Russia Finds Meta Guilty of 'Extremist Activity' (reuters.com) 102
A Moscow court on Monday found Meta Platforms guilty of "extremist activity", but said its decision would not affect the WhatsApp messenger service, focusing its ire on the company's already banned Facebook and Instagram social networks. From a report: Moscow's Tverskoi District Court upheld a lawsuit filed by Russian state prosecutors on banning the activities of Meta on Russian territory, the court's press service said in a statement. The U.S. company's lawyer, Victoria Shagina, had said in court earlier on Monday that Meta was not carrying out extremist activities and stood against Russophobia, the Interfax news agency reported.
My feelings on this one. (Score:4, Insightful)
My feelings on this one draws a blank - it's like seeing two bullies fight each other and I don't feel bad about it and just let them have it.
Re: (Score:2)
Meta is about the algorithm. The thing with the algorithm is doesn't really have a political agenda. However, the algorithm is about maximizing profit, to make profit for Meta, it is show data that will get people to see and respond to it. Extremist views, From the Right, or from the Left or on a particular topic, get people riled up. Thus they respond for or against it, meaning that content is getting advertising impressions. Russia loved this when it worked in their favor, where they could make posts an
Re: (Score:1)
The thing with the algorithm is doesn't really have a political agenda.
But the people who write the algorithms DO have political agendas.
One time, I shared a meme with Valerie Jarrett next to Helena Bonham Carter that was captioned something like "I'm not saying that Roseanne was right but I understand why she said it."
Within 30 seconds, the post was flagged, removed and my account was restricted. That was obviously 100% political.
LK
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand, if things are curated without an algorithm, then you get people freaking out that their ideas aren't represented as much as they like (Sara Palin and her lamestream media rants). Even in this case, if you just said, truthfully, that there's a war in Ukraine then Russia would call that an extremist and illegal viewpoint. I prefer a curated news from a relatively widely trusted and centrist source, ie, BBC, Reuters, etc.
Hanlon's razor (Score:2)
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Free markets cater to what people desire whether or not it's any good for them.
This.
It also explains the display of Oreos at the grocery store piled up taller than me.
Re: (Score:2)
Oreos??? Where!
Re: (Score:2)
They even make coffee flavored Oreos. And I'm sure someone makes Oreo-flavored coffee.
But big brother/sister in California keeps us safe by banning flavored cigarettes. No more vanilla cigars for 40-something black dudes. But everyone, even children, can have addictive caffeine plus obesity and diabetes from our favorite coffee-flavored beverage chain.
Re: (Score:2)
What they either agree with or strongly disagree with.
There seem to be certain circles, Facebook, Instagram, and Reddit are known for it, wherein people seem to believe that the only thing that exists is their tribe, and what they perceive as the opposing one about a particular subject both are obsessed with. — Outsiders typically find both exemplary of a horse-shoe situation.
I once read an article that claimed that all politics was “identity politics” and came with examples that showed it
Re: (Score:2)
Stupidity? Surely you mean a calculated pursuit of profit?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Stupid Americas are hating the Russian people ... I've written a pretty balanced article about Ukraine/Russia if people are interested:
https://battlepenguin.com/poli... [battlepenguin.com]
Kind of hard to see anything balanced with your midset
Re: (Score:2)
Russians are evil, Putin is evil. One morning Putin woke up and decided to start a war with Ukraine just to prove to the world how evil he is.
There were number of American foreign policy scholars predicting this outcome starting back in 2015. But lets ignore reality and say that people of Ukraine are winning and Putin will be overthrown by all the people who are fleeing Russia to avoid the possible draft. Even if Ukraine wins this military conflict, what
Re: (Score:2)
There were number of American foreign policy scholars predicting this outcome starting back in 2015.
Is that a mistype? Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014.
Re: (Score:2)
Not really. Most countries, including America, have restrictions on the free exchange of speech and information, and several countries with tighter restrictions than those in America are considered far freer.
Re: (Score:2)
The key point is that we can say whatever we want and not go to jail for it. That's a major thing that some countries don't have. We have absolutely free exchange of speech and information, barring national security, libel laws, etc. That does not mean the mass media are passing along that speech, but that's not a government censorship, and if you want your message you just have to find or create an outlet for it. The very fact that we have Qanon means that we have free speech in America.
Re: (Score:2)
But you can't. Say anything that gives succour to terrorists in America and you're looking at a long stretch in prison (at best - at worst, a spell in the naval brig in South Carolina). Promote child porn and you'd be fortunate to reach prison alive. Actively lead a violent rebellion and you're due for prison time, as several insurrectionists have discovered.
So, no. You can't say whatever you want, and there are indeed things you can say that will land you in prison or an early grave.
You go on to say "barri
Re: (Score:2)
But in every single war in the US there have been protests against it and rarely has anyone gone to jail over this. There are some still pissed off at Jane Fonda over anti war activities (some people need to let it go, especially at their age) but she also went and visited the enemy which is more than just speech and is clearly into the "succor the enemy" area. The McCarthy era was disgraceful and most everyone agrees on this (a few diehards out there sadly), but no one went to jail on this.
Now there is br
Re: My feelings on this one. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Russia is fighting a war of annihilation against Ukraine and you complain about the people you're actively trying to kill calling for your death. Russia attacked and disabled infrastructure in other countries, for example satellite internet connections, but Facebook is "moving on Russia"? Take your zwastika and shove it up your arse, sideways, vigorously and repeatedly, you fucking fascist. The world will be a better place when you leave it.
Re: (Score:1)
> Russia is fighting a war of annihilation against Ukraine
Are they? They've avoided almost all civilian areas. Most of the civilian causalities have been caused by Ukrainian forces. They know they can't hold Ukraine and I don't think they intend to. If their demands are me, I bet they'd withdraw except for Donbas and Crimea.
> Take your zwastika and shove it up your arse, sideways, vigorously and repeatedly, you fucking fascist.
You realize Ukraine's Azov battalion are actual, literal Nazis right?
Re: (Score:2)
There are nazis in every country, but the only nazi country right now is Russia. FOAD.
Re: (Score:1)
Nazis are not in every country. These are real, actual, direct descendents of 1940s Nazis .. and they are way worse than anything in Russia:
https://strelizia.net/objects/... [strelizia.net]
Re: (Score:1)
Are they? They've avoided almost all civilian areas. Most of the civilian causalities have been caused by Ukrainian forces. They know they can't hold Ukraine and I don't think they intend to. If their demands are me, I bet they'd withdraw except for Donbas and Crimea.
> Take your zwastika and shove it up your arse, sideways, vigorously and repeatedly, you fucking fascist.
You realize Ukraine's Azov battalion are actual, literal Nazis right?
Yes they are. Firing hypersonic missile at shopping mall is not "avoiding civilian casualties". Same for firing artillery at evacuation corridors during ceasefire and bombing of hospitals.
Russia is trying to annihilate Ukraine because they know they will never conquer it. Even Hitler would be shocked by these atrocities.
It's good that we live in era of internet and russcists are so vocal posting their views on internet. That will sure help Simon Wiesenthal's of the future.
Oh, and fuck off with that Az
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
During the opening weeks of the war, on the ground reporters saw no signs of invasion in any of the major cities:
https://youtu.be/G3Iv1CBpEl4 [youtu.be]
Ukraine is also shelling its own people:
https://youtu.be/ANNhDKGjNK8 [youtu.be]
and finally, any dumbshit who volunteers to fight for Ukraine is being given no armour, limited ammo and have their passports torn up so they can't leave:
https://youtu.be/hu_0wzADQ24 [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe if Facebook was allowing posts encouraging violence against Russian civilians [rferl.org] you might have a point.
Fake news (Score:2)
The next step beyond simply calling something you don't like "fake news".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My feelings on this one draws a blank - it's like seeing two bullies fight each other and I don't feel bad about it and just let them have it.
Well in a battle between creepy somewhat unethical corporation and mini-Hitler I'm throwing in with creepy somewhat unethical corporation.
I mean FB invades my privacy, but they're not running torture camps [aljazeera.com] and bombing bomb shelters [globalnews.ca].
Re: (Score:2)
On the day of Russia's invasion I posted a comment [slashdot.org] about how Russian troops would kill captured Ukrainian soldiers and the mass rapes which would take place. I was assured the Russian army is a professional army and would treat the population honorably.
Obviously the person who replied to me was as deluded as Putin who thought he could waltz in and take things over in a few days.
Re: (Score:2)
I mean FB invades my privacy, but they're not running torture camps and bombing bomb shelters.
On the day of Russia's invasion I posted a comment [slashdot.org] about how Russian troops would kill captured Ukrainian soldiers and the mass rapes which would take place. I was assured the Russian army is a professional army and would treat the population honorably.
I'll agree about the mass rapes. Though the pattern from Donetsk suggests that captured soldiers will be treated better since they're collateral for prisoner exchange.
Civilians in captured/occupied territories are likely to bear the brunt of Russian atrocities.
Re: (Score:2)
When a devil gets caught by a monster, I, as a human being, can only hope that they both die.
Re: My feelings on this one. (Score:1)
Thing is, as far as I can see... the algorithm isn't favoring "extremist" views about Russia. There certainly IS some of that going around unfortunately, but mainly there's just alot of talk about the psychopath running their country and perpetrating an unjust war. According to the Russian government, telling the truth about the piece of shit holding Ukraine AND their own country hostage is tantamount to hate speech, which it is not.
And... (Score:1)
I Can't Stop Laughing....
Please, what is that "Russophobia"? (Score:5, Insightful)
I mean, Russia is a "democratic" country, people voted Putin to be in power, and 71% of its population agree on the massacre and genocide of Ukraine as per official documents.
What is that "Russophobia"? Pointing murderers for what they are?
What is that "Russophobia"? A Government that incarcerates the few population that tries to speak about the abominations Russia is doing in Ukraine?
What is that "Russophobia" if not the scream of Humanity against Death?
I'm really asking what is that "hate" (phobia) they do talk about. Have they not proved themselves with their own despicable actions or insulting omissions WORTHY of public pointing at them for what they are...
It is not "hate" speech when you speak loud and clear WHO the murderer, WHO the criminal, WHO the monster is against humanity.
Re: (Score:3)
So you believe Russian elections are free and fair and polls being published are accurate? You are being needless curl to a people who largely have little say in the actions of their government. Many of whom who are actively taking great personal risk to protest that governments actions. Sounds pretty "russophobic" to me. Putin is a murder, Putin is a dictator who holds power thru intimidation and election rigging. I would hazard and I have posted on this before that their is probably a solid 30% of the Ru
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
First, look at the pics of traffic jams in Russia currently, they almost all have 'Z' on them. Nobody is forcing them.
You poor naive child.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody is forcing them, but they have one and only one viewpoint being told to them. The reason is that people are locked up if they try to share an alternate view. Those people with Z on their cars do think it's just a special military operation against extremist nazis engaged in genocide against anyone who speaks Russian. Meanwhile, the Russian army is recreating an Aleppo/Grozny situation in Ukraine, and the Russian citizens for the most part do not know this.
How can you have a free election when there
Re: Please, what is that "Russophobia"? (Score:2)
I don't think you understand how locked down state control over media is there.
The entire reason the myth of US government controlled MSM exists is so they can fool you into thinking it's the same everywhere. It's bog standard accusing others of what you do misinformation. Jesus, go read TASS right fucking now. It's not bias, it really is straight up brainwashing. It makes the most biased Fox News or MSNBC narratives look simplistic, and they don't even have competing narratives like my Fox/MSNBC hypoth
Re: (Score:2)
"[A]t the same time, they are worried about defense and NATO expansionism."
Strange that they took the one action that guaranteed that all their neighbors would really, really want to join NATO.
Re: (Score:2)
What a load of propaganda. Ukraine ruled by a despot? They certainly can’t be paying you in rubles to say that.
Re: (Score:1)
The automatic gut reaction for you to call me some kind of Russia troll is part of the propaganda. Have a disagreement about foreign policy does not make me sympathetic to a regime that jails a punk rock band for dissonance. So fuck off with your "you're a Russian troll" bullshit. It shows you can't form a good argument.
Re: (Score:2)
Your entire premise is wrong to begin with. That leaves little room for foreign policy discussion. You think the elected Jewish president of Ukraine is somehow secretly a n@zi?
Re: (Score:2)
And some dog's "solution" to end the ware is to capitulate: hand over Crimea, hand over Donbas, despite neither of them legally belonging to Russia. They did used to belong to a Russian Empire, but so did Finland, huge chunks of Poland, etc. The people in Donbas do not want to belong to Russia, except for the minority separatists many of whom are actual Russian soldiers.
Re: (Score:1)
Crimea was given to Ukraine and was originally a part of Russia. Donbas has been fighting for independence for forever.
Get your fucking history right.
Re: (Score:2)
Crimea has gone back and forth. It was a vasal state under the Ottman empire. Became independent then conquired under the Russian empire in 1773. Then the Crimean war. Then Russian revolution where Crimea switched between whites and reds a few times. the Soviets initially made it a part of the Russian federation, but transferred to Ukraine in 1954.
So "originally", Crimea was not Russian at all. And when it was in the Russian "empire", was it really Russia or just Russian empire? Remember Finland was in
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm not a troll. I'm just an American trying to make a rational argument no one has the balls to make. I'm not sympathetic to a regime that has no freedom of speech or protest.
And everyone hates Russians? The people? You don't see a problem with that? Seriously? There are a hundred million+ of them. They're just regular people with jobs, kids and lives trying to make it. Hating a Russian for being born a Russia is bigoted.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Russia is not insane, but made a horribly misguided decision. They thought this woul
Re: (Score:1)
> NATO will grow along Russia's borders, I'm sure of it.
You .. you do realize it can't grow on Russia's borders right? It literally already contains every single country on the European part of their border except for Ukraine. That's the problem. Here's a map for you:
https://battlepenguin.com/poli... [battlepenguin.com]
Re: (Score:2)
> NATO will grow along Russia's borders, I'm sure of it.
You .. you do realize it can't grow on Russia's borders right? It literally already contains every single country on the European part of their border except for Ukraine. That's the problem. Here's a map for you:
https://battlepenguin.com/poli... [battlepenguin.com]
Your link is too slow to load but it's a well known fact that Finland is in Europe, borders Russia and currently isn't part of Nato but will probably join now that Russia invaded Ukraine.
Re: (Score:2)
The reason that the states of the former soviet bloc want to join NATO in the first place is so that they don't get invaded by Russia. After all, would you want to live under Putin's totalitarian rule and with his cronies' corruption?
Re: (Score:2)
NATO told Ukraine "no". Russia not satisfied since there are no guarantees. It's ridiculous, Putin is paranoid.
Those examples of first strikes you listed were not done by NATO.
No one is hating on the Russian people. Listen to Schwarzenegger's video on this. He loves the Russian people. Ukraine loves the Russian people, so many of them are interrelated to Russians, so many of them are native Russian speakers, including the Ukraine president! You seem to be believing Putin's propaganda.
The answer to your question (Score:2)
Lies in whether it is a double standard (have you applied it to ALL countries that have committed attrocities? Even countries you like?) or whether it is a standard that is applied only to Russia.
If the former, then it is not Russophobia because you apply an equal standard to everyone. The fact that it is being applied to Russians at this time is merely incidental, it is the standard and not the target that matters to you.
If, however, the standard is selectively applied only to those you see as enemies, the
Re: (Score:2)
The scale of the atrocities ranks up in the top 5 since WWII. And it's done without a legitimate reason or justification. Sure, Putin thinks it's legitimate and he has good reasons but they're dubious at best. Remember Grozny and Aleppo, this is not Putin's first rodeo in the atrocity department. The tactics of the Russian army since Putin has been in charge has been to force a surrender by any means necesary including the continual bombardment of a town until they surrender or no one is left alive to surr
Re: (Score:2)
I agree that Putin has gone way past the line. This is Total War, at least as defined in Wikipedia. (Their definition is that civilians are considered legitimate military targets and/or fundamentally part of the war effort. There's no dispute at all about Putin seeing them as the former. Ukraine arming them is a very understandable response but would mean Ukraine is also waging this as a Total War at this point.)
I am no fan of Total War, and whilst Ukraine really doesn't have much of a choice in the matter.
Re: (Score:2)
I appreciate that you put "democratic" in scare quotes. The fact that they assassinate or imprison people who oppose them and bar the most popular opposition candidates from participating makes Putin's 2018 election victory something of a farce.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your argument is a fallacy (and a quite insulting one).
For starters, could you point me in a map where the "Islam" country is located?
I mean, because in your ignorance you're comparing by yourself a country (Russia) with a religion (Islamic) and, insultingly, trying to point your own false conclusion using wrong arguments as a consequence of my post.
Do you understand the consequence of your fallacies?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I have no problem with people who migrated from russia, received citizenship and now live as part of that country. Nobody is taking away your heritage or nationality, but you cannot haul your whole country with you wherever you go.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Still, some similarities can be drawn. If you move away to a place with different religion, respect their religion and don't force your religion on them. Otherwise stay where you are.
Re: (Score:2)
It is not "hate" speech when you speak loud and clear WHO the murderer, WHO the criminal, WHO the monster is against humanity.
Of course you are correct, but "suppressing extremist activity" is obviously not the real motivation here. Russia is shutting down media outlets because they are reporting the truth, and Russia does not want the truth reported. All of Russia's ostensible "reasons" are just fabricated window dressing, because openly stating their actual motivations would make them look bad (er, worse).
Re: Please, what is that "Russophobia"? (Score:2)
I mean, Russia is a "democratic" country, people voted Putin to be in power, and 71% of its population agree on the massacre and genocide of Ukraine as per official documents.
What is that "Russophobia"? Pointing murderers for what they are?
That's not very fair, the average Trump/Brexit low information voter analog in Russia has no idea what is even happening in Ukraine because they're being constantly lied to while a new iron curtain is being drawn up.
Not to mention lumping a full third of a country's population in with the rest. Don't be a bigot and blame their whole population for an authoritarian that has been consolidating power and control over all their media.
Re: (Score:2)
Regardless of the validity of your words, you have clearly lost perspective. Find another subject to think about because you have clearly lost the plot on this one.
(really odd CAPTCHA for this one. weird)
Ofcource (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Do you have a clip/link to their "death to ukrainians" videos? I want to see that.
So are Russians leaving? (Score:2)
Russophobia?!? (Score:2)
Come-on-now... nobody actually has "Russophobia", guys. What people are afraid of is Putin's war mongering. And rightly so; the man is unhinged.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that. I don't have Russophobia, I have Putinphobia.
If anyone should have Russophobia, it's Russians. Their government spends their lives casually.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a part of some Russian's psyche. They will say that they are the most invaded country, but they forget about Poland probably because they don't want to acknowledge that they were doing half of the invasions there. They will say how everyone hates them. And this is because that story was told over and over again in the Russian media and in the USSR media.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a part of some Russian's psyche. ....
That is a truly sad commentary. It's believable, mind you... but that just makes it that much more sad.
Two wrongs make a right (Score:2)
Everyone wins!
Congratulations are in order! (Score:2)
According to plan (Score:2)
Step 1) Create a law that all data on Russian citizens must be kept in-country.
Step 2) Declare company keeping data on Russian citizens guilty of "extremist activity".
Step 3) Seize all servers owned by company, getting both free hardware and extraordinarily detailed files on every single Russian citizen.
Step 4) Profit!
In a related news... (Score:2)
Can't we do it too? (Score:2)
Asking for a friend.
Russians are the victims too (Score:2)
Quite a few Russians don't like what is going on. It is obviously not doing the citizens of Russia any good to have most of the rest of the world as enemies. The economy was never that good, and is now going down the tubes due to sanctions. Now there are thousands of Russian soldiers sent home in a bag. And what do you get out of this? A country that was once a thriving agricultural and mineral resource is now a pile of rubble, and most of the people have buggered off to Poland. What's wrong with trading wi
afraid of the truth, or of meddling (Score:2)
On the other hand, the Russians know so well how meddling is done, perhaps that's why they need to stop some of the top meddling channels...