Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Businesses

Google Accused of Creating Spy Tool To Squelch Worker Dissent (bloomberg.com) 57

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Google employees are accusing the company's leadership of developing an internal surveillance tool that they believe will be used to monitor workers' attempts to organize protests and discuss labor rights. Earlier this month, employees said they discovered that a team within the company was creating the new tool for the custom Google Chrome browser installed on all workers' computers and used to search internal systems. The concerns were outlined in a memo written by a Google employee and reviewed by Bloomberg News and by three Google employees who requested anonymity because they aren't authorized to talk to the press.

The tool would automatically report staffers who create a calendar event with more than 10 rooms or 100 participants, according to the employee memo. The most likely explanation, the memo alleged, "is that this is an attempt of leadership to immediately learn about any workers organization attempts." A representative for Alphabet Inc.'s Google said, "These claims about the operation and purpose of this extension are categorically false. This is a pop-up reminder that asks people to be mindful before auto-adding a meeting to the calendars of large numbers of employees." The extension was prompted by an increase in spam around calendars and events, according to Google. It doesn't collect personally identifiable information, nor does it stop the use of calendars but rather adds a speed bump when employees are reaching out to a large group, the company said.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Accused of Creating Spy Tool To Squelch Worker Dissent

Comments Filter:
  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @08:27PM (#59341128)
    desperate and always at each other's throats. It seems like we never learn, but they do. They learned really well from the last round of labor organization.

    While you and me are arguing over paying a few bucks in Union dues every month they spend millions making sure we never get the chance.
    • While you and me are arguing over paying a few bucks in Union dues every month

      They already own the unions. You get nothing from paying your dues.

    • by Cito ( 1725214 )

      What I find funny and a little hypocritical is Google's internal chrome browser for employees also use the popular adblock plugin which no employees have the ability to remove any of the several pre installed plugins.

    • desperate and always at each other's throats. It seems like we never learn, but they do. They learned really well from the last round of labor organization. While you and me are arguing over paying a few bucks in Union dues every month they spend millions making sure we never get the chance.

      And union bosses want closed shops and mandatory dues. And would desperately like to distract you into hating "the rich" which is anyone who makes more than you.

  • "It's just a helpful, mandatory, little extension to help curb calendar spam. We promise."

    I wonder just how many Google employees are going to have Office 365 accounts now, hahaha!

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Google employees have a right to organize, but they don't have a right to do it during working hours while using Google's conference rooms for their meetings.

      Google has the right to monitor what their employees are doing while they are on-the-clock.

      • by gweihir ( 88907 )

        If your definition of right and wrong comes down to what the law allows, then you have already failed.

  • by cunina ( 986893 ) on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @08:47PM (#59341166)
    Google does indeed have a spy tool, it's called "Google," and the workers should know because they themselves created it.
  • by chasisaac ( 893152 ) on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @09:04PM (#59341218) Homepage
    You mean google spying on people? In particular those who work for them? No way. Not even possible.
  • yeah that sounds about right.
  • by misnohmer ( 1636461 ) on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @09:21PM (#59341260)

    If Google wanted to know is whether someone has a meeting for more than 100 people or 10 rooms, they would either scan the server for such meetings or have the server automatically log such meetings - they wouldn't need a client side plug-in. The client side plug-in is probably needed to warn the user before they schedule such large meetings, which can happen accidentally when inviting people on mailing lists or when forgetting to delete a bunch of rooms (I often add 100 rooms to a meeting just to see which ones are available, then delete 99 of them, but someone could forget) - that is the official explanation from Google which makes sense.

    • They could do the second thing server side too.

      • They could, but it might have been easier and load the server less to do it on the client side - warn the user before submitting the meeting to the server side.

    • Just Devil's Advocate, but it could conceivably be a soft intimidation tactic - letting you know that the size and scope of your meeting is being noted. It's probably innocuous, but a subtle reminder like that might just be part of 'discouraging' these sorts of things through little reminders that you're being watched.
      • Well, my Microsoft Outlook warns me when I try to schedule meeting for large groups, or even send out an email to more than some threshold of people. It also warns me if my email has an email address outside of the company anywhere in the to/cc/bcc. I don't see it as intimidation, I actually find it helpful. I once sent out an email notification to thousands of people by accident because such warning was not present in the the online collaboration tool, and the UI was inconsistent - in one part of the tool,

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • That's true.
      Also, with taxes, benefits, office space, etc on top of salary, the average Google employee costs the company close to $200,000 / year. Certainly more than $100,000.

      After holidays and vacation time, employees "work" an average of just under 2,000 hours per year. (Where work includes browsing Slashdot, getting coffee, etc.). So the cost to Google is about $75-$100/hour per employee.

      If you book a one-hour meeting with 120 people who each cost $100/hour, that meeting costs $120,000. It might not

      • 120 * 100 = 12,000

        So it was only a $12,000 per hour meeting, unless you think the conference rooms for the meeting costs $108,000 per hour (in which case I want to be in a business to provide meeting rooms to Google), or that everyone in the meeting spent 10 hours of company time preparing for it.

  • If Google's employees are supposed to be the best & brightest in tech, why would they be using company email for labour organising? They shouldn't even be using company provided hardware (laptops & phones) for such things. If that's all they have to communicate & organise their lives with, maaan, they're gonna learn some hard lessons in corporate retaliation & how petty, vindictive, & utterly without empathy executives can be.

    Organise outside of work hours, outside of work, on channels

    • by AHuxley ( 892839 )
      The idea long term is to allow union representatives to come to private property.
      That needs a place to meet...
      So union organizers and union representatives can come in. ie not trespassing and a place to meet workers.
      A nontrespassory method to talk with employees.
      Once an ad company workers go union, they go full union :)
  • Derp State (Score:2, Informative)

    by PopeRatzo ( 965947 )

    It's always good for a laugh when the Slashdot PatriotsTM try to accuse Google or Facebook or Amazon of having some leftist/liberal bias. As if the biggest corporations in the world are somehow left-leaning, in the face of all of the evidence being to the contrary.

    Lately, candid comments from the CEOs of some of these corporations have let the mask slip and they showed their true colors. They exist to prop up authoritarians no matter what, because it helps them cultivate power and even greater wealth. Th

  • by khchung ( 462899 ) on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:00AM (#59341648) Journal

    know what other people felt when being spied on by Google.

    Isn’t Google’s motto “you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide”?

  • by wakeboarder ( 2695839 ) on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:08AM (#59341656)

    Remember the "don't be evil days?"

  • Maybe don't plot your protests or whatever on company time and equipment. Do your god damn job and plot your protests/strikes on your own time. Protests and strikes can be done on company time, but plotting them where the man can overhear is just stupid. If they're scanning your personal email and texts, then take them to court for invasion of privacy.
  • Do know evil.

  • They dont need spyware they have plenty of human spies, You can be sure of that.
  • Unions are an artificial monopoly on labor, and the free market suffers in the same way that it does in any other monopoly. Stop with the class warfare garbage.
  • For years, it's been the strategy of the FAANG companies to hire the world's Ph. D's, keep them paid well enough to not quit, and provide every convenience for their lives to keep them at work as much as possible. Microsoft has taken this stance as well...keep the workers so busy and so wrapped in the all-inclusive blanket that they have no desire to leave or make trouble.

    What's interesting is seeing this bargain become less compelling. Even with the truly nutty housing prices and cost of living in SV, Goog

  • So the employees said they found a "team" working on a tool, but the Alphabet rep says it's just a popup warning. Who needs a team to write a popup?

    I don't pretend to know what environment they're working in, but popups are usually pretty simple, quick endeavors, that don't generally require a whole team to write...

  • "It doesn't collect personally identifiable information"

    I don't believe there is a Google tool that doesn't at the very least try to do that.

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...