Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Chrome Privacy The Courts

Google Antitrust Suit Takes Aim At Chrome's Privacy Sandbox (theverge.com) 16

AmiMoJo shares a report from The Verge: State antitrust watchdogs are targeting Google's plans to phase out third-party tracking cookies, building on a major lawsuit filed last year. The group of 15 attorneys general, led by Texas, updated its complaint about Google yesterday to include a more detailed case against the search giant, including new claims about Google's strategic use of the Chrome browser. In particular, the new complaint takes aim at recent privacy updates to Chrome, which could better protect users' personal data while also entrenching Google's market position.

Like the original Texas complaint, Tuesday's updated filing primarily focuses on Google's technology for targeting ads across the web. The attorneys general argue that Google used its power in search, streaming video, and other markets to stamp out independent advertising platforms, forcing small businesses and media outlets to use its system. But in the updated complaint, the states apply this argument to Google's 'Privacy Sandbox' -- a tool that's supposed to replace invasive third-party tracking cookies with a more limited system devised by Google.
"Google's new scheme is, in essence, to wall off the entire portion of the internet that consumers access through Google's Chrome browser," the complaint reads. "Google is trying to hide its true intentions behind a pretext of privacy," the suit continues. With Privacy Sandbox, "Google does not actually put a stop to user profiling or targeted advertising -- it puts Google's Chrome browser at the center of tracking and targeting."

In response, Google said the new allegations rested on a misunderstanding of Chrome's privacy features. "Attorney General Paxton's latest claims mischaracterize many aspects of our business, including the steps we are taking with the Privacy Sandbox initiative to protect people's privacy as they browse the web. These efforts have been welcomed by privacy advocates, advertisers and our own rivals as a step forward in preserving user privacy and protecting free content. We will strongly defend ourselves from AG Paxton's baseless claims in court."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Antitrust Suit Takes Aim At Chrome's Privacy Sandbox

Comments Filter:
  • By using weasel working and making different qualified claims, both could be construed as correct. Lots of dumb people don't spot misleading PR claims for what they are. See what a difference it makes when reworded to selective privacy. "These efforts have been welcomed by privacy advocates, advertisers and our own rivals as a step forward in preserving user privacy and protecting free content" Now that line needs careful deconstruction. and the privacy advocated named, although I doubt it will include the EFF. Now if Google added to facility to completely, under user control, turn off all tracking, then their claims might be closer. However one believes this is NOT an option. As such the 'enhancement' only disables third party tracking, unless they agree to pay Google something for access . Now as all the selectivity is almost all benefits Google, the lawsuit seems on the mark.
  • by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday March 18, 2021 @08:05AM (#61172092)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • Can you point to where on this doll The Google hurt you? You people keep harping on all the "harm" Google is doing, but where is this harm? Where have you, personally, been harmed by Google? Anyone? Ken Paxton is a self-serving idiot, and all who join him in this Quixotic quest are just as idiotic.
      • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • by huckda ( 398277 )

        I've read every comment and didn't see the word 'harm' used other than in your post twice, are you projecting?
        Your personal opinion about Ken Paxton has no bearing on the legitimacy of the lawsuit being discussed, try a concrete logical argument based on the facts of the case and you might actually lend credence to your position.

    • It appears to be that the Google privacy will stop anyone but Google tracking me .... that's better then now
      Just Windows only reports me to Microsoft ... I assume it did ...
      And Apple tracks iPhone users ... but nobody else can

  • If google cared about privacy they should have implemented protection against fingerprinting. If you check the crbug.com and search for fingerprinting you will find bug/request reports that are years old.

    I reported an instant crash a while ago. It was fixed in 9 days!!! So they are on purpose ignoring requests from users to fix/add protection from fingerprinting.

    Here's an example of chrome's default search engine setting:
    As default in Chrome on install the default setting on the address bar is to send data

He who has but four and spends five has no need for a wallet.

Working...