Google To Require All Advertisers To Pass Identity Verification Process (cnbc.com) 29
Google will soon require all advertisers to verify their identity, the company said in a blog post on Thursday. It's making the change to prevent advertisers from misrepresenting themselves and says it it should allow consumers to see who's running ads and which country they're located in. From a report: Consumers have seen a proliferation of ads for products from dubious advertisers, like fake vaccines, in recent months. Fake businesses have also been an issue. Existing advertisers will have 30 days to complete the verification process, according to a spokeswoman. If they don't submit the documents by then, Google said it will suspend the account and the advertiser's ability to serve ads until they provide it. The company said consumers will start seeing disclosures that list this information on the advertiser when they click "Why this ad?" on placements beginning this summer. Google will begin by verifying advertisers in the U.S. and will expand globally, expecting that the process will take a few years to complete. Google began requiring political advertisers to verify their identity back in 2018 before running election ads.
About fucking time. (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously, this is way overdue.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed, but I do wonder how easily this will be circumvented.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If you're a natural person, it is your generally accepted national ID, whatever it is. If you're a legal person, your registration. Easy-peasy. How do you sign a contract without these anyway?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: About fucking time. (Score:2)
I wish... (Score:1)
I wish the people pretending to be Google would stop calling my phone to "verify my business listing".
Good. (Score:2)
Dumbasses at Google should have done this about five years ago. Guess the revenues are more important than reliability. Probably take the same view of their other product offerings. Maybe that's why their search has gone downhill. Big mistake going public years ago.
Re: (Score:1)
The right solution for this, is to have USPS/DHS provide vetting for American digital certificates just like we do passports today, and then have other nations figure out how they want to vet their citizens. Ideally, just like passports.
Won't work (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re: (Score:2)
Vetted by whom? The only entity with the raw power to do meaningful vetting is the government, and nobody would trust them to.
Re: (Score:2)
Do/Have you a military ID? If so, vetted by the government.
Having a VETTED digital certificates means that you have a passport to be able to move around on the net, just like a regular passport enables you to move around nations. With social media, they can choose to allow us to be vetted, but still not use our name. IOW, just because you submit a vetted DC of who you are, does not mean that you can not continue to use
Re: (Score:2)
They will just "borrow" ids from their friends. Over 8 billion people to have identify theft done out there. This will be as effective as "phone number" verification.
Why will that "not work"? You'll see an add about a political campaign, and at the bottom it will say "this ad is provided by John Smith of Wilmington, Ohio", and that sounds fine. The fact of an ad not having an official-sounding sensible-sounding provider is a step in the right direction, and a sufficient step I think.
Imagine that. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If they did that you know that the neo-cons would insist on USPS using the most ridiculously expensive vendor and wouldn't provide any money to do it with. They'd probably try to get them to pre-fund the entire program for the next 75 years as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Sad... (Score:4, Insightful)
I guess I'm just on old timer .. but I remember when Anonymity was associated with freedom on the internet.
The math hasn't changed, but I guess people are more concerned about commerce then freedom. The less anonymous the internet because, the easier it is to control every transaction and comment. Monitor, data mine , and control the information, so you can control the people.
Re:Sad... (Score:4, Insightful)
Your right to anonymity ends the instant you reach for another person's wallet.
Re:Sad... (Score:4, Insightful)
Nobody is forcing anyone to buy ads on the Internet. There's still plenty of ways to be anon.
Re: (Score:3)
If they require VDC for person and business to post ads on the sides, and you gripe that one of the ads is a con,
Likewise, I want to post a political ad for Libertarians. However, Libertarian party says, that I am no longer part of the group (went GDI several years
Re: (Score:2)
Not sad at all.
If you don't peddle your wares for money, be as anonymous as you wish. If you're interesting, I'll eventually read what you've posted. Or not.
If you use a platform that can stuff your crap in my throat, then there better be a way to track you down if you lie.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Privacy is the ability to control access to your personal information. It is a thing very much worth having.
Anonymity is the ability to detach your personal information from your online presence. It is a thing worth having, but with some qualifications.
And they are, like, totally different animals.
Re: (Score:3)
You're wrong. I accept that that is your opinion, but you're wrong.
Anonymity is behind many of the problems on the internet, but by no means behind all of them. E.g. the story right above this one is about Amazon using the internet and private information to undercut it's competitors. That wasn't done anonymously.
Re: (Score:2)
IMHO, allowing anonymity (anybody easily hiding their identity/activity), is the root cause of all problems in the internet [...]
IMHO, if we really want to save future of humanity, then we need to stop allowing anonymity in the whole internet!!!
Just one question:
Are you OK with disclosing your "identity/activity"?
It should be easy: just post your real name in a reply to this post, plus some way to verify that it really is you.
A phone number should work, I could check the white pages that it is registered to you and then give you a call during a mutually agreed-upon time and ask you some questions. Or an address, so I could drop by for a pleasant chat.
What? You don't want me to know who you are? But that would be arguing for anonymity, wouldn't
You mean the company that is using shell companies (Score:1)
Yeah, the badvertisers are laughing as we speak.
Is this like SSL certificates? (Score:2)
Where the certificate authorities only certify that your credit card didn't bounce, and the only thing they're an authority on is processing credit cards?
Google is an advertising business, and they're not going to turn away most of their business.