Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Technology

Study of Over 11,000 Online Stores Finds 'Dark Patterns' on 1,254 sites (zdnet.com) 42

A large-scale academic study that analyzed more than 53,000 product pages on more than 11,000 online stores found widespread use of user interface "dark patterns" -- practices meant to mislead customers into making purchases based on false or misleading information. from a report: The study -- presented last week at the ACM CSCW 2019 conference -- found 1,818 instances of dark patterns present on 1,254 of the ~11K shopping websites (~11.1%) researchers scanned. "Shopping websites that were more popular, according to Alexa rankings, were more likely to feature dark patterns," researchers said. But while the vast majority of UI dark patterns were meant to trick users into subscribing to newsletters or allowing broad data collection, some dark patterns were downright foul, trying to mislead users into making additional purchases, either by sneaking products into shopping carts or tricking users into believing products were about to sell out. Of these, the research team found 234 instances, deployed across 183 websites.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Study of Over 11,000 Online Stores Finds 'Dark Patterns' on 1,254 sites

Comments Filter:
  • So why should websites not continue to do it?
  • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Monday November 11, 2019 @04:19PM (#59404640)

    “His Dark Materials” is actually a biopic about Jeff Bezos.

  • That’s racist.

  • by Dutch Gun ( 899105 ) on Monday November 11, 2019 @04:57PM (#59404728)

    But honestly, they're all about marketing psychology, which is sort of scummy to begin with. I personally love the phrase "Hurry! Limited quantities left!", which, when you think about it, describes exactly 100% of all purchases of physical goods throughout all of history.

    I did a quick search, and even though I don't recall hearing the name "dark patterns" before, it's been around at least a few years. A rather now-infamous example is Microsoft's "Upgrade to Windows 10" dialog box, which was a master class of deliberately misleading design.

  • by v1s10nary ( 5867496 ) on Monday November 11, 2019 @04:58PM (#59404730)

    ...is "add to cart to see price!"

    • by JustAnotherOldGuy ( 4145623 ) on Monday November 11, 2019 @06:45PM (#59405046) Journal

      ...is "add to cart to see price!"

      I add it and then immediately remove it, hopefully adding a data point to the "saw the price and fled" metric.

    • by AvitarX ( 172628 )

      Some of those are I think for legal reasons.

      Or they maybe lie about it.

      Like suppliers give you free advertising (perhaps in the form of authorized seller) in exchange you cannot advertise for below a price they set.

      Listing the item on the page below said price is considered advertising it, but once it's in your cart it's not.

      It's definitely a dark pattern, but not necessarily the site's fault.

      • Or maybe the seller (in the case of a marketplace) is offering free delivery, but needs to know where the delivery will go, before telling you how much the product is (because its not actually free, and never is.)

        Remember those "free" learn-to-use cdroms that were advertised on tv, but you had to pay shipping and handling? "Handling" is code for "Thats our price" in such cases. Online marketplaces may be doing the reverse of that... free shipping but the price depends on your location.
    • Still better than "log in to see prices", which is just a way to harvest your contact information so they can spam you forever and ever amen... that, or an opportunity to charge different customers different prices. Or both. When I see that BS, I immediately go looking for another source.

  • I thought "dark patterns" meant "dark" as in a "hidden, conspiracy-theory" way, not "dark" as in "hard to eyeball."

    An example of "conspiracy theory" "dark patterns" would be using analytics in spooky and shady ways, like a doctor's office selling your data to a data broker who sold it to a company that marketed baby-products so as soon as you get the results of your pregnancy test all your ads are all about babies. Oh wait, that's already happening.

    Oh well, both techniques are shady, pardon the pun.

    • Yeah, but it's google doing that, not your doctor. Your retailers and credit card companies are also probably sharing data. Banks too. It's just so tasty and it's just sitting RIGHT there. How can they resist such an easy revenue stream? Someone surely needs a bonus.

  • by A10Mechanic ( 1056868 ) on Monday November 11, 2019 @05:08PM (#59404766)
    Only two tickets left at this price! /fire up the VPN/ Only five tickets left at this price!
    • Only two tickets left at this price! /fire up the VPN/ Only five tickets left at this price!

      To be fair - and I'm not certain we should be - with tickets, there's a holding period while things are (potentially) being purchased. As you start the process, those tickets are locked, marked as inaccessible to others. If you don't complete the transaction within a couple minutes, they revert back to being available for others to buy. Some of what you describe could simply be that. Maybe.

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

    I know slashdot posts old stories but really, 3759 years old? Really, slashdot?

  • Brick and mortar stores have been pulling this shit for years
    Anyone not smart or aware enough to get caught by these simple tricks deserves what they get

    ALWAYS read every word that describes your purchase carefully, and examine your shopping cart before pushing the buy button

    • Re:This is not new (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Actually, I do RTFA ( 1058596 ) on Monday November 11, 2019 @05:35PM (#59404834)

      Why do you want to buy from retailers who are trying to trick you into paying more money or unintentionally buying things? Wouldn't you rather patronize retailers who didn't constantly make you read every line of fine print and just treat you fairly? Or does it make you feel smart?

      Cause, personally, I'm lazy. I prefer a system where asshole companies are called out so I can avoid them instead of spar with them.

      • If you are lazy, you don't refuse to make the purchase, you instead make the purchase, and then refuse to come back.
    • If you really want to stick it to them, let them pay to send the shit they (probably illegally) added to your purchase without your consent then charge back the price of those things plus 100% of postage (since you can't discern the postage price for the unordered items from the postage price for the ones you did want). And never use PayPay... use your CC directly when it's safe. PayPal seems to do some magic voodoo doll thing to banks that makes them *never* accept a chargeback even when it's clearly a fr
  • What's new? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by AndyKron ( 937105 ) on Monday November 11, 2019 @05:43PM (#59404858)
    What the article is saying is that people are still basically shit. Noted and filed.
  • A research study has found 1,254 retail websites that I've never heard of. Probably because they all sound like scams.
    • From TFA:

      "Shopping websites that were more popular, according to Alexa rankings, were more likely to feature dark patterns," researchers said.

      But while the vast majority of UI dark patterns were meant to trick users into subscribing to newsletters or allowing broad data collection...

      So a lot of it is, in fact, the big sites probably including amazon, walmart, staples, ...
  • If you consider politicians and sales men (shops) lie you can't go far wrong
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • I hope it's a joke, because this 'fashion phrenology' will only mislead you.

          Even if there is any tiny bit of substance to this, I think the best con men would know to avoid pleats or anything else that would blow their cover.

  • How is this any different than the strangely tolerated crime known as "advertisement"?

    It is just fraud. Nothing else.

    But then again, all profit aleady is, by definition.

    Not that I'm not saying we should finally make it illegal.

  • ...in "dark patterns" by using the term "dark pattern"

      When I read that, I thought it was some malicious logic built into the site and the code run on the server (aka "logic bomb"), or malicious stuff in the UI that is self triggering if the user clicked on certain parts of the site. Why not just say "deceptive advertising", or is that just not 'cool' enough to grab eyeballs so in desperation they had to use a creepy and mysterious term such as "dark pattern"?

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...