Some Linux Gamers Using Wine/DXVK To Play Blizzard's Overwatch Banned (phoronix.com) 81
Longtime Slashdot reader DrYak writes: Phoronix is reporting that multiple users who all use Wine and DXVK compatibility layers have seen their Overwatch accounts banned by Blizzard. Previously, Blizzard has stated: "playing on Linux or even a Mac while on an emulated Windows environment is not bannable." But users report on Reddit getting banned simply after testing some rendering options. Tech support has answered that they are escalating the ticket and trying to take a closer look, hoping to avoid this from happening to other Linux users. According to Phoronix, the most common explanation for the bans "is a false-positive from Blizzard's anti-cheat technology having issue with DXVK."
Re: (Score:3)
From even just TFS:
"Blizzard has stated: "playing on Linux or even a Mac while on an emulated Windows environment is not bannable.""
So, how did they break the TOS just by doing something that is actually already allowed?
Re: (Score:3)
So, how did they break the TOS just by doing something that is actually already allowed?
The TOS allows playing in an emulated windows evironment.
But... Wine Is Not An Emulator.
And that's enough until they think of a better reason.
Re: (Score:1)
Wine no longer stands for 'Wine Is Not an Emulator', it's just "Wine":
https://www.winehq.org/about [winehq.org] "Wine (originally an acronym for "Wine Is Not an Emulator") "
and in fact it originally stood for "Windows Emulator":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
"The name Wine initially was an abbreviation for Windows Emulator.[16] Wine later shifted to the recursive backronym Wine Is Not an Emulator in order to differentiate the software from CPU emulators.[17] No code emulation or virtualization occurs when running a Wi
Blizzard: *Should* be supported indeed (Score:2)
The TOS allows playing in an emulated windows evironment.
But... Wine Is Not An Emulator.
And that's enough until they think of a better reason.
No, it's not a case of Blizzard playing with words in order to have an excuse to kick users out.
From the Phoronix article :
Blizzard official attention has always been to let Wine users in. (Hey, more customers == more ca
Re: (Score:2)
From even just TFS:
"Blizzard has stated: "playing on Linux or even a Mac while on an emulated Windows environment is not bannable.""
So, how did they break the TOS just by doing something that is actually already allowed?
The TOS was a lie.
Re: (Score:2)
So it was cake instead of pie...
Ban First, Think About Fixing it Later (Score:3, Informative)
A bit bloody arrogant don't you think, Blizzard?
Re: (Score:1)
or.. perhaps there are some settings or reproducible rendering bugs in dxvk that give an unfair advantage to players who use it, and the bans are entirely justified.
Re: (Score:2)
Segregating would be a good compromise. Let all the DXVK players mingle with each other.
Re: (Score:2)
Segregating would be a good compromise. Let all the DXVK players mingle with each other.
The two or three that are logged in at the same time? :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, the gamers.
The only group that OKs segregation, forced isolation, and public ridicule in response to percieved unfairness....
/sarcasm
-- Unbunch you panties, the humor was on point because Linux DXVK are quite rare among the population, and while the total population is quite large the number of those online at the same time will be significantly smaller, multiple orders of magnitude. Now add the low occurrence of Linux DXVK and the player pool will be quite limited.
-- Their segregation is not forced, they chose Linux rather than dual boot. Politics has a cost, get over it.
Re:Ban First, Think About Fixing it Later (Score:4, Informative)
Looks like a perfectly normal screwup to me, not a reason for indignation.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't play Overwatch - is their anti-cheat technology any good at banning actual cheaters? Or is this its only feature?
Re: (Score:2)
Never encountered an overt cheater. Then again, I almost never encounter cheaters in any game these days. I think everybody's anti cheat tech is pretty solid.
Re: Ban First, Think About Fixing it Later (Score:1)
not really, I banned activision from my house due to their treatment of linux.
Re: (Score:2)
But you're willing to reconsider and rescind your ban if they provide a reasonable explanation for why their anticheat technology flagged a false negative and fix it, right?
Of course you're not.
Re: Ban First, Think About Fixing it Later (Score:1)
I'm willing to rethink the ban if they stop actively trying to undermine linux gaming.
Re: (Score:2)
A false positive is not "actively trying to undermine linux gaming."
But just so long as you're willing to make same "ban first, think about it later mistake" that you're complaining of, more power to you. Improving the world zero steps at a time.
Re: (Score:1)
The fact they now have to advertise the fact that playing on linux isn't a bannable offensive kinda suggests its not false positive; and even if it is a false positive, its one false positive among a pile the size of E
verest of true positives.
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that they have "advertised" that playing on Linux isn't a bannable offensive rather suggests that it is a false positive, because otherwise there would be masses of Linux gamers who had been banned for using WINE/DVXK long before this. Even TFA calls this a false positive.
Re: (Score:1)
No, they started taking action a couple of months after they found out people were playing their games on linux
https://eu.battle.net/forums/e... [battle.net]
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, there is not one report on that thread of people being banned for using WINE/DXVK.
Youre using "taking action" as a euphemism for what, exactly? Failing to provide support?
Re: Ban First, Think About Fixing it Later (Score:1)
You clearly miss the point entirely. Activision, for nearly two decades have done everything they could to undermine, damage and thwart gaming on linux. from legal action to firing any developer that dared use it.
for example.
https://www.gamingonlinux.com/... [gamingonlinux.com]
it is definately not a coincidence that a couple of months after someone starts a thread asking "will i be banned for using linux", acti starts hunting down and banning linux users.
Re: (Score:2)
So you utterly missed the part of your own link that stated:
What legal action? What developer firings? All you've done is link to pages that say that Linux is not a supported pl
Re: Ban First, Think About Fixing it Later (Score:1)
The one that immediately springs to mind is the various id software court cases. but there are a lot of them, as mentioned in https://www.gamespot.com/artic... [gamespot.com]
basically they do everything they can to subvert linux developement, its one of the reasons they have only 3 titles on android vs 10 on ios, when android destoys ios for graphics subsystems.
Re: (Score:2)
Which mentions a single ID software court case that has to do with share ownership squabbles, with nary a mention of Linux.
I keep asking for support, and you keep pretending that you've provided it. Yet no lawsuits, firings, or bans intentionally related to Linux usage can be found.
Sad.
Re: Ban First, Think About Fixing it Later (Score:1)
It starts with "Once again, a nasty legal battle has pulled back the curtain of secrecy that shrouds major game-industry deals. " i.e. there's been a lot of them. Agreements with microsoft to not let any of their studios produce linux versions, replying to linux support requests that they are breaching terms of service by using their pc games on Linux (that was the point I banned them iirc), just a pile the size of everest of examples, I didn't exactly keep a journal, but as far as I know its well known to
Re: (Score:2)
And then goes on to describe how several founders allegedly screwed another founder out of his share of ownership so that they could make more from a buyout.
Money problem, not a Linux problem.
Link?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I totally understand, but specifically this combo showing up as a false positive is going to be difficult to get legit users white listed and still have an effective anti-cheat. I do not envy Blizzard programmers at the moment.
Re: A Linux user went outside and u wont believe (Score:1)
he got a motherfucking swirly!!!!!
From a FreeBSD user
Sound's reasonable (Score:5, Interesting)
According to Phoronix, the most common explanation for the bans "is a false-positive from Blizzard's anti-cheat technology having issue with DXVK."
I tell you what, I already had my cane in hand and ready to shake... but then paused long enough to actually read the explanation and this sounds very reasonable. It's obvious by their response that they have nothing against Linux or people using compatibility layers.
Re: (Score:3)
Coupled with the number of cheaters on Overwatch, and the way they can poison play for paying customers, and it's not a surprise if there is a mistake.
Re: (Score:2)
It's all part of the plan. (Score:1)
"Stick with Windows, and everything will be okay." - Microsoft
Re: (Score:2)
Suggestion: if you don't like the way a game works, don't play it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHCARlbShD4 (Score:1)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmWMd3Yxb5_RRqrKD (Score:1)
Native Port (Score:2)