Cell-Tower Attacks By Idiots Who Claim 5G Spreads COVID-19 Reportedly Hit US (arstechnica.com) 240
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: The Department of Homeland Security is reportedly issuing alerts to wireless telecom providers and law enforcement agencies about potential attacks on cell towers and telecommunications workers by 5G/coronavirus conspiracy theorists. The DHS warned that there have already been "arson and physical attacks against cell towers in several U.S. states." The preposterous claim that 5G can spread the coronavirus, either by suppressing the immune system or by directly transmitting the virus over radio waves, led to dozens of tower burnings in the UK and mainland Europe. Now, the DHS "is preparing to advise the U.S. telecom industry on steps it can take to prevent attacks on 5G cell towers following a rash of incidents in Western Europe fueled by the false claim that the technology spreads the pathogen causing COVID-19," The Washington Post reported last week.
The DHS alert will include "advice on ways to reduce the risk of attack, including installing appropriate sensing and barriers, cyber-intrusion detection systems, closed-circuit television and monitoring drone activity near towers," the Post article said. A telecom-industry official said that carriers in the U.S. "have seen sporadic attacks on their cell towers that were apparently prompted by COVID-19 disinformation" over the past few weeks, the Post wrote. In addition to warning telecoms, DHS reportedly issued an intelligence report on the topic "to senior federal officials and law enforcement agencies around the country," ABC News reported Saturday. DHS also teamed with the FBI and National Counterterrorism Center to issue a joint intelligence bulletin to federal officials and law enforcement agencies, the ABC News report said.
The DHS alert will include "advice on ways to reduce the risk of attack, including installing appropriate sensing and barriers, cyber-intrusion detection systems, closed-circuit television and monitoring drone activity near towers," the Post article said. A telecom-industry official said that carriers in the U.S. "have seen sporadic attacks on their cell towers that were apparently prompted by COVID-19 disinformation" over the past few weeks, the Post wrote. In addition to warning telecoms, DHS reportedly issued an intelligence report on the topic "to senior federal officials and law enforcement agencies around the country," ABC News reported Saturday. DHS also teamed with the FBI and National Counterterrorism Center to issue a joint intelligence bulletin to federal officials and law enforcement agencies, the ABC News report said.
I can't even begin to imagine (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The average IQ is less than 100.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The scale is adjusted periodically to make the average 100. But, as you noted, the IQ has been going up for generations. Since older people don't take many IQ tests, the actual population average will be less than 100.
Re: (Score:3)
The scale is adjusted periodically to make the average 100. But, as you noted, the IQ has been going up for generations. Since older people don't take many IQ tests, the actual population average will be less than 100.
IQ hasn't actually been going up, they just make changes to the test to make it culturally agnostic while elderly people taking tests experience cognitive decline which comes with aging for many. It's not the same test which was given decades ago so comparing cross-generation results doesn't work (outside the made up "field" of psychology.)
Can Still Have More Below Average (Score:2)
By definition the average IQ is 100
True but, depending on the distribution you can still have more people with a below-average IQ than above average. However, I doubt the problem here is intelligence but rather lack of education and an inability to benefit from the wisdom of those who are smarter than you.
Re: (Score:2)
The average IQ is less than 100.
It is not a problem of IQ. To fail this extremely, you have to willfully ignore things you know.
Re: (Score:2)
Or not even read an article and then proclaim a bunch of fictional people idiots based on exactly zero examples or proof in said article?
That kind of low IQ, extreme fail?
This can't be real, right? (Score:4, Informative)
Can't be real? YES ...and you are surprised to learn the Virus-by-RF crowd joins them?
You get confederate flag wavers
Anti vaxers
2nd amendment
Anti abortion (because its meant to kill WHITE babies)
Truthers (ha)
Pro trump
Pizza parlor pedophilia
Qanon is God
Masks are the source of cancer
Should be no more shocking than finding the zoo is full of unusual animals.
yes, AC because delusional nuts is dangerous nuts
Re: (Score:2)
I think you forgot something.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Can't be real? YES ...and you are surprised to learn the Virus-by-RF crowd joins them?
You get confederate flag wavers
Anti vaxers
2nd amendment
Anti abortion (because its meant to kill WHITE babies)
Truthers (ha)
Pro trump
Pizza parlor pedophilia
Qanon is God
Masks are the source of cancer
Should be no more shocking than finding the zoo is full of unusual animals.
yes, AC because delusional nuts is dangerous nuts
Oh the irony, a post calling people stupid that contains weapons grade stupidity itself.
A connection with the 2nd Amendment? Flags? Voting for Trump? The utter ridiculousness of your post doesn't bother me as much as the number of people that modded such nonsense up.
Re: (Score:3)
>> Oh the irony, a post calling people stupid that contains weapons grade stupidity itself.
I called no one stupid.
I did imply that you will find a certain cluster of groups that show up together and that that cluster is the likely "great attractor" the new anti-5G people will gravitate toward. I would also predict the new Anti-5G folks are unlikely to be found in other "attractive groups" like the Skeptic's Society, EE Dpt. or the Virology Dept at U.
I applied "stupid" to no one
{I made unfortunate re
Re:This can't be real, right? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm curious, do you try to prove his point by being an example of what he's complaining about?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm curious, do you try to prove his point by being an example of what he's complaining about?
there is no try.
Re: (Score:2)
I unchecked it, left the thought
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The preposterous claim that 5G can spread the coronavirus, either by suppressing the immune system or by directly transmitting the virus over radio waves, led to dozens of tower burnings in the UK and mainland Europe.
It doesn't help that the people who should know better (experts, authorities) lump together two different conspiracy theories into one. The first one, about 5G "suppressing the immune system", is improbable but not preposterous, since excessive exposure to some forms of radiation is a known trigger for autoimmune diseases, particularly cancer. So it's simply a matter of extending widely known medical facts into realms where they don't belong, sort of like applying Newton's laws of gravitation to blackholes.
Re: (Score:2)
The preposterous claim that 5G can spread the coronavirus, either by suppressing the immune system or by directly transmitting the virus over radio waves, led to dozens of tower burnings in the UK and mainland Europe.
This is really well into "Too crazy-stupid to be permitted to run around loose without a leash and a keeper armed with a Tazer" territory.
It doesn't help that the people who should know better (experts, authorities) lump together two different conspiracy theories into one.
And, like one of the postings above, people who lump this completely mindless crap in with political positions they happen to disagree with.
Re: (Score:2)
Read the article and read the exactly no examples of what they are claiming.
There might be actual examples, but they sure as fuck aren't in the article.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm of the opinion that very few people actually believe this, and a few malicious folks are just using it as a handy excuse to commit arson or vandalism. In other words, most are either copycat crimes, a handy cover for people who oppose the deployment of 5G for other reasons, or even just lashing out against the telecoms, which are undoubtedly pretty high on the list of America's most hated companies.
I don't know why, but for some reason I'd rather attribute this to maliciousness instead of ignorance / g
Re:I can't even begin to imagine (Score:5, Insightful)
How anyone in their right mind could associate radio waves with the transmission of a virus. Computer viruses, yes, human viruses, no. I feel like man-kind is regressing to the days of the Troglodytes. This can't be real, right?
This is real. Unfortunately. It means there is a class of people that cannot be educated, because they believe they are right (and superior to everybody else in that) even when they have it utterly and completely wrong and their education would let them verify the truth. Instead they just decide they are right and the do it on something where they are completely wrong. There is no hope for these people, they will never understand anything.
Re:I can't even begin to imagine (Score:4, Insightful)
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."
— Issac Asimov
Re: I can't even begin to imagine (Score:2)
Radio virus transmission technically possible (Score:2)
How anyone in their right mind could associate radio waves with the transmission of a virus.
Radio waves have been shown to transmit viruses: your computer is potentially susceptible to a virus it receives over WiFi. So you only have to be stupid enough to think that there is no difference between a biological virus and a computer virus.
Given that there are people who think they are sensitive to EM radiation (usually taken by them to mean just radio waves) it does not surprise me at all that there are idiots out there unable to make this distinction. What does surprise me is that they have turn
George Carlin said it (Score:3)
As George Carlin said: "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
Re: (Score:2)
>> 5G towers don't cause COVID-19.
Towers, no. Its the signal that carries the virus - I suppose by photonic propulsion, like light sails, ya know - keep it scientific.
>> You need to install the infrastructure first.
>> Slowly roll out mandatory injections after.
No, no. The "infrastructure" was in the injections they have been giving you since 9/11. Now that we are all tagged they begin the 5G rollout.
Re: (Score:2)
/serious on/
Before anyone archives this thread
I was making humor and forgot to label it. I do not think 5G has anything to do with ANY virus, or bacteria! So please lay off the lighter fluid. That tower probably carries your 4G. I chipped my dog, let me tell you that if they came at you with a 50 caliber needle you would have noticed so please *do* get vaccinated for your health and if you wish, take pride in not being a vector.
If I said anything about bleach I was joking - not for ingesting in any for
Re: (Score:2)
But most people moved on to Radeon and GeForce.
Idiots are everywhere (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Anti 1080? WTF? I thought I found every insanity but there are really people who oppose high resolution? I have to admit, I'm curious what's the big evil conspiracy behind that.
Re:Idiots are everywhere (Score:5, Funny)
Is 1080 too high or too low? I.E. are we talking about "Pro-720p" or "Pro-4K" here?
Re:Idiots are everywhere (Score:5, Informative)
Is 1080 too high or too low? I.E. are we talking about "Pro-720p" or "Pro-4K" here?
Anti 1080? WTF? I thought I found every insanity but there are really people who oppose high resolution? I have to admit, I'm curious what's the big evil conspiracy behind that.
Not the resolution (although I'm not a fan of that 1080.. 1920x1200 or 1440p all day lol) It's a brand name for a poison used by our government for widespread aerial drop pest control in our national parks etc. You can read more on Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Novel Geometric Entities (Score:2)
Now they've gone and done it - vastly increased the surface area of the "search for 'covid and 5G'" bubble... One of those rare geometric entities where volume goes to zero as surface area becomes infinite...
Simple solution for simple people (Score:3, Funny)
Just tell these idiots that the only effective method to destroy the 5g virus is to first climb the tower and then set it on fire from the bottom up.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't sound too confident about your solution. Those people are so stupid, they just might find a way that defies the laws of physics...
"My cousin kept saying that gravity isn't real, and not a minute later he was floating into outer space."
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe just put a sign on the tower "This tower has been injected with bleach and is virus-free".
I’ve been warning everyone for years about 5 (Score:5, Funny)
Clean the genes (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People who attack cell towers shouldn't be allowed to have cellphones.
Idiot Post By Idiots, About Idiots (Score:5, Interesting)
From the ARTICLE:
“Misinformation campaigns” (Me: like this article?)
ABC quoted DHS as saying that "since December 2019, unidentified actors conducted at least five arson incidents targeting cell towers in Memphis, Tenn., that resulted in more than $100,000 in damages... Additionally, 14 cell towers in western Tennessee, between February and April, were purposely turned off by way of disabling their electrical breakers."
The warning to law enforcement agencies said that an April 22 Facebook post "encouraged individuals associated with anarchist extremist ideology to commit acts of sabotage by attacking buildings and 5G towers around the world in furtherance of an 'International Day of Sabotage'" and that videos have been posted online "showing people how to damage or destroy cell towers," according to ABC.
So since Dec 2019, people were burning down cell towers (because of covid, in december?).
Purposefully turned off? There is a long history of theft and damage to cell towers.
Definitely somehow the April 22 FB post affected the towers since December. It definitely affected everyone's ability not to be an idiot, including this entire post and thread.
In fact, there is not even ONE anecdotal cell tower vandalism reference in the article due to covid beliefs.
Good stuff everyone, keep calling everyone idiots.
Re:Idiot Post By Idiots, About Idiots (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't move the goal posts, or try to put words in my mouth that I think there are good reasons to attack cell towers. That is cunty and disingenuous, and you know it.
You are now welcome to address the actual topic, but I'm guessing you won't. I'll remind you : "Cell-Tower Attacks By Idiots Who Claim 5G Spreads COVID-19 Reportedly Hit US " - and how there is no actual reporting of this.
If you want to have some other thread about eco-terrorists and anarchists - and whether or not they are idiots, feel free to start it up. I'll probably agree they are idiots, but - check this out - only after I read the article(s) about it.
Insanity Defense denied (Score:2)
I don't believe they believe 5G causes their problems. They're lying. The reason they're sabotaging infrastructure has jack shit with whatever they're saying. They're sabotaging networks because _____. Ok, so I can't fill in the blank, but I can easily make up plenty of amazingly stupid reasons for sabotaging networks which are, nevertheless, much more believable than the "I break random things because I'm just an innocent slobbering fuckwit" explanation.
At the top of my bullshit (but still more-believable)
Is our species too stupid to survive? (Score:2)
Our species doesn't seem to be getting smarter overall over time, it seems to be getting dumber and dumber, and straying into the 'violent stupidity' area, which is even worse; being stupid when it only hurts you is one thing, being stupid and it hurting others, or your society as a whole, is something else entirely.
So seriously: Is our species just too gods-be-damned stupid to survive? Or are the stupid ones just more visible, blips on the evolutionary radar, and they'll sort themselves
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, our species is getting dumber, and your example is a discussion about how we're upgrading wireless infrastructure (yet again).
We're also at an all time low in societal violence.
The only gods-be-damned stupid act here is getting all your information from click bait headlines and not reading actual articles. Where there is no proof whatsoever this is actually happening (at least in the linked and sub-linked articles)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Watch the movie Agora [imdb.com]. It paints a fairly clear picture of just how stupid people have always been.
It's always been a fairly small percentage of society that actually bother to think. Fortunately, we live in the age of the printing press, so intelligent thoughts are more likely to be preserved.
our own social 'Snow Crash' (Score:2)
Our society has a virus: Snow Crash [wikipedia.org].
It's a bit dated, but a good read, and quite relevant, considering current events.
Idiots (Score:2)
5G spreads the surveillance state.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Poe's Law is strong in this one... can't even tell whether he's sarcastic or really stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, nor can I! I will wait for follow-up comments from timeOday to find out if he's clever or crazy...
Re: (Score:2)
they want to steal our testosterone!!!11!
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Not everyone has a 386 yet, and now Intel is trying to sell 486 chips. Why?! What's the rush?
Re: (Score:2)
Come on now, the Amiga 500 isn't that expensive.
Re: (Score:2)
Source: I used to repair arcade games in a previous life.
Re: (Score:2)
They're idiots because they think an *RF protocol causes a virus*! That seems like plenty enough.
It's one thing to not care about or question the utility of 5G, it's a broad jump into lunacy to think it's behind the Wuhan flu.
Re: (Score:2)
Who are they? There's not even one concrete example in the "article".
But no, it's cool to get all riled up about fictional outrageous occurrences.
Are you all idiots for not seeing any evidence first? No? That's just how we do things now ?
Re: (Score:2)
Here's a Wired article tracing the origins: https://www.wired.co.uk/articl... [wired.co.uk]
Since then, ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn's brother got arrested in Hyde Park claiming this same kind of David Icke style bibble as part of a protest against lockdown in UK.
Re: (Score:2)
While a good writeup, there is still not a single example in that wall of text of someone burning down a mast because they actually believed these things. Especially not on the American side.
"In recent days, a number of 5G masts across the UK have been set on fire in apparent arson attacks. According to The Guardian, at least 20 mobile phone masts have been vandalised as a result of 5G disinformation in recent days."
Are they interviewing the arsonists? Are the arsonists leaving manifestos at the scene?
The
Re: (Score:3)
whats wuhan flu?
It's an in-your-face at the PC language police who were claiming that making any connection between SARS-CoV-2 and China is offensive.
Re: (Score:3)
4G isn't even fully implemented and they're in a hurry to push 5G. Why? What's the rush?
Profit... Marketing which leads to sales and then profit..
I'm not likely to need 5G anytime soon, not to mention that due to the distance it goes (about 1% of 4G), I'm unlikely to get 5G anywhere I go anytime soon. Installing towers every 1,000 feet is going to take a LONG time. So 5G coverage will be extremely limited for most of us, it won't ever cover my house (4G is spotty now) isn't likely to cover the daily commute and certainly won't be installed even on rural interstate runs that I might find myse
Re: (Score:2)
You do realize that 5G also works at lower frequencies where I believe the benefits are lower latency and more connections as well as slighty faster speeds for all those IoT devices? Basically there may be 3 bands ranging from current frequencies to the highest frequencies that you mention
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
What do you mean "isn't even fully implemented?" Do you mean not every square meter of the planet has 4G coverage? Why should that matter? It's not (and never will be) about total coverage, but bandwidth.
4G is ten years old. 5G expands the 4G spectrum for increased speed to better handle modern, high-bandwidth applications.
They want to "push" 5G because faster service, and support for more devices, means more customers... which means more money.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:2)
4G is ten years old. 5G expands the 4G spectrum for increased speed to better handle modern, high-bandwidth applications that increase revenue for the wireless companies through more expensive dataplans and/or overage fees when (not if, but when) they exceed their dataplan.
FTFY. xD
Re: (Score:2)
IoT devices. There will be 20 billion of them deployed by the end of the year, and even though most of them are low bandwidth users they need to expand the infrastructure to accommodate them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] is a start.
Re: (Score:2)
Didn't 3G GSM DOG M60A3 solve that?
Re:Why are they idiots? Because they are. (Score:2)
It is called technology progression.
It is the same reason I can use and intel i7 processor in my machine now instead of a 386.
Better tech comes along all the time.
Not necessarily a rush.
Just why sit on old stuff if newer faster better stuff is developed.
Progress.
Re: (Score:3)
Newer isn't always better.
Also consider this:
Sometimes things are a solution in search of a problem.
To-date, I haven't heard a terribly valid reason why we 'need' 5G.
I have a Verizon-branded hockey-puck here where I work that gives me internet access. Speed varies but it's typically about 100Mb/s. Does anyone really need more than that on a mobile device? Again: to-date I haven't heard an explanation that doesn't amount to 'newer is better'.
Re: (Score:2)
Some of us have no choice but to use "mobile" devices to connect to the internet. Speed here varies widely from fast enough to useless during Netflix hours (evenings). I get a 250GB data cap, new sign ups get 500GBs.
Lots of similar rural communities where wireless cell technology is the cheapest last mile solution.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why are they idiots? (Score:5, Funny)
Call the sanitarium, we got a live one here!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Sanitariums were closed down between 1970-1980. Your attempts to belittle the opinions of others without providing factual information is as bad as believing 5G is harmful to our health.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine this:
Hey, now you can stream full feature-length movies in full 1080p over 5G! Oh but we're sorry we're not increasing the size of your dataplan, you'll have to buy a bigger one or pay fees for exceeding it!
I think that's more what's going on here; they're not making enough money off 4G.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, for Christ's sake, call things what they are, this is ridiculous even by the standards of conspiracy theories.
Re: (Score:3)
It does seem ridiculous, especially if your source is the article:
ABC quoted DHS as saying that "since December 2019, unidentified actors conducted at least five arson incidents targeting cell towers in Memphis, Tenn., that resulted in more than $100,000 in damages... Additionally, 14 cell towers in western Tennessee, between February and April, were purposely turned off by way of disabling their electrical breakers."
The warning to law enforcement agencies said that an April 22 Facebook post "encouraged ind
Re: (Score:2)
How about "this is coming from a telecom that's way behind in their infrastructure and are using the pandemic as a cover to sabotage their competitors"?
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, spill it, what is the big truth? I'm not really in the mood of figuring out just what harebrained bullshit conspiracy you're trying to peddle now.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
I'm a fucking RF engineer... and you are a moron.
Trying to explain the basics of non-ionizing radiation to you is like trying to explain a bicycle to a Neanderthal. Trying to explain the law of inverse squares... even more beguiling.
Though sadly- I think the Neanderthal might actually understand if he studied hard enough.
You idiots aren't going to be happy until you tear down what has been built. Simply because you are too dumb to participate. You can't produce any hard data for your assertions. So you make
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty much this. These people are broken in the head.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, what exactly do you mean by "inverse squares"?! Does it become a triangle or... what? I'm confused.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a fucking RF engineer... and you are a moron.
This is the epitome of the elitist attitude that does nothing to prevent pseudoscience from flourishing, and may actually encourage it. Put yourself in the shoes of the person you just called a moron. Do you think they got closer or further from agreeing with you based on that statement?
The best you can do is a calm, level-headed response that cites studies. It won't be enough, even for some people who are decidedly not "morons". This may be based on a
Re: (Score:2)
This is the epitome of the elitist attitude that does nothing to prevent pseudoscience from flourishing, and may actually encourage it. Put yourself in the shoes of the person you just called a moron. Do you think they got closer or further from agreeing with you based on that statement?
The best you can do is a calm, level-headed response that cites studies. It won't be enough, even for some people who are decidedly not "morons".
I think they got closer to agreeing with beheaderaswp. People that fucking stupid tend to respect unrestrained belligerence. They're too fucking dumb to understand the words, so they only listen to the tone of voice. If you sound big and loud and certain, then you're probably right, to their tiny minds. Why do you think Alex Jones has an audience?
This may be based on a mistrust of experts fostered by various historical events such as Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, various Free Trade agreements, The Tuskeegee Experiment, etc.
That's a nice theory. I would be more inclined to believe it if the people we're talking about knew anything about those events. They sure as fuck weren't pa
Re: (Score:2)
>> I'm a fucking RF engineer.
good.
Please explain something to me
>> Trying to explain the law of inverse squares... even more beguiling.
I understand the inverse of squares, but in actual applications?
Horizontal 360 degrees beamed no more than 2 degrees above horizon?
I also hear that 5G cells will have individual beams for each connection - true?
That would allow many connections on one channel. Cool.
I'm sure that the cell operator doesn't want to wast a miliwatt because all transmitters are powe
Re: (Score:2)
Their understanding, maybe. The understanding is that one has nothing to do with the other and that they're still insane loonies.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Fake news (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I was just trying to state the point, and differentiate between 5g causing covid-19 vs interfering with the body's immune system. I don't any links to provide at the moment, but it's what I have been hearing. Go ahead with your next attack... yawn.
You don't have any links. How convenient. You don't even characterize where you have "been hearing" this from. Talk about yawning... Sheesh!
And now I hate myself for feeding the trolls. Thanks a lot!
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't Corona a Mexican beer?
Re: (Score:2)
The resonance frequency of O2 is 60 gigahertz.
https://www.sdxcentral.com/5g/... [sdxcentral.com]
"The frequency bands for 5G networks come in two sets. Frequency range 1 (FR1) is from 450 MHz to 6 GHz, which includes the LTE frequency range. Frequency range 2 (FR2) is from 24.25 GHz to 52.6 GHz."
So not really even close.
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you, Dr. Cusco.
Re: (Score:2)
The bullshit already starts at "natural frequency of O2". What's that supposed to mean?
Fuck, can those dimwits at least try to pretend to learn at least the fundamentals of physics?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Wanna bet (Score:4, Funny)
Have you read the book "Don Quixote"? I haven't either, it's above my Spanish, but I've heard its about a guy who attacks windmills. Now think about it, what if that same dude got zombified and is now back? There are no more windmills in existence, the closest thing we have is 5G towers, so it'll be the logical thing he'd wanna attack. If you followed his character development you'll see it fits.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, because that's a bigger logical error than a fictional character returning to the real world as a zombie and confusing cell phone towers for windmills.