Google Closes the Fitbit Acquisition, Pledges To Not Use Data For Ads (arstechnica.com) 59
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Today Google's senior VP of Hardware, Rick Osterloh, announced Google has closed its acquisition of Fitbit. The $2.1 billion deal was announced back in November 2019, which kicked off a regulatory review process from governments around the world concerned about Google's influence over the Internet and the data it can collect on users. Normally, Osterloh announcing "Google has completed its acquisition of Fitbit, and I want to personally welcome this talented team to Google" would mean Google has cleared its worldwide regulatory gauntlet. Google's announcement today is highly unusual since the DOJ has not yet cleared the deal. As the US Department of Justice told New York Times reporter Cecilia Kang, "The Antitrust Division's investigation of Google's acquisition of Fitbit remains ongoing." Australian regulators also haven't announced a final decision on the merger. It also seems particularly provocative for Google to do something like this while it is also dealing with a DOJ antitrust investigation.
Fitbit's CEO, president, and co-founder, James Park, also has a blog post today, saying "many of the things you know and love about Fitbit will remain the same. We'll stay committed to doing what's right, to putting your health and wellness at the center of everything we do, and to offering a no-one-size-fits-all approach with choices that work across both Android and iOS." [...] Google's side of the story is laid out in the blog post, with Osterloh saying "This deal has always been about devices, not data, and we've been clear since the beginning that we will protect Fitbit users' privacy... Fitbit users' health and wellness data won't be used for Google ads and this data will be separated from other Google ads data." Google also says it won't do anything crazy with Android, like lock all Android phones exclusively to Fitbit wearables, which apparently was something the EU was worried about.
Fitbit's CEO, president, and co-founder, James Park, also has a blog post today, saying "many of the things you know and love about Fitbit will remain the same. We'll stay committed to doing what's right, to putting your health and wellness at the center of everything we do, and to offering a no-one-size-fits-all approach with choices that work across both Android and iOS." [...] Google's side of the story is laid out in the blog post, with Osterloh saying "This deal has always been about devices, not data, and we've been clear since the beginning that we will protect Fitbit users' privacy... Fitbit users' health and wellness data won't be used for Google ads and this data will be separated from other Google ads data." Google also says it won't do anything crazy with Android, like lock all Android phones exclusively to Fitbit wearables, which apparently was something the EU was worried about.
How ? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Doesn't have to be about Ads directly. It could be used in filtering suggestions as in (if fitbit data says you're doing tons of exercise, maybe that will inform predictive models of what restaurants you'll likely want to visit later that night). Who knows. I don't own a fitbit, so I'm not sure what sort of user agreement they make you sign before creating an account/using the device, but I wouldn't be suprised if some form of health data (PII removed) is used to inform recommendations.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: How ? (Score:3)
We're also geeks.
I see nothing that Google can offer, that I want, that I cannot implement myself and better. (My personal e-mail spam filter, for example, is better than Gmail's.)
Re: How ? (Score:2)
You can implement better search than Google? I will offer you $100/mo if you let me use it too.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I can't but these people can https://duckduckgo.com/?q=duck... [duckduckgo.com] escape evil and search wisely, I give this sound advice freely.
Fitbit, the obvious target insurance companies. They wont advertise health insurance to you, they will inform the insurance company that pays them, to ensure to never ever get any advertising from them and of course any quote from them for insurance will have built in the risk factors Google has uncovered for them.
Employment agencies can also get a pipeline into your health status,
Re: (Score:2)
You can make your own phone OS that's better than Android? Your own search engine that's better than Google? Your own lightweight portable TV streaming hardware for $50 that can do 4K and has readymade apps for major services, including DIY streaming like Plex and Kodi?
Yes.
He also makes the best steamed hams in all of Springfield.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Master Race. (Score:2)
What else?
Re: (Score:1)
What nonsense (Score:3)
"Fitbit users' health and wellness data won't be used for Google ads" is a very narrow use of this intimate surveillance data.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Well what does Apple do with health data and fitness tracking tech? Somehow they manage to monetize it without using it to target ads.
Google actually has a substantial healthcare business already, but has fallen behind on the consumer side of things where the Apple Watch is for once a technically quite impressive product.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
R&D doesn't cost nothing.
Re: (Score:1)
Ha! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Ha! (Score:1)
Approximately the time it takes to draft a PR release.
Re: Ha! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nest CEO Tony Fadell told The Verge.... While the founder wouldn’t say that Nest’s privacy policy would “never” change, he did maintain that “our privacy policy stays exactly our privacy policy, that doesn’t change” and that “at this point, there are no changes to our terms of service.”
Ok...how can I delete all Fitbit info...? (Score:2)
Now...I want to know how can I get Fitbit the company to completely, 101% erase any data they have on me before Google takes control.
Re: Ok...how can I delete all Fitbit info...? (Score:2)
Use the GDPR process as if you were a EU citizen. That's the fun part: Non-EU citizens can use those new data deletion facilities too. (If necessary, you could change adresses or the like first. But normally, the link that works for EU citizens works for other people too.)
Re: Ok...how can I delete all Fitbit info...? (Score:2)
Why Do I Doubt Them? (Score:2)
Bye, fitbit (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I use an OpenOffice spreadsheet, personally.
Re: (Score:2)
Riiiiiiiiight... (Score:1)
Why else did you buy them then, dear advertisement company?
You mean not use it *now*. To make people swallow it.
So you can actually get to their data later.
. . . Because you did not say "never", now did you. And we all know that was on purpose.
Throw away your FitBit now (Score:2)
"pledges" (Score:2)
Is there a legal contract? Is there someone with standing to enforce it?
If not a 'pledge' will only last until it is not in google best interest for monetization.
Re: (Score:2)
Since it's worth nothing, can we call it Lemon Pledge?
Don't Be Evil (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Google promised not to be evil too.... (Score:2)
Google promised not to be evil once upon a time.
I wonder if Google will keep this promise.
Not used for ads? [Giggle] (Score:2)
"Google Closes the Fitbit Acquisition, Pledges To Not Use Data For Ads"? Yeah, pull the other one, or I'll be walking crooked. Googol has made such assurances before, but the half-life of them has been about 6 months. Whatever Googol buys - EVERYTHING they buy - is devoted to their ad business.
Once upon a time, their corporate motto was "Don't be evil". It's still the same, except for a few punctuation marks. Now it's "Don't. Be evil."
"Google...Pledges To Not Use Data For Ads" (Score:2)
No doubt that's because Google has found far more nefarious uses for the data they're going to collect.
Just like WhatsApp and FB (Score:4, Interesting)
Same promises, with no repercussions when this turned out to be an obvious lie. While I would expect this kind of disregard for citizen data from US regulators, it's unfortunate to see the EU has apparently swallowed this nonsense too.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would there be no repercussions? The EU has already fined Google when needed, and I'm sure they would again.
Zuckerberg was on advisory board (Score:2)
because he has some experience with acquisitions and not sharing data.
Too funny (Score:1)
James Park, also has a blog post today, saying "many of the things you know and love about Fitbit will remain the same. We'll stay committed to doing what's right, to putting your health and wellness at the center of everything we do...
I've read a couple papers that show that people who use fitness trackers tend to actually get a bit less exercise than people who workout without one. So are they going to quit selling them?
Google's side of the story is laid out in the blog post, with Osterloh saying "This deal has always been about devices, not data, and we've been clear since the beginning that we will protect Fitbit users' privacy... Fitbit users' health and wellness data won't be used for Google ads and this data will be separated from other Google ads data."
Cool. So what are they going to use the data for?
Re: (Score:2)
Cool. So what are they going to use the data for?
Fighting disinformation that poses a threat to our democracy, duh.
Google "promises" to not use Fitbit data for ads?? (Score:1)
Google Analytics! (Score:1)
Pledges To Not Use Data For Ads (Score:2)
...for the first three months.
There, fixed that for you.
How About You Put It In Writing (Score:1)
I'm not worried. (Score:2)
Not use it for ads??? (Score:2)