Windows 11 is Getting Some Much-needed Taskbar and Start Menu Improvements (theverge.com) 134
Windows 11's taskbar is a giant step back in usability compared to Windows 10, and now Microsoft is starting to make improvements. A new update that's currently being tested by Windows Insiders brings the clock and date back to the taskbar on secondary or multiple monitors. From a report: It's a change that multiple monitor users will appreciate, as many have had to install third-party apps like ElevenClock just to get this basic functionality in Windows 11. I've not been shy about criticizing the changes made to the taskbar in Windows 11. I hate the new taskbar, so I'm happy to see Microsoft make this initial change. There's still much more to be improved, and hopefully we see the return of being able to drag and drop files onto taskbar apps and the general customization options. Elsewhere, Microsoft is also making some improvements to the Start menu in Windows 11. The latest 22509 Insider build includes the ability to configure the Start menu to show more pins or more recommendations instead. That makes the Start menu a little more customizable, although many Windows 11 users are also opting for third-party apps here, too.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
It's fine.
That's pretty much all I can say. It's not good, it's not bad. It's just fine.
The best improvements I've found are non-obvious ones, for example, I have a 4k monitor and a second 1080p monitor, with Windows 10 if I switched on my KVM to something else on my main monitor everything got shifted to the smaller, secondary monitor, and when I switched back and the windows came back the scaling fucked up the Window size, so my windows over time became tiny and needed resizing. It was always a minor anno
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Seems to me that at least in a business environment where you deploy your new PCs from images and manage them via InTune or the like? Win 11 is a no-go right now, unless your I.T. department has nothing better to do than tinkering around with all the small changes needed for it to work properly.
We had several of our Win 10 users upgrade to 11 before we could edit our InTune settings to prevent it from getting offered to them, and those machines have gotten so messed up, they had to ship them back to us to
re: Intune used incorrectly? (Score:2)
I don't think so, but then, I'm always learning something new every day.
We used the "Feature Updates for Windows 10 and Later" option to tell our PCs to remain at Windows 10, build 21H1.
Until that was added, they received all of Microsoft's updates including the one that offered users the Windows 11 upgrade by clicking on a box.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:What're everyone's thoughts on win11? (Score:4, Interesting)
There are things i like better about 11, nothing so far i specifically really like less.
With a big multi monitor setup, i actually like the start button in the middle of the taskbar -- everyone knows corners are easy to hit and that's why its been there since 95, but in my setup if i shoot for a corner with the mouse, i end up on the next monitor half the time.
Plus if you hate it, you can send it back to the side. But for me the new location is better.
Of course, half the time I use the keyboard keys any way so position it doesn't matter, but there again, on a big screen setup, having it come up more centered is also an improvement if you are using a big screen or ultra-wide.
Beyond the desktop cosmetics i really haven't noticed much different from Win10 21H2. Stability has been fine for me.
I think the AC before me got it right, if you are installing the semi-annual windows 10 feature updates, this is just another one except marketing got their hands on it and slapped a version number on it. It's really much ado about nothing for most people I'd say.
Re: (Score:3)
The new start menu layout is crap, but the search function is a lot better. So if you like using the mouse it sucks, but if you like typing the name of the app it's better.
Re:What're everyone's thoughts on win11? (Score:5, Informative)
>"With a big multi monitor setup, i actually like the start button in the middle of the taskbar -- everyone knows corners are easy to hit and that's why its been there since 95, but in my setup if i shoot for a corner with the mouse, i end up on the next monitor half the time."
Silly me, using KDE... I can put the "start" button (launcher) anywhere I want on the taskbar. In fact, in Plasma/KDE (and many other Linux DE's) you can have whatever you want on the taskbar in any order or location, or have multiple taskbars, on any edge of the screen. And you can have different types of launchers. Hide, show always, group or non-group, preview or not, icons/names or both, auto-sort or not, multiple click actions, pretty much totally customizable. It has been that way for many, many years.
And all that with no "suggestions" or ads, to boot!
Re: (Score:2)
Silly me, using KDE... I can put the "start" button (launcher) anywhere I want on the taskbar.
And if putting the start button anywhere on the screen I wanted was more important than running the software I need and want to run, I might switch.
But its not.
Re: (Score:2)
Presumably "normal" people will not be using multi monitor setups generally. So multi monitor settings are generally "advance" settings.
So in the option window for multi screen setup, they should have an option for how the taskbar works. And if a single screen user wants to change how the taskbar works, they can also go to the same "advance" settings and change it there.
Re: (Score:2)
What is a normal user though?
The new taskbar / start menu layout is better for a lot of users:
-- Multi-monitor setups (every desktop at multiple client sites I work with are multi-monitor now, along with where my wife works). I don't think they're unusual now.
-- Touch screen setups (surface devices, and so forth)
-- Large Single Monitors ultrawides, living room TVs, projectors
Plus if if they left the default alone, nobody would know they could now change it. By enabling the new placement by default, everyone
Re: (Score:3)
I do. It's not ready for prime time, especially as it relates to gaming. If you're thinking of upgrading the OS of your Windows 7 gaming rig, consider just stepping it up to Windows 10, as that is stable enough for almost everyone at this point.
As for Windows 11: most people should probably wait until at least a year from now.
Re:What're everyone's thoughts on win11? (Score:4, Interesting)
The start menu's recommendations section is annoying, I turned off all the Recommendations and the category is still there. I finally just got a copy of Start11 which fixed that problem. If only MS would give the option to turn that section off completely.
At least Windows 11 seems to have fixed some of the issues I had with networking on Windows 10. Now if only they'd fix it on my mom's computer that's stuck on Windows 10. It has a local laser printer that I'd REALLY like to share.
Stability has been great, no crashes since upgrading. The interfaces to do a lot of basic things (like change DNS server to my Pi Hole) are much better, no need to jump to the adapter options. While not as familiar as the old Control Panel, the new Settings does make a lot of things easier to accomplish.
Did not like the centered taskbar, but changing that's easy enough, thankfully MS kept the option to have the icons on the left. The limitations on task bar placement might be annoying for anyone that kept their task bar anywhere but on bottom, though, since it stays on bottom now.
The notifications area is different, don't particularly like the change. Of course I didn't like its previous implementation either. Most notifications are useless anyway.
Other than that, it's basically a somewhat reskinned Windows 10. It's got its annoyances, but I don't regret upgrading. It works fine.
Re: (Score:2)
The limitations on task bar placement might be annoying for anyone that kept their task bar anywhere but on bottom, though, since it stays on bottom now.
I'm one of those, I value vertical screen space over horizontal (especially with widescreen laptops), so I've kept the taskbar on the left since win7. I do kind of wish I could mirror it so the start button is still in the lower left moving the clock to the upper left
Re: (Score:2)
Me too. Especially on those awful 1080p screens.
I ran it on the left too for a number of years, until i went multi-monitor, and they gave the option of having it on all screens, which works well on the bottom, but didn't work so well.
Also, having it on the bottom isn't so bad on a good size 4k screen, there's enough vertical space to open a PDF page at 100% and comfortably read it, or view an entire word document page, etc, even with it at the bottom.
The other option of course is you can still autohide it;
Re:What're everyone's thoughts on win11? (Score:4, Interesting)
Windows 11 has one categorically better improvement, WSLG. It's not perfect (e.g. it supports neither linux window managers nor does it get managed by the native windows window management either, it has its own weirdly limited window management that is about the worst window manager you could imagine). Despite the drawbacks, it's better than what Windows 10 does.
Other than that, it's largely 'different', and, for example, the taskbar suffered for the rewrite for rewrite's sake.
Some people may be put out by several features being removed from Windows 11 (almost like Windows 11 was a cosmetic change to justify dropping maintaining a number of features. I don't care about most of the features (the taskbar and context menu changes are the most annoying, but I think that is transient.
If you aren't running linux applications, I'd ignore it for now. When it gains built in android app support, might be interesting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] to see if anything you care about went missing.
Re: (Score:2)
Hurray that Cortana is gone. Always felt like an inept advertisement for an xbox game to me.
Aero Peek is handy though, meaning to see the contents of a window by hovering the mouse over the thumbnail on the taskbar, and having an undocumented keyboard shortcut isn't the same thing. The Aero Peek to show the desktop with transparent windows isn't useful though.
A lot of the other stuff just seems like more of Microsoft's long-term goal of removing all customization options because users who customize window
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know what aero peek was removed, if I hover over an icon, thumbnails appear, and hover over one thumbnail causes that window to appear by itself on the screen...
Re:What're everyone's thoughts on win11? (Score:4, Insightful)
As far as I can tell, its just like Windows 10 but with a bunch of UI inconveniences. Stupid things like you can no longer right-click the Taskbar to get to Task Manager, that is a right-click on the Windows button now. Win11 also hides the traditional right-click menu, if you have something like 7zip integrated with Explorer and you right-click a file you do not see your 7zip option, you have to click to See More Options. The Start menu is now always collapsed, where to see the list of install programs you have to click the Windows button then click All Apps. I could go on, all of the little UI conveniences you are accustomed to are gone or moved.
The UI is dogshit, otherwise its just Windows 10.
Re: (Score:3)
I've been using windows 11 for 2 or 3 weeks now. I would say its nether better or worse than windows 10. Some things are different and some things are the same. There are no show stoppers for me or anything that makes me go "whoo and ahhh" over it. The best thing I can say is I like the rounded windows.
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone have any experience with 11?
I just recently tried it. No different, unless you're the sort of person obsessed with UI and rounded corners it's the same as Windows 10. In terms of the start menu it depends on how you use it, I just hit the 'windows' key and start typing and for that workflow it's no different to Windows 10.
Re: (Score:2)
A change since the last update, the Shutdown menu must be double-clicked to open. Do other people experience that?
Other comments suggest a lot of the power-shortcuts have been deleted or buried inside other shortcuts.
I don't know if W
Re: (Score:2)
Based in running it in a VM I see zero need to change ("upgrade" has no meaning here, it's not a functional improvement) for several years as typical with Windows.
There has never been a compelling reason to switch Windows versions unless getting close to EOL or using specific business software that requires it.
Did they fix the random window reshuffling? (Score:2)
Why does it do it? And will they fix it? Have they fixed it? This insidious re-size even messes up the TurboVNC X-Windows sessions running on linux behind the RDT to a windows box!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This screws up on MacOS too for me, when I unplug a closed laptop and take it to a conference room. Nothing changed resolution and yet the windows often look like it temporarily though it was 320x200. I suspect no one at Apple ever considered that someone might want to use a laptop with the cover closed.
Re:Did they fix the random window reshuffling? (Score:4, Interesting)
MS Window manager can not handle any window to exceed screenbuf size. There are software rendered screenbuf and actual hardware rendered screenbuf, in the windows registry. If the hardware rendered screen does not send a heartbeat to the Window manager, it assumes the hard ware screen has been disconnected. So it falls to the next screenbuf in the registry. It could be a software rendered screenbuf, usually default or lower resolution resolution. It not only rejiggers all the current windows it sends a despo "Screen size has changed" message to all remote hosts connected via RDP. They rejigger their windows and pass the info to the linux host running an X Windows session via TurboVNC. That too rejiggers its windows.
Momentarily the heartbeat comes back. But by this time all the windows have been rejiggered and they can not be unjiggered. Frustrating.
If the Window Manager simply minimizes the RDT sessions, it is a tolerable alternative. Eventually when the user maximizes the RDT session, it can check the screenbuf size, and rejigger if necessary.
I tried editing the registry to redefine all the screen bufs to be the same size. But gosh, there were so many of them in so many places, I could not really find all that mattered.
Re: (Score:2)
This happens only when power / screen saver/ sleep / hybernate kicks in or comes out. That is why it never happens on a regular working session. The graphics card cuts out power or sleeps and stops the heartbeat and Window manager is still awake getting ready to sleep. It sends out rejigger message to the remote hosts just moments before falling asleep. That seems to be the root cause.
Re: Did they fix the random window reshuffling? (Score:2)
Is the 4k monitor plugged into DisplayPort? On an nVidia card?
I had this exact problem constantly until I maually set the EDID on my monitors like here:
https://nvidia.custhelp.com/ap... [custhelp.com]
Turns out the trouble was the way nVidia scans the monitors, when they go to sleep, nVidia acts like they're completely disconnected and then something between the Nvidia drivers and windows resizes/moves all the windows to some default so they won't be orphaned on a non-existent screen.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been grappling with this since getting my new 3070Ti and finally jumping from DVI to DP. Having 2 different monitors with different capabilities disconnecting each time they go to sleep and then reconnecting in a different state is maddening. Sadly, manually setting EDID isn't a feature on non-workstation cards.
Worse yet; seems one of my monitors sends a different EDID for different modes (e.g. G-Sync compat. enabled/disabled) which then create new nVidia Display Audio devices for each monitor configur
Re: (Score:2)
I've heard you can disable dp pin 18 in the cable if all else fails...
Microsoft has been working on this for 25+ years (Score:4)
You'd think they'd have some expertise in streamlining the workflow and UI of their most iconic product line. But it feels more like they have only gotten a lot of practice at screwing at least something up with every re-skin.
Re:Microsoft has been working on this for 25+ year (Score:5, Interesting)
You'd think they'd have some expertise in... .
Emphasis added. Here's the thing: the "they" who is working on Windows 11 most likely has absolutely zero overlap with the "they" who worked on Windows, 25 years ago. In fact, I might even go so far as to suggest that the "they" who worked on the initial Windows 10 builds, well less than a decade ago, have likewise almost all moved on to other things.
And note that this isn't a ding against Microsoft -- nor is it a defense of them, in any way. This is just a fact of life: software engineers worth their salt rarely stay in one place for very long. Employee turnover is a distinctly challenging problem, even for smaller projects... but for a project like the Windows codebase? I would imagine that it's royally brutal, especially when someone who has made significant contributions leaves.
All of that to say: I personally think the "real" reason that Microsoft reduced the feature sets of both the task bar and the start menu could very well be that they no longer have anyone on staff with enough historical knowledge of the codebase to make meaningful changes to the bloody thing.
Re: (Score:3)
Back at a previous job we had a big book of insights and knowledge we had gained, least we forget it or new employees don't pick it up.
Microsoft should start one. First entry should be "every changing lists of favourites are really annoying because they fight against muscle memory."
Re: (Score:3)
There's a software developer mentality that I often see that I suspect is around everywhere. That is when the dev assumes that they are an expert because they use something a lot. Ie, too many devs think they totally understand time and date stuff because they learned how to tell time in kindergarten, and then they reimplement something broken. Similarly, a lot of devs really think they completely understand UI and UX because they've been using UIs since they were in the womb (as uncomfortable as that so
Re:Microsoft has been working on this for 25+ year (Score:4, Insightful)
software engineers worth their salt rarely stay in one place for very long.
I think one thing that is very clear is that software engineers haven't designed interfaces at Microsoft for a long time. No doubt they have entire UX departments staffed entirely with kids playing on their phones.
We know the kinds of interfaces software engineers design because they often hide them in the code somewhere for their own amusement https://www.howtogeek.com/4024... [howtogeek.com]
Nothing like a single menu with everything.
Professional UI designers (Score:2)
Indeed, they have a lot to answer for. It is all about what's hot and what's not.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure I buy that. We're not talking about hundreds of complex libraries where if something changes thousands of applications break. We're talking about a window manager. There have been quite a few 3rd-party window managers for Windows.
The real reason why they remove features and hard-code everything is for the same reason other software developers do: large egos thinking they know best and the end user WILL use the software they way they are told. It would be so nice if the taskbar and start men
Re: (Score:2)
Shouldnt there be some documentation on what was noted / found in terms of users and how they use the computers over the pass 25 years?
It's not like when they get new hires, they start from zero with no knowledge of things noted previously. There should be design/UI guides, best practices, etc. And doesn't MS have UI designers and such, who are aware of such things, even if the engineers don't know where to place a button?
At least thats my experience with other organisations.
Re: (Score:2)
Shouldnt there be some documentation ... ?
Speaking as a software developer: I would assert that practically all developers are notoriously bad at documenting their code, even those of us who fancy ourselves better communicators than most of our peers -- but it's not for lack of trying, mind you. We all, without thinking, make far too many false assumptions about other people: one such assumption is that another developer who is competent enough to maintain any given code base must by necessity have the same level of knowledge that we do. The thing
Re: (Score:2)
I can agree with you when it comes to the internals of the OS. But isn't there a bunch of UI designers / experts on hand in MS to advice how things are supposed to look and where what buttons go etc?
Am involved in a new startup, and even here there is discussion on how the UI is supposed to look before anything is done.
Re: (Score:2)
... But isn't there a bunch of UI designers / experts on hand in MS to advice how things are supposed to look and where what buttons go etc? ...
Personally, I would opine that the answer to your question is still much the same as my previous answer; you're just asking for it to be framed in a different context. Whether you put the burden on the developers themselves or on someone with the title of "UI Designer" likely makes little difference.
That said: there are still other caveats to the question to consider. To wit:
* Is there documentation, as you've described? Well, quite possibly. No, no: I'll do better than that -- I'd actually go so far as to
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not just MS. Apple and others do it too. :(
Re: (Score:2)
Except for the 6th. That was also good.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with Beethoven's 10th is that it suddenly stops.
Windows 11 is the new 8 (Score:3)
They are already running ads about how great the UI is and now they have to redo it? Somebody needs to be fired. I suspect an edict comes down from the top stating a goal, and the UI is forced to fit that goal regardless of practicality. The executive then says, "but I fit your goal!, so it's not my fault its convoluted." EdictOrientedProgramming; Been there done that.
Re: (Score:2)
Designs really need to come top-down. I suspect there's a bottom-up approach being taken without a high overlord of what the new product should be.
Go Try Linux! (Score:2)
Go try Linux again.
If you are not using hardware that requires a proprietary driver or software that is exclusive to Windows you have absolutely no reason to still be using Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
I did, the printer driver was defective, wasted 3 boxes of paper spewing out gibberish*. Linux ain't green, burn it!, like my score is about to...
* mis-escaped printer control code. Rebooting temporarily solved it, but it randomly came back
Re: (Score:3)
Was it a Cannon inkjet by chance?
Thanks to Cannon being all hush hush about releasing the API for their hardware the Linux drivers for those need work. And last I checked the company still flat out refuses to provide official support for their hardware.
For all the other hardware I have Linux has had better hardware support over the years than even the latest versions of Windows. Granted if its a fringe item like an old gaming keypad or niche I/O card Linux support isn't as good as Windows. Simply because
Re: (Score:2)
Reminds me of my first tech job in college. I printed out the "sh" man page. And it wasn't one of the fast printers. Soon there was a line of people saying "who's printing this out?" and I had to fess up.
Re: (Score:2)
you have absolutely no reason to still be using Windows.
I tried Linux. No Outlook, no OneDrive integration, Games didn't work and everything was moved around meaning I'd have to relearn everything.
Sincerely,
Users who use software and don't use operating systems.
Ability for Linux to run hasn't been a barrier for Linux for 2 decades. There are many reasons people don't use it even if you ignore them.
Re: (Score:3)
My org has switched to Google Drive, Google Docs, and Chromebooks. Not a single person has complained. We also pass our security audits with way less hassle.
Outlook and OneDrive are garbage but if you want to be tied down to a dumpster fire be my guest.
Re: (Score:2)
Not a single person has complained.
Not to your face anyway. Must be a small org of IT professionals. Or you don't have any computers. A normal user will complain about literally any change. Hell they'll complain about you reverting a change they complained about.
We also pass our security audits with way less hassle.
LOL. Sure.
Outlook and OneDrive are garbage but if you want to be tied down to a dumpster fire be my guest.
Oh indeed, Outlook is the worst. Except for all the others. It remains software without compare in the entire industry. You may call it a dumpster fire, I call it what it is: The backbone of nearly every single one of the fortune 500's communication systems and governments
Re: (Score:2)
Lol you must be a boomer.
All our employees are Gen-X or younger and we're a tech company so yea if someone did complain they'd need some pretty good reasons.
Millennials hate Outlook and don't want to use it.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, there's still a lot of lock in for Windows in the Enterprise. Ie, Must Use Outlook is often key in a lot of places, even though there's a web-based Outlook available. Often it's a mandate from IT on high that Thou Shallt Use Windows! As in, you can't use Linux because there's no one in IT that understands it, Microsoft doesn't offer a Linux version of Office, we don't know what Anti-malware to use, so no, don't use it and stop bugging us. No one ever got fired from IT for mandating Microsoft produ
Re: (Score:2)
Go try Linux again.
If you are not using hardware that requires a proprietary driver or software that is exclusive to Windows you have absolutely no reason to still be using Windows.
We have some Ubuntu installs for building petalinux and some other functions. I find myself highly irritated that the default file explorer lacks the capability to manually modify the path or paste one in. Though perhaps I just haven't done my due diligence to figure out how that works. Not like I have a lot of time when this is a small part of one of five projects I'm working on...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Oh and when querying the device it reports that raytracing extensions are not supported
That's because the poster you replied to said "the open source drivers for AMD (mesa and radv) have surpassed the closed drivers in terms of stability and performance", conveniently ignoring the fact that they are behind the closed source drivers in terms of conformance and functionality. FYI ray tracing support does not exist in the AMDVLK driver today, it exists in an experimental form in RADV but there are a lot of other problems and missing features in RADV. That is why your system with the proprietary
Re: (Score:2)
The OP claim was "So you end up with the open source drivers which have performance issues and an incomplete implementation of Vulkan". Show me where RADV have performance issues vs the closed AMD Vulkan driver. RADV is also fully Vulkan compliant. Yes not all extensions are fully supported yet, but #1 these are optional and #2 there are new extensions added all the time so no one is 100% compliant there.
You re probably correct with the ray tracing extensions, I have never used any of them and don't plan to
Re: (Score:2)
Show me where RADV have performance issues vs the closed AMD Vulkan driver.
Why? I never made that claim. I said "conformance and functionality", which is correct.
RADV is also fully Vulkan compliant.
When I run vulkaninfo it clearly states radv is not a conformant vulkan implementation testing use only , maybe you're using the term "compliant" to mean something different to "conformant".
Yes not all extensions are fully supported yet but #1 these are optional
Not if you need them they aren't. Raytracing extensions have been around a long time now (the initial NV extensions even longer) and it's not exactly foreign since it's been shipping on Windows in DXR in pretty much the same form as V
Re: (Score:2)
When I run vulkaninfo it clearly states radv is not a conformant vulkan implementation testing use only , maybe you're using the term "compliant" to mean something different to "conformant".
Not it doesn't unless you run on a very old version of mesa, what vulkaninfo writes is that "lavapipe" aka the CPU renderer in mesa is not fully compliant with v1.1. not sure why you think this have anything to do with AMD or radv though.
Show me a single extension that you are missing, except for the ray-traying, that is preventing you from enjoying a game or application on Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Not it doesn't unless you run on a very old version of mesa
Nope, whatever version ships with Ubuntu 20.10 (and 20.04), standard installation. For reference here [github.com] is the line of code that outputs the message and it's the RADV driver name that is passed in. Then here [github.com] is the line that makes that function call, anything that is outside of chip class 8, 9 or 10 means you get a non-conformant driver. Maybe you have the MESA_VK_IGNORE_CONFORMANCE_WARNING env var set which would suppress that warning.
what vulkaninfo writes is that "lavapipe" aka the CPU renderer in mesa is not fully compliant with v1.1.
No it doesn't, I copied, pasted and bolded it. Literally the first word is
Re: (Score:2)
WARNING: lavapipe is not a conformant vulkan implementation, testing use only.
WARNING: lavapipe is not a conformant vulkan implementation, testing use only.
I'm not trying to move the goal posts, why complaint about non support for an extension that you don't need? There are lots of experimental and vendor specific extensions so no driver will ever support 100%. You also claim that the closed AMD vulkan driver supports more extensions that radv but where are the list? Currently radv in 21.3 supports 159 out of the 166 existing extensions
Re: (Score:2)
So as I wrote you where running on an older mesa.
No, I pointed you to the code and, even though it's trivial enough that even somebody who doesn't understand software would be able to get it, I then explained that chip classes that radv supports with a conformant implementation are 8, 9 and 10. Mine is gfx10_3 which is why mine outputs:
radv is not a conformant vulkan implementation testing use only.
You don't see that because you have an older GPU.
Currently radv in 21.3 supports 159 out of the 166 existing extensions, but how many does the closed driver on Windows support?
The number is irrelevant, it's whether it supports the ones you need. But in Vulkan there are extensions to
Re: (Score:2)
Mine is gfx10_3
Sorry, I missed that part. I hate when people don't read everything that they answer to so I am really mad at myself right now for missing that detail.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh I don't doubt that it's happening. They are also adding raytracing support so that will eventually get there too but it's slow. We had Vulkan 1.2 conformance and raytracing support on Windows over a year ago and on Linux over 6 months ago (via the closed-source driver).
So the cutting edge is still Windows, then eventually the Linux side of things will start to catch up and different bits will be available at different performance levels at different times depending on which of the different drivers you c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That both AMD and nVidia threats Windows as a first class citizen and Linux as a third one is something that I can fully agree on.
But that is because Microsoft devotes a significant amount of resources to working with them. Microsoft, AMD and Nvidia work together to ensure the user has a good experience on Windows. When you look the relationship AMD has with the Linux community they even release an open source driver (as well as the proprietary one) but the Mesa folks would rather go off and do their own thing rather than collaborate, this competition rather than collaboration is at the expense of the user experience.
I certainly don't
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So you have a very special use case and that is most likely the market for the closed driver anyway since you guys need support from AMD which you won't get from the open driver. Then your issues makes more sense and if you had lead with that from the start then I would have never made a comment, I was answering from a perspective of a normal user/gamer.
21.3 was the version where radv/mesa added support for the raytracing extensions. Do think that they are not hw accelerated on RDNA2 yet, though to be hones
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure why you are so damn upset by a small talk about some GPU drivers, but anyway. 21.3 was when they added support for Raytraying: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.... [phoronix.com] , now I don't know how they appear in vulkaninfo so I cannot judge if your grep is correct or not.
What they added in kernel 5.10 as "zen3 support" was the sensors for temperature measurements. Perhaps they are crucial for you, I wont argue with that since I cannot determine what is important for you or not.
You talk a lot about blame shifti
Ya, but (paraphrasing) that old saying... (Score:5, Funny)
A person with one monitor knows the time, a person with two is never sure.
[Note: MS has confirmed that you'll have to have a 27th gen Intel processor and TPM 9.4 for this feature -- for security reasons.]
Re: (Score:2)
The person with one monitor playing a full screen game doesn't know what the time is and ends up going to sleep at 3am.
Windows Mobile? (Score:4, Interesting)
Anyone else feel as if Windows 11 was developed from Windows Mobile instead of from a desktop Windows?
So many.. Insanely stupid design choices.
Re: (Score:2)
That would be because it's a derivative of Windows 10, which is a derivative of Windows 8.
The usual "Windows feature" question (Score:2)
Can I turn it off, and how... wait, what?
Where's the consistency? (Score:4, Interesting)
Since windows 8, Microsoft seem to have lost all consistency with OS updates.
They continuously "throw the baby out with the bathwater"
Getting rid of what people are actually familiar with in terms of UX/UI - and sure, improving some aspects.
The problem is the UI - it must be infuriating for windows users to see sweeping changes to the UI in every release since windows 8.
To have the main UI interface to access apps etc. just constantly change - for no reason anyone can actually fathom?
If we look at the main competitor on the Desktop - the only one to be honest - since 2001, the main UI paradigm has remained as is.
There's a dock with apps in it.
A Mac user could time travel from 2001 to 2021 and still find it familiar.
Going further, the top bar, with the apple icon to the left and the menu system, has been in place since ... 1984.
Yep, 37 years.
For 37 years, macOS has had the familiar top bar on their Desktop OS - that would be the very first release - Mac OS System 1.0.
What is it with Microsoft that they continually fuck around with their Desktop UI/UX?
\_()_/
Re: Where's the consistency? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I use Linux on the desktop on an almost daily basis and have been using it since 1996.
Granted, these days it's only for my PC gaming rig - and I've settled on PoP_OS!.
The plethora of desktop options for Linux doesn't worry me - to be honest, what windows does, doesn't worry me either, as I no longer use it.
My point is that the worlds most widespread Desktop OS, by a huge margin, is continuously changing the UI/UX so users have to relearn each time.
This is a problem, because "muscle memory" is absolutely a "
Everyone wants to stay on the old version (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Menu Improvements (Score:4, Insightful)
In other words: We hid all your shit again.
First thing I do on a new Windows machine (Score:5, Informative)
1. install OpenShell
2. set the taskbar to 'never combine'
3. install something to get the taskbar across all screens (might be part of openshell now)
4. disable 'hide extensions'
5. set all folders to use the default folder template and not the idiotic Pictures/Music/whatever customization
6. Set all folders to display Details and show the Modified Date column instead of the useless Date column.
7. Install StopResettingMyApps
What I wish I could do:
8. replace Explorer with a file browser that works. I feel like I'm always scrolling half a mile to get to the folder I want. There's no way to have favorite folders in a menu. The folder tree is braindead. I've tried a dozen alternatives, but they all have showstopper problems.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Been using TotalCommander for over 20 years.
Re: (Score:2)
dude - try dopus as a filemanager - pricey but the best (the in situ wildcard search functionality alone makes it worth it - I personally like it over total commander...)
I've been using it for 10+ years
also, I like, in addition to openshell, "7+ taskbar tweaker" to get the precise effects I prefer with the interface in win7 (and win10)
I also don't use pinned apps and reenabled the quicklaunch bar...
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. The problem is: Quick Access is never visible when you want it. I have to scroll up past a thousand folders to get to it, then Windows hiccups and expands another set of folders and I have to scroll up again.
Then I can get to the QA folders, but I've lost the place in the folder hierarchy where I was.
I need it to be about half the height (Score:2)
I feel like they made it so much bigger for the SOLE purpose of having the date/time on two lines. It's taking up so much fucking space for no reason!
Windows UI hasn't improved in decades (Score:2)
Every change Microsoft has tried to make to the Windows UI in the last 20 years has been a massive devolution that's done nothing but make it more confusing and harder to use.
The best thing they could do would be to keep the nicer graphics, and some of the indexing/search features, but otherwise completely revert every other UI change made in the past 20 years.
Microsoft must always f' with the task bar! (Score:2)
I use the StartAllBack/the updated StartIsBack (Score:2)
It cost me a couple of bucks to update my license. It gets updated frequently, to deal with Windows 11 updates, and to squash minor bugs, but for me it worked fine from the beginning.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I was looking forward to Windows 11 doing away with the "Settings vs Control Panel" disaster, but nope.... they both try to coexist in Windows 11!!
Two things. First, go look at the earliest releases of Win10; you'll see that plenty has changed throughout the life cycle. The most notable example I can think of are the UAC prompts. They look a lot like Vista/7/8 in the early 10 builds, but became "touch friendly" at some point. I wouldn't put it past MS to do the same here.
Second, I think at least a little bit of the control panel will exist for as long as the Win32 API does. I've got too much random hardware and software that adds control panel applet
Re: (Score:2)
Having both is no problem if controls are accessible in both places. The problem is when some controls are only accessible in one, and some are only accessible in the other. It means a lot of flipping back and forth trying to find things. It wouldn't even be so bad if one were a strict superset of the other,
Not there yet... (Score:2)