ICANN Cheers Registrars' Efforts to Fight COVID-19 Scammers (icann.org) 14
ICANN chief executive Goran Marby has a message for its hundreds of registrars. Though ICANN can't involve itself in content issues, "That does not mean we are unconcerned or unaware of how certain domain names are being misused in fraudulent activities during this global pandemic."
It is this concern that prompted me to contact the registries and registrars thanking them for their efforts and actions aimed at helping to mitigate and minimize the abusive domain names being used to maliciously take advantage of the coronavirus pandemic. For example, the Registrar Stakeholder Group has posted a useful guide, entitled "Registrar approaches to the COVID-19 Crisis" that provides a number of steps and resources the registrar community can use in their efforts.
Many of our contracted parties already support a Framework to Address Abuse, which deals with DNS abuse and website content abuse. I continue to commend them for making this commitment to protect the DNS from those who would maliciously exploit domain names. In my correspondence to the registries and registrars, I expressed ICANN org's appreciation for their work during the pandemic.
Additionally, I'm pleased to tell you that ICANN org has joined registries, registrars, security experts, law enforcement, Internet engineers, and others, in the COVID-19 Cyber Threat Coalition (CTC). The CTC's mission is to, "operate the largest professional-quality threat lab in the history of cybersecurity out of donated cloud infrastructure and with rapidly assembled teams of diverse, cross-geography, cross-industry threat researchers."
I am proud that so many in the Internet ecosystem are joining together during this crisis to stop those who prey on the desperate.
AFP reports that just in March at least 100,000 websites were registered with names including terms like "COVID," "corona," and "virus," according to recent report prepared for ICANN. "COVID-19 is unique in that it is truly global; and the cyber bad guys haven't drifted toward it, they have rushed toward it like a barrel off Niagra Falls," ICANN security chief John Crain told AFP.
"This is a new low, preying on people at a time like this."
Many of our contracted parties already support a Framework to Address Abuse, which deals with DNS abuse and website content abuse. I continue to commend them for making this commitment to protect the DNS from those who would maliciously exploit domain names. In my correspondence to the registries and registrars, I expressed ICANN org's appreciation for their work during the pandemic.
Additionally, I'm pleased to tell you that ICANN org has joined registries, registrars, security experts, law enforcement, Internet engineers, and others, in the COVID-19 Cyber Threat Coalition (CTC). The CTC's mission is to, "operate the largest professional-quality threat lab in the history of cybersecurity out of donated cloud infrastructure and with rapidly assembled teams of diverse, cross-geography, cross-industry threat researchers."
I am proud that so many in the Internet ecosystem are joining together during this crisis to stop those who prey on the desperate.
AFP reports that just in March at least 100,000 websites were registered with names including terms like "COVID," "corona," and "virus," according to recent report prepared for ICANN. "COVID-19 is unique in that it is truly global; and the cyber bad guys haven't drifted toward it, they have rushed toward it like a barrel off Niagra Falls," ICANN security chief John Crain told AFP.
"This is a new low, preying on people at a time like this."
While they sneak through a (Score:2)
ICANN what a joke!
Just my 2 cents
Where'd they learn that? (Score:3)
Like the political strategists are fond of saying, "You never let a serious crisis go to waste".
Standby for legit sites to get taken down (Score:2)
I'm confused (Score:2)
".. ICANN can't involve itself in content issues.."
So what is your motivation? I thought your job was resolution. Make sure the network resolves properly and your registrars are operating per legislation in their specific location, and let the individual jurisdictions worry about content.
The minute a utility designed to make it easier for a human to resolve a name to an address decides it has responsibility for content publication is the minute the network needs to find a better solution for domain resolut
Re: (Score:2)
I think what they mean is that they will limit their oversight to things like typosquatting and misuse of trademarked names. Once you get to the site you were looking for, it's still "Let the buyer beware."
Re: (Score:2)
virtue signalling that they're the good guys.
I know, stop laughing.
This is the company that is selling the .org to a hedge fund, and created the ".sucks" domain specifically to rake in cash from companies that had to buy one before someone else did, at a massive mark up.
This is not really a new low (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"We can never stop being vigilant about online fraud."
Fraud is fraud. It's not changed since the 1600's tulip market in Amsterdam, snake oil salesmen in the early 1900s, CDOs from Goldman or investments from Madoff.
It's just become easier (and significantly cheaper) to target victims internationally.
There will always be a vector for a criminal, and those vectors will be found and exploited before those responsible for enforcement will know of it's availability. The cat will chase the mouse in perpetuity.
Res
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed and this is my argument for being okay with the extended validation on SSL certificates not having a place in Let's Encrypt and other similar changes. Trust shouldn't be coupled to the part of the network layer that deals with encryption.It was convenient to do that years ago, but a mistake.
To start with, reduce the number of TLDs (Score:2)
They went and created almost infinite registrars, when they made the ridiculous decision to allow people to register just about anything as a TLD. And now they are worried about people using all these TLDs to register scam sites with one of the new scummy registrars with those TLDs.
Their problem, theirs to fix. Move all those new non-country TLDs to whatever.sorryfromican.net.us until everyone drops them. Then you only need to monitor .com, .edu, .mil and .org (which you take away from the Public Interest R
More tech (Score:1)
If they merely... (Score:2)