Experimental AI Lie Detector Will Help Screen EU Travelers (engadget.com) 102
SeriousSamy shares a report from Engadget: In the future, you might talk to an AI to cross borders in the European Union. The EU and Hungary's National Police will run a six-month pilot project, iBorderCtrl, that will help screen travelers in Hungary, Greece and Latvia. The system will have you upload photos of your passport, visa and proof of funds, and then use a webcam to answer basic questions from a personalized AI border agent. The virtual officer will use AI to detect the facial microexpressions that can reveal when someone is lying. At the border, human agents will use that info to determine what to do next -- if there are signs of lying or a photo mismatch, they'll perform a more stringent check.
Stop implementing dystopian shit, you idiots! (Score:4, Insightful)
Do you want war? That's how you get war! Read the books to the end before you think "hey that tech sounds cool I'm going to build that".
Re: Stop implementing dystopian shit, you idiots! (Score:1)
Also, these mental rejects are calling tuned algorithms "intelligence."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
... a public execution.
Do you mean "releasing to elsewhere"?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you want war? That's how you get war!
Americans complaining about border control in the EU amounts to war? Are you high? Have you ever traveled into either the EU or into America as a non-resident? If this was leading to war then the USA would have been in a perpetual state of wa....... oh crap.
Re:Used just like a polygraph (Score:4, Insightful)
Nice theory - except that even with people that believe in them, polygraphs are about as effective as flipping a coin. I'm sure this will be much better though - more on par with rolling dice.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
polygraphs are about as effective as flipping a coin.
Not true. Polygraphs don't work on people trained to defeat them. They don't work on some people at all. But for most people most of the time, they work fairly well. They are far below the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of a criminal court, but are certainly better than "flipping a coin".
Polygraph effectiveness is exaggerated by some. Its ineffectiveness is exaggerated by others. The truth is in the middle.
I'm sure this will be much better though - more on par with rolling dice.
Preliminary work based on NN observations of micro-expressions has shown it to be surprisi
Re: (Score:1)
WRONG. So so so fucking wrong. Polygraphs have absolutly zero science behind them. They detect nothing that can be claimed to be effective.
The truth is straight out polygraphs are absolute psuedoscience crap. Go fuck off.
Re:Used just like a polygraph (Score:4, Insightful)
Lie detectors are a lie, fact. Lie detectors as currently deployed in the US are in fact, reaction to question detectors, whether or not you lie in response to the question is entirely arbitrary, all that counts is your response to the question, hence, lie detectors are in fact a lie.
Re: (Score:1)
When used on untrained people, lie detectors have an accuracy rate of about 65%. Clearly that is not enough, in itself, to draw any serious conclusions, such as guilt or innocence. But it also is clearly better than "flipping a coin".
Many of the "tricks" used in the past, such as the old thumb-tack-under-the-toe trick, no longer work because they now require you to remove your shoes. So if you ever have to take a polygraph test, make sure you wear clean socks. They also put sensors on your abdomen to de
Re: (Score:1)
Are polygraphs scored by a computer that comes up with a True/False response, or are they scored by human graders who "interpret" the results? If it's the latter, then it's just dowsing/palm reading/dream interpretation crap.
Well (Score:1)
Great idea (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Sample Questions (Score:3)
"Let me see your identification."
"These aren't the droids we're looking for."
"You can go about your business."
"Move along... move along."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why is that?
I'm just a bit of a bastard.
Re: (Score:2)
lie detectors (Score:1)
Every person who has taken Psychology 101 is aware that lie-detectors are useless -- I cringe when congress people call for those things to be used as they should know better -- the only benefit is if the person giving the test is watching for certain body language giveaways (it's entertaining to watch some of the people that are aware of body language signals displaying truth as they will enter into a strange feedback loop when they are asked questions)
Re:lie detectors (Score:5, Interesting)
Learn to lie with body language.
'Tenting' your fingers during a job interview can get you more money. It's supposed to show 'true confidence and competence'.
Lean forward whenever an interviewer is really boring the fuck out of you. It's supposed to show you are 'engaged and interested'.
Remember there are no 'right answers' to personality assessment tests...unless you want the job. Then you want to score high on conscientiousness, openness to experience and agreeableness, low on neuroticism, right in the middle on extroversion (unless a marketer, than high on extroversion).
Maintain an internal happy chant...'I've got a secret and you won't catch me, la la la lala, I've got a secret...'
Re: (Score:3)
You should really charge Donald rent for that space he occupies in your head. Clearly you don't have any to spare.
Re: (Score:2)
That's a very small partial list, do your own research and practice, practice practice.
Re: (Score:2)
Any particular recommendations for further reading/research?
Re: (Score:2)
Resources on 'How to spot a liar' or 'poker tells' are good places to start.
Youtube has a few.
Also: Play poker.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks. I meant more the part about body language for interviews, but I suppose some of it is interchangeable.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't lie too much, until you get good at it.
Play poker for stakes high enough that bluffs are a thing. In penny ante everybody just calls all bluffs.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The same test most widely accepted and used for hiring decisions in the USA?
I'm not sure I get your point?
Are you in favor of the scientology personality test instead? It also has 'correct' answers...which are mostly obvious, except for some reason the clams think you should memorize bus schedules when you have free second. If you see that test, best bet is to flee, there are Hubbardists in that company.
Re: (Score:1)
Only the professional liars will get through (Score:4, Interesting)
Nothing like being sent to secondary screening with the presumption you have done something bad. Humans don't handle part two under these circumstances any better than I believe robots will handle part 1.
--
I make mistakes growing up. I'm not perfect; I'm not a robot - Justin Bieber
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing like being sent to secondary screening with the presumption you have done something bad.
How does that differ from today?
Re: (Score:2)
Ah yes, the Jewish sponsored Muslim takeover of europe...
What part of that conspiracy makes any sense?
Re: (Score:2)
There are no screenings at all inside the EU today
Then who are those nice men in the military style uniforms I talk to when I enter and leave Germany, for example? More important, the question was how being sent to secondary screening today differs from doing it based on an AI flag? Both have overtones of guilty actions.
Re: (Score:2)
There are no screenings at all inside the EU today
Are you coming from/leaving to a Schengen country?
Irrelevant. The statement I replied to said there are NO screenings AT ALL inside the EU. Germany is inside the EU. There are screenings to get in. Therefore the statement I replied to is proven to be a lie.
Re: (Score:2)
What the fuck does that have to do with it?
Right now there is screening for EU citizens moving within the EU. There is screening for non-EU citizens moving within the EU. There is screening for anybody entering the EU.
Where the Schengen agreement allows people to skip the whole business now why would you assume it would be different in the future?
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe not 'professionals'. But Lying is a skill that can be improved, like any other.
Lie more.
Re: (Score:2)
Skilled liars ... (Score:2)
Skilled liars engage in an excess of trust building behaviour in expressions of speech and nonverbal communication. These convince most people but not those trained as human lie detectors.
Voice stress analysis is applied extensively by UK insurance companies for claims management and used to focus anti-fraud investigations.
Possible questions in 2025 (Score:4, Insightful)
Have you committed a thoughtcrime, or expressed an opinion that would not qualify as being approved by the EU, since your last mandatory screening?
Have you ever shared, created, or even willingly viewed an illegal meme that is not already part of your permanent criminal record?
Have you ever attempted to avoid, tamper with, or disable, any or all monitoring systems present in any personal electronic device, public space, or area designated for personal hygiene?
Re: (Score:1)
No surprises there. The actual EU haters should actually like this.
The surprising part is that the EU is apparently fundi
Re: (Score:2)
They have a right wing extremist government.
I've learned not to trust statements like this on Slashdot, epecially from ACs.
On this occasion the research actually backs you up. Now I'm wondering why my mother loves Budapest so much.
Re: (Score:2)
You seem to be confusing the EU for the US. It's the US border where they will steal all your stuff, copy all your personal data off your devices, check your social media accounts etc.
EU borders have nude scanners and of course non-EU citizens will be checked. But they don't generally ask about things like political views, don't review your social media accounts etc. Things like criminal record checks are done at the visa stage, or for people who don't need a visa on the landing card, and only consider thin
Re: (Score:2)
Oh really? Article 13 didn't pass and police raids and arrests for social media posts aren't happening on a daily basis? The London metropolitan police aren't actively trawling through social media looking for thought crime?
Then there is this recent ruling by the EU court of 'human rights' [theatlantic.com] that decided that free speech is not a right and that the “the right of others to have their religious feelings protected” will be enforced through pain of fine or imprisonment. No doubt there will be even m
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your papers please (Score:2)
So this is probably not the best image to project to the "virtual agent" when attempting a border crossing.
http://images5.fanpop.com/imag... [fanpop.com]
upload photos? (Score:3)
it wants you to upload photos? over the internet? is that safe? what if someone fakes AI's FTP server and ends up getting those photos instead? you'd think Mr. AI, at the airport, would have a camera ... a pair of high speed ultra high definition high dynamic range ones, even.
I wonder if it will accept Monopoly money.
I wonder if it will accept bribes.
Re: (Score:2)
According to TFA this will be a pre-screening done well before you reach the border, from your own computer. The idea is to speed up border crossing by doing as much of the checking prior to arrival as possible, and then only a quick mostly automated re-check is needed on the ground.
The risk will be similar to online banking or any other web site that handles sensitive information.
If you are paranoid you can opt out and use the standard border checks. A lot of people will probably be forced to due to techni
micro-expressions (Score:2)
Can you say "Bogus"? I knew you could.
Re: (Score:2)
This is being implemented in Hungary, a very anti-immigrant (and racist!) country. It's clearly designed to select people with dark pigmentation as "needing additional screening"
Counter AI? (Score:2)
Somebody will create an AI using my image to answer the questions, without the indicators that I may be lying.
Will be fun for people who are illegal (Score:2)
With shared documents.
Using another persons story to create documents to travel with.
People who have supported banned groups.
Who have applied for "protection" many times under different names and with different "stories" each time.
Criminals trying to gain a new clean ID as a person with another ID?
Re: (Score:2)
How will this reduce freedom of movement?
Current situation: Uniformed official asks you questions, validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country.
Future situation: Computer program asks you questions, validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country. If it can't provide validation then it hands off to a uniformed official who asks you questions and validates that it's legitimate for you to enter the country.
Wait? The future state is cheaper for the Government to operate and yet offer
Won't work (Score:2)
You'll catch cheaters but the sociopaths and psychopaths will beat this easily and those are the ones that you need to catch.
Perhaps just as immigrations at the US borders (Score:2)
Every time I go through US immigration border control, I wish we had something similar instead here in the EU instead of just waving everyone through. (There's some "nice" stories about certain flight routes from African countries where there are virtually no check)
Look at the ESTA form that is part of the US Visa Waiver program. They even want a list of all your social media accounts. Last time I applied, it was still optional, but I bet it is only a matter of time. Of course there is a worry what they thi
Doesn't work on psychopaths (Score:2)
This, like all other methods based on behavioural observations and physiological reactions, will NOT work on psychopaths, which is arguably the demographic you should worry the most about. Psychopaths don't reflect their emotional state on their behaviour or on their body reactions. They don't sweat, their heart rate doesn't increase, when confronted with their lies, or while lying - even if they're lying their ass off.