrum is as well since the spectrum tends to be very expensive.

    With (hopefully) only one 5G standard, and sunseting of all 2G and 3G networks, more harmonization worldwide is possible, which leads to simpler radio modems (the end Game is TDD-LTE + 5G), and cheaper equipment. Also, spectrum that is currently used for 2G and 3G can be refarmend for 4G and 5G, leading to better service.

    this should be seen as a welcome development.

    • Pretty soon there will be so many phones in landfill, we will have no space to bury our dead!

      I am in the UK, and I still get 2G connections on my 4G phone in some areas. The first network here to dump 2G is going to lose a lot of subscribers because their phones will find large areas of "no signal". Also, a lot of phones switch to 2G only when the battery is low cos it uses less power. (They go back to 4G when a call is initiated).

      • by GuB-42 ( 2483988 )

        Bury the dead with phones, like that, when 2G/3G dies, the dead will be able to enjoy it in the afterlife.

    • "this should be seen as a welcome development."

      Why should it? I still use a 2G feature phone since it does everything I need, i can operate it without looking at the screen and while wearing gloves and the battery lasts over a week on standby. What is so welcome about me having to spend money on a phone with 4G when I don't need the functionality?

      • Why should it? I still use a 2G feature phone since it does everything I need, i can operate it without looking at the screen and while wearing gloves and the battery lasts over a week on standby. What is so welcome about me having to spend money on a phone with 4G when I don't need the functionality?

        By that same token, analog phones worked fine! Why did they sunseted the standard? Oh, the Nikel-Cadmium batteries contaminated the soil more than the lithium ion of today, and while there were less phones back then, those contaminated more and used more raw materials.

        The same could be said about IS-54/136, or CDMA2000, or TD-SCDMA... Those worked fine... Why discontinue them?

        Anyway, you do not need to buy a smartphone to enjoy the benefits of 4G, here you can have this phone for around $80. It has 4G. You

        • by Viol8 ( 599362 )

          "Oh, the Nikel-Cadmium batteries contaminated the soil more than the lithium ion of today, and while there were less phones back then, those contaminated more and used more raw materials."

          My 2G phone is smaller and used less raw materials in its manufacture than any smartphone.

          "Those worked fine... Why discontinue them?"

          I don't know, you tell me. There reaches a point where things are good enough , the only reason to keep replacing them is to make money for the companies involved, not to provide a better se

  • I suppose I can now box my 3G phone hoard of "backup" phones for electronics recycling. I wonder how this will affect MVNOs, and the many 3G phones activated on those that sell service on Verizon's network? I have one on PagePlus for the few times I don't think I'll have usable T-Mobile access.

    • It will affect MVNOs using the Verizon network as well.
    • Just put them on eBay so people who live in places where the networks are still going can buy them... or people who want them for other projects.

  • when you pry it from my cold dead hand!

    • Mot-o-rola star...tac... There's a name I've not heard in a long time... a long time...
      Flip phones... where I could feel like Captain Kirk...
  • "For several years we've been been publicly saying that our 3G CDMA network will remain available through the end of 2019..."

    Now, as is noted in the statement above, Verizon has committed to shutting down its 3G CDMA network by the end of 2019.

    No, that's not what they said. Verizon verbally confirmed the 3G network will be available through the end of 2019. They never stated it was not going to be available after that, they simply did not commit to keeping it up. They are leaving themselves the option of shutting it down then. Nothing has been said about it being taken offline.

  • by antdude ( 79039 )

    Time for a newer smartphone by the end of 2019 since this iPhone 4S goes up to 3G (can do 1X too). :(

"...a most excellent barbarian ... Genghis Kahn!" -- _Bill And Ted's Excellent Adventure_

Working...