Regular Windows 10 Users Who Manually Look For Updates May End Up Downloading Beta Code, Microsoft Says (techspot.com) 115
In addition to relying on Windows Insiders, employees, and willing participants for testing updates, Microsoft is pushing patches before they are known to be stable to regular users too if they opt to click the "check for updates" button on their own, the company said. From a report: In a blog post by Michael Fortin, Corporate Vice President for Windows, it is made clear that home users are intentionally being given updates that are not necessarily ready for deployment. Many power users are familiar with Patch Tuesday. On the second Tuesday of each month, Microsoft pushes out a batch of updates at 10:00 a.m. Pacific time on this day containing security fixes, bug patches, and other non-security fixes. Updates pushed out as part of Patch Tuesday are known as "B" release since it happens during the second week of the month.
During the third and fourth weeks of the month are where things begin to get murky. Microsoft's "C" and "D" releases are considered previews for commercial customers and power users. No security fixes are a part of these updates, but for good reasoning. Microsoft has come out to directly say that some users are the guinea pigs for everyone else. In some fairness to Microsoft, C and D updates are typically only applied when a user manually checks for updates by clicking the button buried within Settings. However, if end users really wanted to be a part of testing the latest features, the Windows Insider Program is designed exactly for that purpose. Further reading: Windows 10's 'Check for updates' button may download beta code.
During the third and fourth weeks of the month are where things begin to get murky. Microsoft's "C" and "D" releases are considered previews for commercial customers and power users. No security fixes are a part of these updates, but for good reasoning. Microsoft has come out to directly say that some users are the guinea pigs for everyone else. In some fairness to Microsoft, C and D updates are typically only applied when a user manually checks for updates by clicking the button buried within Settings. However, if end users really wanted to be a part of testing the latest features, the Windows Insider Program is designed exactly for that purpose. Further reading: Windows 10's 'Check for updates' button may download beta code.
JFC... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
YES. It's here. THE year of the LINUX DESKTOP!!
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Will do just as soon as you can point me to the Linux release that will run all of the following:
Rhinocerous 3D
Keyshot
Adobe CC ( Full Suite )
Capture One Pro
Zbrush
Painter 2018
The above + MS Win 10 bullshit is why I'm still running Windows 7 Ultimate.
( At least Maya has a Linux version )
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget CAD packages. At least AutoCAD makes a version for OSX.
They also make this AutoCAD version [autocad.com], which is a clue that long term, what desktop you're on doesn't really matter, and all the major browsers already support Web Assembly.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll switch to Windows just as soon as you can point me to the windows release that will run the following:
Synopsys Design Compiler
Primetime
VCS
Spyglass-LP
Jasper Gold
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It triggers my PTSD. I used to work for Cadence.
Re: (Score:1)
Point with this kind of against-Linunx arguments is that about 99% of the normal users do not use that applications, and probably not even heard about the most of them.
So - For a small part of the user base indeed keep using Windows is needed. However, the overwhelming majority of users could use Linux without missing out anything. This is even more true since more and more applications are "on-line" and cloud based, and as such it does not matter on what operating system you are working on.
Re: (Score:2)
I want Proton to simmer for a while before I jump in to use it.
The answer is on Microsoft's web site: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
it is made clear that home users are intentionally being given updates that are not necessarily ready for deployment
All Windows 10 users are given updates that are not necessarily ready for deployment, that's how Windows 10 updates work.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How pathetic?!?, I was thing more along the lines of "Muther fuckin' puss bucket, what the fuck".
Or Mac! (Score:2)
Mac OS is not too bad.
Windows was always beta code. No news here. (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Except that with Windows 10 it seems to be worse than it have been in a long time.
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of companies are doing this! :(
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They've always used their customers as beta testers. That shit started at least as early as the MS-DOS days.
A nice quip on the quality of MS software in general, but not constructive to the discussion. There are orders of magnitude differences in not only the quality of software but the actual business practices of MS between the DOS days and now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, well, no proof or evidence of that is needed for your claim at all.
The sky is blue. I'm not providing proof of that either. I'm just assuming a minimal knowledge on the subject matter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Microsoft is a bunch of good people now."
What the fuck are you talking about. I never said that in the slightest. In fact given the subject matter at hand what I wrote implied the exact fucking opposite.
dumbfuck
Yeah my line to you arsehat. Don't make assumption about others then act like a dick, especially when the assumption is wrong. You look like a fool.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wow. Unable to read or understand context and then doubling down on stupidity when you're corrected. You're *actually* an idiot. Okay thanks for letting us know.
I'll keep it in mind in the future to use simple words with you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cool let's go for a basic English lesson. In english you can't take sentences out of context so let's start with the context:
1. An article describing treating current users a beta testers through the remote.
2. A post saying that customers have always been beta testers.
3. My reply. Now lets analyse that one in detail:
a) "A nice quip on the quality of MS software in general" A general sense of agreement that you're pandering to the crowd on the quality of windows software, not a disagreement of the fact (your
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Having looked into the EULA and its online extensions, yes, Microsoft does claim to pretty much own the data on the PC. Moreover, they claim they can delete any "app" they consider is priated - and - they claim - they can run code remotely. You basically sign away your first born. Have a look:
[quote]
However, before more data is gathered, Microsoft’s privacy governance team, including privacy and other subject matter experts, must approve the diagnostics request made by a Microsoft engineer. If the req
Re: (Score:2)
In other news (Score:1)
Are you kidding me? (Score:1)
That is totally not cool.
Microsoft wants Windows consumer customers ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Microsoft wants Windows consumer customers ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Microsoft wants Windows consumer customers ...to go away. There is no other explanation.
They aren't treating their enterprise customers all that well either, just different forms of abuse.
All previous client versions of Windows had the Professional edition equal to Enterprise in all but the licensing component, otherwise they were the same.
With 10, Professional is closer in features to the Home edition and lacks much of what one expects from a domain attached system and group policy, countless policies that no longer work in any edition except Enterprise.
Then there is the licensing. Holy fuck.
Windows Server is now licensed per core available, and has a minimum purchase of 2 CPUs and 16 core. That isn't 16 core per CPU either, it's 16 total.
So 2 CPUs at 24 core each? You need to purchase 4 licenses at full windows server pricing.
4 CPUs at 12 core each? That's 8 copies of windows you buy for that one installation.
Plus CALs
Want to get that Enterprise license for Windows 10 to use with that fancy server? That's a minimum 10 client license purchase.
So 4 copies of windows server and 10 copies of windows 10, added to $180 per user, paid every year.
Want to expand to two physical server systems? Basically double that.
8 copies of windows server, $180 per user per server, and your 10 copies of Windows 10 still even if you went from 1 to 2 PCs.
That enterprise licensing code I mentioned? It's called KMS, and you don't enter keys or anything like that. :P
You are required to run (and license!) a dedicated KMS server on your domain. Any new OS gets turned up, it requests a license from that server, which sends the request to Microsoft, and it goes on your next months bill pro-rated of course.
It sounds easier than managing license keys, and yea it certainly is, but requires opening a line of credit with Microsoft and sending in about the same amount of corporation registration paperwork as it takes to get a damn EV certificate from godaddy
Oh, and if you don't go the enterprise edition and KMS license route and just stick with Professional and "make due", well then we don't get any more control over windows updates than you do at home.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The parent post has major factual errors. As much as I would also deride Microsoft's behaviours as of late, they're not quite as horrifyingly bad as listed above. To address:
-Windows client has had versions above Professional since Vista over 10 years ago. These versions have always had extra capabilities such as DirectAccess VPN and BitLocker encryption. Enterprise/Ultimate features have occasionally drifted down to Professional over the releases since.
-Featureset in Professional is still far above Home, a
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks. It's difficult enough to find your way through the windows 'ecosystem' - server and client versions - without outright lies making things worse. The zealots and fanbois on both sides make life difficult for those of us trying to get our jobs done.
I like linux - a lot. But I'm not stupid enough to believe it's a viable replacement for corporate desktop systems, or even small business. That said, the day someone can make WSUS work on a linux server (without going through an emulation layer), I'll be f
Re: (Score:2)
well then we don't get any more control over windows updates than you do at home.
One big key thing I will mention (and also the reason why I would not wish Windows 10 Home on my worst enemy), at the very least the Pro version allows you to switch to the semi-annual branch whereas the Home users are locked on the Targeted branch. Also Home users can't delay feature updates for 365 days or security updates for 30 days like Pro users can.
It may sound like nothing but lip service, but with current MS practices Windows 10 Pro is basically a minimum requirement for any computer you want to ha
Re: (Score:3)
Well, my plan is to go to a Zen-2 next year with a gaming-only Win10. No browsing, no email, no nothing. For that I have a Linux-machine that I can actually trust to not send all my personal stuff and behavior to the vendor and that I can trust to not screw me over at any and all updates.
Stupid is as stupid does. (Score:4, Funny)
Microsoft's updates are like a box of chocolates...
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft's updates are like a box of chocolates...
More like razor cakes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/c... [reddit.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Still aren't but I would trust Reddit more than any of the cable news companies.
Would trust the companies over facebook for news
Re: (Score:1)
With a bit of cysnide for thst extra taste, it is good for you, we prommise capa
Signed Microsoft
Just Making Windows Insider Program More Efficient (Score:2)
Now, you don't even have to sign up for it!
Excuse me, but if you are using Windows 10 because it is production level code which means no surprises - shouldn't you always get production level code?
And my dad asks why I don't trust Windows 10.
At this point (Score:4, Insightful)
I think most Windows 10 users are doing everything they can to disable any and all updates of any kind considering Microsoft's track record recently.
Re: (Score:1)
Well microsoft stil has servers, the ussr has not exsisted for quite a number of years, so either you where referring to Russia, or your post makes little seance. Had this been Facebook (or the the like) zi would just assume the the US R was referring to Russia, bur since we are on Slashdot I tend to not make that assumption be or checking, So AC (if you ever read this) were do you think those ms servers you a referring to are locates?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think *most* Windows 10 users aren't doing anything. A few of the savvy ones however are doing whatever they can do disable / defer updates.
Remember these are computer users we are talking about. Any idea of logic, thought, intelligence, or capability does not apply to the masses.
WTF. (Score:5, Interesting)
Yeah, undermining people's trust in your OS's security update mechanism is great idea. I really hope someone got a raise for this.
F*uking hell. What kind of drugs would any semi-self-respecting developer have to be on to suggest this, and gets it ok'd by multiple managers.
Can we bring public stoning back.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
F*uking hell. What kind of drugs ... Can we bring public stoning back.
It looks like we've got private stoning all covered so I don't see why not. Just open the WINDOWS and Let the Sun Shine In.
Re: (Score:3)
What kind of drugs would any semi-self-respecting developer have to be on to suggest this, and gets it ok'd by multiple managers
I think you have it backwards. Suggested (demanded?) by the manager and reluctantly implemented by the dev.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed.
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, what kind of masochists hits the check for updates button in the first place! These users *want* to get screwed.
So the rumors are true. (Score:3)
... users ... may end up downloading beta code ...
Microsoft really is trying to be more like Google. :-)
Re: (Score:2)
M$ has been around a lot longer.
Infrequently-used computers (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Not just infrequently used. If I set up a computer for a client or reinstall Windows, I want to hand it back fully patched. To do that, you have to hit that button.
Letters (Score:2)
"B", "C", "D"? Heck, I'd give them an "F".
Jesus fucking Christ (Score:2)
Repeat this process at least 3 times before releasing to the general public.
I am pretty sure people are getting tired of being your beta testers. Especially when don't listen and release a service pack that delete user data.
You can't comp out with the "Good, fast, cheap, pick 2" excuse. You have the money so you can make a good fast product if
Re: (Score:2)
Vote with your wallet or shut up. You have no other leverage or influence. The rest of these comments are just impotent rage.
Things could change if people actually cared as much as they complained.
Re: (Score:2)
Kinda hard to vote with my wallet, since I have done that and they are still around.
I have no say on the work systems.
Its like voting, your individual power is next to meaningless.
Re: (Score:2)
Makes sense considering how Microsoft only notices (Score:2)
Windows 10 Enterprise is the product (Score:2)
Well here's a thought... (Score:2)
Time to switch. (Score:2)
New machine? (Score:2)
In the last month I've build two machines for my family & loaded up two notebooks for friends. One new gaming desktop which seemed to patch fine & reloaded Win 7 on the older one. The notebooks were from friends who wanted me to cleanup, patch, Windows & load, activate, & patch Office.
So of course I "check for updates" over & over until all updates are loaded. Does this mean I possibly loaded beta patches? That last notebook was really a POS, some cheap HP from wallymart sub $300. It