Chromium Cleans Up Its Act -- and Daily DNS Root Server Queries Drop by 60 Billion (theregister.com) 35
The Google-sponsored Chromium project has cleaned up its act, and the result is a marked decline in queries to DNS root servers. From a report: As The Register reported in August 2020, Chromium-based browsers generate a lot of DNS traffic as they try to determine if input into their omnibox is a domain name or a search query. Verisign engineers Matthew Thomas and Duane Wessels examined the resulting traffic and reached the conclusion that it accounted for up to 60 billion DNS queries every day. Wessels has since penned a new post that went unreported when it appeared on January 7 -- the day after the US Capitol riot -- but was today resurfaced by APNIC, the Regional Internet Registry for the Asia-Pacific region. In the post he says the Chromium team redesigned its code to stop junk DNS requests, and released the update in Chromium 87. The result? "Before the software release, the root server system saw peaks of ~143 billion queries per day," he wrote. "Traffic volumes have since decreased to ~84 billion queries a day. This represents more than a 41 per cent reduction of total query volume."
Nice (Score:5, Interesting)
It made me recall that HP color printer that somebody brought from home to the office (to print pretty Excel charts) and that immediately began to check the worldwide intranet for all the 1800 printers on 5 continents and checked if they might be out of paper or ink every couple of seconds and thus brought the whole system to a halt.
Re: (Score:1)
> their alternate Internet, with hookers and blackjack
If they don't have beer, I'm not interested.
Re: (Score:2)
Subnet, bitches!
Re: (Score:2)
Subnets are dying these days. Non-broadcast-multiple-access is the emerging paradigm (in various forms and the PHB acronyms of course change monthly). Just kill all the crappy multicast bullshit that thinks there's such a thing as a "local segment", and use broker services to put back whatever the users just cannot live without, with proper access controls to isolate users and groups.
Eventually we will beat it into vendors to stop using multicast discovery protocols and work with router vendors to consult
Missing Version Info (Score:3, Insightful)
Which versions of the various browsers that use Chromium have this update?
Wouldn't that be really important to include?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The figure below highlights the significant decline of query volume to the root server system immediately after the Chromium 87 release. Before the software release, the root server system saw peaks of ~143 billion queries per day. Traffic volumes have since decreased to ~84 billion queries a day. This represents more than a 41% reduction of total query volume.
Re: (Score:1)
RTFA:
The figure below highlights the significant decline of query volume to the root server system immediately after the Chromium 87 release. Before the software release, the root server system saw peaks of ~143 billion queries per day. Traffic volumes have since decreased to ~84 billion queries a day. This represents more than a 41% reduction of total query volume.
RTF Parent Post:
Which versions of the various browsers that use Chromium have this update?
Re: (Score:2)
RTF Grandparent's post:
Chromium 87 release
Check your about page, or do you think Edge for Windows has already had 88 individual releases since adopting Chromium code?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
LOL wat? Man if pointing out someone is wrong on the internet makes someone grumpy then it's time we redefine our expectation of "normal".
RTF*S* (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But, the joke is on you Mr. Smarty-pants-wearing Anonymo
You're thinking of Blink, as opposed to Chromium (Score:3)
Several browsers using the Blink rendering engine, expandes to now be called a "browser engine" since the UI is also rendered by it etc.
Edge, Chrome, Brave, and Chromium are all different browsers that use *Blink*. These browsers do not use Chromium, they use Blink.
Chromium is just one browser that uses Blink.
Chromium had this issue. Blink didn't have the issue, so it doesn't affect other browsers.
Re: (Score:3)
Several browsers using the Blink rendering engine, expandes to now be called a "browser engine" since the UI is also rendered by it etc.
Edge, Chrome, Brave, and Chromium are all different browsers that use *Blink*. These browsers do not use Chromium, they use Blink.
Chromium is just one browser that uses Blink.
Incorrect. Those all use Chromium, which is both the name of the open source version of Chrome, but also the name of the wider toolkit around Blink that includes the HTTP stack, WebRTC, extensions and much more. Blink is only HTML rendering, and no project I know of uses it alone without the rest of the Chromium stack.
Re: (Score:2)
To compare with the WebKit, it is also both the name of the Safari beta test, and the name of the whole project as a toolkit. Blink is equivalent to WebCore in WebKit.
Has that changed, or are the developers wrong? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
WebRTC has parts both in blink (DOM APIs) and out of blink (video decoding, RTC network transfer, etc).
Re:"the day after the US Capitol riot"? (Score:4, Informative)
What does "the day after the US Capitol riot" have to do with the topic?
News cycle. Literally every news source was reporting about online social media, rioters, deaths, destruction, elections, apocalypse everything. Naturally, even in the Tech-focused reporting circles, this fundamental inner-workings report was inundated with all kinds of noise. I'm happy that APNIC highlighted it!
Re:"the day after the US Capitol riot"? (Score:5, Funny)
What does "the day after the US Capitol riot" have to do with the topic?
Well, I'm sure it's some sort of deep-slash attempt to silence Big Buthurt instead of because, as the summary says, the info had to be re-released since the initial news was drowned out in favor of news of the Capitol riot. By all means though, please make this into a conspiracy theory. In fact, I bet there will be a Q drop about it any day now.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
What does "the day after the US Capitol riot" have to do with the topic?
Nothing. But it was the day after the 955th anniversary of the crowning of King Harold I of England. So it might have gotten lost in the news.
Pornhub (Score:2)
How many DNS lookups could be saved by hardcoding the pornhub.com IP address?
Re: (Score:2)
Would this not bypass load balancing and result in degraded performance?
And I just realized I typed "degraded performance" in reference to a porn site.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Umm I was kidding, you know that right? But I guess you could hardcode a list of IPs and have the browser randomly select one when it connects. If many browsers did that it should help distribute the load.
Re: (Score:2)
Now if they'll fix gmail and calendar web clients (Score:3)
Now if they'd just fix their gmail and calendar web clients...
Both of them, open in a firefox tab on Ubuntu, are dispatching five-ish or more times per second - even if the window with their tab is closed.
(What ARE they doing, for a company that makes billions selling information it mines from its users?)
They also cache enough stuff locally and don't flush it so that, if left running for a day or two on a machine with a "small" (4G!) amount of physical RAM, they shove everything else out to the paging store in a day or so. When I come back the next day the machine is comatose for minutes, while it brings back enough working set to even notice the mouse and keyboard.
Re: (Score:1)
If it's Firefox specific you can submit a bug report to Firefox's bug reporting site https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ [mozilla.org]
When I don't use my internet I set my firewall to block everything. It's basically like pulling the network cable to the internet router. If you don't have that feature then just turn off the internet router.
Oh boy. 4 gb ram. That's claustrophobicly little ram. How old is your computer? I haven't had that little ram in ages. I've got 12 gb and even that is not enough. My next build will have at