Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
EU Transportation Businesses Technology

BMW, Daimler, and VW Colluded To Prevent Better Emissions Control Tech, EU Says (arstechnica.com) 76

The European Union Commission today accused BMW, Daimler, and Volkswagen Group (which makes VW, Audi, and Porsche vehicles) of colluding to limit emissions reduction technology in their diesel and gas vehicles. From a report: The commission accused the three manufacturers of coordinating to limit the size and refill ranges of AdBlue tanks on their diesel vehicles made between 2006 and 2014. AdBlue is a urea-based liquid that is injected into exhaust gas to reduce the amount of nitrogen oxides (NOx) that are released during diesel combustion. The commission also accused the three manufacturers of agreeing to avoid or delay the introduction of "Otto" particulate filters on gas-powered vehicles between 2009 and 2014.

After opening an investigation last September, the EU Commission today sent the three German automakers Statements of Objections, that is, a formal letter outlining the preliminary view that the manufacturers' behavior was illegal. "Such market behavior, if confirmed... would violate EU competition rules prohibiting cartel agreements to limit or control production, markets or technical development," an EU Commission press release read.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

BMW, Daimler, and VW Colluded To Prevent Better Emissions Control Tech, EU Says

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05, 2019 @03:23PM (#58391704)
    corporations will kill us all just to make another cent
  • Conspiracy noun

    1 : the act of conspiring together

    2a : an agreement among conspirators
    2b : a group of conspirators

    Gosh, everyone's always gotta have a conspiracy theory.

  • What is the advantage to these companies of limiting the size (and therefore the car's range) of these urea tanks?

    I get what their "advantage" is from not adding an extra filter would be, but not in limiting the range of their cars.

    Sam

    • by Mal-2 ( 675116 )

      VW, at least, would fill the urea tank with scheduled maintenance, and the tank was intended to last for the entire service interval. Getting the tank filled "for free" withh scheduled maintenance was part of the package. Reducing the size of the tank forces owners to come in for that maintenance sooner than they might want to, because the tank sensor tells them it's time.

      • Not sure about VW, but on many vehicles you can fill the tank yourself. Many petrol stations sell AdBlue right at the pump. Still, not having to worry about filling it would be a selling point I suppose.
        • by Mal-2 ( 675116 )

          I'm pretty sure the owner can fill the tank, sure, but VW was pushing the line that diesel is just as easy to operate and maintain as gasoline, to try to win over the North American market which has never fallen in love with diesel for personal vehicles. Part of that was that the urea system needed to be invisible to the owner. Down the line this decision may have further contributed to the emissions software scandal, as minimizing urea use through software was definitely one of the methods they used to kee

      • by Anonymous Coward

        That's silly. It's urea for crying out loud! Unzip, relieve yourself, and you're good to go for another thousand miles....

        • That's silly. It's urea for crying out loud! Unzip, relieve yourself, and you're good to go for another thousand miles....

          Well you need to filter it too, add antifreeze and color it blue :)

          Or you can buy it at tank-station for cents.

    • What is the advantage to these companies of limiting the size (and therefore the car's range) of these urea tanks?

      I don't understand that part of TFS and the linked article isn't any more clear. I am a (very happy) owner of a TDI motor. Prior to having it "fixed" I was getting ~2.5k miles per 1 gallon (imperial) of AdBlue. I don't know what it's getting since the "fix" as I haven't gone through a full tank, but with it's 5 gallon tank I've already had to refill it's fuel tank 5 times (~2.5k miles) with no sign of the low fluid warning. Maybe it's me, but that doesn't feel very limited...

      • Well considering it's supposed to last until the service interval, having to refill it every 20000km is quite limiting given the service interval on most modern cars is 30000km.

        • Well considering it's supposed to last until the service interval, having to refill it every 20000km is quite limiting given the service interval on most modern cars is 30000km.

          The service interval on Audis and VWs is 10k miles in the US and Porsche is 5k. Both under the vehicle's DEF usage.

    • What is the advantage to these companies of limiting the size (and therefore the car's range) of these urea tanks?

      Ultimately it comes down to consumer choice. Any collusion that sets products standards between companies at a level that isn't market regulated and is lower than the generally available technology is deemed to be potentially negative for consumers by competition law. It doesn't need to always be about cheap products or meeting regulations. In this case it's about better technology in the general market not being passed to consumers.

      The commission's words:
      "The Commission's preliminary view is that the car m

  • by Anonymous Coward

    This is rather ironic, since these three manufacturers are the only once to actually use particulate filters in petrol cars.

  • Shocked, I say!

  • No worries really: corporations will self-regulate and not only obey all published laws but go above and beyond the letter of the law to improvements based on the spirit thereof - it is in their best interest to do so after all.

A committee takes root and grows, it flowers, wilts and dies, scattering the seed from which other committees will bloom. -- Parkinson

Working...