Microsoft is Showing Ads in the Windows 11 Sign-Out Menu (bleepingcomputer.com) 151
Microsoft is now promoting some of its products in the sign-out flyout menu that shows up when clicking the user icon in the Windows 11 start menu. BleepingComputer: This new Windows 11 "feature" was discovered by Windows enthusiast Albacore, who shared several screenshots of advertisement notifications in the Accounts flyout. The screenshots show that Microsoft promotes the OneDrive file hosting service and prods users to create or complete their Microsoft accounts.
Those reacting to this on social media had an adverse reaction to Redmond's decision to display promotional messages in the start menu. Some said that Windows 11 is "getting worse in each and every update it gets," while others added that this is a weird choice given that "half of the Start Menu is for recommendations" anyway. BleepingComputer has also tried replicating this on multiple Windows 11 systems, but we didn't get any ads. This hints at an A/B testing experiment trying to gauge the success of such a "feature" on devices running Windows Insider builds or the company pushing such ads to a limited set of customers.
Those reacting to this on social media had an adverse reaction to Redmond's decision to display promotional messages in the start menu. Some said that Windows 11 is "getting worse in each and every update it gets," while others added that this is a weird choice given that "half of the Start Menu is for recommendations" anyway. BleepingComputer has also tried replicating this on multiple Windows 11 systems, but we didn't get any ads. This hints at an A/B testing experiment trying to gauge the success of such a "feature" on devices running Windows Insider builds or the company pushing such ads to a limited set of customers.
I think that you need enterprise version to make t (Score:4, Interesting)
I think that you need enterprise version to enable GPO's that make this go away.
Re:I think that you need enterprise version to mak (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:I think that you need enterprise version to mak (Score:5, Insightful)
Linux desktop looking better every day.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I think that you need enterprise version to enable GPO's that make this go away.
Did they advertise that feature?
Re: (Score:2)
I think that you need enterprise version to enable GPO's that make this go away.
Or maybe just disable the "suggestions" toggle. I've literally never seen an advert *in the OS itself* and I ran stock standard Windows 10 and now 11 since the beginning.
OneDrive adverts, Candy Crush, and all that other shit is literally for people who don't bother unchecking one simple checkbox.
I add the caveat "in the OS itself" because the "setup" options that presents you a friendly reminder to try Edge when the new feature release (or whatever the fuck they call that now) gets pushed is not something t
Re: (Score:2)
No... just no. (Score:5, Insightful)
Fuck you, Microsoft.
I used to be excited for a new version of Windows to roll out. Sure there'd be bugs and minor annoyances, but those I could live with.
These days? I couldn't give two craps about whatever shit like this adds to your bottom line. All I know is I fear every new version of your OS, instead of welcoming it. OSes aren't supposed to make people fearful. And that's the impact to *my* bottom line.
Make your money somewhere else. Anywhere else. Anywhere I can avoid. Stop turning your base OS into a fucking scene out of every animated-ad-ridden future semi-distopian sci-fi movie ever made.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I used to be excited for a new version of Windows to roll out.
Really? What the hell alternate universe do you come from?
I've never seen ANY version of Windows that would get me excited, before or after launch. And I'm talking right back to version 3.1. What invariably goes through my mind at each and every new major release is "Uh oh... Now what new and turdy features and bugs will we have to suffer?"
The best that can be said of Windows is, sometimes after some maturing, some versions of it become really quite okay. Like XP or Win7. But then instead of leaving it alon
Re:No... just no. (Score:5, Insightful)
The older ones here will remember a time when a new version of Windows also meant new features. As in, real features. Features you actually want. Features you could actually use. Features that benefitted you. Not some other customer of them, i.e. ad companies, spy companies or companies bundling their useless junk with the system without giving you a chance ot get rid of it.
Win2k came with USB support and finally you could actually play games on an OS that was not a totally insecure mess. WinXP offered better hardware support and Wifi. Vista ... well, it went downhill from there.
Re:No... just no. (Score:4, Insightful)
Everything about Win7 is better than Win2k except maybe disk space use. The resource use is otherwise comparable, the performance is dramatically better, the hardware support is relevant. If you don't want to look at the dressed up interface, you can disable it completely without resorting to third party software, or even registry editing. Win7 does have a driver signing requirement that 2k didn't, but you can disable that too, through the GUI as well. It's only behind some dire warnings.
The only bad thing about Vista (post updates) is that it wants all your RAM for no apparent reason. Otherwise, it might as well be 7.
Windows 8 is the beginning of the bad times.
Re: (Score:2)
Better than 2k? Yes. Better than XP or Vista? Wellll.....
Re: (Score:2)
Features you actually want. Features you could actually use. Features that benefitted you.
Yeah well ultimately there's two issues here:
a) OSes don't need features. It was much like the early days of Android and iOS. Multitouch! Amazing *smashes the upgrade button*. A clipboard! Oh holyshitballs I want *smashes the upgrade button*. But just like desktop OSes mobile OSes have everything now. There's little you can do feature wise these days that isn't some minor incremental thing or some niche. And even when they add useful features (e.g. multi desktop) all that happens is they get mocked because
Re: (Score:2)
A "feature" in an OS is basically "support for certain hardware out of the box or ease of use of certain technologies". Not needing to install a separate driver for every USB device you plug in is a good thing in my books.
Re: (Score:2)
Win2K you had to reboot your computer each time you unplugged your mouse. People forget over 20 years ago OSes were not as mature as the USB was not a filesystem yet
Re: (Score:2)
I don't say 2k was better than any of its successors. All it was was better than its predecessor.
Now make that case for Win11.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:No... just no. (Score:5, Insightful)
Really? What the hell alternate universe do you come from?
The universe in which people have differing opinions and are free to express them.
Re:No... just no. (Score:4, Informative)
I go way back. I saw Windows 95 shortly after release and it blew my mind how much better than 3.1 it was in interface, speed, and even little things like the alt-tab popup instead of just cycling though open windows. To say nothing of straightforward built-in internet support.
I got Windows 98 day one for better USB support and multiple monitors. I happened to have an old PCI video card and small monitor kicking around and having a second monitor was fantastic. I had hoped to use the MLPPP support it added too but we never had a second phone line :D
I got into Win2k in the late betas and switched over to it almost immediately upon release because it supported nearly every game I wanted to play at the time and was significantly more stable than Win9x. My dad and I had our neary-identically-specced computers next to each other at a long desk and I'd consistently get a little better and smoother framerates on my Win2k vs. his Win98. Once VDMSound was a thing even DOS stuff ran pretty well.
I switched to XP pretty quickly (FCKGW baby, although I actually had a legal copy) mainly because I kept a pretty high-end machine at the time and the added visual features didn't slow it down too much. I was also doing tech support at the time and wanted to stay current on things. The compatibility modes were great too because it got several games running that wanted Direct3D but assumed NT meant it didn't have it (Win2k eventually got them, but it was after XP's release). And of course the later service packs added a lot of security and junk that never got fixed on Win2k.
After that my excitement died down a lot. Skipped Vista, Went to 7 pretty soon on its release and it was fine but while I ended up really liking the look in the end, it didn't really add a whole lot that I didn't already have on XP from mods/etc. DirectX 10 was neat but by that point in my life I wasn't doing a whole lot of high-end bleeding-edge gaming so it didn't add a lot. Skipped 8 entirely. Got 10 was mainly because 7 was getting close to end of support and I figured I'd better get used to it. It was fine too, but again nothing really exciting. So yeah, I used to be genuinely excited for new versions of Windows because they actually added some cool stuff that improved the experience and features for day to day use. Actually improved games, or better network stacks, or better entire kernel and driver model in the case of Win98->2k, but it's been a long time since I felt that. I still think Win2k or maybe XP was about the pinnacle - simple interface that stayed out of the way and was mainly just a program launcher and driver framework instead of trying to do everything and the kitchen sink. I wouldn't have minded things like the Windows Store for convenient access to programs if so many of them weren't questionable from a microtransaction standpoint or just shady in general. Plus I already had Chocolatey and a couple other package manager options so I wasn't hurting for simple installs of stuff.
I do agree very much with you that they tend to mature an interface or UI setup or whatnot and then immediately make it worse for some reason. Part of why I dislike 11 after 10 finally fixed most of the sins of 8.
Re: (Score:2)
If microsoft pays me enough I will be a windows enthusiast all day.
Re: (Score:2)
I've never seen ANY version of Windows that would get me excited, before or after launch. And I'm talking right back to version 3.1
I don't know if excited is the right word, but those of us who have had to use Windows professionally did enjoy Windows 2000 and 7 very much given the context.
Re: (Score:2)
I used to be excited for a new version of Windows to roll out.
Really? What the hell alternate universe do you come from?
Personally I was excited about the new releases.. NT4, W2k, W2k3, even W2k8.
Now it seems clear Microsoft is no longer interested in producing better products. All they care about is rent seeking, data collection and pushing ads. The windows platform is a total loss.
Re: (Score:2)
You're not excited for new features, like Solitaire and Minesweeper to be several hundred MB downloads with a subscription fee to play them?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: No... just no. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I look after a couple of hundred Windows users and every day they ask me why I can't get them ads in their log off screens. At last I'll be able to give them the news that the most requested feature is going to be available. They'll all be so happy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Have you thought of the poor shareholders?
Laugh all you like at the Cupertino idiot tax... (Score:3)
... but you don't get this shit in MacOS.
Yes, Linux too but I'm comparing paid for OS's.
Re:Laugh all you like at the Cupertino idiot tax.. (Score:4)
After 30 years of Linux I think anyone who is voluntarily running Microsoft Windows has nothing to complain about, this is self inflicted harm. There is a choice, Linux and MacOS, they choose Windows with all its problems.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft wants to manage Linux as well.
Re: (Score:2)
There are a handful of GPO and AD registration solutions for LInux, both free and non-free, including Samba itself. They implement things in somewhat different ways too - Samba seems to mostly be linking things to scripts and sudoers to limit application access. There are things like Centrify that can handle it for Linux and Mac and implement very similar policies where they apply to those. You're not completely off base though because none of it is quite as smooth as Windows and its built-in AD/GP support
Re: (Score:2)
There are a handful of GPO and AD registration solutions for LInux, both free and non-free, including Samba itself. They implement things in somewhat different ways too - Samba seems to mostly be linking things to scripts and sudoers to limit application access. There are things like Centrify that can handle it for Linux and Mac and implement very similar policies where they apply to those. You're not completely off base though because none of it is quite as smooth as Windows and its built-in AD/GP support and they take some level of extra know-how and management. But the functionality is there.
lol. Not even close. If Windows was so bad why do businesses use it and trust it to run their core business. In my 22 years of business my present employer is the only one that had any Unix/Linux presence on the backend. It is all Windows and Novel Netware/Windows before it back in the early 2000s. Active Directory and NDS before it were essential as well as the critical line of business apps
Re: (Score:3)
Meanwhile in my also-approximately-22/23 years of experience, except for a stint at a place for threeish years that was split Linux and IIS for complicated reasons, they all were using non-Windows OSes for their backend. My current place had a vestigial AD server or two for a couple of very legacy internal applications that only a single prod service still used (none of which were Windows anymore - I think we mainly used it as a glorified LDAP server. Was before my time on a system my team didn't handle) th
Re: (Score:2)
Wake me up with Linux gets GPO like functionality and ease of adding to a central directory.
This is literally the equivalent of writing an RFP so that only one vendor could win.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Yeah, about Linux https://news.slashdot.org/stor... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:3)
That is sleazy AF, and Mark Shuttleworth doesn't see why, because he is a toolbag.
However, you can remove the component responsible, so that does set it apart. It's called ubuntu-advantage-tools.
Re: (Score:2)
There are many other Linux distributions that don't have this ad, so you should have said "about Ubuntu," not "about Linux."
And even with this ad, the raw amount of advertising in Windows still dwarfs anything in Ubuntu.
And, if you apply a little bit of Linux power user know-how, you can turn this off. Or you can just get one of the many community-supported Ubuntu derivatives that don't have this. And, lastly, if enough Ubuntu users complain to Canonical about this, they will nix it (something Microsoft w
Re: (Score:2)
Ubuntu has by far the largest market share, nearly 34% https://www.enterpriseappstoda... [enterpriseappstoday.com]
There is money to be made in Linux and you don't think this tiny terminal advert was a test run just like the Microsoft story?
Re:Laugh all you like at the Cupertino idiot tax.. (Score:4, Informative)
Maybe I am simply missing your point here. I thought you were trying to show that "Linux is just as bad." Is that not what your point was?
Because Linux is clearly not "just as bad." Microsoft: you pay for the OS and it has lots of ads, Linux: the OS is free and it has barely-any ads (possibly none based on distribution). The difference is enormous.
Re: (Score:2)
You missed the most important difference. Linux lets you get things done by not getting in your way.
Re: (Score:2)
linux has a steep learning curve
Only if you've been bottle-fed Windows from birth.
Re: (Score:2)
linux has a steep learning curve
And we all sprang from the womb fully familiar with Windows?
From a general user perspective, there's precious little different between Windows and most Linux desktops. I know that 'underneath' it's quite different, but I'd guess that an overwhelming majority of general users could cope with a change to Linux with minimal cross training.
Re: Laugh all you like at the Cupertino idiot tax. (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd guess that an overwhelming majority of general users could cope with a change to Linux with minimal cross training
I SO wish that were true. But its not. There are too many traps that untrained users will fall into.
For example, when running gnome, it is common that someone might double-click a text file and...nothing happens. The reason is, the user has "full rights" to the text file, which includes execute. Gnome by default will assume that is an executable shell script, since it has execute permissions, try to execute it, error out, and show no feedback on the UI because of this. The user must right-click the file and explicitly choose the text editor to use, or go to permissions and remove the execute permission in order for double-click to work. If the file is on an NTFS formatted disk, it is impossible to remove execute permissions, and thus even more confusion ensues.
Maybe the solution here is to just use KDE instead. Or any of a number of other UI layers. That is now a new choice that the user must make, which isn't even meaningful under Windows, so the must learn what this means, and will want to know what the options are, and any option they pick is going to have some quirk like this for them to fall into.
And then there is the issue of hardware compatibility....and hooking up the right repos to get the special drivers written by some hobbyist to get their printer to work...
And then there is the issue of software compatibility....sure they can use Wine but even then compatibility is limited and they have to deal with wine prefixes and wine tricks and maybe Lutris and which runner to pick and on and on.
I do think that most Linux desktop environments are quite nice and make MOST things just as simple or simpler than Windows. But there are enough things that just aren't there that any actual user trying to do real-world things is going to run into them, and figuring it out will require quite a lot of Linux knowledge (or a buddy who has said Linux knowledge).
As much as we would like to believe the Open Source community has kicked Microsoft's ass on usability, it simply hasn't. Linux owns the server market because it wins on reliability, performance, and administration ease (for technically skilled administrators). The UI for non-technical end users simply does not have the "just works" feature level that Windows does.
Re: (Score:2)
Linux also largely suffers a problem of hardware capability. Not compatibility, it's good at that, but rather capability. Got two monitors one being a gaming monitor? Not an uncommon setup. Under Windows, it's plug and play. Under linux, good luck getting the gaming monitor to run at the correct refresh rate. Wayland introduced that ability, and then added so many layers of pain on top of that too.
On Windows is your monitor resolution not detected correctly? 99.9% of the time the issue is simply updating th
Re: (Score:2)
I'd guess that an overwhelming majority of general users could cope with a change to Linux with minimal cross training
I SO wish that were true. But its not. There are too many traps that untrained users will fall into.
Have you seen the incessant complaining here when Microsoft releases a new Windows version that moves some setting into a different dialog? How do you think those people would cope in the Linux world where every distribution is different, where you have multiple ways to change the same settings, where you have a whole bunch of different window managers, UI toolkits, init systems, sound subsystems that all do things differently.
Even if people did switch to Linux what would that do for them? Given we're talki
Re: (Score:2)
My Mom, who was not technical at all, was happily using Linux after I installed it. It helped that she'd never used Windows, so she didn't have any expectations as to how things should work.
A decade or so ago when I ran my own company, I gave everyone (including non-technical staff) a Linux workstation and nobody had any problems adapting to it. Linux may have a steep learning curve for setup if you're used to Windows, but once set up, it's as easy to use as anything else for day-to-day stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
On most systems I've installed it on recently I haven't seen it. I haven't had any issues with drivers, which was the typical issue. For end users, it's a GUI that you click on to run programs. About the most I've had to delve into anything more advanced was to set up some static profiles that reset, oh and set a computer up so it automatically started in Xorg because Remmina's multiple screen mode doesn't work under Wayland yet, which only applies to using RDP to a Windows server. But I have a number of la
Re: (Score:2)
Oh God I tried for the first time in 11 years last year and boy did it regress ... in the department of Nvidia drivers. They used to be rock solid back in 2010 and were as good as Windows. I wanted to learn machine learning so I tried Linux Mint 20 and had some strange issues and it still used Xorg which I DETEST. Fedora Cinnamon had Wayland and Firefox fonts were all misrendered after it woke up with the Nvidia proprietary drivers.
I gave up and went back to Windows with WSL to run my Linux apps as result.
Re: (Score:2)
Technically, a steep learning curve means it is learned quickly. (to be pedantically correct)
Re: Laugh all you like at the Cupertino idiot tax (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing you can skip Ubuntu and go with vanilla Debian.
Re:Laugh all you like at the Cupertino idiot tax.. (Score:4, Informative)
If you think Apple doesn't constantly ask you to create an Apple ID, you haven't used a Mac. There is basically a permanent red alert icon in System Preferences until you set one up.
Re: (Score:2)
The Mac also pops up a "please login" modal every few hours. It's really annoying.
Re: (Score:2)
A small red dot (Score:2)
is hardly the same as adverts in your face. Try comparing like for like.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, you do get a lot of this same crap in Mac OS and iOS now. They're trying to upsell people to buy Apple+ subscriptions during device setup.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People do not run operating systems and find it weird autie nerds obsess over them.They run programs.
Wake me up when grandma can run quick books by point and click from the cdrom on her business or check email with ease and setting a meeting like in Outlook. Thunderbird still doesn't do free/busy for work stuff in an office with a scheduler assistant. Pretty darn essential if you ask me. ... not including the line of apps each profession has that are Windows only such as AutoCad, Great Plains Accounting, MS
Re: Laugh all you like at the Cupertino idiot tax. (Score:2)
Wake me up when you've actually used MacOS. It's far more intuitive than the visual confusion that is Win10. But then let's be honest, your username rather sets out your position.
Re: (Score:2)
... but you don't get this shit in MacOS.
Yes, Linux too but I'm comparing paid for OS's.
But you do get the exact same thing [appleinsider.com] in iOS.
It's just not that important any more (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
How is OpenSUSE these days? I haven't touched it in years as a server OS and never used it on the desktop. I can't think of a better terminal-based package manager than YaST, though.
I jumped to Ubuntu LTS for servers and when I occasionally use a desktop Linux it's still the LTS version of Ubuntu. Mostly laziness and popularity, since I don't have to do a lot myself when there's documentation on how to get almost anything running under it.
Re: (Score:2)
No complaint really beyond needing to setup media codecs separately.
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes something will update faster than others cause weird problems for a week or 2.
So when I reinstall it, because I keep doing all kinds of dumb shit, I will be installing Leap instead.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I do recall a mess or two with the Packman repo, but that could easily be my fault. I don't that has happened lately.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ads, more ads, and even more ads... (Score:5, Interesting)
Haven't we reached a point of diminshing returns? Do so many ads actually accomplish anything? More to the point, surely the more educated/affluent people are increasingly using ad blockers, pi holes and other means to *not* be flooded with ads?
Just as a data point. My wife and I both use browsers wtih ad-blockers, both on our PCs and our phones. Neither of us uses Win-11. Nonetheless, I see that PiHole has blocked more than 2000 queries just today. Even though that likely includes a lot of "phone home" stuff, it is still a seriously insane quantity of unwanted cr@p.
As long as somebody's paying money (Score:2)
One of the worst things that happened with modern companies is when departments started "billing" other departments. That and stack ranking are two of the worse things to happen to mankind.
Re: (Score:2)
More to the point, surely the more educated/affluent people are increasingly using ad blockers, pi holes and other means to *not* be flooded with ads?
It may be worth actually reading TFA and seeing that this has nothing to do with ads, and isn't blockable vi pi holes or any other adblockers. This applies to when you log into windows without a Microsoft account and click your account picture, basically it's just telling you to link your Microsoft account using a few different euphamisms for features which don't work e.g. "Backup your files" - Need to log into Microsoft account and enable Onedrive for that one, e.g. "Complete your profile" - the profile in
Re: Ads, more ads, and even more ads... (Score:2)
Yeah. (Score:4, Interesting)
BleepingComputer has also tried replicating this on multiple Windows 11 systems, but we didn't get any ads.
Re: (Score:2)
Did they try disabling their adblocker?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It wasn't even an ad. It was an option for OneDrive file back up. Good God the anti MS people are raving today
Back then.. (Score:2)
When a windows install got to the state windows 11 is, you would assume it is infected to the brim with malware and probably reinstall the thing from scratch.
A poor choice of words (Score:2)
"This new Windows 11 'feature' was discovered by Windows enthusiast Albacore..."
Is "Windows enthusiast" really a thing? I can't help but think "Windows victim" or "Windows hostage" might be more accurate.
And no, I am not commenting from the lofty heights of the Linux Experience, or the safety of Apple's Walled Garden. I, too, know the deep shame of having my psyche and my hardware violated by the Redmond Tallywhacker of Ignominy.
Re:A poor choice of words (Score:5, Funny)
Hey! I'm a Windows enthusiast!
I'm also a security consultant...
Re: (Score:2)
I am not sure why tunas would be enthusiastic about Windows, but I've never tried using a computer underwater, so maybe the experience is actually better?
Re: (Score:2)
I, too, know the deep shame of having my psyche and my hardware violated by the Redmond Tallywhacker of Ignominy.
I used windows daily and linux/unix for recovery/admin jobs for twenty years, then windows 10 happened. When I got a new faster machine I dual booted it for about two months. Not good enough, make linux your daily driver and only vnc/rdp into old windows systems for odd chores and infrastructure needs. Windows is like my toilet, I need one or two but I don't want to spend much time with them. You can fight back, windows should serve, not rule.
XP, 7, 10 were pretty solid (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Probably there's a senior VP at Microsoft how cries because not enough people like OneDrive's malware, and another who cries because they can't monetize all the customers who don't have a Microsoft Account.
I'll take bets (Score:3)
How long 'til malware takes a hold of that feature? We'll be lucky if it's just gonna display some shock pics.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll bet against you. Easiest money I'll ever make since you clearly didn't even so much as look at the screenshot let alone bother to understand what these "ads" are, and why they are on the profile context menu and all directly related to not signing into a Microsoft account.
How do you want to transfer money? Paypal?
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoins. In 2-3 months.
Or I could just blow a raspberry in your general direction, same effect.
Hell⦠(Score:2)
As always (Score:2)
The ads are where, now? (Score:2)
I think maybe someone buried the lede. Are you telling me that there are still people who sign out of their home computer?
Bury this OS (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting. ./ goes into infinite "Working..." (Score:2)
...when I try to post /s /t 0 in the subject line.
Run cee-emm-dee dot exe, then enter shutdown
We Need a New Platform (Score:2)
It wasn't an ad (Score:3)
It was an option to back up files if you enabled OneDrive
So done, shark ate the jumper (Score:2)
When M$ has to restort to "Free PC" tactics of roughly 25 years ago, Windows is done.
Nothing new, useful, or innovative can be added, and it's all shit turtles from this point on.
Just release 11 as the final and most stable Windows (with all the crap stripped out), and take the company into a whole new direction not involving desktop operating systems, or continue to run Windows completely into the ground like they are doing now and possibly take the entire company with it. Either way they are abou
thanks for the info (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)