China Hacks Airbus Suppliers For Commercial Secrets (ibtimes.com) 50
An anonymous reader quotes International Business Times:
European aerospace giant Airbus has been hit by a series of attacks by hackers targeting its suppliers in search of commercial secrets, sources told AFP, adding they suspected a Chinese link. AFP spoke to seven security and industry sources, all of whom confirmed a spate of attacks in the past 12 months but asked for anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the information they were sharing...
Many state-backed and independent hackers are known to disguise their tracks, or they may leave clues intended to confuse investigators or lead them to blame someone else. But the sources said they suspected Chinese hackers were responsible, given their record of trying to steal sensitive commercial information and the fact that Beijing has just launched a plane designed to compete with Airbus and US rival Boeing.
State-owned plane-maker Comac has already launched manufacturing of its first mid-range airliner but has struggled to get it certified. Engines and avionics are "areas in which Chinese research and development is weak," one of the sources said.
Many state-backed and independent hackers are known to disguise their tracks, or they may leave clues intended to confuse investigators or lead them to blame someone else. But the sources said they suspected Chinese hackers were responsible, given their record of trying to steal sensitive commercial information and the fact that Beijing has just launched a plane designed to compete with Airbus and US rival Boeing.
State-owned plane-maker Comac has already launched manufacturing of its first mid-range airliner but has struggled to get it certified. Engines and avionics are "areas in which Chinese research and development is weak," one of the sources said.
Standard Operating Procedure for China (Score:5, Informative)
Boeing won a contract to produce aircraft for the Chinese National Airline. The contract called for Boeing to build the aircraft in China so Boeing setup factories, manufacturing, assembly and testing facilities inside of China. After the contract was over, China started producing new, Chinese aircraft based on the Boeing design and manufactured, assembled and tested at the former Boeing facilities.
Airbus requires the work to be accomplished within the consortium countries. China has no access unless they can buy the access so they steal the access.
Red China has done this all over the world when they want someone else's technology.
Re:Standard Operating Procedure for China (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, Airbus has an assembly facility for the A320 in China.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Assembly.
http://www.modernairliners.com... [modernairliners.com]
Everyone has. (Score:4, Insightful)
Not sayigm it's OK or it isn't.
Just pointing out that it is a key part of the Snowden leaks that Five Eyes did this as a normal part of their business. That Israel Iran and Pakistan have beem caught doing it. And that Russia is also pretty much guaranteed to do it.
It's kinda the point of a spying agency that follows the interests of the country, in this global asshole society.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
After the contract was over, China started producing new, Chinese aircraft based on the Boeing design and manufactured, assembled and tested at the former Boeing facilities.
Now if we could trick them into building Boeing 737 MAXes . . . that would be an counterintelligence coup!
Re: (Score:2)
To the best of my knowledge, Boeing has done 2 things in CHina, which was non-critical parts for the 787, and a completion factory for 737 (and this just started).
Not surprising (Score:1)
Just like japan and korea and most east asian countries, they're great at manufacturing existing technology but for whatever cultural or social reason they're utterly shit at large scale innovation so have to use others ideas. And if it means stealing them then so be it.
Re: (Score:1)
COPYING IS NOT THEFT.
Actually, it's the worst form of theft. Because you steal over and over again from the victim.
Re: Standard Operating Procedure for China (Score:2)
What "Chinese National Airline"? Do you mean China Eastern? China Southern? Air China? One of the random city owned airlines?
It's not just China (Score:2)
Re:Trump (Score:4, Insightful)
Seriously?
Did a single person here not read that headline without thinking "Either them, or... Boeing/NSA/Trump."?
Nope.
Although I did wonder how quickly someone would deflect a Chinese/European matter into somehow being a Evilz USA! USA! caused problem.
It turns out it was three posts. Congratulations
Re: (Score:3)
You know they've already been caught doing it, right?
https://www.google.com/search?... [google.com]
Re: (Score:1)
You know they've already been caught doing it, right?
https://www.google.com/search?... [google.com]
Not even my point. Your purposeful whatabout deflection is exonerating the Chinese. You wrote nothing other than trying to change the subject.
So we need to discuss how evils 'murria is, rather than a completely non-'murrican subject, amirite? Three posts to an attempted change of subject. If you aren't being paid by China, you should send them a bill for your services on their behalf.
Re: (Score:1)
Not even my point. Your purposeful whatabout deflection is exonerating the Chinese.
I'm not exonerating anybody, China could well be guilty.
Trump's government is currently slinging as much mud as possible in the direction of China. This article smelled like that is all.
Re: (Score:2)
Not even my point. Your purposeful whatabout deflection is exonerating the Chinese.
I'm not exonerating anybody, China could well be guilty.
But you do - inadvertently. That's the problem when there is a political subject, and almost the first post (yeah, it was 3) takes a sino-european matter, and turns it into a Trump and three letter agency USA thread.
That's why whataboutism is eventually doing the opposite of what it's intentions are. Unless you are trying to say that the USA was spying on Airbus, and giving the data to China. Wrong is wrong, and countries spy on each other.
Re: (Score:1)
It's not even a new thing. The French famously caused the USSR's supersonic transport aircraft to crash while on display at Paris. A French military jet got too close trying to take photos. Who really knows how much technology and how many ideas were stolen for the later Concorde design.
Re: (Score:3)
It's not even a new thing. The French famously caused the USSR's supersonic transport aircraft to crash while on display at Paris. A French military jet got too close trying to take photos. Who really knows how much technology and how many ideas were stolen for the later Concorde design.
The Concorde and the Russian SST were only superficially similar, kind of like how the Buran and the Space Shuttle looked alike, but were actually quite different. And with only a couple months between maiden flights of either - the Tu-144 was first, it isn't likely that France copied much. The 144 was pretty unstable in the original design. Indeed, the external design similarities was more related to the function of the aircraft. The American version that never came about also looked similar. Here's a litt
Re: (Score:2)
And I get modded "Offtopic.
Although it is funny, Slasdot has become just another troll fest, and must be thought of in the same context as Youtube, Facebook, or Yahoo Comments.
What for? (Score:2)
What for?
Re: (Score:2)
>>>>> "And each day, I learn just a little bit more. I don't know why, but I do know what for." What for?
It's a slang for retribution, such as "giving a person or group what for"
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously?
Did a single person here not read that headline without thinking "Either them, or... Boeing/NSA/Trump."?
Nope.
So you agree that not a single person read the headline and did not think "Either them, or... Boeing/NSA/Trump".
People do seem to have a lot of trouble parsing multiple negatives.
Me too.
Golly! (Score:2)
Now frown at them real hardlike, EU.
Sharing is caring. Harming is not. (Score:2)
I think whenever somebody keeps a secret from somebody, that could improve his life, for the only puprose of gaining an (unfair) advantage, and not to protect anyone from harm, ... that's harm, and hence a crime. It's also self-harm in the long run. And a state that supports it is a rogue state.
Of course I doubt the Chinese leadership care much about not harming others. So keeping certain secrets from them is a smart move.
But thieves love to confuse the inability to steal from you with stealing from them. I
Unfortunately, that leaves us as hunter-gatherers (Score:5, Insightful)
I absolutely see your point. Sharing is great.
Also, Thomas Edison constructed thousands of prototype light bulbs before finding a design that worked well. Intel spends $23 billion dollars on R&D every year. Why do you think Intel spends $23 billion annually to make computers better and better?
By the way, the $23 billion is your 401k money and mine. Why do you think Intel is spending that on R&D, and why are we *letting* them spend our retirement money on research a next generation CPU? Because they can sell it make $30 billion back, of course. Nobody spends billions just to be charitable. I wouldn't save up my whole life and spend my retirement savings to research CPU design just to give it away, would you?
R&D is done to have something better than the competition so that you can sell it and MAKE YOUR MONEY BACK. If R&D doesn't give you a secret sauce, if it was throwing money to competitors, it would be stupid to do R&D. With no R&D since the 1970s, the phone you used to type your post *would not exist*. You'd still be using a rotary dial phone.
Re: (Score:1)
Let's consider that possiblity (Score:2)
> In fact most progress is done by people who aren't motivated by profit much at all.
Let us consider that possiblity. Just Intel alone, one company, spends $23 BILLION every year on R&D.
Can you find any evidence that the sun total of ALL R&D done by people not getting paid to do it is at least $23 billion / year? If there is any evidence of that, that would indicate that the not-for-money R&D equals the R&D of one single for for-profit company.
The development of Linux would cost about
The Chinese learned from some 3 letter agency... (Score:2)
If they actually did spy, they must have learned all this from the Europeans and Americans. [theregister.co.uk]
Pretty damning IMHO (Score:2)
...So we are told that anonymous sources, without any evidence, "suspected Chinese hackers were responsible".
Sounds like an open and shut case to me.
Just to reinforce our understanding here,
1. It is rumoured that Chinese hackers often steal industrial secrets.
2. Therefore when industrial secrets are stolen, Chinese hackers must be responsible. (At least it's "highly likely").
3. This in turn reinforces the belief that Chinese hackers often steal industrial secrets.
This breathtaking dishonesty would disturb m
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Commercial secrets? (Score:2)
Sorry, there's no such thing. Perhaps you confuse it with trade secrets?
gee, anybody surprised? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
On a completely unrelated topic, when was it that you were visiting Taiwan (part of China) again?
Wrong headline ... (Score:2)
Airbus Suppliers Fail To Protect Their Commercial Secrets, China Walks Off With IP
Gee thanks captain OBVIOUS (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Presupposing that the article is correct, they at least have the requisite skills to use cyber weapons...